Pharyngula

And then there were none

I mentioned last week that the Discovery Institute misrepresented the Minnesota state science standards, pretending that they endorsed “teaching the controversy”. Now Dave Thomas goes through the other 3 (or 4? The DI can’t count) states that the Discovery Institute slandered, and guess what? They don’t support creationism either.

Comments

  1. #1 David Marjanovi?, OM
    November 20, 2007

    *Tiptoes away from violating Godwin’s Law*

    You mean fulfilling it.

  2. #2 David Marjanovi?, OM
    November 20, 2007

    *Tiptoes away from violating Godwin’s Law*

    You mean fulfilling it.

  3. #3 Kristine
    November 20, 2007

    *winks at David Marjanovi?*

    But you know what I mean! How can something “about to collapse” be so “dangerous” and strong in its “weakness”? I can’t help it if it reminds me of another fearmongering ideology. Okay, I’ll think of a better metaphor. The John Birch Society is a good one.

The site is undergoing maintenance presently. Commenting has been disabled. Please check back later!