The gang at Bakersfield that ran one of the polls we contributed to has noticed, and they feel violated. Mildly. And with a little good humor. I guess we'll have to do it again sometime!
Search
Profile
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
…and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• facebook
• MySpace
• Twitter
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.
Random Quote
More attention to the History of Science is needed, as much by scientists as by historians, and especially by biologists, and this should mean a deliberate attempt to understand the thoughts of the great masters of the past, to see in what circumstances or intellectual milieu their ideas were formed, where they took the wrong turning or stopped short on the right track.
R.A. Fisher
Recent Posts
- Mary's Monday Metazoan: Ambition!
- Our illness is their profit
- Friday Cephalopod: NUMBERLESS HOSTS!
- Dear Jezebel
- There Will Be Blood?
- Zooming in on the Origin of Life Science Foundation
- Friday Cephalopod: Feasibility trial successful
- Making excuses
- More bad science in the literature
- An open letter to the Indiana legislature
A Taste of Pharyngula
Recent Comments
- Jeanette Garcia on Mary's Monday Metazoan: Ambition!
- sandra - juegos de mario on Our illness is their profit
- Owlmirror on More bad science in the literature
- Tumara Baap on Our illness is their profit
- Palaverer on Mary's Monday Metazoan: Ambition!
- Owlmirror on Zooming in on the Origin of Life Science Foundation
- Nerd of Redhead, OM on More bad science in the literature
- Zaki Aminu on More bad science in the literature
- Zaki Aminu on More bad science in the literature
- Zaki Aminu on More bad science in the literature
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
Blogroll
Other Information
« Only a Theory | Main | An inspirational poster »
More articles by PZ Myers can be found on Freethoughtblogs at the new Pharyngula!
Call me…The Violator!
Category: Humor
Posted on: July 31, 2008 5:22 PM, by PZ Myers
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/77789
Leave a comment
HTML commands: <i>italic</i>, <b>bold</b>, <a href="url">link</a>, <blockquote>quote</blockquote>
Comments
Posted by: Glen Davidson | July 31, 2008 5:28 PM
Well they weren't going to tell the truth, that they were pleased to get noticed like they were.
Publicity is the only purpose for these silly internet polls anyhow.
Glen D
http://tinyurl.com/2kxyc7
Posted by: Randomfactor | July 31, 2008 5:32 PM
They got off lucky. PZ could've stuck a rusty nail through their poll.
Posted by: SiMPel MYnd | July 31, 2008 5:34 PM
How are we supposed to get a respectable atheist "religion" built up with only a few thousand followers??!!
I think PZ needs to perform a few miracles to get his following up...
Posted by: Lord Zero | July 31, 2008 5:36 PM
They are saying than my opinion dont matter ?
Or does it has no value compared to theirs ?
Such bigotry... shame on them.
Posted by: Patricia | July 31, 2008 5:38 PM
Awww, now they hurt mah little girlie feelins'.
Posted by: Anna | July 31, 2008 5:40 PM
I think they are saying the "violated" bit tongue in cheek. Don't know much about them, but the little article seems nice enough.
Posted by: SweetKevin | July 31, 2008 5:40 PM
Crashing polls is one of my favorites.
Posted by: Lord Zero | July 31, 2008 5:41 PM
"The Violator" ... dont you mean that
critter from Spawn ? ... mmm... cachy.
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp | July 31, 2008 5:41 PM
Yeah I didn't take it so bad. Almost like when you find out you're the butt of a practical joke and give a little grin.
Posted by: Thomas Langham | July 31, 2008 5:44 PM
I would have thought they would have appreciated more people contributing to their opinion poll. The previous ones were a little pathetic. I mean, the number of people voting goes 263, 3, 252, 207, 189, 184, then we come along, and then its 4063!
Posted by: Brownian, OM | July 31, 2008 5:45 PM
Woah! I just had a David Mabus flashback as a result of the title of this post. (For those who don't recall, Mabus had a strange fascination with Depeche Mode's Enjoy the Silence video, which somehow supported his assertion that Nostradamus "stopped the Randi-Dawkins-Myers Corp", whatever that means.
Posted by: KevinGreene | July 31, 2008 5:46 PM
On the plus side there post unlike the original poll does provide a place for leaving comments.
So I can finally say how insulting it was to see the poll question in the first place.
Posted by: Dustin | July 31, 2008 5:50 PM
No.What I will do, however, is replace your wikipedia photo with the one where you're cuddling a stuffed pink squid.
Posted by: Artoo45 | July 31, 2008 5:59 PM
If inviolability was truly a concern (i.e. this here poll is for Bakersfield folk only), then perhaps it should've be circulated about their fine town on a sheet of paper, and then only to those who would've respond in a way you find favorable. This might have prevented that "violated by the world" feeling they spoke of. Crimony, I'd be thrilled if my blog received 400 visitors, let alone 4000.
Posted by: Artoo45 | July 31, 2008 6:03 PM
. . . I'd also be thrilled if I proofread my posts for grammar. Sigh.
Posted by: thegomezsymbol | July 31, 2008 6:07 PM
thegodpoll.com
we are starting to hack it via LJ
Posted by: Randy | July 31, 2008 6:09 PM
Perhaps "Do you feel violated by 'poll boosting'?" should be a polled?
Posted by: Buzz Buzz | July 31, 2008 6:09 PM
Man... "The Violator". That's awesome!
Why can't I get a kickass nickname like that bequeathed upon me? You are a lucky bastard, Myers.
Posted by: Azkyroth | July 31, 2008 6:18 PM
Except that they only accept comments from registered users. Fuckers.
Posted by: John Yates | July 31, 2008 6:20 PM
Bakersfield regular robinislost, who you can find in the comments section, had this to say:
"I feel insulted by the poll boosts. It feels to me like the folks over there are chuckling and making fun of us."
You know, I think she might be on to something!
Posted by: Randomfactor | July 31, 2008 6:22 PM
Guys, Robin is a teenager with a very good heart. Play nice, please.
Posted by: John Yates | July 31, 2008 6:28 PM
Randomfactor:
But not a very good brain by the sounds of things! ;)
Posted by: Sili | July 31, 2008 6:29 PM
*wikipeeks at PZ M
eyers*Dustin, you're a filthy liar.
Posted by: Randomfactor | July 31, 2008 6:30 PM
Actually quite young and quite bright. Wants to be a copy editor--how many teenagers set their sights on maintaining accuracy in the media.
Posted by: Jparenti | July 31, 2008 6:31 PM
Well, I think they're actually amused, so it all works out. Maybe this will at least change a couple attitudes when it comes to atheists in public office. Despite the "no religious test" clause, a majority of Americans wouldn't vote an atheist into office.
And think of the tax breaks we'd give! We'd just start taking away tax-exempt status for the religious organizations, and the citizens wouldn't need to pay a penny more for universal health care (or whatever crazy thing they want to start up). Pay up, Bob Jones University! :)
Posted by: Randomfactor | July 31, 2008 6:33 PM
For what it's worth, there's a fairly active core group of atheists who frequent the blogs, doing battle with the Forces of Darkness in Bakersfield. One of 'em is Possummomma, the fabled Atheist In A Minivan. Another is Chaos' Humble Servant, yours truly.
Posted by: Sili | July 31, 2008 6:33 PM
Bugger. There is a strikethrough on the "e", but it's hard to see.
And just to be on topic, I think the Bakosphere sounds like a remarkably good sport, and people dissing them for question are being overly sensitive. The context was descriped early in the original text, and on that basis it was a relevant thing to ask. And please do remember that it was pretty much skewed before PeeZed posted.
Posted by: firemancarl | July 31, 2008 6:42 PM
How is that? We are so totally PZs minions! Woot!
Posted by: DCN | July 31, 2008 6:50 PM
The reader comments over there are great. If they're in any way representative of Bakersfield, color me impressed.
Posted by: John Yates | July 31, 2008 6:51 PM
Well Random, I suppose you're in a better position to judge than we are. If she's still young, perhaps there's hope for her yet... although something tells me that's unlikely.
