Obviously vice-presidential material…in America
Category: Kooks • Politics
Posted on: June 11, 2008 7:05 PM, by PZ Myers
I keep telling people there is a deep dangerous strain of insanity running through this country, and here's a perfect example: Bobby Jindal.
We've discovered that in an essay Jindal wrote in 1994 for the New Oxford Review, a serious right-wing Catholic journal, Jindal narrated a bizarre story of a personal encounter with a demon, in which he participated in an exorcism with a group of college friends. And not only did they cast out the supernatural spirit that had possessed his friend, Jindal wrote that he believes that their ritual may well have cured her cancer.
Reading the article leaves no doubt that Jindal -- who graduated from Brown University in 1991, was a Rhodes Scholar, and had been accepted at Yale Law School and Harvard Medical School when he wrote the essay -- was completely serious about the encounter. He even said the experience "reaffirmed" his faith.
Jindal is considered a serious contender for the vice presidential nomination…or at least, he's one of the people the media thinks will appeal to a broad swathe of the country, boosting John McCain's presidential aspirations. He's also the governor of Louisiana. How could you people down there elect this goony bird?





Comments
Posted by: Brownian, OM | June 11, 2008 7:11 PM
How could you people down there elect this goony bird?
Duh! He, like, fought a demon?!
How could they not?
Posted by: dogheaven | June 11, 2008 7:16 PM
The part of me that trusts that there are good people that will be voting this year, wants McCain to pick him. He's so easy to show as a nut.
The part of me that thinks that the country has too many crazy voters (as evidenced by Bush's reelection) does NOT want this guy as McCain's runnning mate. Why? He's cute and young. People will fall in love with him if he keeps his mouth shut.
Posted by: The Science Pundit | June 11, 2008 7:18 PM
Brownian, OM said:
Duh! He, like, fought a demon?!
How could they not?
PZ,
Sometimes I have to wonder about you.
;-D
Posted by: Randy Stimpson aka Intelligent Designer | June 11, 2008 7:19 PM
1994 was a long time ago. Fourteen years is a long time for a person too grow and learn. Having had some apparently supernatural experiences myself I always try to keep an open mind when listening to someone else describe their experiences.
Posted by: QrazyQat | June 11, 2008 7:20 PM
"You people" up there elected the pro wrestler. How'd that work out?
Maybe just sticking to pointing out that Jindal is a nutcase, yet a very typical Republican candidate, is the approach.
Posted by: PatrickHenry | June 11, 2008 7:21 PM
I've been trying to track the creationist tendencies of all the election people, and I've got this over at my place: McCain's Possible VP Choices -- Creationists?. Bottom line is that McCain isn't much of a creationist, if at all. As for his possible VP choices, only Rommey is known to be sane on this issue.
Posted by: Steve_C | June 11, 2008 7:24 PM
Oh please please please pick him McCain!!!!
I can see the MoveOn ad now...
They could do a twist on Cheney being a demon and now the GOP wants a demon slayer? Why can't they make up their minds...
Posted by: Holbach | June 11, 2008 7:25 PM
Uh oh, we are in deep doo doo if this loony with demons in his closet is considered as a vice-president. I still will maintain that we are in for some unexpected surprises if McCain is elected. Pete Stark, are you aware of this? So if McCain gets in we will be in Irag with the American deaths mounting for the duration of his term. And as a bonus we will have a Louisiana demon destroyer as vice president who no doubt will exercise his demon powers to effect the course of reason extermination. Wow, this has the potential to be downright scary.
Posted by: Mooser, Bummertown | June 11, 2008 7:25 PM
S.J. Perelman also went to Brown. If only he were here now!
Posted by: ndt | June 11, 2008 7:29 PM
Quite well, actually. Our ludicrous car tax was reduced, roads got some funding for a change, and he refused to proclaim a state day of prayer.
Posted by: Sili | June 11, 2008 7:30 PM
Phew - for a second there I thought you were talking about Democratic veeps.
I say do your best to get McBush to select him. Sounds like that campaign will do its best to help us.
Posted by: Fred | June 11, 2008 7:30 PM
Anyone know how the Biology program is at Brown? I'm always alarmed when a creationist gets honors from an undergrad Biology program.
Posted by: Glen Davidson | June 11, 2008 7:31 PM
He's also in support of the "academic freedom" bill that passed the Louisiana House today:
Which is not surprising to anyone who's heard about him in the past.
He may be the first governor to sign one of the bills coming out of the spate of recent DI attempts to subvert the Constitution by invoking "academic freedom". A real dick.
Glen Davidson
http://tinyurl.com/2kxyc7
Posted by: Dallas | June 11, 2008 7:34 PM
I'm still 17, I had no say...
-Dallas from Louisiana
Posted by: scooter | June 11, 2008 7:42 PM
Jindal ran on the platform, "I'm they guy without the felonies" It's Louisiana politics.
Posted by: JJ | June 11, 2008 7:42 PM
OT - but...
Just a reminder, Ken Miller's New book, "Only A Theory - Evolution and the Battle for America's Soul"
will be available in stores tomorrow. For those of you with advance copies, I think you will agree, it is a must read.
ISBN - 978-0-670-01883-3
He will also be on The Colbert Report, June 16.
Posted by: Leland | June 11, 2008 7:43 PM
"'You people' up there elected the pro wrestler. How'd that work out?"
Let's see, worked for part of his life as an entertainer versus claims seriously to have fought a demon and cured cancer. Which one seems a worse idea to elect?
Posted by: gex | June 11, 2008 7:46 PM
AND he quite famously said religion is for the weak minded. Any other state elect a politician willing to state things that way?
I disagreed with Jesse on a lot of things, but he doesn't see invisible sky fairies, and he spoke his opinions honestly, not focus grouped to death. Two traits I like my politicians and leaders to have.
Posted by: James F | June 11, 2008 7:47 PM
Glen D @ 13
DAMMIT. Three guesses who's already crowing about it, and the first two don't count.
Posted by: Geoffrey | June 11, 2008 7:50 PM
Not to sound condescending but ... why wouldn't Republicans want this guy to be their Vice Presidential nominiee? Isn't it sort of the M.O. of religious conservatives to believe ridiculous things about the universe? And wouldn't most conservative evangelicals, members of the religious right, creationists, etc. think it a bonus that this guy believes this sort of stuff?
It's sad but I wouldn't be surprised if Jindal gets a "bump" when this story gets out ...
(To be honest, I come from Connecticut, where, I think, most people would be shocked by someone's belief in demons, but this could all be a "Blue State" delusion ...)
Posted by: James F | June 11, 2008 7:51 PM
#10
He didn't even have time to bleed.
Posted by: Patches | June 11, 2008 7:53 PM
I feel like a complete geek that this was what the title of this post immediately made me think of: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gAJesGKzi4
Posted by: Zeno | June 11, 2008 8:02 PM
The late John Paul II beefed up the ranks of exorcists in the Catholic church because he couldn't tell the difference between psychosis and demon possession (heck, it's not clear he could even tell the difference between dissent and demon possession). It's a rich legacy that the current pontiff will surely not back away from, since church dogma teaches that demons are always tempting us to do naughty things (and being remarkably successful with members of the priesthood). It was only a natural development to discover that Catholic candidates for political office would eventually include a supernatural warrior in their ranks. If only Kerry had thought to splash holy water on George Bush during one of their debates and yelled "The power of Christ compels you!" That would have been good theater. And there's at least a fifty percent chance Bush would have burst into flames and melted.
Posted by: Michael | June 11, 2008 8:12 PM
Quoting Jindal:
"[L]et's talk about intelligent design. I'm a biology major. That's my degree. The reality is there are a lot of things that we don't understand. There's no theory in science that could explain how, contrary to the laws of entropy, you could create order out of chaos."
Let's see...not even in a open system (the earth, with it's atmosphere) fed by an consistent, outside energy source (the sun)?
I guess being a biology major doesn't qualify you to discuss basic physics.
I was a math major in college, but in high school I learned the 2nd law of thermodynamics, which only applies to isolated or 'closed' systems.
Posted by: matt | June 11, 2008 8:19 PM
@#4
Sleep paralysis is a much better explanation and it is NOT supernatural.
Posted by: James F | June 11, 2008 8:21 PM
#24
"There's no theory in science that could explain how, contrary to the laws of entropy, you could create order out of chaos."
Yes, that would require a giant outside source of energy....
Posted by: SLC | June 11, 2008 8:26 PM
I wonder if this schmuck ever took a biology course from Ken Miller?
Posted by: Tommykey | June 11, 2008 8:34 PM
What is it with these Catholic Indian-Americans being so right wing? Bobby Jindal. Dinesh D'Souza. I think Ramesh Ponnuru is Catholic too, but have to check on that.
Posted by: Holbach | June 11, 2008 8:35 PM
# 27 He took all his biology courses from Ken Hambone, and Brenda will be his theses instructor. Are they still doing all this crap by correspondence courses?
Posted by: Holbach | June 11, 2008 8:39 PM
# 28 Is Deepcrap Chopper a catholic? Of course you know who I mean. Whether right wing or bat wing they are all moronic shitheads.
Posted by: decrepitoldfool | June 11, 2008 8:44 PM
Jindal is charming, self-deprecating (when not claiming to be Gandolf), and has charisma. This scares the hell out of me because voters flock to likable candidates whether they make any sense or not.
Posted by: Tony P | June 11, 2008 8:46 PM
Oh my, he went to Brown? I worked at Brown and I'll let you in on some secrets.
First of all any University that does pass/fail should be fairly suspect.
That said, the chemical experimentation in the area in the 80's to mid 90's was legendary. I can guarantee that Jindal's demon was a bad acid trip.
Posted by: James F | June 11, 2008 8:47 PM
#28
I'll give D'Souza one thing, he realizes ID is a failure.
Posted by: brokenSoldier, OM | June 11, 2008 8:50 PM
Posted by: Zeno | June 11, 2008 8:02 PMAnd it seems as though their willingness to forgive has a distinct bias towards those priests, as well. As a matter of fact, their sins seem to be our fault...
http://news.aol.com/newsbloggers/2008/04/17/pope-blames-society-for-pedophile-priests/4
Posted by: Bob Carroll | June 11, 2008 8:52 PM
Re # 26. Paraphrasing a comment from some time ago, "I pondered all night as to what such an energy source might be, and then it dawned on me." I don't recall the author.
Re # 24. Not incidentally, the second law applies to all systems, open or closed/isolated. The specific requirement of the law in the case of closed systems requires, as we all know, that the entropy cannot decrease. For open systems, the law has a different form, involving the Gibbs free energy, but the law still holds. It wouldn't be much of a law if it were so severely restricted.
Bob
Posted by: CalGeorge | June 11, 2008 9:02 PM
Jindal:
"I am 100 percent anti-abortion with no exceptions. I believe all life is precious."
Yeah, that's what we need, another misogynistic penis telling women what to do with their bodies.
Posted by: Holbach | June 11, 2008 9:07 PM
James F @ 33 Oh I see, so this elevates him in the cause of denigrating all religious morons? He may realize ID is a failure, but this does not in any way alter my contempt and ongoing wish to see him smashed soundly by a debater who has the guts to ask him pointed questions, demand he answer the freaking questions, and insist he brings down his god to lend credence to his insane bullshit. He may also state that he does not believe in purgatory but heaven and hell only, but he is still up there with the pantheon of the religious insane and therefore on the same level no matter what he realizes does not mesh.
Posted by: dave | June 11, 2008 9:10 PM
Didn't the physicist Maxwell have a demon? Seems that he won too.
Posted by: CalGeorge | June 11, 2008 9:17 PM
Jindal in a 2007 debate:
"Sure, and let's talk about intelligent design. I'm a biology major. That's my degree. The reality is there are a lot of things that we don't understand. There's no theory in science that could explain how, contrary to the laws of entropy, you could create order out of chaos. There's no scientific theory that explains how you can create organic life out of inorganic matter. I think we owe it to our children to teach them the best possible modern scientific facts and theories. Teach them what different theories are out there for the things that aren't answerable by science, that aren't answered by science. Let them decide for themselves. I don't think we should be scared to do that. Personally, it certainly makes sense to me that when you look at creation, you would believe in a creator. Let's not be afraid to teach our kids the very best science."
http://www.talk2action.org/story/2007/10/15/222041/63
Yes, let the children decide! What an idiot.
