Sweet ride
Category:
Posted on: July 20, 2006 11:20 AM, by PZ Myers
I want something like this. I think I'll have to wait for the model that costs significantly less than $80,000 and is a bit more practically designed for Minnesota winters.
Pharyngula
Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal
Search this blog
Profile
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
…and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• facebook
• MySpace
• Twitter
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.
Random Quote
(Complete listing)Although it does not logically follow, I would claim that there is a strong case for the subjectivity of morality if there is such widespread disagreement. This is so especially if, as is the case, proponents of subjective morality can provide plausible accounts of such disagreement (social and biological evolution, psychological influences from individuals and cultures) whilst the proponents of objective morality can provide no account of such disagreement, except the rather unsatisfactory statement that we may, in the future, detect the reasons why there is such disagreement. Indeed, we may, but until we have done so, it seems as if the subjectivists have a much more convincing story to tell.
Niclas Berggren, "On the Nature of Morality" (1998)
Recent Posts
- A quickie from Michael Edmondson
- A last lecture
- Baylor rededicates itself to bible college status
- A slight delay
- Friday Cephalopod: a subtle overlord in blue pastels
- Dr Chilingar, AKA Dr Chill
- One goofy site
- A gift from Oregon
- What it's like to be me
- The Great Desecration
A Taste of Pharyngula
(Complete listing)Upstream plasticity and downstream robustness in evolution of molecular networks
Patterning the nervous system with Bmp
Recent Comments
- gathererofknowledge on Fresh thread
- Patricia on One goofy site
- tim gueguen on Baylor rededicates itself to bible college status
- watercat on A quickie from Michael Edmondson
- Al on Baylor rededicates itself to bible college status
- El Herring on One goofy site
- Dustin on A quickie from Michael Edmondson
- JoeBlu on A quickie from Michael Edmondson
- kermit on One goofy site
- M.Filla on A quickie from Michael Edmondson
Archives
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
Blogroll
(Complete listing)Other Information
Subscribe via Email
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« Coming to Life | Main | Scientists conclude that Peggy Noonan kills brain cells »
TrackBacks
(TrackBack URL for this entry: )
Comments
No wonder you like that thing. It looks like an insect.
Posted by: strait woman | July 20, 2006 11:33 AM
Damn I want one! I was just at the Tesla Motors site yesterday wondering what it looked like. They just have a countdown at the moment.
I really want the Spinner from Bladerunner though.
Posted by: Steve_C | July 20, 2006 11:39 AM
Yeah, 3.5 hours to charge fully, but laptop batteries are pretty notorious for wearing out, plus of course there's always the hazard of them exploding... :-)
http://explodinglaptop.com/
And what happens when you need to replace one or more of these thousands of batteries?
Plus how much does it cost (in terms of resources etc) to produce these batteries? How about disposing of them?
How about putting all that research money into drugs that make you feel thrilled by the acceleration of your local bus.
Posted by: ColinB | July 20, 2006 11:41 AM
Yeah, I'd worry about the way battery life declines with age, and the expense of replacing all of them.
Actually, my ideal form of transportation would be if they'd restore a regular passenger train run from western Minnesota to Minneapolis, with a few stops along the way.
Posted by: PZ Myers![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/nav-commenters.gif)
|
July 20, 2006 12:10 PM
But P.Z., if they do that (create effective mass transit) how ever will they justify endless miles of new highway construction? To whom will they sell cars and gasoline?
Posted by: BruceH | July 20, 2006 12:25 PM
I'm still patiently waiting for my plug-in flex fuel hybrid. 50 miles electric before it switches to gas. Any entrepeneurs out there, you already have a customer.
Posted by: doink | July 20, 2006 12:26 PM
HSR! A country as big as this should have HSR. It's lame we don't.
Posted by: Steve_C | July 20, 2006 12:27 PM
More on the Tesla Roadster.
http://www.autobloggreen.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiled-in-santa-monica/
Posted by: Steve_C | July 20, 2006 12:39 PM
QUOTE: "Yeah, I'd worry about the way battery life declines with age, and the expense of replacing all of them..."
You may not have much to fear concerning battery technology in the future. A team of researchers at MIT came up with the idea of using carbon nanotubes to hold charges. They claim the benefits over current battery technology are greatly increased surface area for charging, virtually indefinite life span, and a charging time of mere minutes.
Sounds too good to be true, completely anyways, but the nanotube revolution could finally save battery technology. They're going to be attempting this nanotube technology in consumer electronics within a couple years.
http://www.sciencentral.com/articles/view.php3?type=article&article_id=218392803
Posted by: BlueIndependent | July 20, 2006 12:42 PM
Posted by: quork | July 20, 2006 12:55 PM
Since there are thousands of batteries, if one fails it doesn't really matter. I think the quote from the company spokespan was something along the lines of "it would be like putting a marble in a gas tank"
Also, if this is anything like the Prius, the batteries are warrantied for 100,000 miles
Posted by: Jason | July 20, 2006 1:06 PM
I heard on a radio interview that replacement of the entire battery matrix would cost about $20,000 right now, and that they should last about 150,000 miles. Now, this is from a Tesla Motors exec, but I think it's a huge leap from where electric cars have been, and may just revolutionize the way people think about electric cars (i.e. terribly slow and with no range). I'm excited.
