Seed Media Group

Pharyngula

Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)

I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

tbbadge.gif
scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

(Complete listing)

The critical thinking and precision of science began to really affect my ability to just believe something without any tangible evidence.

Salvador Cordova, proponent of Intelligent Design creationism

Recent Posts

A Taste of Pharyngula

(Complete listing)

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

(Complete listing)

Other Information

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

« Bookclub on autism | Main | Bill O'Reilly is a big fat idiot »

Nothing significant

Category: Kooks
Posted on: October 1, 2008 2:46 PM, by PZ Myers

Just more eliminationist rhetoric from a good Catholic. Fortunately, this stuff is ebbing right now.

From: JBWPSR@aol.com
Subject: Your desecration of the Eucharist
Date: October 1, 2008 1:25:00 PM CDT
Received: by 10.141.86.17 with SMTP id o17cs33336rvl; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.65.40.16 with SMTP id s16mr14590483qbj.74.1222885505714; Wed, 01 Oct 2008 11:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtain-w.tc.umn.edu (mtain-w.tc.umn.edu [134.84.119.8]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s12si172335qbs.9.2008.10.01.11.25.05; Wed, 01 Oct 2008 11:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imo-d06.mx.aol.com (imo-d06.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.38]) by mtain-w.tc.umn.edu (UMN smtpd) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:25:04 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from JBWPSR@aol.com by imo-d06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v39.1.) id 6.bff.4865a02f (30738) for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:25:00 -0400 (EDT)
Return-Path:
Return-Path:
Received-Spf: neutral (google.com: 134.84.119.8 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of JBWPSR@aol.com) client-ip=134.84.119.8;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 134.84.119.8 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of JBWPSR@aol.com) smtp.mail=JBWPSR@aol.com
X-Umn-Remote-Mta: [N] imo-d06.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.38] #+NR+UF+CP (A,-)
X-Umn-Report-As-Spam:
Message-Id:
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Unknown sub 34
X-Spam-Flag: NO

Professor Myers:

Your actions are decisive evidence that if your brains were blown out with a shotgun the collective intelligence of the world would increase a million times. Fortunately, you do no damage. Nobody subhuman is of consequence.

James B. Williams

Comments

#1

Posted by: Moses | October 1, 2008 2:49 PM

He sounds just like the Muslim radicals he, no doubt, despises...

#2

Posted by: zeekster | October 1, 2008 2:50 PM

brain asplode!

#3

Posted by: Timothy Wood | October 1, 2008 2:50 PM

If by "subhuman" he means not created in the image of God... I would take that as a compliment.

If anyone's brains were blown out with a shotgun the "collective" intelligence of the world would decrease.

If a stupid person's brains were blown out with a shotgun the average intelligence of the world would increase.

#4

Posted by: schism | October 1, 2008 2:51 PM

Fortunately, you do no damage.

Yet he felt obligated to email you in response. Funny how that works.

#5

Posted by: Timothy Wood | October 1, 2008 2:53 PM

asplode. lol.

#6

Posted by: Holbach | October 1, 2008 2:54 PM

Hey, I'll let my god take care of this Myers desecrater. god, take care of this for me will you? Can you hear me? Are you there? What the fuck am I talking to you for? I'll take care of it myself. Moron.

#7

Posted by: Feynmaniac | October 1, 2008 2:58 PM

Oooooh, what will we find out here? Is he an idiot who will get his wife fired? Will he have blogs featuring aborted fetuses with Obama's face photoshopped into them?

#8

Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp, KoT, OM | October 1, 2008 2:58 PM

Man that is awesome.

PZ your brain has the relative power of a all the brains in the world times ONE MILLION!!!11

Sure he says it's negative, but coming from Mr. James "Shot his load early" Williams that's gotta say something.

#9

Posted by: Glen Davidson | October 1, 2008 2:58 PM

Nobody subhuman is of consequence.

And Jebus died so you can eat crackers.

Don't subhumans want to eat crackers? You know, like Parrots?

Glen D
http://tinyurl.com/2kxyc7

#10

Posted by: ggab | October 1, 2008 3:00 PM

This is what I consider to be a "True Christian".

