Now on ScienceBlogs: The Heaving, Voluptuous Breasts of the IPCC Chief

Enter to Win

Pharyngula

Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)

• Quick link to the latest endless thread




I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

tbbadge.gif
scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

Among mammals, a virgin birth (parthenogenesis) can only produce female offspring, for chromosomal reasons. Messiahs are mammals. Therefore, Jesus was… On the other hand, among turkeys, the chromosomal situation is such that all products of virgin birth are males. So if Jesus was a male, he might also have been…" (Zindler's own punctuations)

[Frank Zindler, in a note to the debate Does god exist? with John Koster]

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« Virgin male in dress chastises gay people for their confused sexuality | Main | Another mind poisoned »

Machines of aggressively loving grace

Category: CephalopodsOrganismsReproductionScience
Posted on: December 23, 2008 12:10 PM, by PZ Myers

Blogging on Peer-Reviewed Research

Squid don't just make sperm: they package it up into fairly elaborate little torpedoes called spermatophores, which are either handed to the female with a specially modified arm called the hectocotyl arm, or squirted onto her with a penis. Once on the female (or a male, it really doesn't matter), the spermatophore everts, forming a structure called the spermatangia, in which all the packed sperm uncoil, ready to do their job, and the whole mass is anchored to the target with a cement body. These structures do show species-specific differences, but here is one example from Heteroteuthis dispar.

spermatophore.jpeg
Heteroteuthis dispar. Spermatophore (a) and spermatangium (b)

Now the curious observation: squid are often captured festooned with spermatophores and spermatangia, and in many cases, the spermatangia may be imbedded deeply into the musculature of the animal — so it's not simply as if the spermatophores are lovingly placed in an appropriate orifice, they are piercing the female (or the male, again, they don't care that much), tearing deep into the interior. The question is, how do they get in there?

A few simple observations have revealed the answer. Spermatophores can be triggered by a gentle squeeze, at which time all of their fertilization machinery will fire. Here are some photos of some spermatophores going to work on a squid carcass.

implant.jpeg(A) Placement of spermatophores on a dead male specimen of Moroteuthis ingens (mantle length ~300 mm) and initiation of the spermatophoric reaction by pressing on the ejaculatory apparatus with a forceps. (B) Same specimen, but submerged in seawater, showing the ejaculating spermatophores. (C) Exterior view of implanted spermatangia in tissue of a female, showing the site of penetration and part of the amber ejaculatory apparatus. (D) Interior view of same spermatangia, showing the sperm mass and the amber ejaculatory apparatus.

(Read the caption carefully. That's a human triggering sperm to ejaculate into a dead male squid. It's gay necrophiliac bestiality! You don't see that in the papers every day.)

The answer is that spermatophores also release digestive enzymes and actively burrow into the target tissue. Squid sperm show an aggressive persistence and vigorously active assault on the female body that our own pathetic human emissions lack…I feel a little inadequate, but I'm sure women are a bit relieved.

Another interesting observation is the function of the squid penis. It seems to be less an intromittent organ than a kind of hose to direct the ejaculations onto the female. In natural situations, unlike the photographs above, it is responsible for initiating the spermatophore reaction. Each spermatophore has a threadlike extension of a surrounding membrane, and tugging on that triggers the reaction. It's like a squad of paratroopers leaping out of a phallic airplane, each attached by a static line that yanks the rip cord as they emerge.


Hoving HJT, Laptikhovsky V (2007) Getting under the skin: autonomous implantation of squid spermatophores. Biological Bulletin 212: 177-179.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/88577

Comments

#1

Posted by: Dan Howitt | December 23, 2008 12:17 PM

Real interesting, thks for the article.
Dan Howitt nyc

#2

Posted by: Devon | December 23, 2008 12:18 PM

Eeeeeeew. That was mildly revolting.

#3

Posted by: The Science Pundit | December 23, 2008 12:20 PM

The day wouldn't be complete without a little gay necrophiliac bestiality.

#4

Posted by: Glen Davidson | December 23, 2008 12:21 PM

The loving design of the Creator shows up once more.

Seriously, why aren't more Xians happy to relieve their "God" of such aggressive and damaging practices? Granted, Ken Miller still needs to tell us why the world is left to evolve such barbarities, but at least he isn't telling us how God carefully designed malaria so that it will kill small children.

Glen D
http://tinyurl.com/6mb592

#5

Posted by: Gordon S | December 23, 2008 12:25 PM

(Read the caption carefully. That's a human triggering sperm to ejaculate into a dead male squid. It's gay necrophiliac bestiality! You don't see that in the papers every day.)
You should read Worldnetdaily more often.
#6

Posted by: Epikt | December 23, 2008 12:28 PM

The Science Pundit:

The day wouldn't be complete without a little gay necrophiliac bestiality.