Posted by: Shygetz | July 20, 2006 2:01 PM
That sounds quite optimistic for Li-ion technology (assuming 15,000 miles/yr travel). I'm also wondering if the range of the car will drop from about 250 miles to about 125 miles within two to three years.
Doesn't the Prius use NiMH and tranditional lead-acid batteries?
Posted by: Rick @ shrimp and grits | July 20, 2006 2:20 PM
doink: I got some good news for ya buddy. Cal Cars. This is a group that not only currently converts hybrids to plugins, but also converts non-hybrid vehicles to hybrids. They have done some amazing things, check them out. Oh and Toyota and Honda have both stated publicly that they plan to implement plugins into their hybrids in the next couple years.
Posted by: Webs | July 20, 2006 3:09 PM
For a (relatively) bargain solution you could always send your current car to Left Coast Conversions (http://www.leftcc.com/) and let them convert it. Only cost you about 17k, not including the vehicle. I was at their shop the other weekend and I saw an electric '46 Ford hot rod. Now that's some hoppin' zero emissions, right there.
Posted by: Sifu Tweety | July 20, 2006 4:43 PM
Strib Review: 'Who Killed the Electric Car?' short circuits
Posted by: quork | July 20, 2006 4:50 PM
Ok, it is a really cool car and I'd love to drive it. I've owned an Alfa Romeo that could do upwards of 130 mph and get there pretty quickly. So I understand the allure. However it is still a damn car and what we need are better alternative modes of public transportation and a complete redesign of our cities and living spaces to eliminate the need as much as possible for individuals to transport themselves cocooned in a couple thousand pounds of materials. Electric powered or not a traffic jam is still a traffic jam. An electric bus or train makes a lot more sense to me. I still miss living in New York where I didn't need a car at all. Anyway, sorry to be a spoil sport, but to make up for it check out this beautiful vision of reality. http://www.solarlab.org/. I especially like the solarcab/rickshaw and the solar bus.
Posted by: Fernando Magyar | July 20, 2006 5:48 PM
This is the right way to get the public interested in electric cars. Soichiro Honda was a racing fanatic and used to make his engineers work on the racing team.
Over time, it'll get cheaper and more practical and more companies will do it.
Posted by: decrepitoldfool | July 20, 2006 11:01 PM
One would think a Tesla vehicle might be continually charged "in transit" by giant Tesla coils, set up at intervals around the countryside (recall his theories of wireless electricity distribution)?
;o)
Posted by: Poison P'il | July 21, 2006 11:11 AM
Last I heard, this car is essentially a converted Lotus Elise, at double the price. So presumably the conversion costs roughly $40,000. Of course, you're getting some performance enhancements and trade-offs (long charge time) for that dough...the thing (allegedly) has some numbers that are better than much more expensive cars. I'd love to see a car mag do a track comparison.
Regarding the batteries' life: I don't know what the current situation is with lithium-ion batteries, so this may have changed. However, historically, lithium-ion batteries devour themselves over the course of a few years, whether they're heavily used or sitting on a shelf:
http://www.dansdata.com/gz042.htm
I'd want to be sure that Tesla was offering a battery warranty as good as Toyota and Honda, just to be safe.
Posted by: rrt | July 21, 2006 11:38 AM
Surely educators are paid what they're worth, no?
Posted by: arensb | July 21, 2006 2:24 PM
I'm excited if they have come up with a market solution that works. Electric cars would have some neat consequences - especially work on silent and effective wheels and road surfaces would get more momentum.
Some of the technical solutions leave me wondering though. Why not have some of the battery packs exchangeable for quick refueling? A special loading outlet adds cost to a building. And why use a gear box with a reverse, if the electronic control pack is so capable that they have DC/AC conversion and regenerative braking?
But the main idea seems good. IIRC there are some battery improvements in the pipeline for added efficiency and lifetime, at least regards electrodes.
On supercapacitors with carbon nanotubes it seems odd if they could be so much better than todays supercapacitors, which was already a significant achievement. They have their uses, mainly for buffering temporary peak power. Extended power is something else.
Posted by: Torbjörn Larsson | July 21, 2006 10:14 PM
Just make it look like a Lambretta or Classic Vespa and I'm sold!
http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/27/the-fhybrid-hydrogen-li-ion-scooter/
Posted by: Steve_C | July 27, 2006 12:48 PM