Posted by: Robin | July 31, 2008 6:59 PM
Thank you, Random. I always appreciate the fact that you're there to defend me.
And thanks a lot, John Yates. I appreciate the insult. You seemed to notice that I was a regular, but you didn't really read my profile, now, did you? Because if you had, you would have realized that I am young, as mentioned by Randomfactor.
When I commented about the chuckling and laughing, I meant that I felt you were laughing at the whole city of Bakersfield, not just the blog itself.
And just for the record, dear enemy, I hate Chad Vegas just as much as you do. I actually went to church with him, and believe me -- it wasn't fun.
Posted by: Pimientita | July 31, 2008 7:04 PM
How dare he defile the name of Depeche Mode by associating them with his lunatic ravings!
Wait...I just had a creepy thought. I too had a fascination with that video as an adolescent. Does that mean I'm gonna go beyond batshit crazy like Mabus?
Nooooooooo!
Posted by: Itzac | July 31, 2008 7:07 PM
Apparently the poll was in response to this article:
http://www.bakersfield.com/hourly_news/story/471675.html
I found it after soundly defeating their impenetrable UI. To be fair, we probably should be sure to read the associated articles before crashing their polls.
This Chad Vegas fellow sounds mighty unpleasant, not to mention criminally ignorant of the constitution.
Posted by: mikeg | July 31, 2008 7:09 PM
#16
yikes! TGP... inane in the extreme (+)
Posted by: Patricia | July 31, 2008 7:10 PM
Aaaaww! The air is MUCH better over here. I didn't think I was ever gotta get that troll yeck off my shoes. :(
Posted by: mothra | July 31, 2008 7:11 PM
@#3 PZ had trouble getting his following up? I thought his webzite did that. :]
Posted by: Robin | July 31, 2008 7:12 PM
Itzac, thank you for posting that link for everyone, because that's what I was wanting everyone to understand on the Bakosphere blog. The poll question was only created because of what Chad Vegas had said; it wasn't a random question that came out of nowhere.
Posted by: echidna | July 31, 2008 7:16 PM
Oh, hi Robin! Welcome to Pharyngula.
I hope you hang around. PZ's biology posts are really something, and the defense of science from arm-waving religionists can be a lot of fun too.
While moderation is not really a key attribute of the posters here, attacks aren't meant to be personal, they are more attacks on baseless ideas. The poll question was about as baseless as it gets, being unlawful and all that, and while some know the context regarding Chad Vegas, not all of us do (including me).
Posted by: KevinGreene | July 31, 2008 7:17 PM
I read the story and still don't see the reasoning that lead from it to the poll question.
Posted by: Itzac | July 31, 2008 7:20 PM
No prob, Robin. I don't really understand the justification behind ridiculing an entire town for what a few ignorant people in it say. I am, however, all for ridiculing the ignorant people and what they say. From there it's pretty easy to cross a line in the zeal of the moment.
From the article: "Now, the fascist agenda of liberals becomes clear," he wrote. "Give up your first amendments rights or lose your job!"
The Kern High School District trustee wrote that he swore to uphold the Constitution, not "every ridiculous law that comes down from liberal activist judges or the California Legislature."
If that disqualifies him or Barnett from office, he wrote, "then I suppose no abolitionist or civil rights activist ever qualified for office in these United States."
Just reading that made me die a little inside.
Posted by: DarwinRules | July 31, 2008 7:24 PM
PZ is so cool!
Posted by: Patricia | July 31, 2008 7:25 PM
It must be some kind of quirky regional thing, cause I don't see how the poll ties to the story either.
Posted by: Randomfactor | July 31, 2008 7:27 PM
To be clear, what Vegas is advocating is that the County Board of Supervisors pass a law specifically to ban same-sex marriages in the county, regardless of whether or not it's constitutional. He threatened their jobs if they didn't.
He's also one of the two ringleaders of (alas) a successful effort to place "In God We Trust" posters in high school classrooms. The posters were modified greatly from the original design as people raised objections, but they still went up.
