Word is just in from a fellow doing some interesting work that the Royal Society lecture by Steve Jones, "Why Creationism is wrong and Evolution is right" is available for your viewing pleasure.
Search
Profile
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
…and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• facebook
• MySpace
• Twitter
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.
Random Quote
We still have no adequate theory to describe conditions before the Planck time; consequently, as most physicists will admit, we really have no idea what to say about those conditions (nor, indeed, whether to admit that we should give a realistic interpretation to our models of the universe at, and before, that time). But, in these circumstances, I see no good reason to accept the extrapolation beyond the Planck time which is required in order to arrive at an initial cosmological singularity. What there is good evidence for is the claim that the universe has expanded to its present size from a much smaller early universe; but this claim is quite compatible with the further claim that there was no initial cosmological singularity. (Note, by the way, that a bouncing, or oscillating universe, is not the only possible alternative. There are various other options—e.g. those involving world ensembles and wormholes—which might avoid an ex nihilo origination.)
Graham Oppy, "Reply to Professor Craig" (1995)
Recent Posts
- Our illness is their profit
- Friday Cephalopod: NUMBERLESS HOSTS!
- Dear Jezebel
- There Will Be Blood?
- Zooming in on the Origin of Life Science Foundation
- Friday Cephalopod: Feasibility trial successful
- Making excuses
- More bad science in the literature
- An open letter to the Indiana legislature
- One Carnival of Evolution, coming right up
A Taste of Pharyngula
Recent Comments
- David Marjanović on Our illness is their profit
- David Marjanović on Dear Jezebel
- David Marjanović on Zooming in on the Origin of Life Science Foundation
- The Tim Channel on Our illness is their profit
- 'Tis Himself, OM on More bad science in the literature
- mackhitch on Our illness is their profit
- Nerd of Redhead, OM on More bad science in the literature
- David Marjanović on More bad science in the literature
- bpruitt570 on Our illness is their profit
- Seti on Our illness is their profit
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
Blogroll
Other Information
« I want to know how much he pays in taxes | Main | PZ Myers: godless babykiller »
More articles by PZ Myers can be found on Freethoughtblogs at the new Pharyngula!
Steve Jones at the Royal Soc.
Category: Creationism • Science
Posted on: April 15, 2006 5:50 PM, by PZ Myers
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/4630
Leave a comment
HTML commands: <i>italic</i>, <b>bold</b>, <a href="url">link</a>, <blockquote>quote</blockquote>
Comments
Posted by: Baka | April 15, 2006 6:02 PM
I think the first link is broken, PZ.
Posted by: llewelly | April 15, 2006 6:30 PM
The first link should be http://www.evolutioninmaterio.com , like this .
Posted by: AndyS | April 15, 2006 8:22 PM
Anyone have a link to the text or to video than I can download?
Posted by: Gerry L | April 16, 2006 12:36 AM
You can also find the link at the Royal Society site (http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/). Available in Real Player or Media Player, but I don't know whether text or downloadable video are available. I watched it earlier this week. Seemed a bit disjointed to me in parts, but then I was a bit drowsy.
Posted by: Gerry L | April 16, 2006 12:38 AM
Sorry. I see now I was responding to the wrong link. It's late. I'm drowsy again.
Posted by: Mike | April 16, 2006 8:58 AM
Here's the direct URL for downloading: mms://193.63.75.9/onDemand/LFP2006_jones_hi.wmv
It's about 106 MB big.
Posted by: arensb | April 16, 2006 9:14 AM
The guy's name is Steve, so of course he's an evil satanic athiest (sic) Evilutionist.
Posted by: Rob Fenwick | April 16, 2006 9:45 AM
Downloading the video will only be of limited use to you without the accompanying Powerpoint slides - we're going to work on an Enhanced Podcast version next week when the UK is back at work after its Easter vacation.
Posted by: guthrie | April 16, 2006 3:36 PM
Ah HA!
Mr Fenwick- given that you appear to connected to the Royal Society, I wonder if you would mind answering a question or two. Given that Prof Jones says that creationism is being taught in some UK schools (At least according to the media reports, and I dont have broadband to find out) yet the Gvt says that it isnt, according to communications recieved by some acqaintances of mine, there would seem to be some mistake somewhere. The Dispatches program on Channel 4 apparently interviewed some ex-pupils of a Vardy school, who confirmed that Creationism was being taught, so my question is, how is the Royal Society going to try and stop this situation? Merely railing about it in a lecture isnt good enough, theoretically the Royal Society should have some clout....
Posted by: Tristram Brelstaff | April 17, 2006 5:02 AM
The Royal Society is beginning to move on this; they've even issued a statement:
http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/news.asp?id=4298
However, I suspect that most of their influence will be behind the scenes directly to members of the government.
In the meantime I think we should start a campaign to have creationism-teaching schools officially labeled as "Centres of Ignorance". This should entitle pupils at these schools to remedial science teaching.
Posted by: Keith Douglas | April 17, 2006 8:42 AM
I watched the talk. Pretty good, and the linguistic analogy is rather interesting. But I do have three complaints. One is that I can see someone watching that and saying "where's the rest of the details?" not realizing that there are a mound of them. Transferrence is always difficult, for that matter. Second, I agree that not everything in life is science, but Jones' attempt to say that made it sound like our nonscientific activities should not themselves be investigated scientifically, and that seems to me to be mistaken. Finally, the blurb describing the talk mentions how creationism is not just bad science but bad religion as well. I do not recall much on that theme. I am, of course, of two minds on that latter issue anyway - I've never been convinced that telling people "oh, yes, you can be religious but only if you adopt the viewpoint of (say) Miller" is the way to go. Better to let people draw their own conclusions in the long run, I think. (After all, isn't increasing knowledge of a specific subject like evolutionary biology partially a means to make people more reflective and intellectually aware generally?)
Posted by: Linguist | April 17, 2006 8:57 AM
Agree that the linguistic analogy was decent, but the use of glottochronology (the idea that linguistic change occurs at a regular rate) is unfortunate. That theory has been disproven for decades.