Now on ScienceBlogs: Dr. Rolando Arafiles: Antivaccine rhetoric, colloidal silver for the flu, and Morgellons disease

Enter to Win

Pharyngula

Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)

• Quick link to the latest endless thread




I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

tbbadge.gif
scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

Man always deceives himself when he abandons experience to follow imaginary systems. He is the work of Nature. He exists in Nature. He is submitted to her laws. He cannot deliver himself from them. He cannot step beyond them even in thought.

[Paul-Henri Thiry, Baron d'Holbach, "The System of Nature"]

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« Crap. Now the extremist Grecians are going to be mad at me | Main | Reading material »

Betrayed!

Category: Creationism
Posted on: September 3, 2007 10:58 AM, by PZ Myers

Oh, no! Now Tiny Frog is giving ammunition to the producers of Expelled by revealing The Stifling Dominance of Secular Academia! At least biologists aren't being picked on in this case — it's those biased secular theories of physics that are being blamed.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/49747

Comments

#1

Posted by: leo | September 3, 2007 11:20 AM

Intelligent Falling (IF) proposes that the scientific explanation of gravitational force cannot explain all aspects of the phenomenon, so credence should be given to the idea that things fall because a higher intelligence is moving them. Furthermore, IF asserts that theories explaining gravity are not internally consistent nor mathematically reconcilable with quantum mechanics, making gravity a "theory in crisis". Pretended IF apologists advocate that IF should be taught in school along with the theory of gravity so that students can make "an informed decision" on the subject in accordance with demands to "teach the controversy".

#2

Posted by: Marcus Ranum | September 3, 2007 11:41 AM

Uh, that's a parody, right?

If it's not - simply "re-frame" it as one!!

Ha, ha, ha, look at the funny blog entry! It sure sounds like a creationist dipmire! He did a great job of pretending to be a dumbstick, didn't he?

#3

Posted by: Firemancarl | September 3, 2007 12:44 PM

Thank our lord and savior Jesus Christ who art in heaven. I am glad someone else on here understands that it is DIVINE force that holds things up and prevents them from falling. For instance, I can't tell you how many times on the fireground I have walked next to a building that should collapse but I knew that God and Jesus kept the garvity off the wall to as to allow it to stay standing and not snuff me out. Yes, I know what you're thinking "Hey, gravity works, how many times to do see things fall up"?!! The answer is simple, the things that fall up God and Jesus don't allow you to see, just like angels, you don't see them and we know they are in Heaven and how would they get there if there really was "gravity"? They couldn't and you know it. It's Gods will.

the preceeding was all sarcasm.....

#4

Posted by: Dan | September 3, 2007 1:31 PM

So, it is now okay for me to say, "I'm not fat. God's just pressing extra hard on me."

#5

Posted by: uncle frogy | September 3, 2007 1:48 PM

I followed the link to tiny frog then followed this link to another fundie sight on why I am a geocentrist http://foru.ms/t2551753-why-i-am-a-geocentrist.html
EEEE Gads!
i am afraid to look for a flat earth sight!!

#6

Posted by: J Myers | September 3, 2007 2:20 PM

Yes, that's a parody. I know that because, in addition to being obvious, it says it's a parody a few paragraphs in. Was that a rhetorical question?

#7

Posted by: tourettist | September 3, 2007 3:59 PM

Slightly OT, but in case anybody's interested, the IMDb page for Expelled is now up. Who wants to be the first to ask a question for the FAQ? General users used to be able to edit information but I think they put an end to that. Pity. It would be fun to vandalize. Check out the filming locations - they don't mention Morris, MN.

#8

Posted by: Murkanen | September 3, 2007 6:32 PM

Intelligent Falling is a reference to an Onion article from some years back I believe. It's sad that we are in such a time and place that something originating in satire risks becoming reality.

#9

Posted by: Graculus | September 3, 2007 10:53 PM

It's sad that we are in such a time and place that something originating in satire risks becoming reality.

You mean like:

-"Bush: Our Long Nightmare of Peace and Prosperity is Finally Over" (Onion, June 2001)
-"Why Do All These Homosexuals Keep Sucking My Cock" (Onion, July 2005)

The Onion staff have orders of magnitude more positive hits than Sylvia Brown.

#10

Posted by: Julian | September 5, 2007 12:19 AM

Admittedly, Im not an expert on the subject, but if energy and matter can neither really be created, nor really be destroyed, then how can entropy be general? What I mean is, loss of energy is really only the transfer of energy from one place to another, otherwise the law of conservation of energy and mass is violated; the universe doesn't have a leak. So, if the universe is closed, then entropy cannot continue to dissipate to zero for the simple fact that the amount of space for energy to dissipate through is not infinite, and even if it were open, the energy will still be there, just spread incredibly thin. All life runs through the gathering of energy; in other words, life forms feed off of the entropy of some other object. Much of our technology is dedicated to the same goal; recycling another object's chaos into order for us. If we ever find a way to manipulate the fundamental forces of the universe, isn't it reasonable to assume we'd figure out how to gather up that dissipated energy? But then I guess you'd just be left with a 100% efficient energy scoop that spends all its time gathering up the energy its using, and thats not a very interesting universe at all.

#11

Posted by: Julian | September 5, 2007 12:21 AM

oops. I meant this for the reading material comments above this. And thus I am introduced to the dangers inherent in firefox's mutlitab function.

Leave a comment

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.