
Clutch of Argonauta nodosa eggs and hatchlings
Figure from Cephalopods: A World Guide (amzn/b&n/abe/pwll), by Mark Norman.
Now on ScienceBlogs: Let the War on Christmas being. Atheist style.
Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal

PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
…and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• facebook
• MySpace
• Twitter
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
• Quick link to the latest endless thread
The Roman Catholic Church announced yesterday that the Shroud of Turin, venerated by millions of Christians over the centuries as the burial cloth of Jesus, cannot be authentic because new scientific tests show that it dates from the Middle Ages. … Nevertheless, Catholics were encouraged to continue their veneration of the shroud as a pictorial image of Christ, still capable of performing miracles, even though it cannot be accepted as a genuine historic relic, and no one knows how the image was produced. … At a news conference yesterday, the shroud's custodian, Cardinal Anastasio Ballestrero, revealed that radiocarbon tests conducted independently by three laboratories this year have concluded that the shroud cloth was created between 1260 and 1390. … The shroud's authenticity has been debated since it was first put on display in the mid-14th century. … In the Middle Ages, many objects appeared in Europe that were said to be the shroud of Jesus, fragments of his cross or other relics, but most were discarded as fakes long ago, and few others maintain a devoted following as does the Shroud of Turin. … The shroud, which belongs to the pope, has been kept for the last 410 years at the Cathedral of Turin, where it lies folded inside a silver casket. It is rarely put on public display. … An estimated 3 million visitors came to see it when it was last exhibited in 1978.
[Roberto Suro, New York Times, San Francisco Chronicle, 14 October 1988]
« All we want to do is eat your brains | Main | Cephalart »
Category: Cephalopods • Organisms
Posted on: December 8, 2006 6:00 AM, by PZ Myers

Figure from Cephalopods: A World Guide (amzn/b&n/abe/pwll), by Mark Norman.
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/27532
Sign in or register with TypePad. Sign up with Movable Type.
Comments
Posted by: MissPrism | December 8, 2006 6:43 AM
They're soooo cute!
Posted by: DrDork | December 8, 2006 6:54 AM
Reminds me of the last "Hospital Ball".
Posted by: Drhoz! | December 8, 2006 7:11 AM
*wibbles at the cute*
they're almost as cute as parasitic bunny botflies!
(well, it's close - the cephalopodlets have the big cute eyes, the bunnybots have strokable silvery fur)
Posted by: coracle | December 8, 2006 9:08 AM
over at SciencePunk the plural of octopus has been queried. Can anyone confirm the correct term.
Posted by: Roxy | December 8, 2006 9:59 AM
That is one of the cutest things I ever did see (well...aside from newly hatched chameleons)!
Posted by: John McKay | December 8, 2006 12:32 PM
I realize all babies are supposed to have blue eyes, but just what is that incredibly pigmented spot? Is it an eye? I'm having trouble making heads or tentacles out of the pretty colors.
Posted by: YuppiTuna | December 8, 2006 2:59 PM
I went to the Minnesota Zoo yesterday, and it turns out they've got a baby two-spotted octopus there... *gets glassy eyed*
Posted by: The Ridger | December 8, 2006 3:08 PM
The plural of octopus: take your pick:
Octopuses - plain old English, as is perfectly appropriate for a borrowed word (compare troikas (not troiki) or raccoons (not whatever the Algonquian would be))
Octopodes - correct plural for the Greek original
Octopi - incorrect plural, would be correct were octopus a Latin word (which it's not), but then even Romans got it wrong sometimes
Posted by: SEF | December 8, 2006 3:43 PM
Perhaps it's baby's first ink in its ink sacPosted by: Mike Crichton | December 8, 2006 4:55 PM
They'll be even cuter when they start cannibalizing eachother!
Posted by: coracle | December 11, 2006 4:38 AM
Ah, thanks Ridger.
Posted by: Steven | December 11, 2006 5:42 PM
Cool photo. Is the one at the bottom right winning the race?