“Mommy, she's so mean”
Category: Politics
Posted on: November 2, 2008 4:42 PM, by PZ Myers
This is how petty election politics have become this year: a Republican denies children Halloween candy if they won't agree with her choice of McCain for president.






Comments
Posted by: blueelm | November 2, 2008 4:51 PM
For real? Sounds like a joke! What a psycho. Well, a neighborhood of children will have bad memories of Republicans!
Posted by: Dahan | November 2, 2008 4:52 PM
I think this makes sense. I didn't give anyone any candy unless they said they were followers of the FSM.
Posted by: PeteC | November 2, 2008 4:52 PM
No longer on youtube, but here:
http://www.casttv.com/video/aqqwzk1/michigan-mccain-palin-supporter-says-no-treats-for-obama-kids-on-halloween-video
Posted by: Kimbo Jones | November 2, 2008 5:00 PM
I like how the teenager at the end (who looked below voting age) was the voice of reason and the so-called "adult" (who can vote) was the childish and irresponsible one.
Also, how effective is handing out McCain-Palin fliers to people who already support McCain? So her "strategy" is both needlessly hurtful to children *and* moronic.
Posted by: Kel | November 2, 2008 5:02 PM
That's pretty terrible tbh
Posted by: TW | November 2, 2008 5:09 PM
Bizzare and mean spirited but, hey, it is up to her who she gives candy to. How she thinks this will encourage support of McCain is beyond me, but then she doesn't look all that rational.
Equally weird, how did this make it into a news item?
Posted by: TSC | November 2, 2008 5:12 PM
She looks so happy too.
Posted by: tybowen | November 2, 2008 5:12 PM
You know, if I was undecided (and hadn't already voted) this would swiftly push me to voting for Obama. I wonder if she thought about that?
Posted by: SN | November 2, 2008 5:12 PM
It shows that conservatives only approve of handouts when it is to fellow conservatives and elites (ie bailout package, Reaganomics).
But when it is to progressives, the poor, or children (Bush vetoing Child Insurance bill), they cry socialism.
Posted by: Bubba | November 2, 2008 5:16 PM
That's what eggs and shaving cream are for.
Posted by: Desert Son | November 2, 2008 5:16 PM
Talk about missing the spirit (in the non-supernatural sense) of the holiday.
Here's a fun night in the life of youngsters (of just about any age), a time to dress up, and enjoy sweet treats and shivers of spooky fun. A time to have a communal, social connection from neighborhood to neighborhood.
And this lady made it all about herself.
Lady, I'm largely unfamiliar with the phraseology of much of the youth these days, but if I'm not mistaken, that's pretty significant fail. That's at least 3 standard deviations above the mean of fail.
Sad.
No kings,
Robert
Posted by: Joshua Zelinsky | November 2, 2008 5:17 PM
Between this and the kicking out of the young Republicans who looked like they might be protesters the Republican party seems to be doing a wonderful job of alienating almost anyone below the age of 25. This is different though since it is one person being crazy rather than a well-planned action by people in the party. And the scale is a bit smaller. (And I wouldn't be surprised if somewhere there's an Obama supporter doing the exact same thing).
Posted by: Bubba Sixpack | November 2, 2008 5:26 PM
Yeah, that's a great strategy for getting people to vote for McCain: tell their kids they don't get candy if the parents support Obama.
I'm sure the parents will turn right around and vote for McCain...
BTW, this "lady" would fit right in with the elite filthy rich Wall Street Repub crowd, with that outfit. Perhaps she's really a Dem and that was her Halloween character: a demented Wall-street McCain supporter.
Posted by: E.V. | November 2, 2008 5:28 PM
Oh, don't worry, this will bite her on the ass eventually. She'll never live down being the Old Rethuglian Witch who discriminated against kids (who couldn't vote anyway). We'll just chalk it up to "karma" with a wink and a nudge.
I'm sure those disappointed kids will want to be Republicans when they grow up.
Posted by: Jadehawk | November 2, 2008 5:29 PM
how incredibly petty.
Posted by: Zeno | November 2, 2008 5:32 PM
Boy, that settles it! That lady has helped me to see the light. I've not been nearly militant enough in promoting my political views. Henceforth, no passing grades for students who vote for McCain!
In all fairness, I should announce that in class tomorrow.
And left-over Halloween candy for the Obama voters! Yay!
Posted by: Nemo | November 2, 2008 5:33 PM
I would. (Be surprised, I mean.)
Posted by: Eric Atkinson | November 2, 2008 5:34 PM
More SNL fun: http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/31783_Olbermann_on_SNL
The "Keith Olbermann" segment from Saturday Night Live.
Spot on.
Posted by: Eric Atkinson | November 2, 2008 5:37 PM
"Henceforth, no passing grades for students who vote for McCain!"
This message was approved by the NEA.
Posted by: Nibien | November 2, 2008 5:41 PM
Well, to be fair, you would need to be rather unintelligent to vote for McCain, so even without discrimination they probably wouldn't pass.
Posted by: Sonja | November 2, 2008 5:42 PM
Obama's scary?! Has she SEEN McCain?
He looks like central casting's pick for the old man behind every Scooby Doo haunting...
Posted by: Sam B | November 2, 2008 5:44 PM
I was surprised that no-one in the video seemed to explicitly raise the point that what she was doing was moronic - the kids can't vote, candy isn't gonna change the parent's vote.
Although I would find it stupidly awesome if the entire presidential campaigning process was based on candy.
O: "Vote for me, I'll give everyone a free lollipop!"
M: "No, vote for me! I'll give everyone TWO lollipops"
O: "Well, I'll give them a bar of chocolate as well. Not supermarket brand chocolate. Cadbury's."
M: "Heck, I'll give them a free tour of a chocolate FACTORY!"
Reporter: "Sirs, what are your stances on the war in the middle-east?"
O+M: ...
O+M: "CHOCOLAAAAAAATE!"
Oh dear god/thor/fsm, that would be the best thing in history to watch.
Posted by: K. R. | November 2, 2008 5:50 PM
She's not just a random shrew, either; this really is the kind of person McCain is building his campaign on:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/04/AR2008090400079.html
http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId=338928
Second link is photo evidence. ;O)
Posted by: Joshua Zelinsky | November 2, 2008 5:54 PM
Ok, KR. Now that is disturbing.
Posted by: Eric Atkinson | November 2, 2008 5:56 PM
This Republican women was mean to those children.
A true Democrat would have inspected each kids bag and depending on that child's racial and social economic status,removed or added candy as required.
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead | November 2, 2008 5:58 PM
EricA the class clown. You aren't funny, just pathetic.
Posted by: christophoros | November 2, 2008 5:59 PM
Halloween: All these dangerous socialists who want to redistribute the candy....
Posted by: Capital Dan | November 2, 2008 6:01 PM
Those Real Americans™ and their silly bigotry sure are special. I'm thinking this woman has a mountain of leftover M&Ms.
Posted by: Eric Atkinson | November 2, 2008 6:02 PM
This "red headed nerd" spents quite a bit of time trying to insult me, but little time trying to refute what I say.
Typical Democrat Behavior.
Posted by: Rob | November 2, 2008 6:02 PM
This would not have worked out for so well when I was a kid. They call it trick or treat for a reason.
All I can say is that a bunch of pansies live in that neighborhood.
Don't they have any soap, eggs, flaming bags of poo???
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead | November 2, 2008 6:04 PM
EricA the class clown. I am not a democrat. I've told you that in previous threads. So I add liar to your list of crimes, the first of which is not funny.
Posted by: Gregory Kusnick | November 2, 2008 6:05 PM
Sam B @ #22:
Maybe you've forgotten Bob Dole: "Vote for me and I'll give you a dollar next time you fill up your gas tank."
