
Manuscript note by Francis Crick: "I think the most significant aspect of DNA is the support it gives to evolution by natural selection." Note written on the back of a letter from D J E Stamp. 13 June 1989.
(hat tip to Branch of the NCSE)
Now on ScienceBlogs: Twitter: as in actual science jargon (something to do with marmosets and shrews)
Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal

PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
…and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• facebook
• MySpace
• Twitter
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
• Quick link to the latest endless thread
We
[Catholics] are also under an obligation to keep secrets faithfully. And sometimes the easiest way to fulfill that duty is to say what is false, or to tell a lie.
[Catholic Encyclical X, 195]
« Everyone is so mean and picking on me! | Main | Good ol' Christian tolerance »
Category: Evolution
Posted on: July 13, 2007 1:00 AM, by PZ Myers

(hat tip to Branch of the NCSE)
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/45475
Sign in or register with TypePad. Sign up with Movable Type.
Comments
Posted by: Seppo | July 13, 2007 4:01 AM
I like this quote from Francis:
" I should perhaps emphasis this point, since it is good manners to pretend the opposite. I do not respect Christian beliefs. I think they are ridiculous."
Posted by: Mick | July 13, 2007 4:05 AM
Great find.
Posted by: evopsycho | July 13, 2007 6:56 AM
Love the sentiment. However, is it definitely real? Crick was an Englishman who worked in England, so why is the date written in the American format? Was he living in the US at the time maybe?
Posted by: Toby | July 13, 2007 7:25 AM
From 1977, Crick worked at the Salk Institute in California, long enough for him to have fallen into the American dating style.
Posted by: evopsych | July 13, 2007 8:18 AM
Ah, that would explain it.
Posted by: philos | July 13, 2007 12:39 PM
Interesting paper on Crick's hypothesis of
Directed Panspermia:
http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/SC/B/C/C/P/_/scbccp.pdf
Posted by: Steve LaBonne | July 13, 2007 4:05 PM
Moran has his knickers in a twist about it, though, on the grounds that this is true only if you're talking about molecular phylogeny and he believes Crick wasn't thinking of that,and "therefore" it was a stupid comment and Crick was barmy by that time anyway. One of his commenters has set him straight, though, reminding us that Crick was a pioneer in predicting the usefulness of sequence data for phylogeny, though as he made his original proposal in the 50s he was taking about protein sequences back then (of course he was well aware of the use of DNA sequence comparisons in 1989!)
Posted by: Nevyn | July 13, 2007 11:53 PM
Speaking of the value of DNA, remember that Tostidos commercial you mentioned where the dad says to his kid we have different DNA so we can survive and adapt? I just saw it again today, and now when the kid asks why? there's a pause before the dad just says "so we can adapt." The DNA reference is absent and the empty pause is in its place.