Now on ScienceBlogs: NIDA Launches Medical Curricular Resources on Substance Abuse and Dependence

Seed Media Group

Pharyngula

Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)

• Quick link to the latest endless thread




I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

tbbadge.gif
scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

But might not one suppose as some have supposed, that the feeling which is observed in animated bodies, might belong to a being distinct from the matter of these bodies, to a substance of a different nature united to them? Does the light of reason allow us in good faith to admit such conjectures? We know in bodies only matter, and we observe the faculty of feeling only in bodies: on what foundation then can we erect an ideal being, disowned by all our knowledge?

[Julien Offray de La Mettrie (1709-1751) "The Natural History of the Soul" (1742)]

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« Benazir Bhutto assassinated | Main | Somebody must have spiked the eggnog »

Progress on ScienceDebate2008

Category: Politics
Posted on: December 27, 2007 10:20 AM, by PZ Myers

Well, they've got one Republican and one Democratic congressman to agree to co-chair a presidential debate on science, which is good news. The framework for the debate is coming together…now all they need is some debaters.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/59699

Comments

#1

Posted by: Lucy | December 27, 2007 11:39 AM

This makes me so happy...thanks for the good news, needed it...especially after what happened in Pakistan

#2

Posted by: Chris Bell | December 27, 2007 11:51 AM

If you attend a university and you don't see your administration on the list of signatories - agitate.

#3

Posted by: Arnaud | December 27, 2007 11:56 AM

Le Monde had a mention of this a few days ago in a piece about the dominance of religion in the US political landscape.

A group of scientists, including several thousands researchers and more than a dozen nobel prizes, are asking for a TV debate on science, environment, medicine and technology. This organisation, ScienceDebate2008, ask for all candidates to participate in at least one public discussion on these subjects. Lawrence Krauss .../... declared having been convinced of the necessity of this debate after hearing Mike Huckabee, ex republican governor of Arkansas and a baptist minister, defending creationism against darwinism.

Some good statistical data towards the end of the article:

In the society at large, the religious phenomena seems declining. According to polls taken by the Pew Research Centre and published in March, 45% of US citizen still say that praying is an important part of their daily life, 10% less than seven years ago. Between 2003 and 2007 the percentage of people who affirm never doubting the existence of god has lost 8 percentage points (still high at 61%). Pew Center analysts say that the '90s tendency of augmentation in religiosity, has been reversed. The proportion of agnostic Americans still stay infinitesimal (12%) but is in augmentation among young people: nearly 20% of whom are without religious affiliation or atheists.

How much of that is due to outspoken "militant" atheists, I wonder, and how much thanks to framing...

#4

Posted by: danley | December 27, 2007 12:23 PM

Get Slimy Sal to chair. He's young republican, just like his cosmos.

#5

Posted by: rp | December 27, 2007 12:39 PM

Between 2003 and 2007 the percentage of people who affirm never doubting the existence of god has lost 8 percentage points (still high at 61%).
Never doubting??? I never believed. I used to try to believe, when I was like 10 and my mother made my father haul me to Sunday school (luckily, he used to come back to get me afterwards), but I always thought it was just fairy stories, or maybe the history of delusional people, but I never did believe.

#6

Posted by: Doug | December 27, 2007 12:49 PM

How much of that is due to outspoken "militant" atheists, I wonder, and how much thanks to framing...
My vote is education. That's how my spouse's and her siblings broke the chain. However, that's only the ones who have technical degrees. The non-technical siblings still believe in Jebus.
#7

Posted by: Helblindi | December 27, 2007 12:59 PM

I will be mightily impressed if scienceblogia (is that the current term?) actually manages to pull this off - a science debate would be a far better proof of the power of the net community in these elections than mushy YouTube recordings of candidates and their loving families. I wish we'd have something like that over here...

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





           Sign in or register with TypePad.            Sign up with Movable Type.

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM