Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)



I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

I think what attracts me about the Electric Monk is that it's such an eloquent example of the futility of belief for belief's sake. I mean there's only any point in believing something if it's true.

[Richard Dawkins, interview with Douglas Adams]

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« Hate is the essential spice | Main | What's up, NSTA? »

More articles by PZ Myers can be found on Freethoughtblogs at the new Pharyngula!

Carnivalia, and an open thread

Category: CarnivalsOpen Thread
Posted on: November 26, 2006 10:14 PM, by PZ Myers

Just to squeeze in a couple of the Sunday carnivals here…

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Jump to end

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/26658

Comments

#1

Posted by: Ref | November 26, 2006 11:18 PM

DEEPAK CHOPRA RESPONDS:


The God Delusion? Part 3

November 23, 2006
Correction
Dear friends,

I want to thank the responders who pointed out that Fred Hoyle, the British astronomer who invented the phrase Big Bang, nevertheless opposed the notion of an expanding universe. I remembered one fact and forgot the other. My apologies.
Love,
Deepak

http://www.intentblog.com/archives/2006/11/the_god_delusio_2.html

Edited at HuffingtonPost:

If the universe is self-aware, it would explain the formation of a self-replicating molecule like DNA far more elegantly than the clumsy, crude mechanism of random chance. As the astronomer Fred Hoyle declared the probability that random chance created life is roughly the same as the probability that a hurricane could blow through a junkyard and create a Boeing 707.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/deepak-chopra/the-god-delusion-part-3_b_34497.html
-------

Addition at HuffingtonPost by Deepak Chopra:

The God Delusion? Part 4

I realize that I've dropped a bomb into the discussion. The instant the word 'intelligent' comes up, skeptics rush in to shout that one is defending Intelligent Design, which is a stalking horse for creationism, which is a stalking horse for fundamentalist Christianity, which is a stalking horse for Jesus as the one and only son of God. Such is the heated climate of debate at the moment, and Dawkins takes full (unfair) advantage of it. Only Jesus freaks could possibly believe in an intelligent universe.

However, if consciousness is innate in the universe, so is intelligence. That absolutely has nothing to do with God sitting on a throne in heaven creating Adam and Eve. If we remain sane and clear-headed, the reason to assume that consciousness exists is simple. There's no other way to account for it. Without a doubt there is enormous design, complexity, organization, and interconnectedness everywhere in Nature. You can either say "I see it, let me explain it" or you can say "Ignore it, it's just a byproduct of randomness."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/deepak-chopra/the-god-delusion-part-4_b_34842.html

#2

Posted by: Shawn S. | November 27, 2006 4:27 AM

An intelligent or conscious universe, like God, doesn't seem like it is within the bounds of science to prove or disprove. While the random formation of life is highly improbable, it isn't impossible (or I wouldn't be writing this). Chopra, like so many religious, argue from personal incredulity.

PZ, are you aware of any specific papers where researchers shows spontaneous formation of nucleic acids on (clay? limestone?) some sort of substrate. The experiment basically shows that it was possible for nucleic acids to form in the environment of early earth. This was 'proof of concept', if you will, of the idea of an RNA world that was the predecessor to cellular life.

Damn, or am I thinking of primitive cell membranes forming spontaneously, and that nucleic acids were already present?

Someone should know. I recall the discussion in Environmental Microbiology class, but have forgotten the details!

Anyway, Chopra may be an MD, but he has forgotten his chemistry!

#3

Posted by: Caledonian | November 27, 2006 7:51 AM

The UK comes one step closer to madness:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/6187534.stm

#4

Posted by: David Harmon | November 27, 2006 8:02 AM

Typo alert for the Synapse link (Indeed, the word "synapse" has a transposition in the URL).

#5

Posted by: quork | November 27, 2006 9:33 AM

Peace equals Satanism


Woman faces fines for wreath peace sign
By ROBERT WELLER, Associated Press Writer
Sun Nov 26, 11:13 PM ET
.
DENVER - A homeowners association in southwestern Colorado has threatened to fine a resident $25 a day until she removes a Christmas wreath with a peace sign that some say is an anti- Iraq war protest or a symbol of Satan.
.
Some residents who have complained have children serving in Iraq, said Bob Kearns, president of the Loma Linda Homeowners Association in Pagosa Springs. He said some residents have also believed it was a symbol of Satan. Three or four residents complained, he said.
...

Wow, so peace equal Satanism, and parents with children in Iraq prefer the continuance of war. This is very odd.

#6

Posted by: quork | November 27, 2006 9:38 AM

Cartoons (seriously) can teach us about faith


...
For some reason, many who might shun such serious topics when presented by religious and educational leaders will listen to debates about theology if they are presented in the context of a cartoon.
...

I'm guessing the person who wrote that considers it to be ironic.

#7

Posted by: gengar | November 27, 2006 9:38 AM

Caledonian, it would appear that the guy quoted in the article has a track record.

I've recently communicated with my MP about the Truth In Science mob, and there's a glimmer of hope that not only is the Education Secretary unlikely to take this suggestion seriously, but also that he might even be proactive about the issue, Blair's interference notwithstanding.

#8

Posted by: Style Graduate | November 27, 2006 1:28 PM

PZ, I'm interested in making charitable donations to celebrate Cephalodmas, and I was wondering if you (or another zeta-list blogger) would be interested in compiling a list of appropriately secular and humanist charities.

Leave a comment

HTML commands: <i>italic</i>, <b>bold</b>, <a href="url">link</a>, <blockquote>quote</blockquote>

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.