Not that much different if you ask me.
Posted by: Nibien | November 2, 2008 6:05 PM
True. Oddly enough, I don't try to refute people who say "The Bible says it, I believe it, that proves it" for some reason.
I guess some people are just too stupid to be dealt with as they understand so little. Of course, the lovely irony is those people are too stupid to realize even that, and think that people not responding to their sheer stupidity, such as bible sayings, somehow means they win.
You are, no doubt, one of the best Christians I've ever seen.
Posted by: Emmet Caulfield | November 2, 2008 6:10 PM
How did this make it into a news item on Fox?
Has the worm turned?
Posted by: Steve Vance | November 2, 2008 6:12 PM
Absolutely unacceptable. This person should be in jail. It doesn't surprise me that the same people who support private ownership of murder weapons would stoop to such a low. If this were a better country she would be in care of a psychiatrist. It's obvious her thinking is fatally broken.
Posted by: Eric Atkinson | November 2, 2008 6:14 PM
Nibien; I am an Atheist and the LAST book you would hear me quote is a Bible.
Your assumption made you a ass.
And Nerd, I don't care if you call yourself a liberty unionest, or what. Its still TDB.
No lie.
Posted by: Joshua Zelinsky | November 2, 2008 6:14 PM
Eric, you didn't get a better response because your comment was about as close to contentless as it could be barring it becoming a string of random letters. What are you claiming when you say that "A true Democrat would have inspected each kids bag and depending on that child's racial and social economic status,removed or added candy as required." Are you trying to refer to affirmative action or to reparations? Are you trying to refer to the use of welfare? If the first case, then the claim is stupid because most Dems don't support any form of reparations for slavery. If you are talking about welfare then the claim is equally stupid because making sure that people have the minimal amount they need to survive with dignity in a given society isn't at all the same as deciding how much candy kids get (notice the difference between essential and non-essentials). In fact, almost no one is in favor of no federal welfare programs. The question is to whom to give and how much? Moreover, the notion of a government deciding to use its tax money of the electorate in a certain way is so different than someone taking candy of a non-consenting individual by a private citizen that I don't even know how to express it.
Posted by: saber | November 2, 2008 6:16 PM
Bubba @ #10 lmao exactly
She's got every right to award the behavior she likes, but why the hells didn't someone trick this lady! It's Halloween! Get in the spirit!
Posted by: Azkyroth | November 2, 2008 6:18 PM
That briefly registered on the "cleverness" meter.
Now if only you weren't getting beat up by a windmill...
Posted by: Bob Vogel | November 2, 2008 6:18 PM
This was on Fox News? Even they seem to be giving up on McCain.
Posted by: Capital Dan | November 2, 2008 6:18 PM
Don't feed the fucking troll. It's the same conversation over and over. He's just a pathetic attention whore. Just let him rot and die and the world will be a much better place.
Posted by: dean | November 2, 2008 6:18 PM
Eric Atkinson
I'm very much a backer of the democratic party, but I didn't inspect the bags of any kids or redistribute anything based on height or other criteria. Actually, I don't know anyone who does, just as I know of none of my Republican friends who discriminated against non-McCain backers. This woman is simply a moron.
Back to the main point: So much for your ignorant statement about "typical Democratic behavior". Do you have any other idiotic statements you want to make?
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead | November 2, 2008 6:19 PM
EricA the class clown, I tell the truth when I say you are not funny. Half the time, you are not even logical. So I am supposed to believe the class clown when he says the equivalent of "trust me"? If you think that, I have a bridge to sell cheap.....
Posted by: Teh Merkin | November 2, 2008 6:20 PM
Obama for Mercedes Benz?
Posted by: Heather | November 2, 2008 6:21 PM
Hopefully, the parents of all the trick-or-treaters who encountered this woman are taking advantage of this "teachable" moment, no matter what their political affiliations.
Posted by: Eric Atkinson | November 2, 2008 6:25 PM
"Absolutely unacceptable. This person should be in jail. It doesn't surprise me that the same people who support private ownership of murder weapons would stoop to such a low. If this were a better country she would be in care of a psychiatrist. It's obvious her thinking is fatally broken."
WTF?
I think Steve misses soviet russia or some such.
I am really glad I live no where close to Steve.
If you dissagree with Steve, you need a Psychiatrist.
That must be somewhere in the DSM-IV, but I forget where.
Posted by: Emmet Caulfield | November 2, 2008 6:25 PM
There. Fixed.
Posted by: DarkFalzX | November 2, 2008 6:26 PM
Anybody else thought the inclusion of the "Obama is for Mercedes Benz"(That was NOT a peace sign), and an Obama cardboard cutout as a Halloween decoration were subtle jabs at the intelligence of Obama supporters? Leave it to Fox News: )
Posted by: Stanton | November 2, 2008 6:27 PM
My beloved Strawberry Blond, Eric Atkinson does not care that you're not a Democrat, or not: all he cares about is indulging in his desire to prove his loyalty to the Republican Party by dehumanizing and, more importantly, demonizing all those who do not mirror his opinions, irregardless of whether or not they also happen to be his fellow countrymen, or even members of the same species.Posted by: Nerd of Redhead | November 2, 2008 6:27 PM
Thank you Emmet. My mistake.Posted by: Susan | November 2, 2008 6:28 PM
Bubba
And toilet paper. And bloggers (and YouTube).
Nifty. A crazy, godbag, child-hating thief loves you. Aces, McCain!
Posted by: Joshua Zelinsky | November 2, 2008 6:30 PM
Steve, stupidity and pettiness aren't reasons to send people to jail.
Posted by: Annapolitan | November 2, 2008 6:31 PM
Hopefully, the parents of all the trick-or-treaters who encountered this woman are taking advantage of this "teachable" moment...
That's the right attitude, Heather. This is a teachable moment.
And one I would definitely take advantage of as I return home to grab some toilet paper.
Posted by: JJR | November 2, 2008 6:32 PM
Yep, someone who richly deserves to find out the other part of the "Trick OR Treat" dynamic the hard way...
This is a Witch, spelled with a capital "B". ;-)
Posted by: Eric Atkinson | November 2, 2008 6:32 PM
Eric Atkinson. Happy "muder weapons" owner and proud member of the National "muder weapons" Association.
Posted by: Kel | November 2, 2008 6:35 PM
Got to love Eric, he's the epitome of hypocrisy. Acts exactly like the accusations he throws against others. As a result, he just comes out as a narcissistic arse.
Posted by: spion | November 2, 2008 6:36 PM
And this sort of shit actually makes it into the news over there in the New World? How utterly, utterly, troglodytic.
Posted by: Norman Doering | November 2, 2008 6:37 PM
Capital Dan wrote:
And toilet paper decoration draped all over her house and trees.
http://normdoering.blogspot.com/2008/10/proving-that-republican-base-is-mostly.html
Posted by: JJR | November 2, 2008 6:37 PM
Just what the #@$! is "private ownership of murder weapons" supposed to mean? More woo-woo voodoo thinking...as if guns are possessed entities that can kill all by themselves.
I'm a Lefty and don't like the lady in the video either, but "private ownership of murder weapons" has got to be about the stupidest thing I've heard in a long time.
Posted by: Phil | November 2, 2008 6:38 PM
Let us be fair, it seems everyone has forgotten the trick part of Halloween. This is what toilet paper and eggs are for.
Posted by: Sydney S. | November 2, 2008 6:43 PM
...I can't even begin to express how disgusted I am right now.
Posted by: matt | November 2, 2008 6:45 PM
I love the logic of Eric A:
"Nibien; I am an Atheist and the LAST book you would hear me quote is a Bible.
Your assumption made you a ass.
And Nerd, I don't care if you call yourself a liberty unionest, or what. Its still TDB.
No lie. "
I like how his behavior can't be typical bible-thumper behavior because he's an atheist, but someone who's not a democrat still exhibits typical democratic behavior. I know there's logic there somewhere, I just can't seem to find it because it makes my brain hurt.
Posted by: LiquidThinker | November 2, 2008 6:45 PM
New slogan: "Supporting McCain gives you cavities!"
Posted by: Eric Atkinson | November 2, 2008 6:50 PM
Matt. Please read the last line of post #33.
I wasn't accused of acting like a thumper.
I was accused of being one.
Posted by: matt | November 2, 2008 6:56 PM
And you accused nerd of being a democrat...my head still hurts. Oh, and how are those conservative economic policies working out for you?
Posted by: Nibien | November 2, 2008 6:58 PM
Your assumption made you a ass.
I never said, specifically, you ascribed to the beliefs of the Christian doctrine, I said you were, in fact, a good Christian.
That is, you're ignorant, unthinking, uncritical, uneducated, spiteful, hateful, spout pointless phrases that mean nothing, yet think they win the day for you, are a general ass who seems to hate everyone who is different from you.
In fact, every personality trait you have seems to fit perfectly into one of the most fundamental Christian sects there are. Your lack of belief in God, I can be assured, did not come from critical thinking and a strong intellectual background, it comes merely from either from an emotional standing, or merely a lack of indoctrination.
Also, I quite enjoy the irony of you calling me an ass, as you are undoubtedly the most disliked human beings and I use that word for you, quite "liberally" in your case (I like puns)) who posts on these forums, and for good reason.
So, ascribing to the belief in a God or not, you are a perfect fundie-Christian, or any other religious nomination you wish to ascribe all the spiteful traits to. Your lack of believe in a God is of minor consequence, because the real problem with the religious is not their belief but that hatred and ignorant that stems with it and that, you have all of and more.
Posted by: Nibien | November 2, 2008 7:00 PM
Ah damn, I failed on the second line with blockquote. Alas, I can take comfort that it is an insignificant fail in comparison to Eric's post and I daresay life.
Posted by: Sanity Jane | November 2, 2008 7:02 PM
DarkFalzX @ #48: You mean that wasn't symbolic of how Obama's in favor of giving people a bigger piece of the American pie?
Posted by: matt | November 2, 2008 7:04 PM
I also like how he dodged my point of painting someone with whatever label he wants, regardless of it's validity, by saying someone else did it to him and they were wrong. But hey, dodging the issues and crying about how he's treated: typical republican behavior.
Posted by: papa zita | November 2, 2008 7:06 PM
Cortical cavities.
Posted by: Crazyharp81602 | November 2, 2008 7:09 PM
I saw that on TV last night. I thought it was totally unfair to give those trick or treaters who support Barack Obama nothing while she only gives treats to those supporting McCain. How should the children know all this when what they really want is candy for Halloween?
Posted by: Eric Atkinson | November 2, 2008 7:10 PM
Matt, this is going to hurt.
I am a registered Democrat.
It's so I can vote against Democrats in the primary.
I have no factual information on what party nerd belongs to.
Nerd said that he is not a Democrat because he "votes a split ticket."
But from the way he talks here he sure sounds like one to me. If he lived in Vermont, I would say a liberty unionest.
But I've be know to be wrong, and besides, nerd claims I am a liar.
An so on.
Posted by: Tziedel | November 2, 2008 7:13 PM
JJR #54, please don't associate us witches with that whackaloon.
Posted by: paleotn | November 2, 2008 7:13 PM
"This ReTHUGlican women was mean to those children. A true Democrat would have inspected each kids bag and depending on that child's racial and social economic status,removed or added candy as required."
