Now on ScienceBlogs: Dr. Rolando Arafiles: Antivaccine rhetoric, colloidal silver for the flu, and Morgellons disease

Enter to Win

Pharyngula

Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)

• Quick link to the latest endless thread




I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

tbbadge.gif
scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

What can we say to a man who tells you that he would rather obey God than men, and that therefore he is sure to go to heaven for butchering you? Even the law is impotent against these attacks of rage; it is like reading a court decree to a raving maniac. These fellows are certain that the holy spirit with which they are filled is above the law, that their enthusiasm is the only law that they must obey.

[Voltaire, 1764]

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« Maternal effect genes | Main | So, um, Dembski is a mathematician? »

Polar lobes and trefoil embryos in the Precambrian

Category: DevelopmentEvolutionFossilsOrganismsScience
Posted on: June 16, 2006 1:37 PM, by PZ Myers

dentalium_polar_lobe.gif
lobed_embryo_tease.jpg

The diagram above shows the early cleavages of the embryo of the scaphopod mollusc, Dentalium. You may notice a few peculiarities: the first cleavage is asymmetric, producing a cell called AB and a larger sister cell, CD. Before the second division, CD makes a large bulge, called a polar lobe, and it almost looks like it's a three-cell stage—this is called a trefoil embryo, and can look a bit like Mickey Mouse. The second division produces an A, a B, a C, and a D cell, and there's that polar lobe, about as large as the regular cells, so that it now resembles a 5-cell embryo. What's going on in these animals?

Here's another example, another mollusc with the beautiful name Ilyanassa (seriously, my kids almost got named after some invertebrates. Ilyanassa, Ciona, Dentalia…but no, not Crepidula):

ilyanassa_polar_lobe.gif

Again, we see the peculiar movement of the cytoplasm prior to division, a process called ooplasmic segregation. The contents of the cell stream to one side (A), and when division occurs, one of the sister cells is left holding the polar lobe (B), forming a trefoil embryo. The lobe contents flow back into the cell, so that cell is much, much larger than its sister (C). The D cell and its descendants may do this for the next few divisions, making it obviously different from the other cells in the embryo, even as the animal begins the pattern of molluscan spiral cleavage.

What we're seeing is a simple and overt mechanism for setting up early asymmetries in an animal. Molecular determinants that define certain fates in the embryo are segregated and localized to a single cell in the dividing blastula. We only see it now in certain spiralian embryos, as other animals seem to have evolved more subtle mechanisms for doing the same thing.

We know the polar lobe is part of an essential mechanism for development because, as you might guess, when embryologists see such a discrete blob of cytoplasm, they have an irresistible urge to snip it off. It's hanging there by a tiny stalk of membrane, so it's fairly easy to do…and the embryos survive and continue to divide. Unfortunately, they've lost some crucial information. Their anterior-posterior axis is undefined, and among the structures that fail to form are the velum (a ciliated feeding structure in the larva), foot, shell, heart, intestine, and eyes. Other bits do form, but it's basically a doomed partial embryo.

When you see a polar lobe in an embryo, what you are seeing is an early morphological for an animal with polarity and specialization—it means you're looking at an organism that is definitely going to grow into something more complex than a ball of cells. Since the processes that preserve fossilized embryos only seem effective at very early stages of development, this is good to know…especially when you find a collection of 580 million year old cleavage stage embryos and are looking for clues about what they are.

Like these:

lobed_fossil_embryos.jpg
(click for larger image)

Lobe-forming embryos from the Precambrian Doushantuo Formation. (A to K) Lobe-forming embryos with equal division both in trefoil stage [(A) to (H)] and J-shaped stage [(I) to (K)]. (L to V) Lobe-forming embryos with unequal division in trefoil stage [(L) to (U)] and J-shaped stage (V). (W to Z) Five-lobed embryos. Panels (A'), (B'), and (L') are dissecting images of (A), (B), and (L), respectively, showing preservation of a connected neck (black arrow); (B'') is a magnified image of (B'). Abbreviations: MT, biogenetic microtunnel; FF, diagenetic fissure filling. Images are SEM [(C) to (K), (M) to (Z)] or SR-µCT [(A), (B), and (L)]. Scale bar, 250 µm.

Now that you've had a little context, isn't it obvious what we're looking at? These are phosphatized specimens from the famous Doushantuo Formation of China, a layer of rock dated to the Precambrian, about 580 million years ago. The odd number of blastomeres would be suspicious if you didn't know that polar lobe formation was a primitive mode of symmetry breaking in developing embryos. What this suggests is that these are bilaterian embryos that, if they hadn't been suffocated in layers of fine silt over half a billion years ago, would have grown up to be some interesting and relatively sophisticated animal.

We don't know exactly what they would have grown up into, but one interesting observation is that in older embryos from the same deposit, there is no indication that any developed by spiral cleavage. While lobe formation is restricted to spiralians among extant animals, what we see here are probably non-spiralians that are using this method of establishing early asymmetries. That suggests that polar lobe formation may be a very primitive mode of segregating cytoplasmic determinants in the metazoa.


Chen J-Y, Bottjer DJ, Davidson EH, Dornbos SQ, Gao X, Yang Y-H, Li C-W, Li G, Wang X-Q, Xian D-C, Wu H-J, Hwu Y-K, Tafforeau P (2006) Phosphatized Polar Lobe-Forming Embryos from the Precambrian of Southwest China. Science 312(5780):1644-1646.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/8194

Comments

#1

Posted by: Grumpy Author Profile Page | June 16, 2006 5:07 PM

seriously, my kids almost got named after some invertebrates.

A kid could probably get away with a name like Cerion.

#2

Posted by: djlactin Author Profile Page | June 16, 2006 11:35 PM

heh. my old man wanted to name me Argon!

#3

Posted by: Greg Mead Author Profile Page | June 17, 2006 10:50 AM

PZ,

Wow, what a posting! I had purposely avoided looking at this until the weekend, due to the press of other duties. This was facinating. As a geologist, I'm not up on current biology and certainly not embryology, but of course I've heard of the Chinese fossilized embryos. I remember seeing some of the "trefoil" embryos and wondering what was going on. Now I know.

This is a great example of the principle of Uniformitarianism, the idea that understanding the present can be the key to understanding the past. It's also a great argument that these fossil structures are in fact organic in origin rather than being some kind of inorganic structure.

Thanks!

#4

Posted by: Torbjörn Larsson Author Profile Page | June 17, 2006 11:32 AM

One of the endearing traits of this blog is series of articles that touch the same biology subjects. As a layman it is nice to see the discussions or update of knowledge as reflected in somewhat different cladistics for example. Presentation of the different mechanisms is also good since it foils the naive tendency to take the first as the hammer and look for all the nails. This time it was even trefoiled. :-)

#5

Posted by: romunov Author Profile Page | June 30, 2006 1:03 AM

I wonder what species of Crepidula made you change your mind. :D

Here's Ron Shimek's blog who also did some work on scaphopods.

#6

Posted by: popel | September 25, 2008 10:40 AM

hello im popel and im guy and will have a child without a women.
with a MAN.
and im a man

Leave a comment

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.