Seed Media Group

The Homunculus

steveSteve Higgins is a psychology graduate student at an online university. He hopes that the three weeks and $29.95 that he is spending on his Ph.D. will get him a job at a Tier 1 research university. Do online universities have postdocs? Ok...just kidding, Steve is a real graduate student at a real school.


Glial Cells

Access Omni Brain mobile here.

Access Omni Brain email here.

Axons

Search This Blog

What the Brain is Reading


Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Archives

Blogroll

Bloggers' Rights at EFF


Channel N


Openlab 2007

OmniBrain is now Of Two Minds!

« AI talking to AI | Main | How diet sodas taste like crap and why they're designed that way! »

How to make your scientific paper absolutely suck

Category: AcademiaHumorLinksPhilosophy of ScienceResearch
Posted on: May 17, 2007 11:55 AM, by Steve Higgins

ac20_09a.jpgA great abstract I found via improbable research blog:

How to write consistently boring scientific literature

Kaj Sand-Jensen (ksandjensen@bi.ku.dk), Freshwater Biological Laboratory, Univ. of Copenhagen, Helsingørsgade 51, DK-3400 Hillerød, Denmark.
Abstract

Although scientists typically insist that their research is very exciting and adventurous when they talk to laymen and prospective students, the allure of this enthusiasm is too often lost in the predictable, stilted structure and language of their scientific publications. I present here, a top-10 list of recommendations for how to write consistently boring scientific publications. I then discuss why we should and how we could make these contributions more accessible and exciting.

And don't forget the How to make a scientific lecture boring post also at Improbable Research by Alexander Kohn. Here's a snippet:

At a symposium, meeting or congress when there are a number of speakers, there comes a moment when your name is called. A nice ploy to attract the attention of the audience to you at this stage, is to place yourself in the middle of the last row, so that when you are introduced as the next speaker, you raise the whole row, stepping on their toes, proceed slowly to the front and then start searching your pockets for a convoluted pack of your lecture notes. Next you extract from another pocket a package of slides with which you go back to the projectionist and enter into an animated discussion with him trying to explain which slide is first and which side up and instructing him: "And don't forget to show slide No. 3 again after slide 7." Then you go back to the lectern, and start searching for your reading glasses. If you find them they would probably be in an unexpected pocket. Next you proceed to "read the paper." and we mean literally "read" it. This technique of delivering a lecture is defined by Prof. Sabin as "kissing over a telephone--completely tasteless."

If you wish to put your audience to sleep as soon as possible after starting to lecture, begin with the enumeration of all historically important papers published in the last 50 years that have any bearing on the subject matter. Another well tested method is to start talking about something that has nothing to do with the subject by saying for instance: "Before we turn to the discussion of......, let us shortly review...etc."

Beginning at the beginning is an unpardonable mistake. Some speakers use the so called multiple colon technique. They say: Mr. Chairman, I should like to say: the situation is as follows: I mean to say that: I should like to clarify in this lecture some points which are not sufficiently clear: etc. etc. If you continue for a few minutes in this vein, you lose the audience very soon.

A useful habit to distract the attention of the audience is to have a "tic," like twitching of one cheek, a sniffing movement of the nose, twisting of the neck, buttoning and unbuttoning your jacket etc. Putting on and removing the reading glasses while you talk, and glance at the audience, may sometimes replace such a tic. If you manage to combine the tic with the glasses, the better.


TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

#1

Man, it's behind a subscription wall! Do you have a PDF of the paper about papers?

Posted by: coturnix | May 17, 2007 12:52 PM

#2

sadly no... not until I get back to Illinois. I'll try to go through the library though now...

Posted by: steve | May 17, 2007 12:59 PM

#3

Re sleep-inducing lectures, he forgot the technique of rattling heavily-accented English into the mike at top speed; after all, you only have so much time to present a world of information.

Posted by: Susannah | May 17, 2007 2:37 PM

#4

Surely no one uses actual 35 mm slides anymore?

What happens now is that the speaker will attempt to disconnect the previous speaker's laptop from the projector while connecting their own. The projector will then stop working. The speaker will then attempt to get the laptop to recognize the projector and vice versa. If this process takes more than about a minute, a small crowd will gather around and make helpful suggestions about Systems Preferences. (This is a continuation of Fell's rule, which states that no-one with a Ph.D. actually knows how to fix a 35 mm slide projector).

Alternatively, the speaker loads their slides from a CD or USB stick onto the laptop being used for projection and turns hopefully to the screen. Because the slides were created on a Mac and are being displayed on a PC, or were created in Well-Known Slide Program 10.1.2 but are being displayed in version 10.1.1, the fonts will have changed from 22 point Swiss Bold to 12 point courier and the graphs will be upside down.

Posted by: Andy | May 17, 2007 2:42 PM

#5

Here's the full version of the article, found by Johan. Enjoy :-)

Posted by: miss puzzlebrain | May 27, 2007 1:36 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most Active

Search All Blogs

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com