More Bell post-game analysis
Category: Communicating science
Posted on: September 29, 2007 12:00 PM, by PZ Myers
Chris Mooney has his summary post up, in which he predictably and incorrectly declares victory for the forces of empty rhetoric, and Greg Laden correctly declares victory for the puppies and small children, which, of course, was our side.
No word from Matt Nisbet yet. He's probably having a late breakfast of roast puppy, served by his army of child-slaves. (←framing.)







Comments
This deserves to become a new meta-rhetorical device! Just attach "←framing" to instances of over-the-top mudslinging. For example,
Posted by: Blake Stacey | September 29, 2007 12:15 PM
I resent the term 'cognitive miser'. Children today are merely 'cognitively penny-wise' and are carefully conserving their few moments of actual thought for important decisions in their old age.
Posted by: melior | September 29, 2007 12:38 PM
Throw in a victory for kittens, and I'm aboard.
LOLFramer: I iz in ur Mooney, b-ing penny-wise.
Blake, "meta-rhetorical" would be rhetorics on rhetorics, wouldn't it? Like framing framers by LOLFramers.
Posted by: Torbjörn Larsson, OM | September 29, 2007 2:49 PM
Where do I sign up for my own puppy-rôterie? And childslaves?
Heck, just point me in the direction of the puppy-kicking contest and I'm happy.
Posted by: Sili | September 29, 2007 2:51 PM
Bwa ha ha ha! Thanks for the great laugh after getting back from my long drive just now.
I'm working on my analysis of the event, photos, audio, etc. It was nice to meet each of the panelists for the first (or second) time, and too bad I didn't have the time to stay for the reception afterward! There will be more chances, we're all in this for the long haul.
Posted by: Inoculated Mind | September 29, 2007 3:19 PM
Nisbet has reported in. He doesn't say much.
Posted by: Rieux | September 29, 2007 7:04 PM
I love the smell of atheists bashing each other in the morning!
Posted by: Manul Goldsenwhower | September 30, 2007 9:07 AM