Actually, Eric, a Democrat, particularly a Liberal Democrat, would give candy to any child, irregardless of political view, faith or lack of it, national origin, race, gender, sexual orientation, whatever, you name it. We treat everyone equally, remember.
A Republican would only give candy to the kids of her rich cronies and tell the less fortunate tots to go choke. She's got hers and doesn't give a good goddamn about anyone else, UNLESS there is something in it for her.
The GOP motto..."If they're going to die, let them do it quick and reduce the surplus population."
Or better yet..."Yes, we'd sell our own mother to benefit ourselves, but only if we can send her COD."
Posted by: shonny | November 2, 2008 7:14 PM
I think the term for her is "hard-faced bitch".
She looks a bit like that Marcos sheila married to the Philippino dictator (Dickwad Reagan's mate), the one who collected shoes.
Posted by: NOT Eric Atkinson | November 2, 2008 7:20 PM
I ls lk t tch chldrn. Inpprprtly.
[NO. Faking another user's name to post scurrilous accusations is not allowed, and will get you banned.]
[This comment was not posted by Eric Atkinson. -- pzm]
Posted by: Eric Atkinson | November 2, 2008 7:22 PM
"That is, you're ignorant, unthinking, uncritical, uneducated, spiteful, hateful, spout pointless phrases that mean nothing, yet think they win the day for you, are a general ass who seems to hate everyone who is different from you."
Hate? Because I'm not a liberal?
Ignorant? Yes I am. Show me some who isn't.
Spiteful? Well maybe.
Uneducated? Well, undereducated, I only have one BS and two AAS, so yes undereducated.
Pointless? Give me a break.
Posted by: Taz | November 2, 2008 7:22 PM
Eric Atkinson's comments are very instructive. In his little conservative fantasy world, actual documented bad behavior by a Republican is equivalent to a bizarre, unrealistic projection of Democratic behavior. It's almost a metaphor for this whole election.
Posted by: 'Tis Himself | November 2, 2008 7:24 PM
All of post #72 boils down to "I'm an asshole."
Posted by: Celtic_Evolution | November 2, 2008 7:25 PM
Eric Ass-kinson -
What an irritating little piss-ant you are. You are the reason I resort to "killfile", despite my basic instinctual curiosity for all person's viewpoints.
Haven't we had enough of this guy's intentional and unwarranted agitation at this point? Seriously. I get tired of you swooping in with your "hey, watch me stir the pot... hee hee hee" attitude every chance you get. If there's a position to be had on this board, rest assured you'll be there to take the opposite position. I have no idea what your politics, religion, or any other slant is, Eric. And that's because all you seem interested in is being a contrarian little gnat, looking to piss on PZs carpet every chance you get. I have no idea whether you believe all the crap you dump on the lawn or not... and I don't really care. I've just really had enough of you. *killfile*.
Posted by: Paul | November 2, 2008 7:25 PM
"And this sort of shit actually makes it into the news over there in the New World? How utterly, utterly, troglodytic."
Hehe, clearly that witch lived in an above ground domicile, and not a cave, spion. Now if you're finished casting aspersions on the "New World" can we speak of over-large ears and poor dental care? Cor blimey!
Posted by: Eric Atkinson | November 2, 2008 7:25 PM
#76
Typical Democrat Behaviour.
Once again.
Posted by: Scott | November 2, 2008 7:29 PM
Why am I not surprised by anything Republicans do anymore? They're like a bottomless pit of disgustingly shitty behavior.
Posted by: blueelm | November 2, 2008 7:29 PM
Eric @ #72
What do you hope to achieve by this? Why wouldn't you want to be involved in Republican nominations?
Posted by: clem | November 2, 2008 7:29 PM
For context, the Pointes are where Detroit area old money families traditionally live. This kind of behavior there is, though reprehensible, not surprising. It is the sort of area where 'driving while black' and 'driving while poor' (driving an older car after dark) absolutely will get you pulled over and ticketed.
Posted by: harmlesstree | November 2, 2008 7:29 PM
The Karma will come in the form of an raw omelet splattered all over her house!
Posted by: jeff a | November 2, 2008 7:32 PM
She was a 9th grade English teacher. One of her former students says she was nuts. He tells some funny stories about her that would seem to support his claim, including a story about a garlic necklace, holy water and a cross to ward off the darkness--aka the principal.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JF1tFOC05h8
Posted by: matt | November 2, 2008 7:33 PM
Eric, I never said you were a republican, I just said it was typical republican behavior. Or, to quote you: "And Nerd, I don't care if you call yourself a liberty unionest, or what. Its still TDB." So, Eric, I don't care if you call yourself a democrat or are registered as one. It's still typical republican behavior. And you are still dodging the point that it's OK for you to label others whether or not it fits, but to cry about it (again) when it is done to you. I like your consistent inconsistency. But your right. It hurts...my head.
Posted by: Janine ID AKA The Lone Drinker | November 2, 2008 7:33 PM
Eric, you are an asshole who happens to be an atheist. (Number five.)
So, are you an atypical Democrat? Who am I shitting, I do not give a flying fuck.
Posted by: Eric Atkinson | November 2, 2008 7:42 PM
blueelm;
In the part of North Carolina that I live in, it was years ago almost against the law to be registered as anything other than a Democrat. Local politics. So of us never changred our party affilation.
Despite what you hear, I not a Republican ether. I just don't like the one sided politics of "liberal or be damned."
And I don't like Obama.
Posted by: Patricia | November 2, 2008 7:44 PM
I'm firmly with Bubba on this subject. If I were there I'd have taken 10 dozen eggs and a 12 pack of toilet paper rolls and let the kids have at the old sow.
And if she has an outhouse, I'm sure Bubba would help me push it over. *snort*
Posted by: terrylong | November 2, 2008 7:49 PM
She redefines the term "candy-ass."
Posted by: Zar | November 2, 2008 7:49 PM
Eric Twatkinson supports terrorism and wants to teach your children how to be gay. In response to this, he will call it typical democrat behavior, thunderingly oblivious to the fact that it's typical republican behavior.
Posted by: Eric Atkinson | November 2, 2008 7:50 PM
Janine. Its very dangerous to fuck and fly.
Especially when you are drinking.
I need to go make some money, so you people will need to make do with out me.
That should get some funny insults.
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead | November 2, 2008 7:51 PM
EricA, the classless assclown, we heard you the first ten posts months ago. At this point, you are just being stupid if you think we don't get that you don't like Obama. You need to understand you aren't funny, so you just sound stupid. You aren't going to be the next Carlin. So if you aren't adding to the thread, just don't just try to be funny.BTW, I am not so much pro Obama as I am "not the republican candidate, whoever it may be". So I am a mild Obama voter.
Posted by: Patricia | November 2, 2008 7:51 PM
Eric Atkinson - Your child molesting post at #76 should get you banned. I hope PZ sends you to the seventh level of the pit. Asshole is too good for the likes of you, at least an asshole has a function. Pervert.
Posted by: The Chemist | November 2, 2008 7:53 PM
Ah Eric A., you're just an unabashed idiot aren't you? Linking to LGF always a good indicator of that.
Posted by: Eric Atkinson | November 2, 2008 7:56 PM
Patricia. Dr Myers has access to the information that shows I didn't make that post.
It wouldn't suprise me if you made that post.
Posted by: afterthought | November 2, 2008 7:56 PM
I am going to be so happy when this election is over. I am sure there will be a whole new bunch of crazy no matter who wins, but at least there may be some new stupid instead of the same old stupid. I personally would like to see some progress WRT:
* Iraq
* Global warming
* Stem cell research
* Alternative energy
* Ending torture in the United States
* Ending illegal spying
* Bringing back the 900+ year right to habeas corpus
* More support for scientific research
* Less hate from loonies (dreaming on that one I know)