I beat poor Phil Plait in another of those "best science blog" awards. Of course, we both creamed Ars Technica, Gizmodo, and Endgadget — those guys must not have even noticed the competition. Hey, I barely did.
Pharyngula
Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal
Search
Profile

PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
…and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• facebook
• MySpace
• Twitter
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
• Quick link to the latest endless thread
Random Quote
One of my less pleasant chores when I was young was to read the Bible from one end to the other. Reading the Bible straight through is at least 70 percent discipline, like learning Latin. But the good parts are, of course, simply amazing. God is an extremely uneven writer, but when He's good, nobody can touch Him.
[John Gardner, NYT Book Review, Jan 1983]
Recent Posts
- Evolution: How We and All Living Things Came to Be
- How can we not?
- List of science blogs, with an asterisk
- I'm having bad acid flashbacks, man
- That sneaky, nasty blasphemy law
- Rise up, Texans!
- Nice euphemism
- Dutch poll needs a little help
- But he doesn't know my mom
- I'm home!
A Taste of Pharyngula
Recent Comments
- professordendy on Evolution: How We and All Living Things Came to Be
- JohnbS1 on That sneaky, nasty blasphemy law
- Nerd of Redhead, OM on Evolution: How We and All Living Things Came to Be
- Peter H on Evolution: How We and All Living Things Came to Be
- Peter G. on List of science blogs, with an asterisk
- professordendy on Evolution: How We and All Living Things Came to Be
- Stogoe on How can we not?
- 'Tis Himself, OM on I'm having bad acid flashbacks, man
- thou 386sx on Nothing will stop the never-ending thread! Nothing!
- Bill Dauphin, OM on Nothing will stop the never-ending thread! Nothing!
Archives
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
Blogroll
Other Information
« Where do the hagfish fit in? | Main | Huckabee is a raving lunatic »
Phil's going to be sad
Category: Weblogs
Posted on: January 15, 2008 4:43 PM, by PZ Myers
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/61432









Comments
Posted by: Scholar | January 15, 2008 4:45 PM
Evil biology beats good astronomy any day.
Posted by: Seamyst | January 15, 2008 5:46 PM
That's a pretty fair beating, too, with a much more comfortable margin than the last one. And good grief, did you both ever cream the other blogs! Impressive.
Posted by: Richard | January 15, 2008 6:22 PM
Who votes for Engadget in a science category?
"Oh look, this new version has TWO superfluous LEDs in it."
About as sciencey as an Intelligent Design conference.
Posted by: Phil Plait | January 15, 2008 7:19 PM
Given how much more traffic you have than I do, you didn't beat me by enough to represent that, so in reality I won.
But dangit, I was gonna post about this today but then a bunch of stuff hit the fan. Oh well.
Posted by: Crudely Wrott | January 15, 2008 10:24 PM
Hearty congratulations and a heart-felt attaboy to you, PZ.
I thank you from my top of my cerebral cortex down to my reptilian brain stem for your intensity and dedication. I visit daily and am the better for it. I don't know how you manage to pull it off and still fulfill your professorial duties.
When I grow up I want to be somewhat like you.
It goes without saying that those who gather here are a force slightly larger than you, but without you it wouldn't happen.
May you live (and post) long enough to leave the entire population of the planet utterly speechless. That would be one hell of a moment, know what I mean?
Posted by: Bob O'H | January 16, 2008 1:03 AM
Not to put a dampener on it, but you came a long way second in the Most Controversial Blog category. I think you might have to try harder this year.
Hmmm. I suggest that sometime in June you start supporting front-loading and Mick Huckerbee. Oh, and convert to a militant form of Sikhism.
Bob
Posted by: John Bode | January 16, 2008 11:26 AM
Given that Ars Technica isn't a blog, and that its traditional focus was somewhat narrow (PC hardware enthusiast), I'm curious why it was in the running at all.
Having said that, Ars has some damn good tech reporting, and has fairly recently added some good science reporting (Nobel Intent). They also have a forum devoted exclusively to science topics.
Posted by: Rita Bennett | January 16, 2008 1:00 PM
#5 Crudely Wrott
What he said.
Posted by: Isaah | January 16, 2008 7:40 PM
While i read this blog religiously (badabump bump), i love the Giz. In a mix catagory of science and technology, they should have one. They blog like its going out of style. they have alot of updates per day. plus, they just the other day told a bunch of other blogs and press to hop of the teets of the industry, regurgitating their press releases.
...this was of course after a Giz blogger brought a TV-b-Gone to CES and started temporarily switching off halls of TVs.
THATSAWESOMEOMG!
but i still love you PZ, just less than my technopr0n.