#11

Posted by: Gregory Kusnick | October 1, 2008 3:02 PM

What he seems to be saying is that the collective intelligence of the world is zero, if someone of no consequence can alter it a millionfold.

#12

Posted by: BobC | October 1, 2008 3:04 PM

He sounded like a typical Catholic to me. There's virtually no difference between Catholics and Muslim terrorists. They're all nuts.

#13

Posted by: Zar | October 1, 2008 3:05 PM

Ah. So THAT'S what Jesus would do.

#14

Posted by: AJ Milne | October 1, 2008 3:05 PM

Nobody subhuman is of consequence.

... However (sings) eeeevery sperm is sacred...

#15

Posted by: Longtime Lurker | October 1, 2008 3:07 PM

Ahh, more love from a true Defender of the Faith.

If we were in Indonesia, he'd be accusing our Tentacled Overlord of stealing penises through witchcraft and exhorting stoning.

#16

Posted by: Tulse | October 1, 2008 3:09 PM

"Subhuman"? Do you worship your god of peace with that mouth?

#17

Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp, KoT, OM | October 1, 2008 3:10 PM

If we were in Indonesia, he'd be accusing our Tentacled Overlord of stealing penises through witchcraft and exhorting stoning.


Let us never speak of penis stealing again..

#18

Posted by: ed | October 1, 2008 3:11 PM

But I thought you killed Jebus?

#19

Posted by: Sastra | October 1, 2008 3:12 PM

Nobody subhuman is of consequence.

Well, just by itself, this rather explodes the hypothesis that belief in God necessarily entails belief in human equality.

When all the value, importance, and significance in the universe is wrapped up in a package labeled "God," then I think it is very easy -- even reasonable -- to conclude that people who are 'without God' are therefore without value, importance, or significance.

Sheesh.

#20

Posted by: Eric Atkinson | October 1, 2008 3:13 PM

Right to Life!
Ok, would you believe... "this guy is crackers?"

Jesus H Fracking Christ on crutches.

Well, its not much different than the stuff you see on the DU.

#21

Posted by: Ryan F Stello | October 1, 2008 3:14 PM

Fortunately, you do no damage

It really is hard to expect these jerks to be consistent in their hyperbolic hysteria, huh?

#22

Posted by: beebeeo | October 1, 2008 3:18 PM

Could that be the james B. Williams who wrote: "From the Mind of God to the Mind of Man : A Layman's Guide to How We Got Our Bible"
I found that guy on Amazon.

How likely is it that his email address was hijacked?

#23

Posted by: the PC apeman | October 1, 2008 3:18 PM

Isn't writing to or about someone of no consequence similar to declaring a least interesting number?

#24

Posted by: Flex | October 1, 2008 3:20 PM

I really need to wean my parents from AOL.

Maybe showing them examples of the other people who still use it may help.

#25

Posted by: Tulse | October 1, 2008 3:25 PM

this rather explodes the hypothesis that belief in God necessarily entails belief in human equality.

Yeah, lucky he has religion to give him morality, or no telling what he might do...

#26

Posted by: Sili | October 1, 2008 3:26 PM

Well. At least he spelt "Myers" correctly.

#27

Posted by: Barry | October 1, 2008 3:30 PM

Lovely.

#28

Posted by: Longtime Lurker | October 1, 2008 3:30 PM

Let us never speak of penis stealing again..

Don't be scared of the witches, Rev, just hide your penis! That's what I do.

#29

Posted by: Martin | October 1, 2008 3:30 PM

Clearly some of that "Christian Love" we keep hearing about.

#30

Posted by: Bill Dauphin | October 1, 2008 3:39 PM

Oy! All this over the symbolic representation of an ancient sleight-of-hand artist?

#31

Posted by: KB | October 1, 2008 3:43 PM

What did you expect? Hateful, moronic actions attract the attention and wrath of other hateful morons.

Why don't you go spray paint some swastikas on synagogues, or go burn some crosses on lawns and see what kind of responses you get? After all they are only symbols.

Not enough cheek turning in the world.

#32

Posted by: E.V. | October 1, 2008 3:45 PM

Fortunately, you do no damage
Hmmm, so what's the problem Jimmy boy?
#33

Posted by: Phoenix Woman | October 1, 2008 3:51 PM

What did you expect? Hateful, moronic actions attract the attention and wrath of other hateful morons.

Why don't you go spray paint some swastikas on synagogues, or go burn some crosses on lawns and see what kind of responses you get? After all they are only symbols.

Um, KB? Re-work your analogies, please. You're comparing apples to goats here, not apples to apples.

Did PZ spraypaint a church? No. He put a nail that he owned through another piece of property that he owned, and took pages out of books that he owned, and no one else's property, mind, body, or bank account was harmed thereby.

#34

Posted by: Jacques | October 1, 2008 3:52 PM

I hope he enjoys a full inbox with all of his new friends from pharyngula.

#35

Posted by: Kobra | October 1, 2008 3:52 PM

Hey Myers, I bet if you ever did commit suicide Kurt Cobain style, you would score higher on an IQ test than this moron.

#36

Posted by: Interrobang | October 1, 2008 3:54 PM

Not enough cheek turning in the world.

Yes, exactly. Which is why the people who were sending Webster Cook death threats, and sending PZ death threats for supporting Webster Cook should have shut the fuck up and sat the fuck down before their big mouths brought all this on. They (and not PZ) have got nobody to blame but themselves.

Smarter trolls, please.

#37

Posted by: Patricia | October 1, 2008 3:55 PM

Silly Chimp! We don't need to steal a whole penis. Just the foreskins.
200 foreskins will buy the daughter of King Saul. 1 Samuel 18:27

#38

Posted by: tsg | October 1, 2008 3:55 PM

What did you expect? Hateful, moronic actions attract the attention and wrath of other hateful morons.

Why don't you go spray paint some swastikas on synagogues, or go burn some crosses on lawns and see what kind of responses you get? After all they are only symbols.

Not enough cheek turning in the world.

Your concern is noted.

#39

Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp, KoT, OM | October 1, 2008 3:56 PM

What did you expect? Hateful, moronic actions attract the attention and wrath of other hateful morons.

Why don't you go spray paint some swastikas on synagogues, or go burn some crosses on lawns and see what kind of responses you get? After all they are only symbols.

Not enough cheek turning in the world.

Anyone have a tally on the number of comments making this ridiculous claim?

#40

Posted by: Desert Son | October 1, 2008 3:57 PM

KB at #31 posted:

Why don't you go spray paint some swastikas on synagogues, or go burn some crosses on lawns and see what kind of responses you get? After all they are only symbols.

Ah, yes. Equivalency. Actually, in the cases you cited, those aren't symbols, they are property owned and/or inhabited by individuals. The events you described fall under the criminal conduct code of vandalism (at the least), as well as hate crimes, and threats of violence (such as intimating a relationship between a shotgun, for example, and someone's brains being blown out).

In the case of the wafer, no one is wounded. You (or I, or anyone, including Catholic churches) can purchase wafers and effect upon them whatever action we wish, in the privacy of our own homes, or in publicly accessible spaces, without fear of recrimination. In the same way that anyone can purchase a flag and burn it. The flag is a symbol. Assuming the burner does not burn his/her self, or others, in the process of burning the flag, the action is defensible, and an expression of free speech (which is protected in this nation, or used to be, at least). The nation and its inhabitants remain unharmed. Unlike the property and individuals you cited in your dishonest attempt to muddy the waters.

Thanks for trying, though, and better luck next time with your self-righteous wounded pride.

No kings,

Robert

#41

Posted by: Kobra | October 1, 2008 3:59 PM

@39: Rev. BigDumbChimp, KoT, OM

I'll start keeping tally when I can afford a quantum computer. 'Cause damn!

#42

Posted by: Benjamin Franklin | October 1, 2008 4:08 PM

If your brains were blown out with a shotgun the collective intelligence of the world would increase a million times.
#43

Posted by: tsg | October 1, 2008 4:09 PM

Anyone have a tally on the number of comments making this ridiculous claim

What I don't get is why they think we're surprised at the reaction. If the Catholics had shrugged their collective shoulders and said, "to each his own", that would have been a surprise.

No, the reaction was completely expected. That doesn't make it right. And that was the point.

#44

Posted by: Chris Phillips | October 1, 2008 4:09 PM

Funny how hate mail tells a story about the hater.

#45

Posted by: Benjamin Franklin | October 1, 2008 4:11 PM

Lets try this again-

If your brains were blown out with a shotgun the collective intelligence of the world would increase a million times.

Resistance is buckshot!

#46

Posted by: Alex | October 1, 2008 4:13 PM

You mock my religion??!!?? I KILL YOU!!

DEAD!!!

Peace be with you.

#47

Posted by: Greta Christina | October 1, 2008 4:14 PM

And why don't you say mean things about Muslims, PZ? It's because you're a coward. You know that if you did, they'd threaten your life.

[/sarcasm]

Sheesh.

#48

Posted by: Patricia | October 1, 2008 4:15 PM

May as well pull the canvas off the trebuchet, and drag out the chamber pots.

#49

Posted by: Kook hunter | October 1, 2008 4:17 PM

This surely refers to our guy (do a search on Williams)--looks like he even pisses off the baptists:

http://www.tbaptist.com/aab/pbc108.htm

#50

Posted by: WRMartin | October 1, 2008 4:19 PM

From her writings (boobies and slutty and all that) I expected Patricia to be all nice and, well, probably hawt. But now there is no way she's getting anywhere near my penis.
[crossing legs tightly]

#51

Posted by: firemancarl | October 1, 2008 4:20 PM

goddamn cannibals! Hell bent on eating your lords body in the shape of a Saltine cracker! You miserable bastards!

#52

Posted by: tsg | October 1, 2008 4:21 PM

But now there is no way she's getting anywhere near my penis.

You mean, there was a chance she would before?

#53

Posted by: AJ Milne | October 1, 2008 4:23 PM

Re #40:

Oh no, you don't understand. The Catholics threatening Webster Cook and PZ are the victims here, see? Just like a terrified freedom rider in the Jim Crow south waking up to a cross burning on their lawn at 3 am, and knowing it's a very explicit message to shut up or be lynched, PZ's sticking a nail through a wafer says to the Catholics writing hate mail... ummm....

Okay. Bad example. But just like the terrified population of Jews in 30s Germany, it says to them, just like the defacing of synagogues said then, that, umm...

Okay. Actually, it just says 'a blogger and his readers are mocking your endless blustering threats and presumptuous demands your hocus pocus be 'respected', where 'respected' means no one is allowed simply to say it's the sheer superstitious nonsense it so clearly is'. But y'know. The principle's the same.... I mean, really. It's a slippery slope. Sure, today you're just making fun of people who deify crackers and who demand kids be thrown out of school over failing to show what you deem is appropriate respect for said belief. But tomorrow you'll be building gas ovens. Fersure...

Therefore, you shouldn't make fun of people who deify crackers. QED.

#54

Posted by: WRMartin | October 1, 2008 4:24 PM

You mean, there was a chance she would before?
No. But just in case she passes by I want to be protected. I mean, I want it to be protected. Or at least well hidden.


#55

Posted by: Patricia | October 1, 2008 4:24 PM

WRMartin no worries! I'm not in the daughter buying trade. ;o)

#56

Posted by: tsg | October 1, 2008 4:26 PM

No. But just in case she passes by I want to be protected. I mean, I want it to be protected. Or at least well hidden.

Oh, you see, I'd be quite willing to risk it.

#57

Posted by: Kook hunter | October 1, 2008 4:27 PM

Looks like our guy is also Dr J.B. Williams, a trustee, or former trustee, of Bob Jones University, and if you search for his name on this page you'll find he's really upset some people, all over which ancient text is less-stupid than which other ancient text

http://www.biblefortoday.org/articles/open_letter.htm

#58

Posted by: Bunk | October 1, 2008 4:36 PM

Haha! Very Good A.J. @ #53. You could probably could've copied and pasted that hundreds of times when crackergate was really flared up. Actually, maybe you did. I couldn't work my way through all those comments.

Those poor Catholic hate mail writers. You guys just don't understand how difficult it is to be so loving of mankind, no that's not it, um, true to Jesus' word, no, um . . . hell, nevermind, pass the crackers.

#59

Posted by: dubiquiabs | October 1, 2008 4:39 PM

@ KB #31

Hateful, moronic actions attract the attention and wrath of other hateful morons.
Why do you think it hateful and moronic to point out the absurdity of ideas like transubstantiation, especially of the RCC variety? Sounds like you want to 'kill the messenger'.

Aren't the offenders here the pushers of lunatic doctrines? Especially those who cause real damage as opposed to the damage imagined by professional 'offendees'?

#60

Posted by: Alex | October 1, 2008 4:41 PM

I guess they just want to have their cracker and eat it too.

Sorry.

#61

Posted by: Fred Mounts | October 1, 2008 4:42 PM

I just had a funny idea for a cartoon: wafers are held behind counters like cigarettes, and anyone wanting to buy them has to show ID. Any artists want to draw?

(or maybe it's not such a great idea after all, but it made my sorta chuckle.

#62

Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp, KoT, OM | October 1, 2008 4:43 PM

Looks like our guy is also Dr J.B. Williams, a trustee, or former trustee, of Bob Jones University, and if you search for his name on this page you'll find he's really upset some people, all over which ancient text is less-stupid than which other ancient text

Sons of a bitches. Bob Jones. Scar on my state. No surprise really. That place is factory for these types of knuckleheads.


/fist shake at the sky

JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONES

#63

Posted by: Inky | October 1, 2008 4:44 PM

He really should take up some constructive hobbies if he has nothing better to do than to write emails to inconsequential "subhumans". For instance, I really think Christian fanatics that advocate self-righteous acts of violence could really use a good talking to regarding the Beatitudes or Jesus's treatment of the lowest in society, but you don't see me writing emails to them. After all, Jesus actively sought out tax collectors and prostitutes to hang out with. *shrug* WWJD?

*Disclaimer: I don't believe in the zombie Jesus, but a message of caring for humanity isn't a bad thing.*

#64

Posted by: Alex | October 1, 2008 4:46 PM

I just don't get how any sane person could pretend so hard that they know for certain that the cracker actually turned into the flesh of a deity. I mean, if they used beef jerky instead, that's an easier sell in my mind, but a cracker? Hmmm.

#65

Posted by: Peter Mc | October 1, 2008 4:48 PM

Wow. How can a sip of altar wine a week fuck up your brians so badly?

#66

Posted by: IceFarmer | October 1, 2008 4:48 PM

As always, a very Catholic comment in complete contradiction to the scriptures they cling to without any apparent understanding of what they say.

#67

Posted by: Tulse | October 1, 2008 4:49 PM

Looks like our guy is also Dr J.B. Williams, a trustee, or former trustee, of Bob Jones University

...which is especially weird, since the Protestants generally see Catholics as idolatrous precisely because of things like the Eucharist.

#68

Posted by: AJ Milne | October 1, 2008 4:57 PM

Bunk @58: Thanks, man.

Re:

...hell, nevermind, pass the crackers...

... 'n whine.

#69

Posted by: Qwerty | October 1, 2008 4:59 PM

Ouch. The junk mail I get is in Russian or whatever language the cyrillic alphabet is. I can't read it; so, I don't know if it's from kooks.

#70

Posted by: ThatOtherGuy | October 1, 2008 5:05 PM

I still say you turn this stuff directly over the the FBI or other law enforcement. See if THEY think it's amusing. I doubt they will.

#71

Posted by: erik Remkus | October 1, 2008 5:10 PM

Actually yes the collective intelligence would increase by a factor of 1 million because we would then have 1,000,000 PZ brains!

#72

Posted by: the petey | October 1, 2008 5:12 PM

...which is especially weird, since the Protestants generally see Catholics as idolatrous precisely because of things like the Eucharist.

not to mention that the catholics rewrote the 10 commandments to REMOVE the no idolatry rule.

#73

Posted by: Hank | October 1, 2008 5:13 PM

Lessee, the last time somebody talked about somebody being "subhuman," as in "untermenschen," and "not counting" a helluva lotta people died. But then, he was Catholic, too.

#74

Posted by: the petey | October 1, 2008 5:15 PM

Actually yes the collective intelligence would increase by a factor of 1 million because we would then have 1,000,000 PZ brains!

so... you are saying that 1/1,000,000th of PZ's brain acts as well as a standard person's brain and that all of his parts operate independantly?

He's like a replicator

#75

Posted by: Alex | October 1, 2008 5:16 PM

But how can life have any meaning without any idols? And fancy costumes. With big hats. And a master magician. Who mutters incantations. You know? Real meaning!

#76

Posted by: Cesium | October 1, 2008 5:19 PM

Let's do some math here.

Average intelligence of world = ( (Intelligence of PZ) + (~6 billion) * (Average intelligence of everyone else) ) / (~6 billion)
(Average intelligence of world) * (1 million) = Average intelligence of everyone else

If we let x = Average intelligence of world,
x = ( (Intelligence of PZ) + (~6 billion) * x * (1 million) ) / (~6 billion)
x = (Intelligence of PZ) / (~6 billion) + x * (1 million)
Intelligence of PZ ~= (-6 quadrillion) * x

Congratulations, PZ! You are 6,000,000,000,000,000 times as unsmart as everyone else.

#77

Posted by: nicknick bobick | October 1, 2008 5:23 PM

C'mon people "James Williams" is much to common a name to be making stupid conjectures about which one he is.

Flood his mailbox if you want, but with the evidence available that is the most we can do.

#78

Posted by: The Petey | October 1, 2008 5:26 PM

PZ:

since you obviously suck the smart out of people heads, are you a professor because it gives you so many aspiring youngs minds to feed on? Do you sit in your classroom and just bask in the glow of your intellectual vampirism?

That is SOOO cool if you do.

#79

Posted by: Stephen Couchman | October 1, 2008 5:27 PM

@ 30 (et al)

Read Jesus the Magician. A little dated, but still chock-full of record-straightening wholesomeness.

#81

Posted by: FlameDuck | October 1, 2008 5:29 PM

What he seems to be saying is that the collective intelligence of the world is zero, if someone of no consequence can alter it a millionfold.
Well no. If something is zero, no orders of magnitude will make it something else. What he's saying is simply rubbish. Like #3 pointed out, there is no way the collective, that is the sum, of everyone's intelligence could possibly increase if someone were eliminated from the sample. However the average could theoretically be increased six orders of magnitude, if Professor Myers had a very small fractional IQ. However IQ is not measured in fractions, and it is virtually impossible to achieve very low scores, even if you try intentionally.
*shrug* WWJD?
To be entirely fair to Jesus and his unevolved Cro-Magnon remnant followers, shotguns weren't around then, and "mouthfull of ballista" doesn't really have the same ring to it. I think suicide by Romans was easily the simplest way to do it back then.
#82

Posted by: Kook hunter | October 1, 2008 5:34 PM

"C'mon people "James Williams" is much to common a name to be making stupid conjectures about which one he is."

Yes, you're right--turns out that there's a lot of whacky James Williams's, and DR J.B. Williams's amd JB Williams's out there.

It should be compulsory for psychos to have psycho names...like James B. Strangelove...that would be easier.

#83

Posted by: Steve_C | October 1, 2008 5:36 PM

I think we should all send him an email that just says.

Subject: Jesus Christ!

Body: It's just a cracker.

#84

Posted by: God | October 1, 2008 5:38 PM

Dear Dr Myers:

Once again, I must apologise for my followers. I sincerely hope you will forgive the blusterings of deluded individuals who, alas, believe in me and my cohort, the Tooth Fairy. They cannot, I fear, help themselves, as they appear to have severe father-figure issues, yet avoid psychotherapy.

Sincerely, God

#85

Posted by: H | October 1, 2008 5:45 PM

Quaint!

More!

#86

Posted by: Eli | October 1, 2008 5:46 PM

PZ, this can't be legal. Death threats are seriously uncool... why not prosecute people like this instead of merely shaming them online?

#87

Posted by: Nerdcore Steve | October 1, 2008 5:50 PM

True or not, I'm pretty sure that's self contradictory.

#88

Posted by: Kel | October 1, 2008 5:51 PM

Funny how he took the time out to tell you that your actions were of no consequence.

#89

Posted by: FlameDuck | October 1, 2008 5:57 PM

It should be compulsory for psychos to have psycho names...like James B. Strangelove...that would be easier.
Or Vernon Wayne Howell, Eric Robert Rudolph, Paul Jennings Hill, Mark David Uhl, Marion Gordon Robertson. Wait, I think I see a pattern here. All these Christian psychos have three names. Wait a minute. Paul Zachary Myers?!? Oh dear, only a matter of time now before he reveals himself as Bill Donahues sidekick, and when it happens, remember that I fucking called it! :o>
#90

Posted by: the petey | October 1, 2008 6:00 PM

if the current acculated intelligence is:
X = C + PZ
where: X is the accumulative intelligence
C is the accumulated intelligence of non-PZ
PZ is PZ's IQ

Without PZ we have
1,000,000 X = C - PZ

I get that PZ's intelligence = -0.999998 that of everyone elses collective intelligence.

with an average IQ of 100
and roughly 6,600,000,000 people in the world

I get his IQ as -659,999,900,000

which makes him -65,999,990,000,000 times as unsmart as other people

but, I'm an engineer. Can someone check my math please?

#91

Posted by: Azkyroth | October 1, 2008 6:01 PM

Nobody subhuman is of consequence.

[For instance,] James B. Williams

Fixed it. ^.^

#92

Posted by: wrpd | October 1, 2008 6:03 PM

Patricia: Unfortunately, they have to be Philistine phoreskins which are kind of rare these days.
Besides, wouldn't King Saul's daughter be rather old and quite dead by now? Not that I'm knocking necrophilia, but you gotta draw the line somewhere.

#93

Posted by: John Robie | October 1, 2008 6:03 PM

So PZ is subhuman, yet he displays human-like characteristics (such as blogging). Does this make him a transitional life form we can point to when the fundies claim there is no proof of evolution?

#94

Posted by: The Petey | October 1, 2008 6:06 PM

@#92 WRPD

if we use philistine foreskins instead of "Philistine" foreskins, we could use most funagelicals'.

though, I don't want to collect them.....

#95

Posted by: Capital Dan | October 1, 2008 6:09 PM

You know, just once, I wish one of these gutless, god-slurping cowards would show up in one of these threads so as to defend himself and his ridiculous threats.

Has anyone emailed this ass-hamster yet to let him know we're having a whole heap of fun at his expense?

#96

Posted by: Alex | October 1, 2008 6:15 PM

"Can someone check my math please?"

Very sloppy. For those calcs to have any validity it should be recognized that IQ varies with age. So the value of an average IQ would have to be given in context to the average age of all humans. Furthermore, we now need to factor in the sub-human population(s) IQs, since clearly, it can be shown that PZ the sub-human does have an impact on overall intelligence. So who's going to tackle defining precisely what a sub-human is? Is it the beard?

#97

Posted by: Monado | October 1, 2008 6:16 PM

Hey! don't insult hamsters!

#98

Posted by: Steve | October 1, 2008 6:20 PM

Perhaps his email gives another clue. JWB, obviously his initials, PSR could be something like Pine Springs Ranch.

http://www.pinespringsranch.org/

I'm sure they have nothing to do with him but you get the idea.

#99

Posted by: Bob L | October 1, 2008 6:21 PM

Look, another internet tough guy issuing a threat in an utterly cowardly way.

#100

Posted by: jj | October 1, 2008 6:23 PM

@Pete #80
"He apparently lives in CA"

No, that's due to that AOL runs their email out of their Mountain View servers.

http://www.zoneedit.com/lookup.html?ipaddress=207.200.72.59&server=&reverse=Look+it+up

#101

Posted by: Patricia | October 1, 2008 6:24 PM

Are we out of Philistines? Nobody tells me anything!
The actual purchase price for Michal was 100 foreskins. David was just having so much fun he didn't stop until he had 200. In reading the whole thing, as I recall, that was the worth of a kings daughter. Surely we have a king somewhere with some daughters. You could haggle a bit if you like.

#102

Posted by: Tziedel | October 1, 2008 6:24 PM