Now on ScienceBlogs: Oxytocin: Starting with the basics

Seed Media Group

Pharyngula

Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)

• Quick link to the latest endless thread




I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

tbbadge.gif
scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

There are actually two ways to prove the non-existence of something. One way is to prove that it cannot exist because it leads to contradictions (e.g., square circles, married bachelors, etc.). The other way is, in the words of Keith Parsons, 'by carefully looking and seeing'. This is how we can know that such things as the Loch Ness Monster, Bigfoot, the Abimonable Snowman, etc. do not exist.

Jeffery Jay Lowder, "Is a Proof of the Non-Existence of a God Even Possible?"

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« A shout-out to the family back home | Main | I survived an SICB media panel »

Friday Cephalopod: Big'un

Category: CephalopodsOrganisms
Posted on: January 5, 2007 6:00 AM, by PZ Myers

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/29682

Comments

#1

Posted by: llewelly | January 5, 2007 7:23 AM

More cross-species dating?

#2

Posted by: Dave Hone | January 5, 2007 8:46 AM

I know the Pacific ones get big, but how close is the diver? Is that a question of perspective, or is it really a 3 or 4 beastie (mantle + 1 tentacle)?

#3

Posted by: anarchistecogeek | January 5, 2007 9:34 AM

Gay Tentacle Porn? Looks like the diver's getting, um, "cephalo"...

#4

Posted by: Saint Gasoline | January 5, 2007 10:04 AM

OMG, he is totally having oral sex with that thing.

...not that I can blame him. She's awfully cute.

#5

Posted by: Saint Gasoline | January 5, 2007 10:04 AM

OMG, he is totally having oral sex with that thing.

...not that I can blame him. She's awfully cute.

#6

Posted by: Saint Gasoline | January 5, 2007 10:04 AM

OMG, he is totally having oral sex with that thing.

...not that I can blame him. She's awfully cute.

#7

Posted by: br0k3nglass | January 5, 2007 10:06 AM

Now I'm jealous. I want a cephalo-hug too.

#8

Posted by: quork | January 5, 2007 10:56 AM

Looks like that cephalopod is carrying home the groceries.

#9

Posted by: Rupert | January 5, 2007 12:13 PM

These novelty condoms have gone too far.

R

#10

Posted by: hans | January 5, 2007 12:31 PM

It's a 4.5 meter 'pussy. Besides, you can clearly see that at least one tentacle goes *behind* the diver.

#11

Posted by: Mena | January 5, 2007 1:04 PM

I don't anthropomorphize often but (s)he looks grumpy. After reading the previous comments I hate to wonder why! :^O

#12

Posted by: Fernando Magyar | January 5, 2007 3:09 PM

The diver is a "he"? How can any of you be so certain about the sex of the diver, not that it really matters ;-)

#13

Posted by: Spoony Quine | January 5, 2007 5:13 PM

` Must... get... visions... of 'Octopussy' out of my head!

#14

Posted by: SEF | January 5, 2007 9:01 PM

Hey, PZ! If Cephalopodmas is the solstice (whether for cultish reasons or more rational ones), then when is its year zero and is the counting system 8 or 10? These questions need to be answered so that people can celebrate the "Big'un" in anniversary terms.

#15

Posted by: brightmoon | January 5, 2007 10:04 PM

wow i hope that octo didnt get PO'd at that diver ....those beaks look like they take a good sized chunk

#16

Posted by: eric | January 5, 2007 10:36 PM

Great picture. Can I be a total German grammar nerd and point out that your caption should be "ein Pazifischer Riesenoktopus"? As with many things in life, context is crucial.

#17

Posted by: JohnnieCanuck | January 6, 2007 4:29 AM

Well BabelFish wasn't much help in determining the diver's sex. I got:

Courageously: One of the two biologists dares itself completely near to a Pacific Riesenoktopus near (4.50 meters; Queen Charlotte sound, Vancouver Iceland, British Columbia, Canada)

'Riesen' by itself translated as 'giant'. Divers here (Georgia Strait) have often tamed them to take food. Myself, I'd worry about the possibility that 'all gone' might not be easily communicated. That can be the case with bears, for example.

#18

Posted by: eric | January 6, 2007 12:05 PM

Courageously: One of the two biologists dares itself completely near
That should be "Courageous: One of the two biologists ventures quite near", and that second "near" from BabelFish should go. "Riesenoktopus" does indeed mean giant octopus.
#19

Posted by: raincoaster | January 7, 2007 1:16 AM

Also, to be nerdily provincial, it's Hecate Strait, not Georgia Strait, that far North.

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





           Sign in or register with TypePad.            Sign up with Movable Type.

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Enter to win

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM