Turnabout is fair play
Category: Humor
Posted on: July 8, 2008 2:52 PM, by PZ Myers
Not bad, but really, the guy in the glasses ought to be redrawn with a beard.
Pharyngula
Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal
Search this blog
Profile
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
…and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• facebook
• MySpace
• Twitter
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.
Random Quote
(Complete listing)We want to stand upon our own feet and look fair and square at the world — its good facts, its bad facts, its beauties, and its ugliness; see the world as it is and be not afraid of it. Conquer the world by intelligence and not merely by being slavishly subdued by the terror that comes from it.
[Bertrand Russell, "Why I Am Not A Christian"]
Recent Posts
- John McCain is a flip-flopping opportunist
- Origins conference
- Proud Ecuador
- My interweb poll-fu is defeated!
- Say…what about Molly?
- Party details!
- Madison details
- Our bright and glorious future
- Darwin movie in the works?
- I'm green here
A Taste of Pharyngula
(Complete listing)Regulatory evolution of the Hox1 gene
Transcription factors and morphogens
Recent Comments
- Ruben on John McCain is a flip-flopping opportunist
- zeerust2000 on Theological inanity
- Longtime Lurker on John McCain is a flip-flopping opportunist
- mark on Even puppets diss Ben Stein
- weing on Origins conference
- Capital Dan on John McCain is a flip-flopping opportunist
- Matt Brust on Basics: Gastrulation, invertebrate style
- shonny on John McCain is a flip-flopping opportunist
- Jupiter BFPOE on John McCain is a flip-flopping opportunist
- Ashkara on Didgeridoos are not for you, little girl
Archives
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
Blogroll
(Complete listing)Other Information
Subscribe via Email
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« Templeton discovers mortality | Main | My mailbox is a funny place »
Comments
I knew you were a closet evangelist
Posted by: Randy | July 8, 2008 3:00 PM
Yes, but he's outed himself now.
This has possibilities. Wonder how easy it would be to get a copy of the local church directories. Just to avoid annoying non theists.
Posted by: JohnnieCanuck, FCD | July 8, 2008 3:03 PM
Brillian! PZ, thanks for posting this.
Posted by: stevogvsu | July 8, 2008 3:05 PM
ahaha, great... thats would be so cool...
Anyway, students should do it for extra credits.
Posted by: Lord Zero | July 8, 2008 3:08 PM
"annoying non theists"
Because getting a free copy of the Principia would be so annoying.
Posted by: qbsmd | July 8, 2008 3:09 PM
Right behind you, PZ
Posted by: Greg Laden | July 8, 2008 3:09 PM
That would be cool to do sometime.Anybody know of a highly populated Jehovah's Witnesses neighborhood?
Posted by: ed | July 8, 2008 3:09 PM
But Newtonian physics already is the state religion (evolution could be seen as a branch of classical physics).
We made it that way so that we wouldn't have to go door-to-door.
In fact, many theists have made peace with the dogma of Newton, clearly doing our bidding in dominating our society with our religion of atheism.
Only the IDiots still fight against Newtonian physics, holdouts against our domination of society and religion. And I'm not really kidding, you know. They may idolize Newton as a theist, but Dembski's Aristotelian biology has to be supported by Aristotelian physics (just as Newton's physics is the implicit basis of evolution), and he desires to reintroduce Aristotle's four causes--especially the final cause.
He is against Newton's Principia, he just wouldn't want to advertise the fact too much.
Glen D
http://tinyurl.com/2kxyc7
Posted by: Glen Davidson | July 8, 2008 3:11 PM
"Not bad, but really, the guy in the glasses ought to be redrawn with a beard."
And tell me the other guy isn't a dead ringer for Phil Plait, well, also sans facial hair...
Posted by: Celtic_Evolution | July 8, 2008 3:15 PM
I would have passed out Demon Haunted World.
Posted by: techskeptic | July 8, 2008 3:25 PM
Not bad, but really, the guy in the glasses ought to be redrawn with a beard.
Without a beard he looks like a computer programmer,
and that's BARELY science.
(snark)
Posted by: ThePetey | July 8, 2008 3:27 PM
Hmm, you're right -- that IS Greg Laden in the picture.
Posted by: PZ Myers | July 8, 2008 3:29 PM
Hey - I'd pretend to be a theist if someone would bring me a free copy of Principia (hard cover with gold leaf, would be excellent)...
Posted by: Zack | July 8, 2008 3:30 PM
The Principia is abstruse and archaic, even if it's translated out of the Latin. A far better choice would be, say, the newest edition of The Feynman Lectures on Physics.
Posted by: Blake Stacey | July 8, 2008 3:33 PM
That cartoon describes my interactions with religious callers except the speech bubbles would have to be swapped. I always try and send them off with the wish that the light of reason and knowledge will enlighten their lives.
Someone has been channeling me.....
Posted by: Peter Ashby | July 8, 2008 3:41 PM
Take it easy there, you don't want to spring Feynman on unsuspecting innocents. That's too much irreverent anti-authoritarian smartass-ness for them to handle. Don't want to be "militant" evil atheists now, do we?
I think the Principia is old and archaic enough to tone down the shock that comes about from the fact that it actually makes sense, unlike the preferred theist reading.
Posted by: Coriolis | July 8, 2008 3:44 PM
Has anyone out there ever actually read the Principia, from cover to cover?
Posted by: J | July 8, 2008 3:49 PM
RE post #14:
you know you are in a geek dominated thread when...
Posted by: Philippe | July 8, 2008 3:51 PM
Darwin's Disciples? The Followers of Faraday? Huxley's Host? Wallace's Witnesses?
Posted by: Umbo | July 8, 2008 3:59 PM
Ok, who gets Salt Lake City and who gets Colorado Springs?
Posted by: Mena | July 8, 2008 4:04 PM
John Safran already did Salt Lake City.
Posted by: Brownian, OM | July 8, 2008 4:11 PM
My favorite part is where the Science Proselytizers respond to the annoyed victim with the blithe assumption that "hostility" is of course a sign that the other guy must secretly know that he's wrong. It's the flip version of the tired old "why are atheists so angry?" canard that gets trotted out with dreary regularity by the smug. Atheists have a bad attitude because they're mad at the church, or the world, or God. There's something wrong with them, and it has nothing to do with the actual issue. Of course.
Argue against belief in God and though you maintain the general composure and nonconfrontational bonhommie of Mr. Rogers on qualudes, you still get called on emotional excess. The spiritually mature are always serene with the confidence of being Attuned to the Cosmic Mind. The spiritually thwarted are what they expect. No matter how you try to couch the critique, their intuition hones in on the real problem.
"I'm sensing hostility. Why does the truth offend you?"
"I'll say it again. The first tactic to avoid addressing the hard question of the validity of religious belief is to reply with a criticism of those who don't believe. Don't fall for it." (PZ Myers)
Posted by: Sastra | July 8, 2008 4:12 PM
That would be cool to do sometime.Anybody know of a highly populated Jehovah's Witnesses neighborhood?
Not quite the same thing, but the first time I did any door-to-door political canvassing, the very first house we came to turned out to belong to some Jehovah's Nuisances. When they explained why they wouldn't take one of our leaflets (any political activity is a no-no) the two of us burst out laughing, but n aturally they didn't see the funny side of it.
Posted by: Nick Gotts | July 8, 2008 4:14 PM
John Safran vs. The Mormons.
He used "The Origin of Species".
http://youtube.com/watch?v=fic56JN7aIw
Posted by: Steve | July 8, 2008 4:14 PM
Brownian, that was very funny. The world needs more Aussies to tell everyone how it is!
Posted by: Mena | July 8, 2008 4:19 PM
Try this in Boro Park or Crown Heights in Brooklyn, for a different flavor.
All fundie, just no Jayzus.
Posted by: David | July 8, 2008 4:19 PM
On second thought... don't really do that (Brooklyn, among the fundie Jews). You will get your ass kicked. Probably put you in the hospital.
There's nothing like a fairly high verbal intelligence, educated to the hilt on illogical twaddle and then confronted with an unwelcome blast of cognitive dissonance to make for reactions more volatile than their inhibitions can handle.
(I know from experience, I lived among this crowd for longer than I care to remember before escaping to the light)
Posted by: David | July 8, 2008 4:28 PM
Is this supposed to be picking fun on scientists or not?
