OTA reminder
Category: Politics
Posted on: September 17, 2007 8:41 AM, by PZ Myers
Remember, we're supposed to be pushing for the restoration of the Office of Technology Assessment. Have you written or phoned your senators and representatives yet?
Pharyngula
Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal
Search
Profile
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
…and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• facebook
• MySpace
• Twitter
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.
Random Quote
(Complete listing)Of course, the United States was not originally intended to be a Christian nation. Jefferson, Washington, Franklin and most of the founding fathers were skeptics or Deists; they specifically intended a secular government with an "unbreachable wall" between church and state; they even wrote into the treaty with the Moslem nation of Tripoli a clear statement that, unlike European countries, the "United States is not, in any sense, a Christian nation." (So clearly understood was the principle of separation of church and state in those days that the treaty passed Congress without any debate on that clause, and President John Adams signed it at once, without any fear that it might jeopardize his political future.)
Robert A. Wilson (Sex and Drugs, 1973)
Recent Posts
- The other conference I missed…
- Mary's Monday Metazoan: Big-eyed ball o' fluff!
- Gosh, I think I went to the wrong meeting
- A not-at-all-pointless poll
- One more from Lindau
- Customize your bible!
- One of us
- Everybody must say "Happy Birthday" to Patricia, OM!
- My inner German awakens!
- Charles Darwin vs. a giant squid
A Taste of Pharyngula
(Complete listing)The burden of bearing a massive penis
Modules and the promise of the evo-devo research program
Chance and regularity in the development of the fly eye
I think I despise anti-environmentalists as much as I do anti-evolutionists
Recent Comments
- Mike Haubrich, FCD on Gosh, I think I went to the wrong meeting
- Cosmic Teapot on Theistic evolutionist beats hasty retreat
- Kel on I was wondering about that
- Happy Tentacles on Gosh, I think I went to the wrong meeting
- Moggie on Gosh, I think I went to the wrong meeting
- Katrina on The other conference I missed…
- Richard Smith on Mary's Monday Metazoan: Big-eyed ball o' fluff!
- Cathy Sander on Christianity's sins against science
- b00ger on The other conference I missed…
- b00ger on The other conference I missed…
Archives
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
Blogroll
Other Information
« Both barrels | Main | I might regret this but…it's a combination Molly Award and Open Enrollment thread! »
Comments
Posted by: Caledonian | September 17, 2007 8:53 AM
How exactly do you imagine you'll get it reinstated?
For that matter, how exactly do you imagine you'll keep it from being a puppet of whatever Administration is in charge? It's not worth anything if it isn't independent, rational, and unbiased.
Perhaps if you demand loudly and frequently enough, reality will set itself aside and give you what you want?
Posted by: fnord prefect | September 17, 2007 9:17 AM
Cal,
So nothing not guaranteed of success is worth doing? Yeah, if a senator/rep is dead against something, no amount of nudging will change it. But lets face it, they are (and not necessarily a bad thing) all vote-whores. If they see they stand to gain more by voting for it than against they may just go ahead and do the right thing.
Posted by: Phoenix Woman | September 17, 2007 9:23 AM
Thanks for the nudge, PZ.
Posted by: Caledonian | September 17, 2007 9:25 AM
The point isn't that some people may do the right thing. The challenge of government is to create a system where the ability of the irrational and malicious to damage society is minimized while fulfilling the basic responsibilities of the government.
We have a very limited ability to demand change in our government, and virtually no ability to demand productive and responsible change.
Posted by: Mike P | September 17, 2007 9:43 AM
I live in DC. I have no senators or representatives :(
Posted by: No One of Consequence | September 17, 2007 12:35 PM
Okay, I did it.
FYI, I have the links for the online forms to contact your Senators/Representatives here.
Posted by: MarkH | September 17, 2007 1:37 PM
Ok Caledonian. You're right. Nothing ever changes. The world is broken. I'm just going to put a bullet in my brain right now.
Or maybe, this office managed to run as an independent and highly-regarded body for 30 years. Maybe the evidence is that this office can work, and actually trying to change the world for the better is something worthwhile and possible.
Posted by: Kagehi | September 17, 2007 4:13 PM
Yeah. Hate to be a cynic, but one can't help but think, given the trend of Bush and the like to already undermine everything they look at, that it might not one day become the, "Office of Theological Assessment", even if we did reinstate it. What is needed is some way to keep people's grubby hands off of such a branch of the government *first*, then you establish one, once its sufficiently protected. Whether or not that also means laws requiring that they be listened to, and not budget cutted to the point where they only have some guy in the basement dusting filing cabinets, is another matter as well.
Posted by: AnthonyH | September 17, 2007 7:24 PM
Caledonian (#1) wrote: "...how exactly do you imagine you'll keep it from being a puppet of whatever Administration is in charge?"
Uh, the OTA was a congressional agency, not an executive branch agency. This means that "the administration" (the President) had absolutely nothing to do with it.
The Wikipedia article clearly states: "It was governed by a twelve-member board, comprising six members of Congress from each party." That was the mechanism for ensuring that the OTA was not "the puppet" of whichever party had a majority of seats in the congress.
Your statement is rather of the same order of understanding as saying "pi equals three."
Posted by: Monado | September 17, 2007 9:01 PM
Otherwise you'll get things like this project mentioned at Ontario Geofish, where the government has already decided to put nuclear waste in an area of weak, fractured rock and there's no public study of the geology.
It seems to be called the Deep Geology Repository. "OPG" is Ontario Power Generation, formerly part of Ontario Hydro. The other two fragments are Hydro One and TSS. Nobody knows what any of them do.