It works, bitches
Category: Humor • Science
Posted on: August 7, 2006 1:35 PM, by PZ Myers
Our behind-the-scenes whip boss at Seed, Katherine Sharpe, mentioned this comic, and after I was done laughing, I had to post it.
It could be our new motto.
Pharyngula
Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal
Search this blog
Profile
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
…and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• facebook
• MySpace
• Twitter
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.
Random Quote
(Complete listing)Strange…a God who could make good children as easily as bad, yet preferred to make bad ones; who made them prize their bitter life, yet stingily cut it short; mouths Golden Rules and forgiveness multiplied seventy times seven and invented Hell; who mouths morals to other people and has none himself; who frowns upon crimes yet commits them all; who created man without invitation, then tries to shuffle the responsibility for man's acts upon man, instead of honorably placing it where it belongs, upon himself; and finally with altogether divine obtuseness, invites this poor, abused slave to worship him!
[Mark Twain]
Recent Posts
- Priorities
- Evolution happens
- Snake segmentation
- We don't?
- World Youth Day had some effect
- Looking for a journalist willing to do a story
- Who the heck is Greg Moore and why does he keep threatening me?
- Epigenetics
- Not again...
- Godless brunch on Sunday
A Taste of Pharyngula
(Complete listing)Recent Comments
- Josh Miller on Priorities
- allonym on Priorities
- gdlchmst on Priorities
- Kobra on Priorities
- Darwin's Minion on Priorities
- Josh Miller on Priorities
- gdlchmst on Priorities
- windy on Epigenetics
- Snark on Priorities
- Buh on Priorities
Archives
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
Blogroll
(Complete listing)Other Information
Subscribe via Email
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« There can be no chance, no junk, no purposelessness, or God is dead | Main | Eeek! Pretty, but with morbid implications »
TrackBacks
(TrackBack URL for this entry: )
Comments
Okay, I know (only) a little about this stuff - why does energy density peak @ 160.4GHz?
Posted by: Bloviator | August 7, 2006 1:49 PM
Ah, got it - cosmic microwave background -
Posted by: Bloviator | August 7, 2006 1:51 PM
When Paul Nelson and William Dembski drive by me on a flying carpet, I'll listen to them. In the meantime, STFU.
Posted by: steve s | August 7, 2006 1:55 PM
I want the t-shirt!
Posted by: Peter Backus | August 7, 2006 2:01 PM
Is there a t-shirt? Please let there be a t-shirt! I want a t-shirt!
Posted by: Joshua | August 7, 2006 2:11 PM
Ouch. I hate when science jokes fly over my head like Spinner on warp thrusters.
Posted by: Steve_C | August 7, 2006 2:12 PM
There will be t-shirt soon, and there are signed prints now!
Feel free to use the comics directly instead of mirroring them; we have plenty of bandwidth and I love to see them being shared! And it makes smile that Bloviator in the comments got that it was the background radiation. You don't know how much email I got asking about that.
Posted by: Randall Munroe | August 7, 2006 2:23 PM
This is the kind of place frequented by geeks where a lot of the readers would get it.
Posted by: PZ Myers![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/nav-commenters.gif)
|
August 7, 2006 2:32 PM
I'm not dissing the joke. Just my lack of knowledge.
Posted by: Steve_C | August 7, 2006 2:35 PM
Baptizing the infidels by hitting them over the head with a Planck. ;)
Posted by: Steve LaBonne | August 7, 2006 2:39 PM
I like all the little dots that presumably represent the FIRAS data from which the blackbody curve was derived.
Posted by: Tom Renbarger | August 7, 2006 3:03 PM
I should get a T-shirt version of this for Ryan, my recently-returned blog partner. Sounds like something that fffffffilthy-mouthed human would say.
This dog's mouth is much cleaner than that, though.
Posted by: Bronze Dog | August 7, 2006 3:43 PM
PZ:
"This is the kind of place frequented by geeks where a lot of the readers would get it."
I am a laymen on this one too, so I'm not sure I get it either. But my weak analysis thus far leads me to conclude the punchline is in the equation, and that knowing what the terms of the equation represent would reveal said hilarity.
I'm guessing the visual graphing is meant to symbolize some sort of decrease in understanding leading to a correlative decrease in scientific interest?...
Posted by: BlueIndependent | August 7, 2006 3:46 PM
I enjoyed Binary Sudoku a great deal.
http://xkcd.com/c74.html
Posted by: Jason (not that one) | August 7, 2006 4:02 PM
Which of those variables accounts for the number of pirates?
Posted by: somnilista, FCD | August 7, 2006 4:02 PM
It's not my speciality, but I believe the equation is the energy density of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation predicted by relativity(?), while the graph represents the actual data confirming the equation's predictions. Hence: Science works. (Bitches.)
Posted by: Joshua | August 7, 2006 4:04 PM
"Behind the scenes whip boss"
Ah, FINALLY an accurate description of my occupation to fill into that little box on Friendster.
Posted by: katherine sharpe | August 7, 2006 4:29 PM
The cartoon is Plank's Law on Blackbody radiation. The graph is usually represented as Intensity v wavelength. The 160.4 just represents the frequency in which we have max intensity. This value is different for different objects and doesn't have some hidden meaning. You learn about Plank's law in intro astronomy or your first modern physics class.
Also, this is not the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation. The CMBR measures the fluxuations in the background. That's all bitches!
Posted by: Scott | August 7, 2006 4:47 PM
Yes, this is the CMBR. Big Bang predicts that the background will fit the black body law and predicts the actual current-day temperature (which is related to the frequency distribution by the black body law). The fit between theory and observations is extraordinary.
Posted by: Steve LaBonne | August 7, 2006 4:58 PM
"Also, this is not the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation. The CMBR measures the fluxuations in the background. That's all bitches!"
You're thinking of the angular power spectrum of the CMB anisotropy. There is a "monopole term" at 2.725 K represented by the graph in the comic. There's more cosmological information in the angular power spectrum than in the monopole, but they are both part of the CMB.
Posted by: Tom Renbarger | August 7, 2006 5:05 PM
It'd also look good on a coffee cup
Posted by: Rex | August 7, 2006 5:35 PM
Personally, I am sick of hearing the word bitches used in this fashion. The version where it is spelled beotch is less offensive, but only slightly. Too bad you can't find humor without insulting women indirectly.
Posted by: IHateFundies | August 7, 2006 5:39 PM
Are not bitches female dogs?
Posted by: Steve_C | August 7, 2006 5:52 PM
A bitch will greet me at the door when I arrive home tonight, and gently lick my legs, before I go outside and throw the ball with her.
She thinks I am da shizzle
Posted by: Blader | August 7, 2006 6:08 PM
oh come on... can't use the word bitch without insulting women... pah. that's just whiney-ass troll bait.
bitch is well beyond a gender specific insult these days.
Posted by: bitchin' | August 7, 2006 6:20 PM
Bitch:
1. A female canine animal, especially a dog.
2. Offensive.
a. A woman considered to be spiteful or overbearing.
b. A lewd woman.
c. A man considered to be weak or contemptible.
3. Slang. A complaint.
4. Slang. Something very unpleasant or difficult.
5. Slang.Pwn3d!
Posted by: Tlazolteotl | August 7, 2006 6:38 PM
No offense, but really, I would think that someone who signs as "IHateFundies" would see the irony in complaining about the use of a derogatory word or phrase.
Just sayin'
Posted by: Tlazolteotl | August 7, 2006 6:41 PM
How bout "I hate those fundie bitches." :)
Just sayin'.
Posted by: Steve_C | August 7, 2006 7:29 PM
We've been taking back "bitch" for 30 years. Even the mildest-mannered of us in the early 70s had "Bitch" stickers under our names on the mailbox. Outspoken women, women who take no shit, have been bitches forever. Today, we say, "yeah, I'm a bitch - whatcha gonna do about it?" We gotta thank those who were bitches before it became popu7lar.
Posted by: Buffalo Gal | August 7, 2006 7:40 PM
Because no-one else has mentioned it:
http://bitchphd.blogspot.com/
Posted by: Owlmirror | August 7, 2006 9:32 PM
And just think, some cable channel didn't have to pay the author 50 million to come up with that.
killed me Steve_C
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp | August 7, 2006 10:23 PM
Too bad you can't find humor without insulting women indirectly.
Posted by: IHateFundies
From the local alpha female:
Quit yer bitching, bitch, or I'll bitch-slap you into next week.
PZ, that's one bitchin' graphic.
Posted by: Graculus | August 7, 2006 11:28 PM
I have always found that equations like that one suggest a certain inelegance to the universe. I mean, what's with the -1 in the denominator? :)
Posted by: Keith Douglas | August 8, 2006 10:05 AM
Have you bitches read the rest of those comics? There's a real slayer in there about Kepler as a janitor...
Posted by: Joshua | August 8, 2006 10:10 AM
Yeah, the motivation of the comic is that the CMB has been something of a "smoking gun" (sorry, hate that phrase but it works here) for cosmological theory - the big bang, and later inflation.
Tom, did you go to the U of M for grad school?
Posted by: jeffk | August 8, 2006 10:24 AM
I think the equation is there just as a generic reference to science. They could have used any scientific equation or symbol. You don't need to know anything about the equation to get the humor in the tag line.
Posted by: Deepsix | August 8, 2006 12:26 PM
Its a great Motto.
"Science, it works, bitches!"
Use it every chance you get!
Posted by: James | August 8, 2006 12:29 PM
Oh, and accompany it with a picture of the blast cloud over Hiroshima!!
"Science, it works, bitches!"
I love it!
Posted by: James | August 8, 2006 12:33 PM
simpler and more widely known equation would be even funnier in reference to "it works":
F = MA
-a Dr. Steve
Posted by: dr.steveb | August 8, 2006 1:25 PM
T-Shirt please.
Posted by: Timothy | August 8, 2006 5:57 PM
but FEMA _didn't_ work.....
oh, sorry...F=Ma, my bad.....
Posted by: polychrome | August 9, 2006 5:00 AM