You've cut out a lot of the panels of this strip, including the one where the guy answering the door tries to politely dismiss the scientists by saying that he's eating dinner. You also cut out the 'Amen' (which, BTW, isn't an inherently religious thing to say, even though most people think it is).
Posted by: RickD | July 8, 2008 4:30 PM
Umbo@19,
Faraday was a lifelong fundie fruitcake himself, and Wallace, I grieve to state, became a spiritualist. Darwin was far too polite and reclusive - has to be Huxley, or for a more up-to-date flavour, Dawkins or our own tentacled overlord. Huxley's Hordes? Dawkins' Dobermanns? Myers' Minions?
Posted by: Nick Gotts | July 8, 2008 4:30 PM
You've all heard the joke about
"What do you get from a cross between a JW and a UU?"
"Somebody who knocks on your door at 8AM on a Sunday to talk about nothing in particular."
"What about a cross between a JW and an Atheist? (and how likely is that?)"
"They're there at 8 wanting to talk about absolutely nothing at all."
But that's just not right. I think caroling is better:
"Gods Rest Ye, Uni...err Rationalists"
Gods rest ye, Noble Atheists, let nothing you dismay; Remember there's no evidence there was a Christmas Day; When Christ was born is just not known, no matter what they say, O, Tidings of reason and fact, reason and fact, Glad tidings of reason and fact.
Our current Christmas Customs come from Persia and from Greece, >From solstice celebrations of the ancient Middle East. This whole darn Christmas spiel is just another pagan feast, O, Tidings of reason and fact, reason and fact, Glad tidings of reason and fact.
There was no star of Bethlehem, there was no angels' song; There could not have been wise men for the trip would take too long. The stories in the Bible are historically wrong, O, Tidings of reason and fact, reason and fact, Glad tidings of reason and fact!
I wouldn't try that back home in Georgia, but it would be a hoot to go around with my friends out here with a Rationalist Songbook!
Posted by: OrchidGrowinMan | July 8, 2008 4:30 PM
But don't you realize that the very next week thier neighborhood would be canvassed by those blasted Seventh Day New Atheists, handing out "The God Delusion"?
Posted by: Benjamin Franklin | July 8, 2008 4:32 PM
"Not bad, but really, the guy in the glasses ought to be redrawn with a beard." -PZ M.
Does PZ (or any member of his family) remember what his chin looks like?
Posted by: Jefe | July 8, 2008 4:41 PM
Re #12, speaking as a programmer, there is *no* science in programming, other than the machines we run on (which for many of us, may as well magic).
Re #19 The obvious one is Maxwell's Demons. :o)
Posted by: Bill | July 8, 2008 4:53 PM
If that's Greg, he needs glasses--and a few more lines (or at least a keyboard off screen).
Posted by: Stephanie Z | July 8, 2008 5:05 PM
Some years ago I tried to read Newton's Principia but found the reasoning too difficult for my ageing brain to follow. Newton invented calculus (he called his version fluxions) to work out the math in The Principia, but knowing that no one would accept that 0/0 = something (see Bishop Berkeley), he derived a separate series of purely geometrical proofs for The Principia, which even Euclid would have had difficulty with.
Posted by: Sceptical Chymist | July 8, 2008 5:06 PM
OrchidGrowinMan, that's a great carol!
Posted by: Selcaby | July 8, 2008 5:07 PM
Admittedly, this yet another made up religion, but the Solstice Carols are worth a listen, and would be fun to do.
http://www.cthulhulives.org/Solstice/
My favorite is "The Carol of the Old Ones". :)
http://www.cthulhulives.org/solsticecarol.html
Posted by: LightningRose | July 8, 2008 5:19 PM
If you want to see a real world demo of this concept:
http://tinyURL.com/SafranMormon
All hail John Safran!
Posted by: DAM10N | July 8, 2008 5:20 PM
That would be cool to do sometime.Anybody know of a highly populated Jehovah's Witnesses neighborhood?
D.U.M.B.O. (Down Under Manhattan Bridge Overpass) in Brooklyn. It used to be a post-industrial neighborhood in which relatively cheap lofts could be found. The Witnesses have had a presence there since the early 20th Century and have built a humongous Watchtower compound. Mofos even generate their own electricity and have a church-run farm upstate.
http://dumbonyc.com/2006/11/16/glimpse-inside-jehovahs-witness-headquarters/
Posted by: Longtime Lurker | July 8, 2008 6:05 PM
OrchidGrowinMan, did you write that carol?
NICE scansion!!
Posted by: Nurse Ingrid | July 8, 2008 6:46 PM
The science inquisition is here! And NOBODY expected it...
Posted by: Kel | July 8, 2008 7:14 PM
Newton was a theist.
Posted by: Bob | July 8, 2008 9:30 PM
OrchidGrowinMan, you missed one:
What do you get when you cross a JH and an agnostic?
Someone who knocks on your door at 8AM and doesn't know why.
And I agree, that *is* very nice scansion.
Posted by: mandrake | July 8, 2008 9:31 PM
Yeah, Newton was a theist.
Then again, Jesus was Jewish.
Posted by: amphiox | July 8, 2008 10:25 PM
and WTF's a JH anyway?
I meant JW, obviously.
see what I get for being too lazy to type something out...
Posted by: mandrake | July 8, 2008 11:56 PM
Could someone go to Behe's door and Rebuke him in the name of Darwin ?
Posted by: DLC | July 9, 2008 1:19 AM
That would be cool to do sometime.Anybody know of a highly populated Jehovah's Witnesses neighborhood?
Some Aussies did this as a prank with Mormons in Salt Lake City. It was for a TV show in Oz. They were met with slamming doors and threats of physical violence.
You should be able to dig something up on youtube.
Posted by: DavidR | July 9, 2008 2:54 AM
Posted by: Andreas Johansson | July 9, 2008 6:57 AM
Old but grate on those who woo-ship.
Personally, I would undertake to knock door among Hollywood producers:
Pre-newtonian physics: "Bodies moves in straight lines if pushed." [Any film.]
Comic physics: "Bodies moves in straight lines for no reason." [Disney.]
Fiction physics: "Bodies makes no sounds when inappropriate."
Science fiction physics: "Bodies makes sounds when in vacuum."
Hero physics: "Bodies can take massive damage wherever and still make a move."
Superhero physics: "Bodies can take no damage whatsoever and still make a movie."
Already there's apocrypha and splitting.
Posted by: Torbjörn Larsson, OM | July 9, 2008 8:51 AM
#33: There's scientific theory underlying a lot of programming, even if it doesn't come up much on a day-to-day basis.
I've spent time in "real" science and in programming and it all blurs together for me. Somebody has to write scientific code, and a little CS and SE background helps.
Posted by: Headache | July 9, 2008 9:54 AM
Nurse Ingrid, #40,
Nope, the "Unitarian Carols" have been floating around for years: I like parody and caricature, b/c they emphasize perceptually significant aspects of self-awareness and -identity and other-awareness and -identity. The problem is distinguising the orientation.
At the risk of offending the filter:
http://www.enk.freeuk.com/stories/uniangjokes.html
http://matt.baya.net/jokes/uu.html
Annnd, for all you PROGRAMMERS:
http://www.webmaster.crevier.org/beatles/
http://w2.eff.org/Net_culture/Folklore/Humor/abort_retry_ignore.poem
http://bolt-randomthoughts.blogspot.com/2007/10/happy-halloween.html
http://w2.eff.org/Net_culture/Folklore/Humor/
Posted by: OrchidGrowinMan | July 9, 2008 10:43 AM
This is on Digg:
http://digg.com/comedy/We_re_Scientists
Digg it up if you have a Digg account. I'd like to see this make the front page.
Posted by: ES | July 9, 2008 11:10 AM
DLC @ #46:
You're forgetting, good clerics turn undead, only evil ones rebuke. :P
Though a Zone of Truth spell cast at the DI would probably lead to mass suicide...
Posted by: phantomreader42 | July 9, 2008 1:53 PM
OrchidGrowinMan@30,
Love the atheists' carol. I'm saving that one for my Northern hemisphere winter solstice cards!
Posted by: Nick Gotts | July 10, 2008 5:59 AM