Wow…so this mysterious stuff called dark matter actually exists? Sean Carroll gives us the context and the beautiful pictures, while MarkCC explains the math.
Search
Profile
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
…and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• facebook
• MySpace
• Twitter
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.
Random Quote
I feel most ministers who claim they've heard God's voice are eating too much pizza before they go to bed at night, and it's really an intestinal disorder, not a revelation.
[Rev. Jerry Falwell]
Recent Posts
- Mary's Monday Metazoan: Ambition!
- Our illness is their profit
- Friday Cephalopod: NUMBERLESS HOSTS!
- Dear Jezebel
- There Will Be Blood?
- Zooming in on the Origin of Life Science Foundation
- Friday Cephalopod: Feasibility trial successful
- Making excuses
- More bad science in the literature
- An open letter to the Indiana legislature
A Taste of Pharyngula
Recent Comments
- Jeanette Garcia on Mary's Monday Metazoan: Ambition!
- sandra - juegos de mario on Our illness is their profit
- Owlmirror on More bad science in the literature
- Tumara Baap on Our illness is their profit
- Palaverer on Mary's Monday Metazoan: Ambition!
- Owlmirror on Zooming in on the Origin of Life Science Foundation
- Nerd of Redhead, OM on More bad science in the literature
- Zaki Aminu on More bad science in the literature
- Zaki Aminu on More bad science in the literature
- Zaki Aminu on More bad science in the literature
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
Blogroll
Other Information
« New York has everything | Main | The Catholic Church retreats into the darkness, again »
More articles by PZ Myers can be found on Freethoughtblogs at the new Pharyngula!
Dark matter matters
Category: Science
Posted on: August 23, 2006 9:10 AM, by PZ Myers
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/19487
Leave a comment
HTML commands: <i>italic</i>, <b>bold</b>, <a href="url">link</a>, <blockquote>quote</blockquote>
Comments
Posted by: Julia | August 23, 2006 9:28 AM
Beautiful and fascinating! Thanks for the links.
Posted by: Bronze Dog | August 23, 2006 10:14 AM
It's proof that woos don't know what they're talking about when they say us skeptics don't believe in the invisible.
Posted by: G. Tingey | August 23, 2006 10:37 AM
But visible through our detectors, covering the whole e-m spectrum.....
Which is why my first testable postulate is:
No god is detectable.
Posted by: tacitus | August 23, 2006 10:54 AM
Heh, just had to post this "alternative" explanation for dark matter:
From: http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/36/36_4/darkmatter.html
So what we think of as dark matter might actually be the cosmic manifestation of those trillions of little angels required to keep the orbits of the stars and planets in place. Comforting to know, I guess...
Posted by: Richard Harris | August 23, 2006 10:57 AM
Gillian (?), of course god is detestable. Well it would be, if there were one.
Posted by: Bronze Dog | August 23, 2006 11:48 AM
Sooooo... We're back to Intelligent Falling and God pushing stuff down with his finger?Posted by: Grumpy Physicist | August 23, 2006 12:44 PM
Damn! Does that mean that we get to call ourselves Newtonists, then?
Oh wait, that's not quite right. And it would get mixed up with that ignorant Gingrich jerk.
Einsteinists! Yes, I'm a godless Einsteinist! Hmm..doesn't quite trip off the tongue.
But when a right-winger accuses me of being a 'relativist', I reply "yes, Generally", but they never get it.
Posted by: Stogoe | August 23, 2006 12:54 PM
My physics prof's favorite woo example was invisible green goblins pushing down on everything. Maybe they're the dark matter.
Posted by: Dustin | August 23, 2006 1:48 PM
Wow... that must mean that when God gets smacked with the spin operator, he spits out complex eigenvalues. I bet I could run a whole theology class on that. Oh, the profundity!
Posted by: Dustin | August 23, 2006 2:21 PM
Heh, sorryfor the double post, I just couldn't resist this:
The Creation Research Equation:
S|God> = (3+5i)|God>
The Nietzsche Equation:
a-|God> = 0
The Jack Chick Equation of Jesus Potential:
Jesus(r) = -(g^2)(e^(-mr))/r
Posted by: DominEditrix | August 23, 2006 5:55 PM
On the subject of beautiful things that do not owe their existence to any deity other than the FSM, is anyone else getting chain-letter spammed with this, exhorting the recipient to 'make a wish - you have looked into the Eye of God' ? A lovely picture, but it's the freaking Helix Nebula, not some Omniscient Oculus.
Posted by: Dustin | August 23, 2006 9:35 PM
That's a freaking planetary nebula for chrissake! It's a dead star. If that's his eye, God needs to get his omnipotent butt to the optometrist in a hurry.
"So, God, what seems to be the problem?"
"Man, I left a contact in for the last few million years, and now I've got this electron degeneracy. Hurts like hell. Do you have any eyedrops for this?"
Posted by: Torbjörn Larsson | August 24, 2006 10:35 AM
"But when a right-winger accuses me of being a 'relativist', I reply "yes, Generally", but they never get it."
Heh! Well, I would like to say that I'm a 'quantist', but I'm uncertain about the interpretation.
Posted by: Keith Douglas | August 24, 2006 11:24 AM
Bronze Dog: Actually, if you think about it, the vast majority of things and processes are unobservable in the strict sense. On the other hand, if we have good warrant to postulate their existence, there are indicator hypotheses that link the observable with the unobservables in question. (Warning: "Observable" here does not have its meaning sometimes used in QM.)
Posted by: Kayla | August 24, 2006 4:17 PM
That's so cool!
Posted by: DP | August 25, 2006 6:46 PM
At what point do you just say, "the theory is wrong" instead of trying to put band-aids on it?