He's also an ID crazy. He's up for re-election after his first term, this year.
Posted by: Patricia | July 31, 2008 7:34 PM
So has he made remarks about not letting atheists run for office?
Posted by: King of Ferrets | July 31, 2008 7:45 PM
I won't feel violated if you crash my polls! (I'll post this on every poll till you do so! =P)
Posted by: possummomma | July 31, 2008 7:47 PM
I'm ashamed to be a resident of this town right now. Of course, anyone reading those blogs (at the Californian site) may figure out why our family gets all the crazy fundies coming around.
Posted by: Artoo45 | July 31, 2008 7:54 PM
Man, I'm totally changing my porn name. Goodbye Larry LeMans, hello Chad Vegas.
Posted by: LisaJ | July 31, 2008 8:12 PM
Oh, I think overall they kinda liked it. Cute!
Posted by: Dolly | July 31, 2008 8:27 PM
"Oh, Sweet Jesus, if You're listen'g keep me ever close to You as I'm travelin, travelin, travelin, travelin, travelin, thru. Ooooooh oooooh ooooooh travelin thru."
The bastards here have nothing worthwhile listening to, sad to say. PZ Myers is a freak of "ad hominem" attacks; so irrational and illogical! Keep the faith brothers and sisters and Jesus will reward you!
Dolly
Posted by: decrepitoldfool | July 31, 2008 8:28 PM
Pollmaster stands beside the meter, watching an occasional response trickle in. He raises the binoculars to his eyes.
"What is that?"
"What is what, sir?"
"That smudge on the horizon. What is it?"
Sidekick looks through the binoculars. "It is getting bigger, sir. I think it is coming closer."
Vibrations begin to form concentric circles on a glass of water on the instrument panel. An ominous rumbling becomes just barely audible. Sidekick hands the binoculars back to Pollmaster, who looks again. The poll-response meter begins to spin wildly.
"My God!," he says; "It's the ILK! RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!!!"
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp | July 31, 2008 8:47 PM
WOOT! Points for Dolly in the Irony Meter Shootout game!
Posted by: Adrienne | July 31, 2008 8:54 PM
PZ Myers: Desecrator...Violator....ok, what's the next -or?
Posted by: Freakin' Nerd | July 31, 2008 8:59 PM
#52 - Adrienne, Actually it's "Violator! Desacrator! Turn around and meet the Hater!" (Superbeast by Rob Zombie)
Posted by: catta | July 31, 2008 9:21 PM
decrepitoldfool, you just made me laugh out loud. Thanks for that. :)
Posted by: shonny | July 31, 2008 9:25 PM
When are you getting the payment from Bakersfield Tourist Commission, PZ?
After all, you put the place on the map!
Maybe not in a manner they really wanted, but all publicity and so on . . .
Posted by: shonny | July 31, 2008 9:28 PM
Keep the faith brothers and sisters and Jesus will reward you!
Dolly (the cloned sheep???)
Posted by: BobbyEarle | July 31, 2008 9:30 PM
PZ...
I don't think you can be a righteous Violator unless you have a flaming sword.
Maybe Vox "the Pox" Day will let you borrow his...?
Posted by: Dreadneck | July 31, 2008 9:41 PM
I responded to Chad Vegas' blog post How would you react if someone boosted your poll? with the following:
This guy is just another fundamentalist evangelical tool who has managed to infiltrate his local school board for the purpose of shoving his religious dogma down everyone's throat.
Posted by: Wicked Lad | July 31, 2008 9:45 PM
I like the comments there. Overall, quite sane and civil, with a good sense of perspective. I appreciate that.
Most of the time, though, I think it makes a better prank if the "victim" doesn't know who crashed them. That's why I copy the poll's URL into my address bar rather than click on PZ's link. That way it's not clear that my vote came from a Pharyngula reader.
Posted by: DCB | July 31, 2008 9:55 PM
Longtime reader, first-time poster...while sympathetic to the thrust of the cracker issue, scientifically, you could do better.