Posted by: Art | June 11, 2008 9:21 PM
""The power of Christ compels you!" That would have been good theater. And there's at least a fifty percent chance Bush would have burst into flames and melted."
He would only melt if he was a witch. I think the effect would have been even more shocking, at least to the people who haven't been following W's career.
W involuntarily bends at the waist, there is a ripping sound and Cheney climbs out of W's rear. Like the empty husk of a mounting insect W is naught but a pile of skin wearing a smirk in a suit.
But that isn't the really dramatic effect. Lots of people had assumed that was the case.
A second application of holy water and invocation of the power and Cheney bends involuntarily and there is a ripping sound, sound of distant thunder, the lights flicker, and the reanimated corpse of Richard Millhouse Nixon climbs out of Cheney's rear and assumes the iconic double peace sign pose.
Posted by: MAJeff, OM | June 11, 2008 9:22 PM
Yeah, that's what we need, another misogynistic penis telling women what to do with their bodies.
Well, it wouldn't be a presidential election without a Republican in the race, would it?
Posted by: badger | June 11, 2008 9:27 PM
Man, i told everyone i knew down here about his demon wrasslin' long ago. It didn't make the slightest dent.
He already nearly blew all of his appointments since he took office as governor because he forgot to submit them to Senate approval, with only two weeks left before the deadline. He was ranked 432 out of 439 in Congressional power rankings when he was representing LA-01. The man's a lightweight.
Wait until you hear one his true believers relate the story about how he helped his wife deliver their third baby, because the ambulance didn't arrive on time. They use this to defend his zealot anti-choice stance, as if being in a room when a woman gives birth qualifies him in medical science and ethics.
I don't believe for a moment that he's a serious contender for VP, but the cult of personality that surrounds him here is powerful.
Posted by: Glen Davidson | June 11, 2008 9:27 PM
I'm waiting for the time when enlightened IDists will allow children to decide the fate of string theory.
Hey, someone has to, don't they? And apparently instead of learning at school, children are supposed to decide controversies.
Of course they wouldn't let children decide any matter that they think is important. Science to them is not, certainly, important.
Glen Davidson
http://tinyurl.com/2kxyc7
Posted by: QrazyQat | June 11, 2008 9:27 PM
Let's see, worked for part of his life as an entertainer versus claims seriously to have fought a demon and cured cancer. Which one seems a worse idea to elect?
I'd prefer the entertainer/9-11 Truther if forced to choose between the two. But I wouldn't consider it a wonderful choice. Seriously, do you?
My point, at least what I attempted to do, was to gently suggest that the "you people elected" thingy is not so great an idea. It reminded me of the time I was in Green Bay in the 1980s and our host not so gently complained about "you people" (me, the California -- at the time -- based leftist) giving the country Ronald Reagan. I was more polite, and being the friend of the main guest and not wanting to knowingly insult anyone (which is hard for me, you know) did not point out that, unlike Wisconsin, Californians had at least once voted against Reagan when they kicked him out of the governor's seat.
Posted by: Holbach | June 11, 2008 9:30 PM
Mooser @ # 9 My man Sidney Joseph! I'm not too sure how he felt about religion and it is difficult to pin him down on this, but I am sure he would have seen a lot of comedy in all this bullshit and expressed it as so much to laugh and guffaw over. Down to earth people are usually down on all instances of nonsense including religion. I'm hoping S J would not be wanting in this regard!
Posted by: Rey Fox | June 11, 2008 9:37 PM
"Personally, it certainly makes sense to me that when you look at creation, you would believe in a creator."
What is "Begging the question", Alex?
"Let's not be afraid to teach our kids the very best science."
Yes, evolution. Ask the scientists (like maybe some of those biologists you might know), they'll say evolution. End of debate.
Posted by: Salt | June 11, 2008 9:38 PM
Jindal in a 2007 debate: There's no theory in science that could explain how, contrary to the laws of entropy, you could create order out of chaos. There's no scientific theory that explains how you can create organic life out of inorganic matter.
Posted by: CalGeorge | June 11, 2008 9:17 PM
Is he wrong?
Posted by: Zeno | June 11, 2008 9:40 PM
We never kicked Reagan out of office. Californians voted for him over and over again, twice for governor and twice for president. We did, however, get in his face precisely once. In 1973, during Reagan's second gubernatorial term, he put Proposition 1 on the general election ballot. It was a spending limitation measure that he wanted us to enact. Assembly Speaker Bob Moretti opposed it as a badly drafted and unworkable scheme and campaigned against Proposition 1. The voters agreed with Moretti and voted against Proposition 1, to Reagan's great chagrin. A year later the voters chose a Democrat as his successor, which irritated Reagan even more. (It was Jerry Brown, who beat Moretti in the Democratic primary.) So maybe we got in his face twice.
Posted by: CortxVortx | June 11, 2008 9:41 PM
I left Louisiana in 2000. Good riddance.
Posted by: Julian | June 11, 2008 9:43 PM
I doubt you'll see many religious conservatives voting this election cycle, and the r's have better vp picks than the gov of Louisiana. One should also consider that most r's, and southerners in general, consider Louisiana to be a hole. As a Texan, I don't see much difference between it and East Texas, Alabama, or Florida, though.
Posted by: Carlie | June 11, 2008 9:47 PM
Wait, he said that he thinks all life is precious, but also that he cured cancer? What about the precious life of the cancer cells, huh? He killed them! They didn't get the right to life!
Posted by: Colugo | June 11, 2008 9:51 PM
"Jindal narrated a bizarre story of a personal encounter with a demon, in which he participated in an exorcism"
Was it a Golgothan shit demon?
Posted by: CalGeorge | June 11, 2008 9:54 PM
Jindal:
"If Christianity is merely one of many equally valid religions, then the sacrifices I made, including the loss of my family's peace, were senseless."
Got that right.
Posted by: raven | June 11, 2008 9:58 PM
Don't laugh. In recent history, Americans have voted for the worst candidate possible. McCain is certainly a serious contender. Jindal is probably crazy and stupid enough but they can always get someone even more repellent.
Some polls this year show McCain beating the democrats.
If he does, just going to stockpile popcorn and wine and watch the US lemmings march off the cliff.
Posted by: CalGeorge | June 11, 2008 9:59 PM
Jindal:
My investigation of Christianity might have remained at this theoretical level had it not been for a short black-and-white film. Though its depiction of the crucifixion was harsher than that of many similar movies, something about this film hit me very hard. For the first time, I actually imagined what it meant for the Son of God to be humiliated and even killed for my sake. Although the movie did not convince me that anything was true, it did force me to wonder if Christians were right. I realized that if the Gospel stories were true, if Christ really was the Son of God, it was arrogant of me to reject Him and question the gift of salvation.
Oh, please let him be McCain's VP!
Posted by: Julian | June 11, 2008 10:03 PM
Bah! This silly "order and chaos" entropy argument. If the folks who trot this canard out would just stop and think for a second they'd realize that entropy is a local phenomenon and that examples of entropy creating order are all around them.
Example 1) You eat a hamburger. The hamburger is destroyed, but you convert it into simple chemicals and proteins which power and expand your body.
Example 2) Any star. It has a set amount of hydrogen; once it burns all this hydrogen into sufficiently heavy elements (like Iron) it will no longer be able to sustain itself. But, in burning that hydrogen it creates greater complexity and order by fusing it into more complex elements, and when it explodes, those elements go shooting out into space, smashing into other elements to form other stars, planets, asteroids, and comets. Lots of order from a little entropy.
Example 3) Death. You die. You get buried. You get rained on for 1000 years. There's an earthquake. You get smooshed by the earth a bit. A few million years pass. Now you're oil! Your decay can now run an internal combustion engine or create a few dozen plastic bags.
Posted by: Ragutis | June 11, 2008 10:20 PM
Well, you have to give the guy some points for casting off the shackles of childhood/cultural religious indoctrination. Many of us can attest that that is not an easy task.
Of course, voluntarily incarcerating yourself in another, equally ridiculous, set of unsupportable beliefs means a deduction of many, many more.
The idea is not to repeat our mistakes, Bobby.
Posted by: Holbach | June 11, 2008 10:20 PM
Off topic, or is it? Comcast.net news, about half an hour ago, tornado in western Iowa smashed into a Boy Scout camp; many injuries and some fatalities. You have to believe in a god for admittance to the scouts and are adamant in keeping out atheists. But that damn intelligent designed tornado had the nerve to countermand their god's orders? No blaming atheists this time.
Posted by: Phil A | June 11, 2008 10:26 PM
I hear the name Kathleen Sebelius being bounced around as a good pick for Obama. She's the governor for Kansas. Now, we know Kansas isn't particularly the most atheist/evolution friendly. But what's her stance on, you know, reality?
Posted by: --PatF in Madison | June 11, 2008 10:32 PM
Where you went to school makes little difference when it comes to politics. I am sure the Jindal knows that the second law has nothing to say against evolution. But running on a platform of evolution versus creationism does not seem to be a great way of getting elected in a close race. Therefore, evolution gets thrown under the bus and Bobby gets into office.
Obligatory admissions:
1) I was an undergraduate at Brown many years ago. (Mathematics, not Biology.)
2) I don't think you can blame this idiocy on the Rhodes scholar people either.
3) I wouldn't vote for this guy in a million years.
By the way, when he ran for governor, I don't think he mentioned Brown at all. He did go on at length about how he was an LSU football fan. (And I don't think LSU is responsible for Jindal's politics, either.)
Posted by: Sadie Morrison | June 11, 2008 10:34 PM
Apparently the lives of women endangered by their pregnancies are less "precious" than those of the fetuses they are carrying.
As a liberal Kansan, I am quite pleased with Sebelius.
Posted by: BT Murtagh | June 11, 2008 10:41 PM
#52: You mean, an Excremental?
Posted by: Patricia | June 11, 2008 10:44 PM
My motto has always been, "no vote, no bitch". And even harsher - no exceptions. This election looks like the first time in my adult life I will not be able to bitch about the president. If Homer Simpson, Odin or Bugs Bunny make it to Oregons ballot MAYBE I'll have a dog in the hunt.
Posted by: marcia | June 11, 2008 10:44 PM
new NBC/WSJ poll has obama crushing mccain:
Although it's still very early in the campaign, the latest NBC/WSJ poll has Obama leading McCain 47 to 41. I believe this is the bump that we all expected after the primary wars finally finished. The last poll was in April, which had Obama 46-43, within the margin of error for the poll. What's really interesting, though, are the ethnic and voter group breakdowns: Obama leads with African Americans 83-7 (7? - geez), Hispanics 62-28, women 52-33, Catholics 47-40, independents 41-36, all women 52-33, and blue collars 47-42. Among Hillary supporters, Obama leads 61-19. Among white men, as you can imagine, McCain leads 55-35 as he does with soccer moms at 44-38. Among the respondents, 54 to 30 say that they believe Obama will win the election.
Another interesting fact is that if you add Hillary to the ticket, he picks up 3 additional points over McCain/Romney.
Posted by: Anthony | June 11, 2008 10:48 PM
This immediately reminded me of a childhood pastor of mine who described a visit from jesus which also included some trippy aspects which strangely resembled an experience fueled by hallucinogenic mushrooms; Which wouldn't have been surprising considering it took place in Oregon.
But hey, people on a societal level are afraid to not support someone who claims to have powers from God. i.e. the ability to banish demons. I would truly love it if was the vp on the ticket if only for the utter hilarity.
Posted by: Patricia | June 11, 2008 11:04 PM
#58 Holbach - Once again gawd ignores his followers. Just like Katrina, the tsunami, earth quakes, tornados, cyclones, 9/11...the current flooding in the midwest, the Sudan crisis...yet gawd loves us all, is omnipotent and all knowing. Allah is doing a real bang up job saving his chosen too. Yeah.
I wonder what sin those poor children commited to deserve their deaths?
No doubt Pat Robertson will tell us. Or if we get really lucky Bush or Walton will make a comment. /snark off/
Posted by: ndt | June 11, 2008 11:07 PM
Yes.
Posted by: Patricia | June 11, 2008 11:30 PM
#47 - Salt - Is he wrong?
Yes, he is.
And don't forget to ask if natural selection is random chance.
Posted by: Kseniya | June 11, 2008 11:31 PM
Patricia, Walton has already stated that he'd consider voting for Jindal - for president - in 2012 or 2016.
Posted by: Patricia | June 11, 2008 11:42 PM
Kseniya - holy shite, I missed that somehow.
Brilliant.
Well hell, maybe he'll vote for me in 2012 for VP - I've actually seen gawd.
How about it Walton?
Posted by: Kseniya | June 11, 2008 11:45 PM
Jindal in a 2007 debate: I'm either an ignorant fool or a career liar, pandering to ignorant fools for the purpose of furthering my personal ambitions and feeding my lust for power. Look at me! I'm so humble!
There. Fixed.
Posted by: No More Mr. Nice Guy! | June 12, 2008 12:02 AM
"How could you people down there elect this goony bird?"
Katrina. Ethnic cleansing. The majority of African-Americans driven out of the state.
Now does everyone understand why the Bush regime took no action in response to Katrina?
Posted by: Charles Minus | June 12, 2008 12:08 AM
I'm a little late getting into this. but I take exception to the remark (#17) about electing a pro wrestler. Jess Ventura is a self-identified atheist. Check out this from 1999 when Jesse was in office:
"Positive Atheism has teamed up with American Atheists in an effort to encourage each atheist to send Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura a letter of support for the atheophobic flack he has received for saying that organized religion is 'a sham and a crutch' and that it encourages people to 'stick their noses in other people's business.'"
You can read about the whole flap at http://www.positiveatheism.org/mail/eml9631.htm.
Do you know of any other elected official willing to describe him/herself as an atheist?
So lighten up on Jesse or we'll have to open up a can of whip ass on you.
Posted by: undeadgoat | June 12, 2008 12:10 AM
My friend Ketan (who is my only close Indian friend) claims that Bobby Jindal makes him ashamed to be Indian. Me, he just makes me wonder why I'm going to Tulane next year . . .
Posted by: Kseniya | June 12, 2008 12:25 AM
Nice, I suppose.
Kerry was leading Bush by a significant margin in the Summer of '04, prior to the conventions.
Ladies and gentlemen, start your engines. Let the swiftboating begin!
p.s. - I didn't realize Jesse was so cool. I used to chuckle over the impressions of Jesse on A Prairie Home Companion back when I was in H.S., and thought it was hilarious that a state like MN had elected a pro wrestler... but I didn't know anything about him.
I do remember reading somewhere that it was odd that he ran not as himself (James George Janos - hey, he's a Slav!) but as his wrestling persona. (Of course, what politician really runs as himself anyway?)
Posted by: travc | June 12, 2008 12:27 AM
My bet is that Jindal (like most of the GOP 'leaders') is really just an Amoral Social Dominator. He probably doesn't actually believe this stuff any more than Parsley actually believes the crap he spouts. It is about finding a nice group of gullible rubes and exploiting them.
That said, I bet he got his rocks off participating. Seriously, if this 'exorcism' went down as described, it was torture. If you think I'm being extreme, just read it keeping in mind what we know about the effects of torture and how so-called 'hypnosis' works.
TPM has more excerpts from Jindal's essay
Posted by: travc | June 12, 2008 12:32 AM
I really hope McCain does not choose Jindal... he likes noting that he has a degree in Biology, which gives us actual Biologists a bad name.
Posted by: Clayton | June 12, 2008 12:40 AM
We need to start a grassroots movement. Our goal? Get a serious reporter to ask McCain whether he thinks Jindal is telling the truth. If he says he doesn't believe he's telling the truth, he's shown himself to have terrible judgment insofar as he seems to be considering Jindal for the VP slot. If he says he does, he's shown himself to be a lunatic. The only way this will happen is if everyone joins the facebook group 'If Bobby Jindal can cure cancer and exorcise demons, he can run with McCain'. That is all.
Posted by: travc | June 12, 2008 12:55 AM
Somewhat OT, but I have a cunning plan (please not my best Baldric impersonation)
On every one of these 'academic freedom' bills we should promote an amendment which ensures teachers are free to teach comprehensive sex-ed.
Posted by: Sadie Morrison | June 12, 2008 1:12 AM
Minor nitpick: Hungarian is not part of the Slavic branch (of either languages or ethnicities).
Posted by: Autumn | June 12, 2008 1:16 AM
Travc,
It would have been torture if it had occured eight years ago. Now, not so much.
Oh, wait, it was done for Jeebus?
Then it's fine no matter what.
Posted by: Shawn Wilkinson | June 12, 2008 1:38 AM
We didn't have much of a choice. The other candidates were second-tier in comparison (eg. lack of name recognition). Jindal's campaign got a pre-mature boost after Katrina with his supporters arguing things would've been different under his reign (doubtful, since the problems are sourced to primarily to FEMA and the Army Core).
Plus, he's Catholic. New Orleans, which comprises of the bulk of the state's voting population, typically swings Democrat. Due to the Catholic vote from New Orleans being locked and his social conservatism wooing the back-country red necks, he was able to secure over 50% of the vote in the state primaries.
*Note: Louisiana is weird. All governor candidates are voted on indepednet of part affiliation in a primary. The top two go in a run-off unless the top candidate secures a majority of the vote (over 50%).
I didn't like Jindal from his first gubernatorial run. And I opposed him being the speaker at my college graduation (since he was also the speaker at my high school graduation when he was in Congress). But that's life.
Posted by: mandrake | June 12, 2008 1:40 AM
How could you people down there elect this goony bird?
Having grown up in N'Awlins, and having a mother & sister still living there, I can say that frighteningly enough he might have been the best qualified candidate.
When David Duke (KKK) ran for governer against Edwin Edwards (multiple indictments), a common bumper sticker read "Vote For the Crook."
Me, I turned 17 and fled for the Left Coast.
Posted by: blf | June 12, 2008 2:43 AM
I think you mean Granddolt. I just made her up and imagines she fights nasty beasties and probably Teh Gays, and seems to fit this dolt to a tee. Or with some nails, to a tree.
There's also Gandalf, who really does fight nasty beasties, whilst screaming "You shall not pass!" Now that's grand style...
Posted by: IAmMarauder | June 12, 2008 4:23 AM
I am not a lawyer, but isn't restraining someone against their will a crime? Wouldn't shoving a book in someone's face constitute assault? They chase her and force her to the ground - that is battery isn't it? And I would think that forcing someone to act against their will is somewhat illegal as well?
So how is this an OK thing to do to someone? I cannot see any way to justify the acts carried out by Jindal and the others... Wonder if the police could have acted on his admission and arrested him without Susan coming forward (probably not, dangit).
Then again, he would have probably got away with it anyways. Maybe use "God wanted me to do it" as a defence.
Oh, as for this quote:
"Whenever I concentrated long enough to begin prayer, I felt some type of physical force distracting me. It was as if something was pushing down on my chest, making it very hard for me to breathe. . . Though I could find no cause for my chest pains, I was very scared of what was happening to me and Susan. I began to think that the demon would only attack me if I tried to pray or fight back; thus, I resigned myself to leaving it alone in an attempt to find peace for myself."
I wonder if the "physical force" was possibly guilt? Could it be some part of him knew what he was doing is wrong? Shame he wrote it off as a demon attack and didn't take a few minutes to think about what he was doing...
Posted by: BobbyEarle | June 12, 2008 5:42 AM
Jesse Ventura does have these three things going for him:
1. Ex Navy SEAL.
2. He doesn't have time to bleed.
3. He looks pretty damned sharp in a pink feather boa.
Now who can argue with that?
Posted by: Stephen Wells | June 12, 2008 5:46 AM
Re: Salt's silly question:
The earth as a whole is not reducing its entropy. An energy flux from the sun arives in the form of a certain number of visible-light photons and leaves in the form of a larger number of infrared photons; the entropy of the universe increases, to an extent far outweighing small local gains in order in living things.
When water freezes to ice, its entropy decreases. Oh shocking, a violation of SLoT! Or not.
Posted by: Julie Stahlhut | June 12, 2008 6:14 AM
If only Kerry had thought to splash holy water on Geor