Seed Media Group

Pharyngula

Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)

I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

tbbadge.gif
scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

(Complete listing)

They said God was on high and he controlled the world and therefore we must pray against Satan. Well, if God controls the world, he controls Satan. For me, religion was full of misstatements and reaches of logic that I just couldn't agree with.

[Gene Roddenberry]

Recent Posts

A Taste of Pharyngula

(Complete listing)

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

(Complete listing)

Other Information

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

« Seed gets personal, and asks me to disclose my secrets: Part II | Main | Ann Coulter: No evidence for evolution? »

Seed gets personal, and asks me to disclose my secrets: Part I

Category: Ask a ScienceBlogger
Posted on: June 18, 2006 12:14 PM, by PZ Myers

Here's this week's "Ask a scienceblogger" question:

How is it that all the PIs (Tara, PZ, Orac et al.), various grad students, post-docs, etc. find time to fulfill their primary objectives (day jobs) and blog so prolifically?

I don't know if you can handle the truth, but here it is…

Caffeine. Lots of coffee. And that isn't sugar I put in it, it's crystal meth.

TrackBacks

(TrackBack URL for this entry: )

Comments

#1

And the crystal meth makes it easier to make those folksy typos and grammatical errors that don't really matter no-how anyway. (It could, however, actually decrease productivity if it caused you to tangle your multiple arms in knots. That'd be kind of a problem.)

Posted by: Zeno [TypeKey Profile Page] | June 18, 2006 1:26 PM

#2

I'm pleased that you don't adulterate your coffee with sugar. Only thing worse would be cream (though I guess the various non-dairy "creamers" might be considered worse, they're all the equivalent of mixing diet coke and single-malt whisky).

Posted by: idlemind [TypeKey Profile Page] | June 18, 2006 1:28 PM

#3

The coffee bean, Friend to Science yay!

Posted by: tikistitch [TypeKey Profile Page] | June 18, 2006 3:01 PM

#4

Thanks for the elucidation. I'd been pondering this very question since March of last year, when PhaWRONGula was an every-single-post thing. (I swear, sometimes I'd finish heckling one post, hit Reload on pharyngula.com, and TWO MORE POSTS would've sprung up. By the time April 1 came around, I was addicted to caffeine, myself.)

Still, we all love you for it. Most of the time, anyway.

Posted by: Rats [TypeKey Profile Page] | June 18, 2006 8:09 PM

#5
... they're all the equivalent of mixing diet coke and single-malt whiskey ...

I've hated coke since I gave up carbonated drinks (12 yrs and counting). I prefer single-malt whiskey any of 3 ways:
(a) Straight
(b) with coffee
(c) with vanilla ice cream

Are (b) and (c) criminal?
(I won't stop if they are, but I'll feel an additional warm glow of happiness when I enjoy them.)

Posted by: ulg [TypeKey Profile Page] | June 18, 2006 9:28 PM

#6

Whiskey with ice cream? That's a new one.

As for how to be more productive, I wish my eyes were like those of the Overlords in Childhood's End and could function independently. Then I could read two books at once!

Posted by: Keith Douglas [TypeKey Profile Page] | June 19, 2006 9:03 AM

#7

How long did it take you to fall off the wagon, PZ?

Posted by: todd. [TypeKey Profile Page] | June 19, 2006 9:21 AM

#8

Wasn't England overrun by coffee houses in the 17th century? Wasn't the Royal Society founded shortly thereafter? There may be more to the caffeine theory of scientific and social progress than meets the casual eye.

Posted by: kaleberg [TypeKey Profile Page] | June 19, 2006 5:51 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Search All Blogs

Science News From:

Science News from NYTimes.com