Seed Media Group

Pharyngula

Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal

Search this blog

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)

I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

tbbadge.gif
scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

(Complete listing)

No man ever knew Providence to interpose when his neighbor's hens are scratching up his garden.

[Lemuel K. Washburn, Is The Bible Worth Reading And Other Essays]

Recent Posts

A Taste of Pharyngula

(Complete listing)

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

(Complete listing)

Other Information

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

« Pair-rule genes | Main | Inherit the Wind, right here in Western Minnesota »

It's not quite “We are the world”

Category: EvilReligion
Posted on: June 23, 2007 1:41 PM, by PZ Myers

What is wrong with these people?

Be sure to catch the cute little toddler's solo at the end. Tell me, is this child abuse yet?

TrackBacks

(TrackBack URL for this entry: )

Comments

#1

I lol'ed. The bad part about this is that Falwell and Dobson followers get to look at these people and say "Oh, well THAT'S just too far", and convince themselves they're anything but maximally crazy.

Posted by: Dennis | June 23, 2007 1:53 PM

#2

Who do you think they voted for last election?

Posted by: Dahan | June 23, 2007 1:55 PM

#3

PZ, I don't understand what your beef is with these people. You have to at least give them points for honesty. Given that they believe the Bible is the word of God, their positions follow quite logically. All of that stuff about hating homosexuals (and nearly everybody else) is right there in Leviticus. As Sam Harris says, it is the religous moderates (now there's an oxymoron for you) who have perverted God's word.

And yes, the toddler's solo at the end is child abuse, as is any religious indoctrination of people who do not have the mental capacity to fight back.

Posted by: Tex | June 23, 2007 1:55 PM

#4

You'll eat your kids?

I can kind of see the twisted logic of all the rest, but wtf? where the heck did they come up with that?

Posted by: Oran_Taran | June 23, 2007 1:57 PM

#5

Wow. Just...wow.

If it's too late to change His mind, I guess I have to go to Hell then. Frankly, if Fred Phelps is right, I'd rather go to Hell then spend eternity with his moronic followers anyhow.

Posted by: Jeff Fecke | June 23, 2007 1:58 PM

#6

I've no idea why Calvinists would put this sort of effort into telling people they're going to hell, since it was decided before their birth that it was to be so.

Strange lot.

Posted by: GodlessHeathen | June 23, 2007 1:58 PM

#7

Oh shit. I just caught the warning to watch the toddler solo at the end (little text, big video box: easy to overlook.) Naturally, I stopped at 2 minutes having seen all I needed to see...

But, I went back to watch the last bit. Truly sickening.

Unfortunately, no ordinary religious person is going to look at this and think there might be something wrong with their own practices. After all, they're not preaching that it's too late for the world and everyone is going to be damned to hell... they're just preaching that it's almost too late for the world, and MOST people are going to be damned to hell.

Posted by: Dennis | June 23, 2007 2:00 PM

#8

Just to weird you all out, Phelps was a registered Democrat.

I don't think he voted for anyone, since he hates everyone.

Posted by: PZ Myers | June 23, 2007 2:00 PM

#9

What's wrong with these people?
1. They can't sing.
2. They don't swing.
3. Only one of them has any concept of harmony.
4. They don't seem to know which side of the Canadian flag goes up (what was that supposed to mean, btw?)
5. They are child abusers indeed.

Oh, that, and they are clearly batshit insane.

Anyone else catch the subtle misogyny too? God ("He") hates the world and all her people. (Especially those with 2 X chromosomes, methinks).

Posted by: CCP | June 23, 2007 2:03 PM

#10

Yes, Tex, but gods are a fiction. And following their immoral strictures is silly and causes grave harm, even though they're fictional.

Posted by: Stogoe | June 23, 2007 2:04 PM

#11

I think the Canadian flag flying upside down is similar to an inverted American flag -- a sign of distress.

And given that it's flying with the Phelpses, I'm sure the flag itself is distressed.

Posted by: Jeff Fecke | June 23, 2007 2:08 PM

#12

One irony is that the agents of the god of the universe must resort to borrowing the musical creativity of the secular world, rather that coming up with something catchy of their own.

Posted by: Nathan Parker | June 23, 2007 2:10 PM

#13

I hope the copyright holder of the music sues them for infringement.

Posted by: Paul Hutchinson | June 23, 2007 2:12 PM

#14

Ah yes, the Phelpsians. Could someone please explain to me what these weirdos actually believe in? I looked at their website, but it's all hysterical ranting. I can't actually figure out what their system is.

Posted by: Mike Eagles | June 23, 2007 2:18 PM

#15

Notice the director, "Alan Smithee" is a pseudonym directors use when they're ashamed of the final product. They should be ashamed.

Posted by: Stephen | June 23, 2007 2:18 PM

#16

OK. Stop. Just make it stop. This has to be one of the most disturbing things I have ever seen. I was so upset by this that I followed the link hoping it was a parody of the 'God hates fags' crowd, put together by some clever skeptics to demonstrate the vicious insanity of the former's belief system.

Nope. This is that very crowd, doing what they do, and having a great time doing it. I did hear a giggle near the end, but judging by the unison sound, this was reasonably well-rehearsed as well. They were reveling in it.

I can't convey how much this upsets me.

Posted by: Scott Hatfield, OM | June 23, 2007 2:18 PM

#17

Interesting, I just found out Shirley Phelps has an "illegitimate" son. If I'm not mistaken, by Calvinist standards, she's doomed to hell. (Though she claims otherwise, of course.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8lDxCRHQD4

Posted by: GodlessHeathen | June 23, 2007 2:20 PM

#18

Sorry, but isn't this just an exercise in irony? I thought it was hilarious.

Bob

Posted by: Bob O'H | June 23, 2007 2:20 PM

#19

This is disturbing. But, as I say, anyone who says I am going to hell, will go to hell as well.

Posted by: Corey Schlueter | June 23, 2007 2:22 PM

#20

>>points for honesty

Posted by: cureholder | June 23, 2007 2:23 PM

#21
Ah yes, the Phelpsians. Could someone please explain to me what these weirdos actually believe in? I looked at their website, but it's all hysterical ranting. I can't actually figure out what their system is.

They believe in the Bible. All of this stuff is in there. They aren't making any of this up, except maybe the 'eat your children' part. I don't remember that particular bit of bat shittery, but it would fit in quite well with the rest of it.

Posted by: Tex | June 23, 2007 2:24 PM

#22

>>points for honesty

Posted by: c | June 23, 2007 2:25 PM

#23

That was touching. They finally have me convinced! Oh, but "It's too late to change his mind." Guess I'll just go eat my kids, after all.

Posted by: mommyrex | June 23, 2007 2:28 PM

#24

Third try: Keeps cutting off!

>>points for honesty

?!?!

If a child molester honestly believes that it is right to molest children, do we give him/her "points for honesty?" No, we condemn the belief as incompatible with a civil society and lock the molester away so s/he can't get at more kids. Here, we say, "Whatever you want to teach your children is fine as long as you believe it, even if it involves teaching hate against others based on stupid books of myths."

Child abuse? Absolutely. There's a line in the bible (psalm 137) blessing the people who would take the hebrews' children by the ankles and dash their heads against rocks (so they wouldn't have to suffer the indignity of growing up under an oppressive people who weren't god's chosen).

I think the same way about these kids. For most of them, an early death would be an escape from the torture they will face as they grow up. (I am absolutely NOT suggesting they should be killed!) According to Dawkins, statistically, very few of them will actually be able to escape.

I intend to help as many of them as I can get in touch with. I've been where they are.

Posted by: cureholder | June 23, 2007 2:29 PM

#25

The irony of them calling everyone else "hateful people" is pretty rich.

As I understand it, the Phelpsians actually get off on being hated, as it helps bind them together as a group (perhaps by ensuring potential apostates see no kindness from the outside world). So I'm somewhat ambivalent about ragging on them, as it feels a little like I'm becoming a participant in their whole sick sadomasochistic deal.

Posted by: Obstreperous B | June 23, 2007 2:31 PM

#26

I turned off the song after less then a minute. Nothing new here to see and why watch such poisoned and twisted people. But I did watch the little girl. She has no idea what she is saying. And the smile at the end when she is done because she made her parents happy. Sad.

Child abuse, hell yes. Just think of all the adults that are part of the choir, one has to think they were also like the little girl. It is much easier to hate them because they had the change to try to rethink think their believes and chose not to. But at some point, they were like that little girl.

As for why they did a parody of a secular song? Being creative is not a goal for these people. Cowering under the sight of an angry Big Sky Daddy is the only way to life. Being creative gets in the way of this. Also, being creative might lead to the idea the there is pleasure to be had in using your own intelligence which leads one away from living in fear at all times.

Just feel grateful the people like this are a minority of humanity. If they were more plentiful throughout history and prehistory, we would still be cowering in caves.

Posted by: Janine | June 23, 2007 2:34 PM

#27

Obstreperous B has a valid point, yelling back at them feeds into their martyr complex. At Dyke Marches and Pride Parades I have been in in the past, I would smile and wave at these people. They want to have an angry exchange. I will not play into it as much as I despise these people.

But we need to be aware of these types of people and why they are such a menace. That is not hate. That is being aware of your surroundings.

Posted by: Janine | June 23, 2007 2:39 PM

#28

Just more proof that Christian music sucks.

Posted by: Bruce` | June 23, 2007 2:41 PM

#29

Wow, these people just read my mind. They sang "you will all stand together and fall," just as I was looking into their eyes and thinking exactly the same thing. After all, that is precisely what they were doing, standing together in front of that cliche microphone and falling for all the worst parts of the Bible. "Change is coming," they sing. Indeed, I think, but far from the change they seem to imagine. If only they didn't ascribe literal meaning to all the shit coming out of their mouths, I might actually agree with it. What gets me is the sheer thickness of sedimentary rock that separates their fossilized interpretations of these ancient words from the only meaning the words seem to actually have (that being the exact opposite of what they seem to think). If God existed, She no doubt WOULD hate a world composed only of such hypnotized sheep.

Love makes the world go 'round, and self-hatred grinds it to a halt, as these people demonstrate with unmitigated clarity. And for the record, passing on such perverse language to the next generation is more than child-abuse. These kids are being sentenced to a life of confusion, delusion, and hallucination. The devil's family indeed. Shame on them all.

Posted by: Josh | June 23, 2007 2:43 PM

#30

Tex "except maybe the 'eat your children' part"
Ezekiel 5:10
"Therefore in your midst fathers will eat their children, and children will eat their fathers. I will inflict punishment on you and will scatter all your survivors to the winds"

Every good citizen who wants to help their religion-virus sickened bretheren need to pagemark this - they have an excellent search feature. Know your mind virus.
http://www.biblegateway.com/

For people supposedly full of hate, they look like they are having a ball. Even the toddler. I am not sure hey so much hate stuff as LOVE THE LIMELIGHT.

Posted by: Sailor | June 23, 2007 2:45 PM

#31

Their god can go fuck himself. And so can they (toddler excepted), as far as it goes.

Posted by: Jessica Guilford | June 23, 2007 2:47 PM

#32

I image they're flying the Canadian flag upside down as a sign of distress or perhaps our inverted values. Gay marriage has been legal here all over the country for about three years and it distresses them that life hasn't dissolved into chaos yet. In fact, it's going along pretty much as usual. Possibly teenage suicides have dropped, as gay teens realize that yes, they can grow up, fall in love, and get married, just like everyone else. BTW, it's Pride Week in Toronto and the Mayor and local Members of Parliament will be riding in the Gay Pride parade. Church Street, which runs through the gay village, will be turned into a street fair.

Posted by: Monado | June 23, 2007 2:53 PM

#33

I like the part where they tell us to stop sinning, yet the whole song is about how it's already too late and we are going to hell...so uh...what is our motivation for stopping?

Posted by: DFX | June 23, 2007 3:00 PM

#34
Just to weird you all out, Phelps was a registered Democrat.

Ah. Well, it's America. Zell "Godzella" Miller is a registered Democrat, too.

Posted by: David Marjanović | June 23, 2007 3:01 PM

#35

Monado: www.godhatescanada.com :)

Anyway, I thought that we atheists were supposed to be the ones who were filled with hatred? That song seemed pretty vile to me.

Posted by: pie.rat | June 23, 2007 3:05 PM

#36

That's seriously disturbed s**t. Though the targets of their venom is really esoteric. Fallen US soldiers? Homosexuals? The Swedish monarchy? This is a Jim Jones/Heaven's Gate cult just waiting for their time.
I copy/pasted the video (not from your website, PZ) to USA for Africa. I think they hold the copyright for "You Are the World". While I am a fan of 'copyleft' open source, I asked that they would sue these assholes to oblivion for clear copyright violation.
Since they've been around for a while (Westboro Baptist Church), I'm only surprised that extreme violence hasn't been perpetrated by one or some of their members. All religions are cults, but these folks qualify for cult to the tenth.

Ken from Kent

Posted by: Ken Mareld | June 23, 2007 3:06 PM

#37

Okay, religion is wack, but these people are beyond wacky. It's a really tiny splinter cult if the sect members genuinely believe that "it's too late to change his mind". They don't accept deathbed conversions? The milk of human kindness sure has curdled in these "Christians". That New Testament forgiveness stuff was just kidding, I guess. Are any of them worried that they missed the repentance deadline? (Haven't they thought about the warning not to "judge lest ye be judged"? I think it's a sin of pride!)

Posted by: Zeno | June 23, 2007 3:06 PM

#38

Let's not forget that many of the early colonists in America were these people's Puritan predecessors. They burnt witches at the stake and saw evil in everything. They would have been right at home singing these lyrics.

Am I wrong?

Posted by: RamblinDude | June 23, 2007 3:11 PM

#39
You'll eat your kids?

I can kind of see the twisted logic of all the rest, but wtf? where the heck did they come up with that?

Where do you think? Leviticus 26:29, Deuteronomy 28:53, Jeremiah 19:9 and Ezekiel 5:10.

Posted by: Anton Mates | June 23, 2007 3:14 PM

#40

If it's too late, then let's party!

My prediction for these folks is that someday, we'll see them on the evening news, holed up in their church and shooting it out with the police. The kind of power and influence that Phelps has over these people has only one outcome.

Posted by: Paul t. | June 23, 2007 3:17 PM

#41

I don't know what's worse: the bigotry, or the fact that I'm going to have this song stuck in my head all day. I'll have to crank up some Highway to Hell I guess.

Posted by: Justin Wagner | June 23, 2007 3:18 PM

#42

You should also know that Fred Phelps was physically abusive to his kids. Often beating the boys severely for minor infractions. I had read a documentary about it at one point. That's why several of Fred Phelps kids (Shirley's brothers) won't talk to him anymore. Fred Phelps demonizes these kids as apostate God haters. I think that's really the heart of the matter when it comes to the Phelps - Fred Phelps feeds on hatred. I think some of his kids (like Shirley) came to the belief that Fred Phelps beatings were just even though they were severe - because thats the way her mind dealt with the experience as a child, which is similar to the excuses a woman might use to legitimize beatings from her abusive husband. Once she legitimized her dad's severe beating for minor errors, once she believed severe beatings were "right", it was only natural to believe God would use severe beatings, too (why wouldn't God do what was "right"?) - and that's exactly the kind of God Fred Phelps taught to his children. He taught them that God's personality is very similar to Fred Phelps' personality: abusive, violent, short-tempered.

Posted by: tinyfrog | June 23, 2007 3:28 PM

#43

Absolutely appalling behavior.

Think about it. They carefully rehearsed that sick song of hatred, then broadcast it for all the world to see.

They had plenty of time to reflect on the nasty lyrics, plenty of opportunity to consider how utterly mean-spirited they were being, and yet they went forward.

Fucking, fucking sick.

Posted by: CalGeorge | June 23, 2007 3:29 PM

#44

Working with little kids, I can only imagine the hours they spent with that girl ramming in the lines so she can sing it from the top of her head.

The other day my almost 3yo daughter ask me what people actually do in a church. Thinking up with a concept to explain it seemed almost laughable. (I answered "singing and telling stories".)

Posted by: Niobe | June 23, 2007 3:30 PM

#45

It's interesting (but hardly surprising) that all these radical religious/ideological dimbulbs are so uncreative when it comes to things like this. Obviously it's meant to be sort of a joke, playing off "We Are The World," but not only is it pathetically unfunny (I'm sure they cracked THEMSELVES up) but by the end you can tell they sort of mean it, too, and can't tell where joke ends and the half-assed bigoteds Hallmark-greeting card sentimentality begins (awww, a little girl!)

Posted by: Mike Eagles | June 23, 2007 3:35 PM

#46

Well, as a devout agnostic, I certainly belong to their targeted group, but they seem to picture everyone running around with a tube of KY in one hand and some Ready-whip in the other, whose kids are slathered in BBQ sauce and turning slowly over the fire. They would be shocked - shocked, I say - at my quotidian life... And now I have to get back to my filthy, disgusting physics book.

Posted by: carey | June 23, 2007 3:36 PM

#47

ramblindude
Don't get too down on the Puritan Fathers, back home they were burning witches and heretics too. The proto US didn't have a monopoly on religious bigotry its just that they had very much more freedom to cultivate and spread it. Freedom means the crazies get to be free too, or else it is tyranny by the sane.

Posted by: Peter Ashby | June 23, 2007 3:36 PM

#48

These people are obviously very caught up in the revenge fantasy aspect of Christianity -- where everybody who disagrees with them and looks down on them will pay a heavy price someday. They're practically writhing in hate, as if it's a snake slithering around in their intestines. And their religion justifies it all.

They're an extreme example, but I think the revenge fantasy aspect of Christianity is a big part of its broad appeal. These people, because they are more hateful and childish than most, are highlighting something that is lurking in even the most moderate of Christian hearts.

Posted by: Max Udargo | June 23, 2007 3:38 PM

#49

By the way, I don't think we ever burned any witches on this side of the Atlantic. We lynched and crushed a few, but I think all the literal burnings at the stake took place in Europe and thereabouts. Burning at the stake was more of a Catholic thing, wasn't it?

Posted by: Max Udargo | June 23, 2007 3:41 PM

#50

This sort of religiously motivated hatred always makes me wonder what these people think of John 3:16 -- "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." This is of course the verse touted by the Gideons as the most translated passage in the history of humankind; one would think that people that claim to take the Bible literally would take this well-known and very unambiguous passage under consideration.

Come to think of it, though, that passage also pretty well undermines Calvinism as well, does it not? I just cannot understand how these people think. Cynical, snarky comments aside here, this one is just so obvious that I really do wonder.

Posted by: Opisthokont | June 23, 2007 3:55 PM

#51
Let's not forget that many of the early colonists in America were these people's Puritan predecessors. They burnt witches at the stake and saw evil in everything. They would have been right at home singing these lyrics.

Am I wrong?

Yes. There were hangings, and one pressing with stones, but no burning at the stake.

Posted by: Caledonian | June 23, 2007 4:01 PM

#52

Peter Ashby and others: Okay, good point, no actual 'burning at the stake' of the evil ones.

One of these people's goals is to not be creative. They are purposely not singing well because that would be indulging in vanity, and giving into temptations of the flesh, or whatever.

It really puts things into perspective to see these brainwashed, spirit deadened fanatics chanting their extremist slogans. It makes one realize just how appallingly opposite to 'vital and alive' people can be.
I usually feel irritation and disgust for the 'subservient deluded', the lying religious crowd, but these people just make me feel sad. They are enslaved, and I would have to agree with those who have commented here that cults like these end in disaster.

Posted by: RamblinDude | June 23, 2007 4:11 PM

#53

It is hard to imagine what they expected to accomplish with this song. That is why I at first thought it was a parody.

It certainly is not aimed at converting anyone to give them some "hope".

It is too late and we are all doomed, so WTF?

Posted by: bernarda | June 23, 2007 4:14 PM

#54

HAH!!!! All you godless liberals must hate the US. We didn't burn any witches at Salem. What propaganda.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The Salem witch trials, begun in 1692 (also known as the Salem witch hunt and the Salem Witchcraft Episode), resulted in a number of convictions and executions for witchcraft in both Salem Village and Salem Town, Massachusetts. Some have argued it was the result of a period of factional infighting and Puritan witch hysteria. The trials resulted in the executions of 20 people (14 women, 6 men) and the imprisonment of between 175 and 200 people. In addition to those executed, at least five people died in prison. One man who refused to plead to the charges was pressed to death with rocks (the medieval torture of peine forte et dure, which, if fatal, did not result in forfeiture of property).

There you have it. Twenty were hung, 5 died in prison under what were probably Abu Gharaib conditions, and 1 was tortured to death, 26 total.

While this atrocity was unfortunate, it does have a lesson that the world routinely forgets. There are similar religious wingnuts roaming Iraq today butchering on a much wider scale with automatic rifles, explosives, and worse in the name of god.

Nothing changes too much. At least once a year, an accused witch somewhere is murdered by someone for something.

Posted by: raven | June 23, 2007 4:18 PM

#55

Raven: Ya, what you said!

Posted by: RamblinDude | June 23, 2007 4:20 PM

#56

raven, which wingnuts in Iraq are you talking about? We've got x number of Shiite militias, Z amount of Sunni militias, the entire Coalition of the Coerced, and then we've got the American crusaders, raping and pillaging for Jayzus and his proxy, Dubya.

So many to pick from...

Posted by: Stogoe | June 23, 2007 4:27 PM

#57

Oh.

My.

Fictional.

God.

Until the end, I was fairly certain this was a tasteless parody.
I would still wonder, had I not read the comments.

Best example of Poe's Law that I've seen.

Posted by: Faid | June 23, 2007 4:29 PM

#58

I can't help thinking that the Phelpsians are going to flame out one day.

1. Could be a Seung Cho style attack on a one of their targets, a medical clinic or bar or whatever their favorite demons are that day.

2. Could be a Waco style standoff with the cops. But I doubt it. The cops don't do Wacos anymore.

3. Or they could just Rapture themselves like the Heaven' Gaters or Jonestowners. I'm sure they would gather a lot of applause for that one.

Or maybe they will just fizzle out. If anyone but the head wingnut has a capacity for thought, the idea of a Heaven's Gate incident must be a little alarming. Last I heard, the UFO fans were still dead and the spaceship never did show up.

BTW, no one has to think too hard about these guys. Phelps is nuts and this is a very small, very nasty cult.

Posted by: raven | June 23, 2007 4:29 PM

#59

makes me wanna drink booze and watch pr0n

Posted by: me | June 23, 2007 4:30 PM

#60

Okay, Phelps theology 101.

1) World has ignored God.
2) All sexual sin is equivalent to homosexuality.
3) Anybody who doesn't believe this, is a "fag enabler".
4) Because the US approves of homosexuality God hate everyone.
5) God shows this hate via wars, deaths, AIDS, etc.

When they called other people hateful, they mean to say that they hate God. And they have incurred God's hate onto America. They are thankful for God's justice and his wrath. Ergo, thank God for AIDS. Thank God for IEDs... etc. They believe we are equivalent to a modern day Sodom and Gomorrah and thusly bad things will start to happen as we are consumed by God's hate. They are non-violent and typically just spread this message of hate (God's hate) as a warning to others... who are probably already doomed.

It's a bit off the beaten path, but it seems about as solid as other Biblical interpretations. I daresay their only mistake is assuming the Bible has any authority at all.

And yes, it was those backwards Europeans who burned their witches. Hah. The Church doctrines read clearly that "the church abhors bloodshed" -- so they burnt them. Loopholes have nothing on nooses. We much more sophisticated Americans prefer to murder innocent people with a short drop and sudden stop.

Posted by: Tatarize | June 23, 2007 4:42 PM

#61

I forgot to add:

They're an extreme example, but I think the revenge fantasy aspect of Christianity is a big part of its broad appeal. These people, because they are more hateful and childish than most, are highlighting something that is lurking in even the most moderate of Christian hearts.


Posted by: Max Udargo | June 23, 2007 03:38 PM

Succinctly put.

it's easy to see these people as extremists, but if you extrapolate the core beliefs and motivations of much of the religious right, (and fanatical beliefs all around the world), and follow them through to their logical conclusions, this is what you get--utter perversity.

Posted by: RamblinDude | June 23, 2007 4:44 PM

#62

Anyone else catch the subtle misogyny too?

I did, but not the same one you saw.

In a normal group of women, even from the same family, even if they're all broke and even if they're all what the fashion mags call "low-maintenance," you'll see a range of choices about clothes, makeup, hair, etc. Even girls in school uniforms will fiddle with accessories and hair styles.

Occasionally, you do find women (and men too) whose choice in these matters is: I am genuinely indifferent to my appearance. But they aren't common (aside from mental patients); even women who (not unreasonably) believe the whole subject to be crass usually make an effort about it--if they're able--in some regard or another (for example, they take care of their skin, or they have some earrings they like, or they have some outfit they wear to job interviews and such).

Yet here are about a dozen women who are, to a one, face-naked, wearing what appear to be clothes from the Goodwill, and with hair in styles that could charitably be described as utilitarian. Zero effort has been made to make themselves look anything but dowdy, old, sexless and poor. Even the knowledge that, they were making a vid that would put them on display to people all over the planet wasn't enough to get any of them to throw on some lipstick.

Conclusion: These women weren't given those choices. It's probably what passes among the Phelpses as "proud sinning."

Note that a common pattern in controlling women's sexuality anywhere (not just among the Phelpses) is making them feel like crap for looking attractive--especially if they put any money or effort into it. You can imagine what kind of head trips they laid on these women (and will lay on that little girl at the end of the video) to get them to look like that.

Posted by: Molly, NYC | June 23, 2007 4:47 PM

#63

Usually I'm opposed to living in denial. Yet I think I was much better off not believing these vile, vile, hateful, evil, people could really exist.

Yes, I knew there was a lunatic fringe interupting miners' and soldiers' funerals with violent protests in the bizzare reasoning that the miners and soldiers were killed by God for America's tolerance of homosexuality. But I guess I liked to believe... I dunno, they were just assholes.

Gad, for the first 30 seconds or so I thought this was satire. I mean c'mon. Nobody can possibly believe God hates the world, right? I mean a cynic can posit God is an asshole but that's hyperbole as such is usually an athiest, and an asshole can believe God hates his (the asshole's) enemies and all the people who disagree with him. But even the most narrow minded bible-thumping bigot believes God has a plan for the world and loves his followers, right? God hates the world? Sheesh! Guess I was wrong.

This is the most vile and disturbing thing I've ever seen!

Posted by: woozy | June 23, 2007 4:53 PM

#64

Phew!

I'm glad they didn't actually show the kid being eaten.

Posted by: The Exterminator | June 23, 2007 4:55 PM

#65

I just plain didn't understand this video. Maybe its because I think like a normal person.

I'm reaching back to my youth when I actually believed in God but isn't there something like "For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son." in the bible? Correct me if I've got it wrong.

Posted by: JrShaBaDu | June 23, 2007 5:05 PM

#66

Having seen a Louis Theroux documentary on these loons the thing that I noticed most was that it was mainly a way for the older members of the group to control their children.

The attitude was that the children, even those who were now in their 20s, were not allowed to have relationships etc because they had to devote all their time to Gawd but it was ok for the adults when it was their turn. Obviously this is dressed up as "the end of the world is nigh" therefore time is short.

Phelps was unsurprisingly a complete &$%£. When asked how many children he had claimed it was a stupid question. Whereas, considering several of his children are outcasts from the group, it would be interesting to hear his reply.

I have no idea if this programme was shown in the US, a clip can be found here

Posted by: badchemist | June 23, 2007 5:05 PM

#67

#61

Yet here are about a dozen women who are, to a one, face-naked, wearing what appear to be clothes from the Goodwill, and with hair in styles that could charitably be described as utilitarian.

Except the one wearing the pink "God Hates Fags" T-shirt.

HAH! There's an ad on this comment page from Dow Chemicals right now. It says "See the world through the eyes of the Human Element". Well, if the this video was an example of the Human Element I'd rather not.

====
Somewhere above someone wrote:

They're an extreme example, but I think the revenge fantasy aspect of Christianity is a big part of its broad appeal. These people, because they are more hateful and childish than most, are highlighting something that is lurking in even the most moderate of Christian hearts.

I hate being a religious apologist, but no, I just can't accept that. These folks are just evil.

Posted by: woozy (blinders! see the world through the woozy element) | June 23, 2007 5:05 PM

#68

Was just looking through their many godhates... websites and discovered this open letter to the UK (written because of a recent BBC documentary), looks like there will be a godhatesbritain very soon. They've even rewritten God Save the Queen to God Hate the Queen, so they will rewrite anything!

Posted by: Amy | June 23, 2007 5:10 PM

#69

#64


I'm reaching back to my youth when I actually believed in God but isn't there something like "For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son." in the bible? Correct me if I've got it wrong.

I always thought that line was kind of obnoxious. A little bit like a harried mother spanking her kid and then admonishing the kid with "look what you made me do".

And I always thought it was flawed in that he only had his only son for the purpose of giving it up. That's a bit like raising chickens for meat and then claiming you are making personal sacrifices in giving up your pets.

But, yes, there is the line. I always figured even the most hateful and nasty and fire and brimstone people had a belief that God has some plan and hope for the world. To actually think God hates the world is ... well, this may sound kind of hypocritical on this particular website but to actually think God hates the world is just sick.

Posted by: woozy | June 23, 2007 5:14 PM

#70
"They're an extreme example, but I think the revenge fantasy aspect of Christianity is a big part of its broad appeal. These people, because they are more hateful and childish than most, are highlighting something that is lurking in even the most moderate of Christian hearts."

I hate being a religious apologist, but no, I just can't accept that. These folks are just evil.


Posted by: woozy (blinders! see the world through the woozy element)

Sorry, but don't try to tell me that millions of good Christians in this country don't see atheists and other 'sinners' as the swarming mob outside of Noah's ark.

The churches are filled with people who cultivate submissiveness and feelings of superiority and condescension toward the unbelievers.

Posted by: RamblinDude | June 23, 2007 5:42 PM

#71
I'm reaching back to my youth when I actually believed in God but isn't there something like "For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son." in the bible? Correct me if I've got it wrong.

Phelp's theology is on par with his sanity, seriously nonexistent. Christ's message is far more benign than the wingnuts admit. He was the one who stopped the crowd from stoning an adultress to death, healing the sick, feeding the hungry, and so on.

He also says in no uncertain terms that judging people is the lords job and not for mortals. Phelps will be very lucky if god turns out to not exist. I don't think he would be too happy with Fred.

The god of the old testament seems to be almost totally disconnected from the god of the new testament. This has lead some to claim that god was just getting started when he created the world and he has been growing up ever since.

Posted by: raven | June 23, 2007 5:44 PM

#72

That is just plain sick. Wish we could isolate them and their disease.

Posted by: dieselrain | June 23, 2007 6:28 PM

#73

Oran Taran wrote:
#4 "You'll eat your kids?
I can kind of see the twisted logic of all the rest, but wtf? where the heck did they come up with that?"

Dear Oran, read and weep.

Leviticus 26:
[27] "And if in spite of this you will not hearken to me, but walk contrary to me,
[28] then I will walk contrary to you in fury, and chastise you myself sevenfold for your sins.
[29] You shall eat the flesh of your sons, and you shall eat the flesh of your daughters.
[30] And I will destroy your high places, and cut down your incense altars, and cast your dead bodies upon the dead bodies of your idols; and my soul will abhor you.

Deuteronomy 28:
[49] The LORD will bring a nation against you from afar, from the end of the earth, as swift as the eagle flies, a nation whose language you do not understand......
[52] They shall besiege you in all your towns, until your high and fortified walls, in which you trusted, come down throughout all your land; and they shall besiege you in all your towns throughout all your land, which the LORD your God has given you.
[53] And you shall eat the offspring of your own body, the flesh of your sons and daughters, whom the LORD your God has given you, in the siege and in the distress with which your enemies shall distress you.
[54] The man who is the most tender and delicately bred among you will grudge food to his brother, to the wife of his bosom, and to the last of the children who remain to him;
[55] so that he will not give to any of them any of the flesh of his children whom he is eating, because he has nothing left him, in the siege and in the distress with which your enemy shall distress you in all your towns.
[56] The most tender and delicately bred woman among you, who would not venture to set the sole of her foot upon the ground because she is so delicate and tender, will grudge to the husband of her bosom, to her son and to her daughter,
[57] her afterbirth that comes out from between her feet and her children whom she bears, because she will eat them secretly, for want of all things, in the siege and in the distress with which your enemy shall distress you in your towns.

Jeremiah19:
[8] And I will make this city a horror, a thing to be hissed at; every one who passes by it will be horrified and will hiss because of all its disasters.
[9] And I will make them eat the flesh of their sons and their daughters, and every one shall eat the flesh of his neighbor in the siege and in the distress, with which their enemies and those who seek their life afflict them.'

Charming isn't it?

Posted by: DingoDave | June 23, 2007 6:35 PM

#74

Phelps will be very lucky if god turns out to not exist. I don't think he would be too happy with Fred.

Indeed. The Phelpses say God sends "fags" (which they seems to define rather broadly) to a literal burning Hell. They don't seem concerned about how God handles self-righteous twits who drive hundreds of miles to add to the misery of people who've just lost someone they love--and in God's name too.

Atheism would be an optimistic choice for these people.

Posted by: Molly, NYC | June 23, 2007 6:46 PM

#75

Hands down the scariest video I've ever seen.
These people live among us. Think about that.

Posted by: Brian Feathers | June 23, 2007 6:50 PM

#76

(IN his best Arthur Dent voice) jufulu said quite brightly, "Actually I quite liked it."..."Oh yes, I thought that some of the metaphysical imagery was particularly effective."
To tell the truth I enjoyed the whole thing, it wasn't until I started reading the comments that I realized who they were. I guess my mind was totally incapable of believing that they really meant it. Too, too strange.

Posted by: jufulu, FCD | June 23, 2007 6:54 PM

#77

That tops off a perfect day! And I thought twelve and a half hours of Hospice nursing was rough, nope, not even close. That filth just makes me want to vomit.

Posted by: Ann | June 23, 2007 6:57 PM

#78

Could this be part of what has them upset? It appears on many of their flyers:

America bombed our church with an IED made by fag
students at Washburn Univ. in Topeka. In His
retaliatory wrath, God is killing Americans with
Muslim IEDs: "Saying, Touch not mine anointed, and
do my prophets no harm." 1Chron. 16:22. "For it is
written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the
Lord." Rom. 1219. A Sovereign God says: "See now
that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I
kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal; neither is
there any that can deliver out of my hand." Dt. 32:39.

And just below that, this appears:

We've turned America
Over to fags;
They're coming home
In body bags.

Posted by: Ted Powell | June 23, 2007 7:00 PM

#79

Catchy tune.

Posted by: "Q" the Enchanter | June 23, 2007 7:09 PM

#80

It's funny. *slap* It's disturbing. *slap* It's funny. *slap* It's disturbing. *slap* It's funny and it's disturbing.

Posted by: Rob the Lurker FCD BMWCCA | June 23, 2007 7:21 PM

#81

>>He was the one who stopped the crowd from stoning an adultress to death...

That's actually a late 4th century addition to the Gospels. Most copies didn't include this story. Though, certainly still gets added to the canon.

I don't think the not Jesusy enough objections are valid. The argument breaks down to, the Phelps aren't cherry-picking the Bible to a large enough extent for the good things. Certainly they believe that "god so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son" -- However, that just makes the world's betrayal of God that much worse. And that's why God's hate is so strong now. The Jesus message gets cleaned up a lot, but nothing they do is really that far away. They see them selves as Lot's family standing in the sea of immorality in the modern day Sodom and Gomorrah.

I think calling them evil is overly extreme. They don't break any laws, and are very well protected by the first amendment. They non-violently protest utilizing their free speech to spread their religious message. Really, the only reason to conclude they are "evil" is because you disagree with the message. I actually think they are harmless.

However, Biblically, their interpretation isn't wrong. The only mistake they make is providing the Bible with undue respect (some). The more I look at their theology and what the Bible says... the more I think they are one of the most logical extrapolations of Biblical theology. Of course, that necessitates that they are completely bat-shit insane and advocate positions which no reasonable person could ever entertain even briefly.

The Phelps are Christian. Other, moral Christians, are only moral in spite of their Christianity.

Posted by: Tatarize | June 23, 2007 7:29 PM

#82

I don't know many christians who wouldn't claim they DON'T think that way, but presented with the issues side by side with some biblical quotes, they'd end up agreeing point by point. OK, 10 points for honesty... zero points for smarts.

Posted by: dorid | June 23, 2007 7:34 PM

#83

...We LOL'd.

Are these people really for real?
Also, what's the original song they ripped off? I know I've heard it before somewhere.

Posted by: octopod | June 23, 2007 7:38 PM

#84

Behold the face of mass insanity.

How many examples this bleak must exist in (probably well-fortified) cubby holes in North America (let alone around the world) that haven't exposed themselves in a video?

I