Now on ScienceBlogs: Competitive Enterprise Institute intends to sue blogger over moderation policy

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Pharyngula

Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)

• Quick link to the latest endless thread




I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

tbbadge.gif
scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

The late Christopher Evans, a psychologist and author, calculated that if the motor car had evolved as fast as the computer, and over the same time period, 'Today you would be able to buy a Rolls-Royce for ?.35, it would do three million miles to the gallon, and it would deliver enough power to drive the QE2.'

Richard Dawkins

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« Happy Darwin Day! | Main | Jebus is big. Jeebus is even bigger. Watch out for Jeeebus! »

Mixing science with love

Category: Weirdness
Posted on: February 12, 2008 10:50 AM, by PZ Myers

The other big holiday coming up is Valentine's Day … so how about some appropriately silly valentines?

valentine-darwin.jpg

Warning: that one is the best one. If it makes you groan, the others will be pure torture. But they do beat out the sappy things we used to hand out in fifth grade.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/63902

Comments

#1

Posted by: HumanisticJones | February 12, 2008 10:54 AM

Oh come on now. I thought the Marie Curie "We've got Chemistry" and the "Sagan all my love for you" cards were priceless.

#2

Posted by: Carlie | February 12, 2008 11:04 AM

The Sagan one was fabulous!

#3

Posted by: Podblack | February 12, 2008 11:16 AM

Oh - that's easy. Digital Cuttlefish had them nearly a month early... because such a romantic little Cephalopod!

http://digitalcuttlefish.blogspot.com/2008/02/valentines-day-is-almost-here.html

My favorite by DC:

A rat cadaver's donor heart
Is stripped of every cell
The protein fiber matrix left
Looks like a ghostly shell;
This matrix, in a sterile flask,
Is bathed in rat-heart goo
With both adult and baby cells,
And starts to grow anew.
In only days, the growing heart
May beat, or merely twitch,
Then work, at roughly two percent...
Like yours, you heartless bitch.

#4

Posted by: Jim Downey | February 12, 2008 11:38 AM

Painful? Perhaps. But beats what the Saudis have done:

Religious police in Saudi Arabia are banning the sale of Valentine's Day gifts including red roses, a local newspaper has reported.

The Saudi Gazette quoted shop workers as saying that officials had warned them to remove all red items including flowers and wrapping paper.

Why? Because it is an "un-Islamic" holiday, of course.

Jim D.

#5

Posted by: June | February 12, 2008 12:30 PM

Remember The Fifties?

Take my love and shove it up your heart!

#6

Posted by: Elin | February 12, 2008 1:13 PM

At long last, the religious cops in Saudi Arabia are good for something. What other holiday causes so much misery, both in single people and in non-single people who are plagued with expectations and resentments regarding those expectations?

#7

Posted by: Brownian, OM | February 12, 2008 1:27 PM

Ah, Valentine's Day. There's nothing quite so North American as decrying the Hallmark Holiday while simultaneously trying to make last minute reservations at some over-priced fusion-cuisine bistro.

Unless of course, it's decrying how we've lost the 'true meaning of Christmas' while simultaneously reaming out some poor department store clerk for wishing you a 'Happy Holidays' after you've just elbowed some fat nerd out of the way for the last Wii on the shelf.

Then again, maybe I'm just cynical.

#9

Posted by: Mooser | February 12, 2008 2:11 PM

My wife, often the very essence of practicality and frugality, has told me of her secret desire for a heart-shaped box of candy. Can I do other than comply gladly? I think not.

#10

Posted by: Escuerd | February 12, 2008 2:24 PM

I guess this is more G-rated than the old:

"I wish I were DNA helicase so I could unzip your genes."

That one might go better with Crick or Watson.

I guess one of the discoverers of DNA helicase would be most appropriate for that one, but Mahmoud Abdel-Monem, Hartmut Hoffmann-Berling, and Hildegard Dürwald (I had to look them up) might not be famous enough for non-molecular biologists for it to work.

#11

Posted by: Escuerd | February 12, 2008 2:25 PM

The term "non-molecular biologists" should be "people who aren't molecular biologists" to avoid ambiguity. My apologies if any other types of biologists thought I was singling them out. ;)

#12

Posted by: Holbach | February 12, 2008 2:26 PM

Kieran: Nice stuff, particularly, the photos of Al and
the Universe!

#13

Posted by: Tom Foss | February 12, 2008 2:30 PM

Dan Barker wrote a song to the effect of that Darwin Valentine: "It's Only Natural."

#14

Posted by: Mooser | February 12, 2008 3:26 PM

Well, let's just say that if I designed a world intelligently it would be totally, like non-molecular. Molecules are icky! You never know where they have been.

#15

Posted by: Interrobang | February 12, 2008 3:44 PM

Those are appropriately goofy for HersheyHallmarkDeBeers Day™ (thank you SomeWoman), a non-holiday holiday which demands not to be taken seriously...

Getcher blood diamonds and chocolate made by child slave labour heeeeere!

#16

Posted by: s1mplex | February 12, 2008 5:49 PM

I initially read it as, "I select you, Naturally!" That is, with a comma instead of a period, such that:

Naturally = by (biological, animal) nature

instead of

Naturally = of course; as would be expected; needless to say.

Not necessarily as romantic, I admit... unless of course your significant other is a bio-nerdette like mine. :)

#17

Posted by: thwaite | February 12, 2008 9:33 PM

Jeez, didn't Chuck D write an entire (half of a) book arguing that sexual selection is an entirely separate dynamic than natural selection, and often at odds with it (resulting in such extravaganzas as the peacock's tail)?

Chuck's argument is updated in semi-popularized form by Geoffrey Miller, THE MATING MIND, who isn't shy about possible psychological implications. Fun read.

#18

Posted by: allonym | February 12, 2008 9:50 PM

Not exactly apropos of Valentine's day, but I'm now considering sending my parents a card emblazoned "You've really left Lamarck on me".

#19

Posted by: Kseniya | February 12, 2008 10:49 PM

When you care enough to send the very best...

Hallamark!

#20

Posted by: allonym | February 13, 2008 12:45 AM

What, I write a lousy joke about a discredited scientist, and nobody's gonna Haeckel me?

#21

Posted by: Michael X | February 13, 2008 4:37 AM

If I get my fiance the Curie card with a magnetic Marie Curie attached, I will radioactively glow with nerdom. And it will rock so hard.

#22

Posted by: MoxieHart | February 13, 2008 9:41 PM

Receiving that Carl Sagan valentine would rock my world. So I'm sending it to all my friends, selfishly hoping they'll send one back to me.

Leave a comment

           Sign in or register with TypePad.            Sign up with Movable Type.

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM