Now on ScienceBlogs: The Laboratory at Harvard

Seed Media Group

Pharyngula

Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)

• Quick link to the latest endless thread




I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

tbbadge.gif
scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

About 200 B.C. mystery cults began to appear in Rome just as they had earlier in Greece. Most notable was the Cybele cult centered on Vatican hill … Associated with the Cybele cult was that of her lover, Attis (the older Tammuz, Osiris, Dionysus, or Orpheus under a new name). He was a god of ever-reviving vegetation. Born of a virgin, he died and was reborn annually. The festival began as a day of blood on Black Friday and culminated after three days in a day of rejoicing over the resurrection.

[Gerald L. Berry, "Religions of the World"]

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« Noooo...get out of my head! | Main | Uh-oh. Quick, act nonchalant — the kids are catching on »

The Church of Illuminated Astronomy

Category: HumorWeirdness
Posted on: July 15, 2007 3:27 PM, by PZ Myers

I never did trust those astronomers. Now I learn that they have been conspiring to keep us stupid.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/45673

Comments

#1

Posted by: Phil Plait, aka The Bad Astronomer | July 15, 2007 3:40 PM

'bout time you figured that out.

Kneel before us! Bwahahahahahahaha!

#2

Posted by: Christian Burnham | July 15, 2007 3:51 PM

Actually funny.

Also- Fair and Balanced.

#3

Posted by: The Physicist | July 15, 2007 5:17 PM

That was childishly stupid, PZ Surely you can do better than that.

#4

Posted by: CortxVortx | July 15, 2007 10:12 PM

Uh, oh, The Phys is back. Must've used up his meds.

-- CV

#5

Posted by: Gib | July 16, 2007 5:07 AM

A question I've been wondering for a while, I thought I'd hijack a thread that has few comments... (I had it ready in response to a thread last Friday, but forgot to click "post")

How many humans started the human race ? What I mean is, consider the population of just-modern-human creatures at the time we consider modern humans to have evolved. How many of them were there ? I assume if we then consider what subset of those are the ancestors of every currently living human, that subset would pretty much be the same as the whole set (if we subtract the virgins) ?

In other words, Creationists say we started with 2 people, Adam and Eve. How many people did we really "start" with ?

#6

Posted by: David Robison | July 16, 2007 5:38 AM

Hysterical!

Thanks for the link!

#7

Posted by: Brian W. | July 16, 2007 6:56 AM

Hm, if you like this guy you may also like Jihad Jerry (AKA Jerry Casales, bassist of Devo)

http://www.mineisnotaholywar.com/video/video_manifesto.html

#8

Posted by: tony | July 17, 2007 7:42 PM

Gib-- you're question is based on the wrong postulates

For an example look at a river delta....

At some point in the 'evolution' of the delta you can say, with assurance, this water is all river. At some other point, (further out) you can say - again with assurance - this water is all ocean.

Now pick a point in between. Where does the ocean start and the river stop? You can't say? That's beacause a river to delta to ocean is *transitional*.

All of evolution is *transitional*.

It just looks 'static' to us, because we're seeing a 'snapshot' of evolution in action.

So to answer your question, somewhat --- there was no 'adam', there was no 'eve' there were just lots of proto-people... and before them proto-proto-people, and so on back to the eukaryotes

#9

Posted by: The Great White Peso | October 20, 2007 2:41 AM

The magniloquence of these psuedo-intellectuals is an abhorrent and infintecimally misappropriated.... haha if you catch the irony there you get a cookie... I have to say for a LOOOONNNG time I was an athiest, but here lately I have to say I have some doubts... but to believe in the bible is just re"cock"u-lous. Ive become a little agnostic seeing as we have these "astronomers" {when in actuallity theyre just fucking in-fucking-sane from the hundreds upon hundreds of years of inbreeding... and they have more money than god, which is the only reason that they know about it...oops back to the point} plotting and scheming against us, for so long and were still here, Im starting to believe in some sort of flying speghetti monster....
Science DAMN YOU, Bilderburg Group!!!

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





           Sign in or register with TypePad.            Sign up with Movable Type.

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Enter to win

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM