Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
…and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• facebook
• MySpace
• Twitter
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
It is plain enough that men and women care for God. This is too apparent to be disputed, unless men and women are hypocrites. What is not so plain is that God cares for men and women.
[Lemuel K. Washburn, Is The Bible Worth Reading And Other Essays]
Evolution of sensory signaling
Upstream plasticity and downstream robustness in evolution of molecular networks
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« Me and my cyberpistol | Main | Nexus in the clear »
Category: Politics
Posted on: July 17, 2008 8:45 AM, by PZ Myers
Because if I lived in Kansas, I could vote for Sean Tevis for State Representative, a pro-education. pro-science candidate with a sense of humor. Since I live in Minnesota, though, I'll have to settle for donating a few dollars to his campaign (you must click through to that link — you'll be missing something great if you don't.)
Comments
Posted by: Kobra | July 17, 2008 8:48 AM
XKCD Style? Awesome.
Posted by: TSC | July 17, 2008 8:51 AM
The sad reality. It's depressing enough to drive someone to commit suicide with a cyberpistol.
Posted by: James F | July 17, 2008 8:52 AM
Here's hoping his opponent gets pwn3d.
Posted by: Mango | July 17, 2008 8:52 AM
What are the national campaigns in which pro-science candidates are running? Congressmen/women carry a lot more weight.
Posted by: MAJeff, OM | July 17, 2008 8:53 AM
That is TEH AWSUMZ!
Posted by: Kobra | July 17, 2008 9:05 AM
http://www.xkcd.com/285/
Right now I'm picturing this guy at a debate, and his opponent says something stupid, and Sean holds up a sign that says [citation needed].
Posted by: zeno | July 17, 2008 9:09 AM
Sean's going to need himself some more bandwidth to handle the flood of Pharynguloid traffic. I hope we give him the bucks he's going to need to do it. Otherwise we're just crashing his site.
Posted by: Spanish Inquisitor | July 17, 2008 9:13 AM
I wish I had the $500. I'd really like to get the video from his mom telling me how great I ma. Alas, I'm going to have to settle for a thank you card.
Posted by: Carlie | July 17, 2008 9:14 AM
I liked the cartoon, but I'm a little suspicious whether he knows what he's doing. He wants to end sales tax on fooc (good), but doesn't say what he'll do to make up for that revenue (bad) and has some other ideas that will cost money without saying how those can be paid for (also bad). His immigration stance is also vaguely negative. I'd like to see a better-developed platform before I'd donate money.
Posted by: Deepsix | July 17, 2008 9:18 AM
He's running for State Rep in Kansas? And his bio doesn't mention which local church he attends, how long he's been attending, and when he devoted himself to serving christ?? DOOMED!
Posted by: MPG | July 17, 2008 9:23 AM
I think the site has been Pharyngulated already - it's taking forever to load.
Posted by: James F | July 17, 2008 9:25 AM
Meanwhile, Florida continues to impress (although they're not Louisiana).
Posted by: No One of Consequence | July 17, 2008 9:26 AM
That guy needs to win. The XKCD comic was enough for me to vote for him...too bad he's one state over.
Posted by: Geor | July 17, 2008 9:31 AM
Ha! The content filter my school uses* won't let me through to his site. The reason: It thinks the site is "Pornography". I was expecting the reason to be "Humor", as I can't access XKCD from work, either.
* As a member of the IT dept., I keep pushing to have local filters that we can control, instead of this stupid filter "service" that flags sites like that one, and oddly also seems to think "typography" and "pornography" are the same thing (as it blocks some typography related sites, too).
Posted by: Cappy | July 17, 2008 9:32 AM
I'm in Kansas, but not in his district. Still, it's great to see we can still breed old fashioned Populist Progressives like we did in the old days!
Posted by: Mercurious | July 17, 2008 9:37 AM
DailyKos has a dairy up for Sean also. If your a member there get over and rec this up!
Posted by: PatrickHenry | July 17, 2008 9:39 AM
Posted by: James F (#12):
I was going to mention that. Those candidates are from the Cape Canaveral area. Yoiks! Candidates differ on drilling. They're asked about evolution and give some amazing answers.
Posted by: Edwin Hensley | July 17, 2008 9:40 AM
This may be off topic, but thought you might like to read it or use it in a future column.
A faith healer is visiting Louisville, KY. The Louisville Courier-Journal quotes Dembski, who notes that after driving 130 miles to see the faith healer for a cure for his autistic son, he was prevented from having his son seen for healing.
You can read more about it here:
http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080717/NEWS01/807170410&s=d&page=2#pluckcomments
Posted by: Mike | July 17, 2008 9:46 AM
Isn't an endorsement here for a candidate in Kansas the kiss of death for their election? Seriously, does he want Myers' endorsement? Has anyone asked?
Posted by: truth machine, OM | July 17, 2008 9:47 AM
That was fucking hilarious -- well worth my small contribution.
Posted by: craig | July 17, 2008 9:51 AM
"I was going to mention that. Those candidates are from the Cape Canaveral area. Yoiks! Candidates differ on drilling. They're asked about evolution and give some amazing answers."
Gah... that moron Workman repeats the "China drilling of the Florida Coast" lie.
Posted by: Lago | July 17, 2008 9:52 AM
I am with Mike here. PZ, is it the best thing for you right now to endorse people? His opponents could use such to muddy the waters and make the guy out to be anti-God. Before the waters calm down and the muck settles he could have lost the race...
Posted by: Terry Small | July 17, 2008 9:53 AM
Man, the last time I donated to someone who appealed to my internet nerd, it was Chris Dodd after stopping that previous incarnation of FISA, and then he dropped out of the presidential race.
I'm too afraid to support anyone else now - they'll only crush my dreams again.
Posted by: Eli | July 17, 2008 9:54 AM
:D This made my morning. Finally a politician who is sensible (or, seems to be at least) and is relevant in a non-pathetic manner. I've been kicking it too long with MC Rove.
Posted by: Benjamin Geiger | July 17, 2008 9:55 AM
I chipped in my $8.34. I figure, anyone who would put up a site like that has to be made of win.
Posted by: MissPrism | July 17, 2008 9:58 AM
I'm not allowed to donate from outside the US, but very good luck to him.
As for PZ's endorsement potentially being a bad idea - I see the point, but Tevis's opponents will make him out to be a baby-eating commie whatever happens. He might as well have enough publicity and campaign funding to deal with it.
Posted by: Marcus Ranum | July 17, 2008 9:59 AM
He just got my $10.
Posted by: student_b | July 17, 2008 10:05 AM
Sentiments like this are exactly the reason why Democrats in congress and the house don't achieve anything. Too scared of their own shadows while rightwing-wackaloons sprout their insanity with impunity.
Yeah, maybe it will hurt him (though I don't think so) but once you have to stand up for your believes and stop cowering, or you'll never get anything done.
And yes, I'll think it's better to go down with a good conscience then to live on having said and done nothing.
Posted by: Greg | July 17, 2008 10:07 AM
Huh? His campaign website is bereft of any pro-science information. It says that Kansas schools are the best in the country and that he wants to keep it that way.
Posted by: Martin | July 17, 2008 10:07 AM
I was half-seriously considering donating the minimun amount, but then I see they don't accept donations from non-US citizens (for probably very good reasons).
Posted by: lauram | July 17, 2008 10:08 AM
Thanks for bringing him to our attention PZ. Donating to someone's campaign is a great way to extend your reach beyond your own neighborhood - ya know - like the billionaires do. Think PACs and "think" tanks are funded by fairy dust and dreams? Nope. Funded by wealthy citizens who like to throw their weight around all over to country to keep it friendly to them and their wealth accumulation and tax avoidance strategies.
The internet finally gives peons like me a chance to throw what small weight around I can. I'm on my way to donate...
Posted by: Suze | July 17, 2008 10:10 AM
Wow. Time to start the Pharyngula Party. No one would get elected, but the ruckus a la Ron Paul would be interesting.
Posted by: andyo | July 17, 2008 10:20 AM
Yeah, I am with Greg, I don't see anything specifically related to science, besides the ID cameo in the comic, which by the way I found no way to access from the home page, is it supposed to be hidden or something?
Carlie,
It's not too vague from what I can tell. He was confused for someone who fired four illegal immigrants and had them deported. He did not do that, and he does not want to be associated with causing suffering to those people. He wants a sensible reform, and I think it's implied that he won't be deporting 12 million people, but trying to help them out instead. And, have a better way for more people to come in legally. I don't think that's negative at all.
Posted by: andyo | July 17, 2008 10:26 AM
I misread that part on the immigrants. It wasn't "four", in the thread linked he says it was "44".
Posted by: David Marjanović, OM | July 17, 2008 10:27 AM
All I can say is...
SEMI-PROTECT THE CONSTITUTION!
Posted by: dcwp | July 17, 2008 10:28 AM
I grew up in the next district over from this one and I think some of my friends and family are still there, I'll have to check.
A few years back there was a nutball state politician from the same town (not sure same district). I believe her name was Kay O'Connor. She gained some notoriety by stating publicly that women's suffrage was a mistake. When confronted on this, she reaffirmed her position. Seriously.
My sister and some other folks I know were involved in a recall campaign over that issue. As my sister tells the story, it was surprisingly difficult to get people to sign her recall petition. Ultimately I don't think anything happened to her.
So I hope this guy is challenging her and delivers a sound defeat. Olathe truly has it's share of crazies and I'm sure there are people who would vote for the anti-women's suffrage female candidate again, but given a viable alternative, this guy may be able to unseat her and put a much more progressive rep in the house.
EDIT: OK, I used teh google and find that Kay O'Connor was in the state senate and has now retired. But this should give a sense of the electorate this guy is running in. So if his positions aren't perfectly progressive I hope you can take it in context.
Posted by: Nerdette | July 17, 2008 10:31 AM
Having gone to K-12 in Kansas, our school system was not great. I went out of state unprepared for the college experience, and I knew it. The schools in and around the Kansas City area are good, but in the rest of the state, not so much. The last time I was home, the Wichita area schools were in the bottom of the barrel.
Love the xkcd homage.
Posted by: Deenie | July 17, 2008 10:36 AM
Huh? His campaign website is bereft of any pro-science information. It says that Kansas schools are the best in the country and that he wants to keep it that way.
Sigh. I grew up in Olathe. It's on the east side of Kansas near Kansas City. It is far more liberal than the rest of the state. Olathe schools are, in fact, really good. My teachers taught evolution and were enraged with the idea that some people wanted to outlaw it in the state. You can learn more about them by using the Google. It's really very simple.
He's running for State Rep in Kansas? And his bio doesn't mention which local church he attends, how long he's been attending, and when he devoted himself to serving christ?? DOOMED!
Please at least try to understand the area you're talking about before you blast it. I'm really sick of everyone using Kansas as the butt of a stupid joke - as if people from Manhattan can't be the most ignorant jerks ever.
Posted by: Nerdette | July 17, 2008 10:40 AM
"Please at least try to understand the area you're talking about before you blast it. I'm really sick of everyone using Kansas as the butt of a stupid joke - as if people from Manhattan can't be the most ignorant jerks ever."
Might want to specify which Manhattan. I definitely read Manhattan, KS first, then had to consider NYC.
Sigh, my Kansas roots are showing.
Posted by: Lago | July 17, 2008 10:41 AM
Dear Student_b
Your response makes little sense. We are not here to prove we are heroes. We are here because we desire change. If PZ public backing of this person ruins the persons chances of getting into office, then we have not done crap. It is like voting for the Green Party. How the hell does that help?
Posted by: Epinephrine | July 17, 2008 10:41 AM
Carlie:
I'm sure that some other taxes will likely need to be introduced to cover the differnce, but there are no taxes on food (neither GST nor PST) here, and it works fine for us. We don't have the provincial tax on children's clothes either.
Posted by: andyo | July 17, 2008 10:43 AM
...aaaand now I see his immigration page changed since it first went up. I guess Carlie was referring to that (and the awful story quoted in the linked thread).
Posted by: Deenie | July 17, 2008 10:55 AM
Nerdette:
Hah, whoops! Although I guess my point is that anyone anywhere can be ignorant.
The Little Apple does have its upsides too...
Posted by: Steve in MI | July 17, 2008 11:09 AM
Slashdotted.
The poor fellow's site appears to have been brought to its knees by our attentions. I'll have to try back later to see what alll the fuss is about. Note to self: if this is all it's cracked up to be, remember to send some $love$ his way to help defray the cost of our interest.
Posted by: andyo | July 17, 2008 11:12 AM
I stumbled upon this site while googling "Kay O'Connor", as I was totally dumbfounded by dcwp's mention of her views. I think you guys will enjoy it. Anyone heard of it before? Does look ridiculous enough to be a Poe.
Posted by: Deepsix | July 17, 2008 11:28 AM
"Please at least try to understand the area you're talking about before you blast it. I'm really sick of everyone using Kansas as the butt of a stupid joke - as if people from Manhattan can't be the most ignorant jerks ever."
Deenie, first off, it was a joke directed at a specefic group of people- not all Kansans. And, have you ever heard that there is some truth in stereotypes? The joke wouldn't have made any sense if Kansas didn't have a history of strong arming creationism/id into the classroom.
Had the link been for a Rep from Florida or Louisiana, I would have made the same joke about them. Again, because of their past history.
Posted by: Glen Davidson | July 17, 2008 11:29 AM
How cynical are people going to be when they can't even download his little cartoon?
I gave up with two rows of panels left that just stayed pixellated for 10 minutes.
I'm not reading it and leaving without doing anything (the last row came through), I'm not even reading it.
Glen D
http://tinyurl.com/2kxyc7
Posted by: Chris Bell | July 17, 2008 11:37 AM
The XKCD parody is hard to load, but if you want to donate just click on his main page. You can quickly get to a donation page that moves much faster.
Posted by: Foob | July 17, 2008 12:03 PM
The guy's a mefite, and pops up in this thread (http://www.metafilter.com/73366/Information-Design-Politics-WIN-Hopefully). There's some discussion of his immigration policy, and an explanation of why he changed his page on it.
Posted by: Jessika | July 17, 2008 12:08 PM
This story was also on BoingBoing, so his poor server is getting a huge influx of people! I'll be interested to see how many donations that guys ends up with.
In a kind of related note, Brent Rinehart put out a comic for his candidacy here in Oklahoma. Complete with devils, angels, toga-wearing gay men. He claims there is a huge liberal "good ol' boy" network here in Oklahoma. I am very disappointed that I wasn't invited to join.
Posted by: xkcd | July 17, 2008 12:22 PM
A disturbing sentence from his immigration stance:
"Illegal immigration, and even *legal* immigration, exacts an unnecessary human cost."
Posted by: Alex | July 17, 2008 12:40 PM
Amusing find in the source of his webpage...
""
Wacky ;)
Posted by: Alex | July 17, 2008 12:42 PM
(/doh, leaving in the comment-marks eats the quote... brilliant. Should say: "Hello person who cares enough to read source code.
Please donate $8.88 to my campaign. Any amount with 88 cents at the end is flagged for me to let me know that it came from someone who I guess is a lot like me. You'll also be entered into a drawing to win a prize and it will help save the world. Thank you.")
Posted by: Andrew | July 17, 2008 12:50 PM
I think it's unbelievably refreshing -- and certainly a first for me -- that the candidate himself allows and responds to comments on his "issues" page. That's grassroots democracy at its best.
Posted by: andyo | July 17, 2008 1:16 PM
xkcd, #51
Yeah, that is a bit confusing, though the next two paragraphs sound more reasonable. I guess we'll have to see what happens next.
Are you THE xkcd, by the way?
Posted by: Carlie | July 17, 2008 1:25 PM
I just don't know where he's going with "immigration reform". Ok, he thinks we need it, but does he mean making it easier, making it more difficult, what? Yes, the current situation is a shambles, but there's a lot of difference in ways to deal with it.
I also agree that food shouldn't be taxed, but he can't say that and say that schools should be better funded and not have a plan for how to accomplish both of those things without bankrupting the state. I'm not saying I disagree with him, I just want to see evidence that he's thought through what those campaign promises would mean.
Posted by: Paul Burnett | July 17, 2008 1:47 PM
"I just don't know where he's going with "immigration reform"."
I didn't realize Kansas had an immigration problem that needed to be reformed. California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas...sure. But Kansas? Or is this an appeal to a wider base?
Posted by: benjdm | July 17, 2008 1:51 PM
On a related note, is anyone running against Monique Davis?
Posted by: xkcd | July 17, 2008 2:13 PM
Are you THE xkcd, by the way?
No, just didn't want to think too hard to come up with a handle.
Posted by: DCWP | July 17, 2008 2:42 PM
Paul Burnett @57
Kansas may not be southern California or Texas, but there is plenty of immigration both legal and illegal. The meat packing industry as you may know is a huge draw for Latin American immigrants of all sorts of legal status and has historically been very abusive of this workforce. There is also a large Vietnamese population in many parts of the state, a result of policies to spread refugees throughout the heartland rather than allow them to form ghettos in the major coastal cities. The district this guy is running in, Olathe, has recently become home to many many Mexican immigrants and is now one of the centers of Mexican-American population in the greater KC metro area. Add to all of that the anti-immigration rhetoric that is at the center of Republican campaigning these days and immigration becomes a very important and legitimate issue for this guy.
As has been stated earlier, Kansas is far more diverse than most stereotypes would have you believe. And like most states there is more for legislators to worry about than farm policy and the second ammendment.
Posted by: Rey Fox | July 17, 2008 2:44 PM
I know who Dirk Kempthorne is! He used to be my governor. The "number of species" factoid is perhaps a little unfair since he was appointed as a lame duck Int. Sec. with about two years left in the administration, but still, I'm completely fine with jabs at Dirk, even as complete digressions within something else.
Posted by: Andrew | July 17, 2008 2:54 PM
The Metafilter thread is worth a read, too; any candidate who uses the phrase "reality-based science" is good in my book.
Posted by: JamesMason | July 17, 2008 2:59 PM
This guy's campaign website is AMAZING.
Forget his policies-- anyone who can do such a brilliant
XKCD homage deserves my $8.34.
I roflol when i got to the "3000" and I am now one of them.
Basically, anyone who can have this sense of humor must
be directed by a clearminded and fair sensibility. (As a counterexample,
see how humorless and stiff Bush/Cheney are.)
I've no idea what Tevis is for or against but hes definitely
one of the "good guys" and i hope hes elected. (Im in NY--
I cant even vote for him!)
Posted by: JohnnieCanuck, FCD | July 17, 2008 3:00 PM
Hmm. Signs of intelligence in a candidate for political office. This should be good.
As an agent of a foreign country, I am foiled in my plan to interfere with this campaign.
Curses. Well, only because I am too unimaginative and lazy to disguise myself. 'Scuse me, my shoe is ringing.
Posted by: PHS Phil | July 17, 2008 3:05 PM
"No candidate for state representative in Kansas has ever had more than 644 donors."
"Number of donors so far: 2,203"
It was half that a few hours ago. He just got more donations in 3 or 4 hours than any other candidate in the history of Kansas has gotten throughout their entire campaign. I love the internet.
Posted by: William | July 17, 2008 3:54 PM
Kansas? You'd move to Kansas? But why not Missouri? We're right next door, and we've got... er... we've got... um... we had our own creationism bill (which thankfully died)... and... we have the Katy Trail...
Damn.
Posted by: Feynmaniac | July 17, 2008 3:58 PM
Okay, just tap your heels three times....
Posted by: nunyer | July 17, 2008 4:05 PM
"No candidate for state representative in Kansas has ever had more than 644 donors."
"Number of donors so far: 2,203"
It was half that a few hours ago. He just got more donations in 3 or 4 hours than any other candidate in the history of Kansas has gotten throughout their entire campaign. I love the internet.
Let's hope at least some of these donors are Kansans. I've been told that a good rule of thumb is 7 voters for every 1 donor, so here's hoping he's getting a good response from his district.
The incumbent, Arlen Siegfried has been endorsed by the Kansas Republican Assembly, the right-wing arm of the Kansas Republic Party. Is there any evidence out there that Siegfried is anti-science?
Posted by: Forti | July 17, 2008 4:45 PM
I can't help, sadly, I'm not even American, but crap, that guy IS something. 2326 donors so far though, so I'm positive that he'll make it.
Now could someone please clone him and send a copy to Poland?
Posted by: Paul Burnett | July 17, 2008 4:50 PM
"Is there any evidence out there that Siegfried is anti-science?"
Under "Issues," his website (http://www.arlensiegfreid.com ) says he "supports education" - which could mean anything.
He also supports "Family Values" - which everybody knows means "Patriarchy Values."
Posted by: kent | July 17, 2008 5:01 PM
I'm generally a lurker. Never post, never donate, but I just had to give the $8.34. That has to be the best pitch I've seen.
Posted by: David Marjanović, OM | July 17, 2008 5:16 PM
LOL!
Posted by: mw | July 17, 2008 5:50 PM
I figured the cartoon alone earned my contribution.
That being said, I suppose I ought to send something to xkcd now.
Posted by: Aaron | July 17, 2008 5:51 PM
I live in KS, about one district over from this guy. Sadly (in this case anyway), I'm not a US citizen (Canadian), I suppose I might be one of the (documented) immigrants that exacts a toll on the whole US system, and I'm not legally allowed to donate to his campaign (I'd chip in otherwise). Mayhaps I'll convince my (American) wife to trhow in a few bucks. He's currently at 2741, when I checked this morning he was at only a couple of hundred donors, not bad for a single day.
Posted by: Paper Hand | July 17, 2008 6:57 PM
Awesome! I can donate *and* vote for him! At least, I think that's my district.
Posted by: Nova | July 17, 2008 7:18 PM
Darn. I would've donated $50 but I'm British and it says only Americans can donate.
Posted by: Lynnai | July 17, 2008 7:41 PM
I think this proves what strange and wonderful power actually having a sense of humour conveys.
Polititians need more humour, it makes them human. Also I think it tends to communicate more information in smaller packages, but that's just me.
Posted by: Leigh Shryock | July 17, 2008 8:47 PM
I sent my $10. Appeals to the newer generation ftw.
Posted by: ajani57 | July 17, 2008 9:34 PM
I just donated and he's at 2894 now. Good for him!
Posted by: Louis Irving | July 17, 2008 9:52 PM
PZ,
A number of us, including me, are unable to donate to this guy not being American and all. Is there any way that you could set up, for example, a Paypal account that Jonny Foreigner could pay some money to, which could then be "donated" by you, a US citizen?
I think it wouldn't be a bad idea to have some kind of method like this in place by which we, as a group, could band together and flex our political and financial muscle a bit more effectively.
Posted by: defectiverobot | July 17, 2008 11:27 PM
I know a Republican district in Illinois just had the guts (brains) to elect a Democratic scientist to fill Asstert's shoes, but still, this state needs more Sean Tevis's! Sean! SEAN! Move to Illinois!
Posted by: Escuerd | July 18, 2008 12:03 AM
For those from other countries who wish to donate, perhaps you know someone stateside who could help you do so by proxy? If you really want to, anyway. I'm stateside, but far too unmotivated at the moment to handle proxy donations.
Posted by: Escuerd | July 18, 2008 12:05 AM
Ach. And now I see Louis Irving's comment #80 which shows that I should always read the thread before posting.
Posted by: Escuerd | July 18, 2008 12:07 AM
And one last comment on that matter. If you wish to do it, it should be done individually through people you know. If anyone could make the case that his campaign (or some particular major donor) were somehow making a concerted effort to get money from people in other countries, someone might cry foul.
Posted by: BlackPocket | July 18, 2008 12:24 AM
It's currently at 2874, so I went to donate but I'm not a US citizen so I'm not allowed.
That's unfortunate - although, on reflection, I'm sure you American's don't need we foreigners affecting your political landscape...
...oh wait.
Posted by: BlackPocket | July 18, 2008 12:30 AM
...I need to be ridiculed mercilessly for Apostrophe Abuse.
My apologies - I have a headache.
Posted by: Dustin L. Hopper | July 18, 2008 12:55 AM
I do live in Kansas and I DID send him $10. :)
Posted by: Louis Irving | July 18, 2008 1:08 AM
Escuerd,
I don't think in the case of my idea that anyone could suggest a "concerted effort" had been made to raise funds from foreign sources. In fact, we (foreigners) have to be basically duplicitous in order to make it happen.
That said, I can still see the situation where some people (probably republicans) would try and call foul about it. And I can to some extent see their point. However, we're not invading their country to try and enforce good governance, just giving some money to a campaign which we believe in as human beings.
Posted by: melior | July 18, 2008 2:22 AM
That's the most fun I had spending $8.34 all month.
Posted by: The Amazing Kim | July 18, 2008 4:42 AM
It is like voting for the Green Party. How the hell does that help?
I don't know, maybe voting for those whose political ideals align closely with your own means you'll have someone in government who will represent your views. Could be that a 2-party system actually isn't that good for actual democracy. Perhaps party funding is based on a threshold of votes or something. No idea.
Posted by: truth machine, OM | July 18, 2008 5:19 AM
I don't know, maybe voting for those whose political ideals align closely with your own means you'll have someone in government who will represent your views.
Uh, no. Because there's only a causal relationship between voting and who you'll have in government if you vote for someone who has a better chance of winning than there is that aliens will come and take over.
Could be that a 2-party system actually isn't that good for actual democracy.
Right, but voting for marginal third parties doesn't change that. You should instead be working to institute IRV.
Perhaps party funding is based on a threshold of votes or something.
Or something? Do you know what that threshold is and the likelihood of the Green Party reaching it this year?
No idea.
Right answer.
Posted by: truth machine, OM | July 18, 2008 5:25 AM
The incumbent, Arlen Siegfried has been endorsed by the Kansas Republican Assembly, the right-wing arm of the Kansas Republic Party. Is there any evidence out there that Siegfried is anti-science?
That is evidence; strong evidence.
Posted by: Liesele | July 18, 2008 8:17 AM
Can you imagine all the real estate agents in KS right now, trying to figure out why their phones are ringing off the hooks with pro-science, pro-open government clients? This so makes me want to move there just to have competent representation.
Posted by: corsair the pirate | July 18, 2008 10:30 AM
I just checked again (I dropped $25 in a couple of days ago) and there is an updated cartoon and an indication of 4,101 donations.
Way to go all.
Posted by: RedStateDemocrat | July 18, 2008 4:09 PM
I've actually talked with Sean about how he intends to cover the lost revenue from food taxes. Here was his answer - well, his answer was actually probably a lot more detailed an intelligent, but this is from memory and a brief conversation, so it may not be totally perfect, but bear with me -
The short answer is that he would raise the taxes levied against services provided. In our economy, we used to have far more goods-based transactions than service-based ones, so the tax rate on goods was higher than that on services. Over time, the economy [in Kansas] has shifted to providing far more services than goods, but the tax rate never shifted to adjust to that fact. A slight rebalance would provide the lost revenue from removing a regressive tax on vital necessities.
So there you go.
Posted by: Brian Kaufman | July 18, 2008 5:06 PM
I grew up in Kansas. Trust me you do not want to live there. This is very very awesome. Even cooler to see it on your blog PZ!
Posted by: Sean Tevis | July 18, 2008 8:00 PM
I just wanted to say to you all that I've enjoyed this thread immensely. I absolutely accept a PZ Myers endorsement and am proud of it.
Thank you to all who have donated. Thanks also to those who helped show me some flaws in my communication. For example, "Illegal immigration, and even *legal* immigration, exacts an unnecessary human cost." means to me that no matter how you're getting into the U.S. right now it's expensive, humiliating, and time consuming. Apparently, my meaning isn't coming through.
RedStateDemocrat - you did a pretty good job paraphrasing.
Posted by: James F | July 18, 2008 9:30 PM
Sean,
At the rate you're going, we may have to draw on another internet meme.
IT'S OVER NINE THOUSAND!!!!!!!
Posted by: Peter K | July 21, 2008 1:48 AM
5112 as of 7/20!