This week's collection of carnivals:
Anyone else feel that it's a shame CoE hasn't hit #66 yet?
Otherwise, you got your open thread right here.
Pharyngula
Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal
Search
Profile
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
…and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• facebook
• MySpace
• Twitter
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
• Quick link to the latest endless thread
I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.
Random Quote
If the atheist is 'dogmatic' for claiming that a god does not exist, is the theist also dogmatic for claiming that a god does exist? Of course not. Even in Rhodes' scenario, all that is necessary is that a particular god's existence logically imply something that we know is false within the .1% of knowledge that Rhodes says we have. It then logically follows — we have a deductive proof — that that particular god does not exist.
Jeffery Jay Lowder, "Is a Proof of the Non-Existence of a God Even Possible?"
Recent Posts
- We're doomed. It's another sign of the apocalypse.
- A wonderful debate
- The world is ending, again
- Rudeness required
- Now I understand everything
- I get email
- Happy Carl Sagan Day!
- A poll in my own backyard
- A True Scotsman™ keeps his Bible in his sporran!
- Who does he think he is, Charles Dickens?
A Taste of Pharyngula
Recent Comments
- False Prophet on We're doomed. It's another sign of the apocalypse.
- Capital Dan on We're doomed. It's another sign of the apocalypse.
- Sanction on Now I understand everything
- wiley on A wonderful debate
- Ravenred on We're doomed. It's another sign of the apocalypse.
- Lion IRC on Now I understand everything
- Meathead on The world is ending, again
- llewelly on A wonderful debate
- Carolyn Ann on Ethical Humanist Society of Chicago: You're doing it wrong
- RamziD on We're doomed. It's another sign of the apocalypse.
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
Blogroll
Other Information
« What is that man doing to that squid? | Main | Naked anaspids »
Carnivalia, and an open thread
Category: Academics • Carnivals • Open Thread • Politics • Skepticism
Posted on: April 27, 2006 7:20 AM, by PZ Myers
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/5422
Sign in or register with TypePad. Sign up with Movable Type.
Comments
Posted by: coturnix
|
April 27, 2006 7:36 AM
Ha! Numerology!
Posted by: Carl Manaster
|
April 27, 2006 8:50 AM
Squidtoons!
Posted by: Charlie Wagner
|
April 27, 2006 10:02 AM
"...the Senate, as an institution, remains remarkably similar to the body created at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. It retains all of its original powers, including providing advice and consent--yes. You said it. You better read that again in the Constitution. It retains all of its original powers, including providing advice and consent to Presidents on nominations and on treaties, serving as a court of impeachment--you better believe it, Mr. President. The Senate can send you home. You better believe that."
-Senator Robert Byrd on the Senate floor
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?r109:S24AP6-0011:
Posted by: Pygmy Loris
|
April 27, 2006 10:12 AM
Huh?
Posted by: What'sYourPoint?
|
April 27, 2006 11:38 AM
Right now Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) is on C-SPAN, filibustering until the Senate agrees to vote on his amendment which would end all subsidies to the oil industry when oil price is over $55 a barrel.
Posted by: Charlie Wagner
|
April 27, 2006 11:39 AM
According to a recent Zogby poll, 90% of U.S. troops fighting in Iraq believe that it is retaliation for Saddam's role in 9/11.
http://www.zogby.com/NEWS/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1075
Since it has been demonstrated that Saddam had no role in 9/11, why do you suppose they are believing this?
Posted by: quork
|
April 27, 2006 12:34 PM
test
Posted by: SkookumPlanet
|
April 27, 2006 2:24 PM
Charlie
"Demonstrating" or "proving" or similar ideas are barely operable terms in mass decision-making and mass communication in the U.S. "Demonstrated" to whom? How so "demonstrated" originally?
You're confusing thinking and reality with politics. A few weeks ago I wrote a bit on how Dub and Vee-Dub originally convinced a third of Americans there was a connection.
I posted it in response to an observation similar to yours.
Posted by: SkookumPlanet
|
April 27, 2006 2:26 PM
Charlie
"Demonstrating" or "proving" or similar ideas are barely operable terms in mass decision-making and mass communication in the U.S. "Demonstrated" to whom? How so "demonstrated" originally?
You're confusing thinking and reality with politics. A few weeks ago I wrote a bit on how Dub and Vee-Dub originally convinced a third of Americans there was a connection.
I posted it in response to an observation similar to yours.