Now on ScienceBlogs: Dr. Rolando Arafiles: Antivaccine rhetoric, colloidal silver for the flu, and Morgellons disease

Enter to Win

Pharyngula

Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)

• Quick link to the latest endless thread




I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

tbbadge.gif
scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

…I was suddenly inspired to describe the Judeo-Christian god as a penis which has been endowed with cosmic significance.

[Soledad de Montalvo]

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« Bill Maher tells it like it is | Main | The limited representation of movie atheists »

It ain't the presidential primary, that's for sure

Category: Weblogs
Posted on: January 6, 2008 1:18 AM, by PZ Myers

It's another meaningless internet award thingumabob—Pharyngula is up for Best Science Blog against my perennial nemesis, Bad Astronomy. It's also up for most controversial blog, against some rather ugly company. Vote or don't — I'm just marveling that I'm in the same category with Perez Hilton.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/60487

Comments

#1

Posted by: Phil Plait | January 6, 2008 1:29 AM

Personally I'd like to see one blog, one category, but hey, I think you're more controversial than scientific, so maybe we can work out a deal...

#2

Posted by: Janine | January 6, 2008 1:32 AM

And the first salvo is fired! Look out! It could get messy!
snicker

#3

Posted by: Zeno | January 6, 2008 1:37 AM

Well, I have noticed before that sometimes it's difficult to tell whether I'm reading Pharyngula or the Perez Hilton blog, but the others appear to have been picked at random.

#4

Posted by: Janine | January 6, 2008 1:38 AM

You know, I just realized, there is just not enough gossip about the actions and thoughts of Britney Spears and Paris Hilton at this site.

#5

Posted by: Chinchillazilla | January 6, 2008 1:48 AM

Maybe you should meet the public halfway and discuss how Britney Spears's self-destructive habits evolved.

#6

Posted by: Mister DNA | January 6, 2008 2:31 AM

Little Green Footballs is also one of the "Most Controversial" nominees. The only controversy about LGF is that there are actually people who think Charles Johnson should be taken seriously.

Anyway, congrats on the nominations... I guess. I'll bet you can even get the creationists to vote for you in this election.

#7

Posted by: Lorax | January 6, 2008 2:40 AM

Congrats on the nominations. I would push pharyngula into the "Most Controversial" category over the "Best Science" category. You spend too much time dealing with science issues that were resolved 100+ years ago (albeit with improvements since then). I, for one, applaud that you spend so much time dealing with it, because it needs to be dealt with aggressively. But that time detracts from time you could be spending promoting the "Best Science."

#8

Posted by: Ross Nixon | January 6, 2008 2:49 AM

Bother! No climateaudit.org this time. Someone slipped up then. I blame Michael Mann. ;-)

#9

Posted by: jfatz | January 6, 2008 4:05 AM

Teach the controversy!

#10

Posted by: wjv | January 6, 2008 6:26 AM

Telling it like it is now becomes "controversial"?

Honestly, I despair...

#11

Posted by: wildcardjack | January 6, 2008 6:45 AM

If it makes you feel any better, PZ, you look a lot more attractive than Perez Hilton.

#12

Posted by: Mike Haubrich, FCD | January 6, 2008 8:19 AM

Who nominates these things? It looks to me like the "performancing" site owner just throws a few of his favorite blogs into the hopper to get people to come to his site for a voting contest and knows that Phil and PZ can drive up his traffic. Did anyone else notice that the other blogs in the "Science" category are gizmo shilling sites?

To me it looks like a way to fatten his Adsense account if nothing else, or else he gets pay-per-click from the product review sites.

Neat trick, and not a bad idea.

Watch for the "Tangled Up in Blue Awards" as soon as I add a few more widgets into my content style sheet. I promise to include some annoying Lowermybills.com dancers, too.

#13

Posted by: Hank Fox | January 6, 2008 9:53 AM

You know your civilization is seriously fucked up when an aversion to lies becomes controversial.

#14

Posted by: Hillary Rettig / The Lifelong Activist | January 6, 2008 10:26 AM

You vs. Perez?! Now that's going to be a tough election-year choice...

I remember how Carl Sagan used to get criticized for popularizing science "too much" - going on Johnny Carson, etc. - very snobby criticism I thought. Seriously, this is a good thing - maybe some Perez readers will stumble on Pharyngula and be a bit enlightened.

Hillary

#15

Posted by: Paul T. | January 6, 2008 11:20 AM

Who the hell is John Chow?

#16

Posted by: Moses | January 6, 2008 11:43 AM

What happened with Climate Audit? Why aren't they there? (snicker)

#17

Posted by: Mike Haubrich, FCD | January 6, 2008 11:50 AM

Paul T #15

I went to John Chow's site and he sells web optimization, monetizing your blog, has ads for $450 "site reviews" and other services that I see so much of. The people that used to be into selling envelope stuffing and other things to make quick money at home are now selling "services" to people who think that blogging is the new way to riches.

I have been to blogs whose only purpose is to aggregate affiliate programs. The blogs themselves are meaningless articles touting the latest avenue to easy wealth. This "Performancing Awards" scam is just another scheme to grab traffic. PZ and Phil are being used because of their notoriety. I would guess that Perez is clueless about it.

#18

Posted by: Dr. J | January 6, 2008 5:35 PM

I'm embarrassed to admit this--but Pharyngula and Perez Hilton actually are the two sites I hit on a daily basis--one to find things to think about, one to find things I don't have to think about (you get to decide which is which).

#20

Posted by: MAJeff | January 6, 2008 5:42 PM

ugh, Jacoby. Along with Jonah Goldberg, proof that talent and intellect are not requirements for conservative columnists.

#21

Posted by: Alan Kellogg | January 6, 2008 9:32 PM

I chose Daily Kos. Why? Because I find the fact those clowns are considered liberals controversial.

#22

Posted by: Bride of Shrek | January 7, 2008 1:32 AM

What about an award for "Best Facial Hair on a Blog" . PZ wins hands down.

#23

Posted by: maxi | January 7, 2008 6:48 AM

Well Pharyngula is whooping Bad Astronomy's ass in the Best Science Blog category.

But who is hell is John Chow?

#24

Posted by: Fade | January 7, 2008 10:26 AM

you've got my vote!

#25

Posted by: Ian | January 7, 2008 11:42 AM

"I'm in the same category with Perez Hilton"

- Better Perez than Paris....

Leave a comment

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.