(via Frolix-8)
Search
Profile
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
…and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• facebook
• MySpace
• Twitter
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.
Random Quote
Where the cross has been planted only superstitions have grown.
[Lemuel K. Washburn, Is The Bible Worth Reading And Other Essays]
Recent Posts
- Our illness is their profit
- Friday Cephalopod: NUMBERLESS HOSTS!
- Dear Jezebel
- There Will Be Blood?
- Zooming in on the Origin of Life Science Foundation
- Friday Cephalopod: Feasibility trial successful
- Making excuses
- More bad science in the literature
- An open letter to the Indiana legislature
- One Carnival of Evolution, coming right up
A Taste of Pharyngula
Recent Comments
- https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlg3ZrAn0yJktAa1txQLOB6bCND-AfW0pA on Our illness is their profit
- mandas on Our illness is their profit
- sue.welsh on Our illness is their profit
- Amphiox, OM on Our illness is their profit
- Amphiox, OM on Our illness is their profit
- symball on Our illness is their profit
- echidna on Our illness is their profit
- margaret on Our illness is their profit
- hibob on Our illness is their profit
- phoenixwoman on Our illness is their profit
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
Blogroll
Other Information
« More mammal macroevolution | Main | Friday Cephalopod: Tasteful and striking use of color »
More articles by PZ Myers can be found on Freethoughtblogs at the new Pharyngula!
Late night anomie and disturbing imagery
Category: Weirdness
Posted on: March 30, 2007 12:00 AM, by PZ Myers
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/36882
Leave a comment
HTML commands: <i>italic</i>, <b>bold</b>, <a href="url">link</a>, <blockquote>quote</blockquote>
Comments
Posted by: Nathan Perrier | March 30, 2007 12:12 AM
I don't get it.
Posted by: H. Humbert | March 30, 2007 12:25 AM
Well, it seems to be saying that struggling to meet the standards of beauty set by the media is self-destructive.
That, or life without breast implants just isn't worth living.
Posted by: strawberry blueberry raspberry | March 30, 2007 12:26 AM
Beauty is pain.
Posted by: sean | March 30, 2007 12:33 AM
Aesthetically pleasing, not too shrill... Twistedly delicious! I'm not sure whether the part at the end where it mentions being produced in Palos Verdes, a rich LA suburb, adds or detracts.
Posted by: beccarii | March 30, 2007 12:51 AM
I agree with H. Humbert's comment on "standards of beauty set by the media" - though I think that the concept can be broadened. Those standards are set by the culture, as well.
It reminds me in style and, to some degree, content of "The Mascot" - see http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0025477/. This and a number of other similarly-produced shorts, beginning early in the 20th century, are collected on "The Cameraman's Revenge, and Other Fantastic Tales" - http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00004Y7HC/animofheavand-20
"The Cameraman's Revenge" is a very well-done (even though it was done in 1912) animation of anthropomorphization of insects.
Posted by: Christian Burnham | March 30, 2007 1:11 AM
Ah- when my friends from Frolix-8 get here- things are gonna get a whole lot better.
Posted by: TAW | March 30, 2007 1:17 AM
Very interesting. It reminded me about this computer graphics thing about schizophrenia. Scary.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYk5SumcxQw
Posted by: H. Humbert | March 30, 2007 1:28 AM
Also, I suppose the video might be commenting on how women are sometimes objectified or "put in a box," made to feel less than human, or that they're "nothing but a pretty face."
I'm sure others can find additional symbolism.
Posted by: Cathy in Seattle | March 30, 2007 1:45 AM
yeah, that was pretty much what it was like growing up "girl" in the 70's. Probably the same now.
Posted by: Jason | March 30, 2007 2:31 AM
I don't know. Personally, I think she looks a lot better with... color. And... eyes.
Posted by: Krystalline Apostate | March 30, 2007 3:49 AM
Wow, that was simply brilliant, & lovely in a bizarre way. Imprinting from the television, a struggle upwards towards an unreachable bar of beauty, a willingness to risk oneself to an addictive desire despite possible extinction, & the final tear wept.
What a statement.
Posted by: beepbeepitsme | March 30, 2007 4:05 AM
The struggle for beauty seemed to be self-imposed. The standard was unattainable, yet rather than accept that; doll face was prepared to self destruct.
It appeared to be the quest that mattered. The results were never going to be able to satisfy the quest. Reminds me of people who are addicted to plastic surgery.
Posted by: Kseniya | March 30, 2007 8:02 AM
Probably more so now.
Posted by: Jan Andrea | March 30, 2007 8:46 AM
Wow, that was deep into uncanny valley.
Posted by: Elliott | March 30, 2007 10:09 AM
I don't know. Personally, I think she looks a lot better with... color. And... eyes.
Jason, I would surmise that she sees a lot better with eyes.
It appeared to be the quest that mattered.
As Walt Kelly once reminded us:
"Too soon we breast the tape, and too late we realize that the fun lay in the running."
Posted by: Hank Fox | March 30, 2007 11:54 AM
...
...
Whew! --Disturbing image. Humanity in the grip of cold, spidery mechanical limbs, with nothing left but the ability to express naked NEED.
To me, that was about something broader than beauty. It was about advertising. It was about media. It was about the destructive allure of every prepackaged, parasitically empty image we're encouraged to absorb or become.
It was about thin, beautiful models and the latest fashions, but also about A Diamond is Forever, and "Hey, You Never Know" lottery ads, and young Americans dead in Iraq because of the lies of George W. Bush.
Yes, it was about the destruction that comes from never feeling good about yourself unless you're striving to become what OTHER people seem to value.
But it was also about all those forces that SELL us those "what other people seem to value" images: the predatory political parties, the voracious corporations, the evangelical hucksters, the viral patriots who want us all to never question, never doubt, never break stride as we give the last full measure of our lives ... to THEM.
...
...
Posted by: Paul | March 30, 2007 3:38 PM
I didn't think about the whole reaching for the cultural standards of beauty aspect of it until I read the comments, but it is another good way to look at it. I viewed it as her reaching for the unreachable dream, and preferring to die in the act of becoming something more than she had first been than to continue in stasis. It's a sentiment I wholeheartedly agree with. It reminds me of that CG short, KIWI that was circulating the web a while back (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdUUx5FdySs).
That one made me cry too.
Posted by: Dan | March 30, 2007 3:46 PM
Wow. That was powerful.
I saw the "endless striving for unattainable standards of beauty" angle right away, but I also like the "objectification" interpretation that H. Humbert brought up.
Posted by: JJR | March 30, 2007 11:38 PM
Very well done, deep.
Enjoyed it very much.
I enjoy even disturbing stuff, if it teaches a deeper lesson. Reminds me of stuff I sometimes see on PBS's THE TERRITORY.
on a lighter note, wasn't there a scene from SNL's Sprockets where Dieter's guest is...
Dieter: "you are but a head in a rusty metal box"
Guest: "If you had been more careful, I would not be just a head in a rusty metal box."
or something like that...
Posted by: Cailen | April 2, 2007 3:02 AM
I take this as be yourself. No one is as pretty as the media portrays. Even models get airbrushed. You are who you are be happy and healthy and that's all you need.