Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
…and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• facebook
• MySpace
• Twitter
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
All of us, indeed, who have ever come to close quarters with theologians must have left them with an elated feeling that our sort of decency is a great deal better than theirs. For they are not, as a class, fair men, nor is there any honesty in them. To find their match in secular life recourse must be had, not to philosophers, but to politicians.
HL Mencken
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« Everyone is so mean and picking on me! | Main | Good ol' Christian tolerance »
Category: Evolution
Posted on: July 13, 2007 1:00 AM, by PZ Myers
(hat tip to Branch of the NCSE)
(TrackBack URL for this entry: )
YES! Send me a free issue of Seed.
If I like what I see, I'll receive 5 more issues (6 in all) for just $14.95. That's 50% off the cover price! If I'm not completely satisfied, I'll simply write "cancel" on the invoice and owe nothing. The free issue is mine to keep.
(Non-U.S. subscribers, click here.)
Comments
I like this quote from Francis:
" I should perhaps emphasis this point, since it is good manners to pretend the opposite. I do not respect Christian beliefs. I think they are ridiculous."
Posted by: Seppo | July 13, 2007 4:01 AM
Great find.
Posted by: Mick | July 13, 2007 4:05 AM
Love the sentiment. However, is it definitely real? Crick was an Englishman who worked in England, so why is the date written in the American format? Was he living in the US at the time maybe?
Posted by: evopsycho | July 13, 2007 6:56 AM
From 1977, Crick worked at the Salk Institute in California, long enough for him to have fallen into the American dating style.
Posted by: Toby | July 13, 2007 7:25 AM
Ah, that would explain it.
Posted by: evopsych | July 13, 2007 8:18 AM
Interesting paper on Crick's hypothesis of
Directed Panspermia:
http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/SC/B/C/C/P/_/scbccp.pdf
Posted by: philos | July 13, 2007 12:39 PM
Moran has his knickers in a twist about it, though, on the grounds that this is true only if you're talking about molecular phylogeny and he believes Crick wasn't thinking of that,and "therefore" it was a stupid comment and Crick was barmy by that time anyway. One of his commenters has set him straight, though, reminding us that Crick was a pioneer in predicting the usefulness of sequence data for phylogeny, though as he made his original proposal in the 50s he was taking about protein sequences back then (of course he was well aware of the use of DNA sequence comparisons in 1989!)
Posted by: Steve LaBonne | July 13, 2007 4:05 PM
Speaking of the value of DNA, remember that Tostidos commercial you mentioned where the dad says to his kid we have different DNA so we can survive and adapt? I just saw it again today, and now when the kid asks why? there's a pause before the dad just says "so we can adapt." The DNA reference is absent and the empty pause is in its place.
Posted by: Nevyn | July 13, 2007 11:53 PM