You've got almost a month to get it together: it's the second annual Carl Sagan memorial blog-a-thon. Write something in honor of Carl Sagan by sometime around 20 December. This event got a huge response last year — it ought to be possible to top it this time around.
Pharyngula
Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal
Search
Profile

PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
…and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• facebook
• MySpace
• Twitter
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
• Quick link to the latest endless thread
Random Quote
What has theology ever said that is of the smallest use to anybody? When has theology ever said anything that is demonstrably true and is not obvious? I have listened to theologians, read them, debated against them. I have never heard any of them ever say anything of the smallest use, anything that was not either platitudinously obvious or downright false. If all the achievements of scientists were wiped out tomorrow, there would be no doctors but witch doctors, no transport faster than horses, no computers, no printed books, no agriculture beyond subsistence peasant farming. If all the achievements of theologians were wiped out tomorrow, would anyone notice the smallest difference? Even the bad achievements of scientists, the bombs, and sonar-guided whaling vessels work! The achievements of theologians don't do anything, don't affect anything, don't mean anything. What makes anyone think that "theology" is a subject at all?
Richard Dawkins (Free Inquiry, Spring 1998 v18)
Recent Posts
- We're doomed. It's another sign of the apocalypse.
- A wonderful debate
- The world is ending, again
- Rudeness required
- Now I understand everything
- I get email
- Happy Carl Sagan Day!
- A poll in my own backyard
- A True Scotsman™ keeps his Bible in his sporran!
- Who does he think he is, Charles Dickens?
A Taste of Pharyngula
Recent Comments
- Ravenred on We're doomed. It's another sign of the apocalypse.
- Lion IRC on Now I understand everything
- Meathead on The world is ending, again
- llewelly on A wonderful debate
- Carolyn Ann on Ethical Humanist Society of Chicago: You're doing it wrong
- RamziD on We're doomed. It's another sign of the apocalypse.
- Trucker Doug on We're doomed. It's another sign of the apocalypse.
- Ken Cope on Rudeness required
- Ben S on The world is ending, again
- TonyC on A True Scotsman™ keeps his Bible in his sporran!
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
Blogroll
Other Information
« Road trip! | Main | So that's the purpose of Conservapædia… »
Sagan-a-thon
Category: Skepticism
Posted on: November 21, 2007 4:16 AM, by PZ Myers
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/56278
Sign in or register with TypePad. Sign up with Movable Type.









Comments
Posted by: The Flying Trilobite, fcd | November 21, 2007 6:19 AM
Carl Sagan was a giant. I'll be participating for sure. I wish everyone in high school had to read Pale Blue Dot.
Thanks for the advance notice, PZ! So kind of ya.
Posted by: Anon | November 21, 2007 8:42 AM
That's awfully close to Cephalopodmas.
I suppose that's why it's called "the holiday season"...
Posted by: Blake Stacey | November 21, 2007 10:07 AM
I didn't even have a blog during the first Sagan-a-thon (although I did manage to recycle the comments I left elsewhere into a blog post), so I'm glad this is becoming an annual affair.
Posted by: G | November 21, 2007 1:29 PM
Well, I'm at least trying to start writing more frequently, glad an opportunity came up.
Posted by: James | November 22, 2007 5:24 AM
Goldenshower--
Sagan is an ex-everything. He's very sadly dead.
I know you were probably going for the claim that since he's dead, he has "met his maker", and no doubt learned his lesson for being an atheist. You probably believe he's burning in hell or whatever.
I think it speaks volumes about the kind of person you are, and many like you, would condemn one of humanity's brightest and most compassionate and most human minds to an eternity of torture by your insane bronze-age monster of a god. Very likely, you don't know anything about Sagan, other than he's an "evil atheist". People like you have never read his works, and have never been moved to tears by his passionate, eloquent love for science, the universe, discovery, and a life very well-lived.
I know I have leapt to all sorts of unfounded conclusions from that one sentence, but whenever I've heard that sort of mealy-mouthed thoughtless drivel uttered, it was always with that sort of intent.
Carl Sagan is one of my greatest childhood heroes, and an inspiration for millions. I won't tolerate you denigrating him.
I probably over-reacted just now, and if you didn't mean any of that, I apologize. I would be interested in knowing what you really mean by that statement, however.
Posted by: Onias | November 22, 2007 1:06 PM
I personally doubt that Carl Sagan existed outside the minds of atheologians. Even if he did, there's not enough evidence to think he turned water into wine or walked on water.
Posted by: Joel Schlosberg | November 22, 2007 4:08 PM
Thanks for the plug, PZ! The traffic on my site went through the roof yesterday, mostly due to this post.
#2: it's also close to Humanlight.
#3: Well, every year, a huge amount of people start blogging, so that's just one reason to think there will be a lot of new people this year.