Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
…and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• facebook
• MySpace
• Twitter
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
A miracle was not in our development plan, but this Madonna thing will go well with our new water amusement park.
[Pietro Tidei, Mayor of Civitavecchia (1995), from a news story in the Ottawa Citizen]
The burden of bearing a massive penis
Symmetry breaking and genetic assimilation
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« Radio reminder | Main | Jefferson was a freethinker »
Category: Communicating science
Posted on: July 6, 2008 9:10 AM, by PZ Myers
Larry Moran has been highlighting the work of some great science writers — you really should start off your day with selections from two of my favorites, Richard Lewontin and Niles Eldredge. It's almost as good as coffee for perking up your brain.
Find more posts in: 
Life Science
YES! Send me a free issue of Seed.
If I like what I see, I'll receive 5 more issues (6 in all) for just $14.95. That's 50% off the cover price! If I'm not completely satisfied, I'll simply write "cancel" on the invoice and owe nothing. The free issue is mine to keep.
(Non-U.S. subscribers, click here.)
Comments
Well, I start my day reading New Scientist, & drinking a mug of coffee. I dread to think what the old brain would be like without that routine.
Posted by: Richard Harris | July 6, 2008 9:39 AM
Lewontin is yet to live down his "Not in our Genes" era for me. He's not innocent of ideologically-driven science.
Posted by: Robert Davidson | July 6, 2008 9:53 AM
I used to assign parts of Biology as Ideology in my intro class. It worked really well for the frosh when we were going over intro-phil-sci stuff.
Posted by: Bob | July 6, 2008 10:34 AM
I would like to echo comment #2 in stronger terms. Lewontin's depiction of E.O. Wilson, sociobiology and evolutionary psychology is a caricature driven by his political commitments. The text cited by Professor Moran basically boils down to this: "Hey, remember, Gould and I both warned ya about spandrels!" That piece is deservedly amongst the most cited in the literature of evolutionary theory, but as far as I can see it is in itself not a refutation of adaptationist reasoning, merely a cautionary tale about speculation uncoupled from experimental test.
Posted by: Scott Hatfield, OM | July 6, 2008 12:24 PM
My vote for best science writer of the decade is for Carl Zimmer. I find his writing clearer and more memorable than Niles Eldredge's. It's a pleasure to be educated by Carl. Such smoothness and clarity is the result of painstaking work on the logic and readability of an entire work and every chapter, paragraph, sentence, and word. By comparison, most writers simply get something down on paper and poke at it a bit to make sure it's coherent. The very fact that the best writing is so easy to understand generally ensures that it's underrated.
Posted by: Monado | July 7, 2008 8:36 AM
I also enjoy Carl Zimmer's work. Andy Revkin's work is always excellent too - thoughtful and well-balanced (in the non-Fox News sense). Would that I could write as well as them.
Posted by: astroande | July 7, 2008 11:38 AM
Posted by: Sven DiMilo | July 7, 2008 1:30 PM