First, in terms of hypothesis testing, your null should have been that nothing will happen to you if you desecrate the cracker (especially since there is no historical evidence that (a) god has ever killed someone for blasphemy). That you were not struck down does not reject the null, it merely fails to reject the null, a result that is statistically uninteresting.
Second, if you really want to prove that it's a cracker, perform a DNA test on one of the blessed things. The Nicene creed says that "he came down from heaven and became man." If this is true, then Jesus had DNA. If the cracker is really Jesus after the blessing, it should have DNA. It would even be better to get a priest (or better yet, the Pope) to wager their faith on the result. PZ will become Catholic if a blessed cracker has human DNA; the Pope will renounce the Church and close it down if it does not.
Posted by: aleph1=c | July 31, 2008 11:29 PM
I just read an article in a recent issue of Scientific American Mind about ad hominem attacks.
Let's not make a kneejerk reaction by discounting all ad hominem attacks as logically fallacies.Posted by: aleph1=c | July 31, 2008 11:32 PM
logically fallacious!
Posted by: Eilish | July 31, 2008 11:35 PM
Where is the logic??
Your anger was at another college's administration -- so instead of dealing with that appropriately you get all weird and lash out.
Makes lots of sense --- college administration does something/fails to do something so you go out of your way to offend members of a world wide church.
There is logic here right? Cause and effect?
Exactly how were you personally affect that you rationalize the reasons for what you have since done?
You were not there and it was not your college.
What was the logic?
Posted by: mcow | July 31, 2008 11:38 PM
The scary thing is that 3% said "yes". 3% of 4063 is about 120 people. Assuming that none of those came from pharyngula, and that the total non-pharyngula turnout would have been about 180, that's about 67% for banning atheists from public office. Come to think of it, that's pretty close to the 62% Newsweek got from their 2007 survey ( http://atheism.about.com/od/atheistbigotryprejudice/a/AtheistSurveys.htm ).
What's the point of crashing a poll if you're just going to extract the "real" results after the fact? I have no idea.
Posted by: epsilon | August 1, 2008 12:03 AM
@63 by Eilish
You don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about do you? Thanks for playing.
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp | August 1, 2008 12:07 AM
You may want to read up on the whole incident, because your simplification is not just a simplification, it is way wrong.
Posted by: Autumn | August 1, 2008 2:09 AM
Unholy Crap!
Is this going to become yet another one of those cracker threads? Can we get back on topic? I've spent way too much of my life perusing Catholic Cathechisms (awesome name for a band, fetish-clad nuns and what-not) and would like to be able to read comments without. . . What the Hell, c'mon Pharyngula, it's only Crackergate.
Posted by: Masks of Eris | August 1, 2008 2:23 AM
At #3: Well, there are more followers of PZ than just a few thousand, but just about that many Minions; it was their turn to poll-vote today. The next time Acolytes vote, then the Ilk, then the Hand.
As for Him Our Host The Biologist performing miracles: If this can be arranged, can I suggest making every cracker a portal into the Dungeon Dimensions?
"Reverend, why is there a tentacle coming out of my wafer?"
"Funny; I didn't know Jesus had tentacles."
"That is no part of His body! Run for your lives!"
Posted by: Kimpatsu | August 1, 2008 3:10 AM
"The Violator" sounds like a contestant on the SciFi channel reality show, "Who Wants to Be a Superhero?"...
Posted by: Masks of Eris | August 1, 2008 3:23 AM
Hm, to me Violator sounds more like a wrestler. But who could he feud with?
Posted by: Dr Doctor | August 1, 2008 4:47 AM
Just make sure you never leave a shoe or a gourd hanging about PZ.
Posted by: Moses | August 1, 2008 7:00 AM
What I would have said if registering at Bakersfield.com was worth the effort.
Posted by: Rolan le Gargéac | August 1, 2008 7:23 AM
Decreprit Old fool,
Thank you for the wonderful image of the bald, tentacled, hairy horde of The Ilk pouring over the edge of the world ! Love it !
Posted by: Logicel | August 1, 2008 7:58 AM
decrepitoldfool #50, I chuckled, and then I chuckled a bit more. Good stuff. Especially liked: That smudge on the horizon.
Posted by: Ferin | August 1, 2008 8:51 AM
Most guys I know would be happy to get their poll boosted for free. Usually you gotta pay somebody for that. :)
Posted by: Natasha Yar-Routh | August 1, 2008 9:34 AM
Oh come on Robin even those of us living in the mountains to the south of Bakersfield laff, point and make rude comments about what a smog covered oven Bakersfield is. And we're just meth cooking trailer trash. Pools like that do emphasize that Bakersfield really is 'America's City'.
Posted by: Kat | August 1, 2008 9:56 AM
You know, this is probably the most scientific thinking they've done all year. *tear* I'm so proud!
Posted by: Robin L. | August 1, 2008 10:08 AM
Hey Robin - Come and join us. Then we'll be laughing with you.
Posted by: CosmicTeapot | August 1, 2008 10:28 AM
BobbyEarle @57 said
"I don't think you can be a righteous Violator unless you have a flaming sword."
He has a rusty nail, will that not do?
Posted by: sublunary | August 1, 2008 10:44 AM
aleph1=c @62 said "logically fallacious!"
And by brain just had to read it to the tune of a lucky charms commercial.
"They're logic-ly fallacious!"
Posted by: Qwerty | August 1, 2008 11:49 AM
After crashing the poll yesterday, I am wondering how many politicians in our country are athiests? I suppose most of them are closeted athiests as it is probably easier to be a open homosexual in public office than an athiest. Even gays believe in the Bible.
Posted by: tsg | August 1, 2008 1:21 PM
An ad hominem doesn't make the argument wrong. At best, you can only show that the person making it doesn't actually believe it or may have ulterior motives for making it.
Posted by: MS | August 1, 2008 1:59 PM
Has anyone pointed out that polls with self-selecting responders have absolutely no statistical validity anyway?
Posted by: Kseniya | August 1, 2008 2:11 PM
Those internet polls aren't scientific anyways - the results don't mean much. So what it the "accurate" results showed that a hundred people out of a couple of hundred in the Bakersfield area cared enough to speak up for violating the CotUS?
I did vote in the poll. I did not do it out of any desire to make fun of Bakersfield. Wasn't Bakersfield once one of the best music towns in the country?
I live in one of the most liberal areas of the country, and even here there's a very wide range of ideologies and politics. That's gonna be true for any town that's more than a speck on the map, or so I reckon. It's interesting to hear from some of the Bakersfield folks who've stopped in here to shed a little light on the bigger picture out there.
Posted by: tsg | August 1, 2008 2:36 PM
That, I believe, is the whole point of crashing them.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo | August 1, 2008 2:40 PM
Only if you consider Buck Owens and Dwight Yoakum to have made some of the best music. I'll say this for Bakersfield: it ain't San Bernardino. "Oklahoma West" we used to call it, and having been to both places and lived in one of them, that still seems pretty accurate.Posted by: HennepinCountyLawyer | August 1, 2008 3:02 PM
aleph1=c
Under what I believe is the standard understanding of the term "ad hominem", the argument about Eliot Spitzer is not and ad hominem attack, because the point of the argument is about ES himself, not about his ideas. An ad hominem attack would be an argument that since ES is such a sleazebag (not to mention astoundingly STUPID), his positions on, say, consumer protection, are wrong.
Posted by: Reginald Selkirk | August 1, 2008 3:35 PM
Chad Vegas? I had never heard of him, but this comes up in Google:
Chad Vegas Discusses In God We Trust Proposal
In which he says he doesn't care if someone sues the local school district for violating separation of church and state due to his actions, because there are many organizations which would represent them in court for free. He should do a little research, maybe talk to the folks in Dover, PA. "the Sword and Shield for People of Faith" (aka Thomas More Law Center) represented their school district in court for free, but didn't offer to pay damages and lawyer fees when they lost.
Posted by: kabin | June 12, 2009 3:07 PM
thanks...
Kabin
Konteyner
Posted by: kabin | June 12, 2009 3:09 PM
thanks...
Kabin
Konteyner