...and a Woody Allen reference.

#7

Posted by: mindy | December 23, 2008 12:33 PM

looks very complex to me.. very very complex... any thoughts? or did this happen just out of hance?

#8

Posted by: Frasque | December 23, 2008 12:34 PM

Gay necrophiliac bestiality, eh? *sings* "It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas . . . "

#9

Posted by: MrStray | December 23, 2008 12:42 PM

Oh professor, I love it when you talk dirty.

#10

Posted by: the pro from dover | December 23, 2008 12:45 PM

I remeber a story in the newspaper about a giant squid (male) that had washed up dead on a beach with another giant squid's spermatophore inserted under his skin. Why this squid hated America and the baby Jesus so much I do not know. Perhaps Rev. Warren will address this burning question at the convocation.

#11

Posted by: the pro from dover | December 23, 2008 12:49 PM

I forgot to mention that genetic testing clearly proved it was Archipoofus Dux.

#12

Posted by: Glen Davidson | December 23, 2008 12:56 PM

Why this squid hated America and the baby Jesus so much I do not know.

Because, that squid was a Darwinist.

Glen D
http://tinyurl.com/6mb592

#13

Posted by: Nick Gotts | December 23, 2008 12:58 PM

or did this happen just out of hance? - mindy

From the free online dictionary:

hance
v. t. 1. To raise; to elevate.
n. 1. (Arch.) See Hanse.
2. (Naut.) A sudden fall or break, as the fall of the fife rail down to the gangway.

hanse (hns)
n.
A medieval merchant guild or trade association.

Nope. Don't think hance had anything to do with the evolution of cephalopod reproductive arrangements.

#14

Posted by: Archaneus | December 23, 2008 12:58 PM

That last description you wrote has implanted in my mind an image of a military training camp inside of the squid for all the little paratroopers. There should be a cartoon.

#15

Posted by: Glen Davidson | December 23, 2008 12:59 PM

With correct html commands:

Why this squid hated America and the baby Jesus so much I do not know.

Because, that squid was a Darwinist.

Glen D
http://tinyurl.com/6mb592

#16

Posted by: whitedevil | December 23, 2008 12:59 PM

This is one of the greatest things I've read all week.

#17

Posted by: Brownian, OM | December 23, 2008 12:59 PM

oh, NOW YOUR SUPRISED??!

THIS is the result of teching the perverted bedbug LIFESTYLE-no its nNot a choice!!!--in schools because thtats the only way gay nevrophilca lifestyles reproduce--doesn't your SCIENCE (which you replaced CThulu) and LOGIC tell you they can't have babies like this?

You REAP what you SEW Professor and his 'choir' (and don't say Im closed-minded I am a vbery open MIND) and what you do is between you and the old ones (which I will laugh when you meet hahahaha!) but how you can pervert innocent squed to not be eatin first is bey9ond me.

Happy Monkey! in CHTULUS name (you dont believe btu you WILL!!!hahahahahahahahahah!0

Bronwian, OD

#18

Posted by: Pope Tilton DCLXVI | December 23, 2008 1:10 PM

It's gay necrophiliac bestiality!

And, as such, far more dangerous to the world than global warming.

#19

Posted by: George | December 23, 2008 1:11 PM

Just goes to show, homosexual and heterosexual and asexual behavior are common - they are natural. Completely contradicts the pope's whole argument in the previous post.

Religion is a human creation for the sole purpose of imposing rules on others. Interestingly, the rules so imposed are not always followed even by the religious leaders them,selves.

#20

Posted by: the Petey | December 23, 2008 1:18 PM

It's like a squad of paratroopers leaping out of a phallic airplane, each attached by a static line that yanks the rip cord as they emerge.

I think i need a towel

#21

Posted by: H.H. | December 23, 2008 1:24 PM

looks very complex to me.. very very complex... any thoughts? or did this happen just out of [c]hance?
Well, right now, the prevailing theory is that a coven of evil djinns designed the sperm delivery system, but that in all likelihood a trickster spirit of some sort, either a sprite or satyr, tampered with the firing mechanism of the spermatophores. Scientists are still hashing out the details.
#22

Posted by: Hank Fox | December 23, 2008 1:24 PM

Whew! Sex as predation.

Reading this description, I imagine scenes with BeeGees music, disco balls and hard-drinking men on the dance floor, internally primed and just waiting for a female to come within striking range.

I'm pretty sure that's how some of us saw ourselves, anyway.

#23

Posted by: Keenacat | December 23, 2008 1:25 PM

Eeeeew.... *shudder*
Parasitic sperm will haunt my nightmares for quite some time now.

#24

Posted by: Rick Chappell | December 23, 2008 1:27 PM

> It's gay necrophiliac bestiality! You don't > see that in the papers every day.

Sure we do. You're just beating a dead horse.

#25

Posted by: Brownian, OM | December 23, 2008 1:32 PM

Sure we do. You're just beating a dead horse.

Heh, I see what you did there, Rick.

#26

Posted by: rob | December 23, 2008 1:35 PM

i call dibs on gaynecrophiliacbestiality.com

#27

Posted by: Tim | December 23, 2008 1:42 PM

You only hurt the one you love.. (Spike Jones version)

#28

Posted by: Flamethorn | December 23, 2008 1:42 PM

Can we refrain from invoking Rule 34 please?

Or is it too late?

#29

Posted by: Angel Kaida | December 23, 2008 1:43 PM

...I was finally starting to not be afraid of squid. I even decided that some of them were pretty and wrote a bio paper on them.
Thanks for reinvigorating my nightmares.

#30

Posted by: ben | December 23, 2008 1:47 PM

Off-topic but cephalopodulent ... do any squidfolk have an opinion on the lumper/splitter debate vis-a-vis the genus Architeuthis? It seems that every specimen ever found has been given a species of its very own: sanctipauli, japonica, etc., on the basis of very little evidence.

#31

Posted by: Ward S. Denker | December 23, 2008 1:51 PM

mindy (#7), are you fishing around to see if you can get us to bite on some creationist drivel, or are you asking a legitimate question? It sounds suspiciously like typical creationist "how could this have all happened by chance" rhetoric.

Random mutation is one way for evolution to occur. There are a lot of mechanisms (punctuated equilibrium, genetic drift, etc.). Some will claim that mutation only destroys and that no new "information" (by which they're inferring that genetic code is intelligently designed) can accumulate in this way. This comes from a misunderstanding of natural selection.

Random mutation could be likened to static on a television screen (to use the analogy from a creationist web site I recently debunked on my blog). Natural selection would be the process of selecting a few pixels from each new batch of random pixels (genes) that most resemble something (say, a photograph), leaving the pixels already selected (mostly) alone, and discarding all the rest (they are lost because they don't lead to viable offspring). With natural selection as a "filter" on this randomness, eventually a clear picture resembling something recognizable appears.

Contrary to popular belief, natural selection is not "survival of the fittest." Fitness is a specific distinction that indicates knowledge of the condition something is supposed to be fit for. In a lot of cases, random mutations can be completely benign (eye color, for example). As long as mutations aren't lethal or prevent offspring and no selection pressures are applied, variety within a species will abound. This is useful to any species because when a selection pressure is applied, all of that genetic variety increases the chances of survival by specific lines.

It should not come as a surprise that the most alien of conditions (the bottom of the ocean) will inevitably lead to alien genetics (from the perspective of us land dwellers). Where lack of light, intense pressures, frigid cold, and contact with already-weird denizens of the deep come into play, it could be easily described as an "arms race of strange."

#32

Posted by: Azdak | December 23, 2008 1:58 PM

Did this remind anyone else of Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex?

#33

Posted by: Coragyps | December 23, 2008 2:05 PM

It seems to be less an intromittent organ than a kind of hose to direct the ejaculations onto the female.

I think I've seen people movies like that......

#34

Posted by: sara | December 23, 2008 2:15 PM

Is spermatangium keratinised or mineralised? How is it so hard?

#35

Posted by: papa zita | December 23, 2008 2:22 PM

It's like a squad of paratroopers leaping out of a phallic airplane, each attached by a static line that yanks the rip cord as they emerge.

Gee, that seems just like the last vignette of Woody Allen's Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex * But Were Afraid to Ask.

#36

Posted by: Fellow Traveller | December 23, 2008 2:25 PM

Great. In my country, the United Kingdom, the government recently outlawed images of necrophilia, bestiality and extremely violent sex. So, by reading your post, I've just set myself up for a stretch in prison.

#37

Posted by: cousinavi | December 23, 2008 2:29 PM

This obvious obsession with squid sex...
bit of a giveaway, n'est pas?
"PZ Myers Arrested for Tentacle Porn"

Phallic airplane?
You dirty little beast.

#38

Posted by: Brad D | December 23, 2008 2:45 PM

As much as I like watching movies like Alien, and other movies with exotic fantasy creatures, I have to say those movies have nothing on nature for the weirdness and occasional horror factor.

#39

Posted by: Quiet_Desperation | December 23, 2008 2:47 PM

Bleah. I'm alerting Rick Warren about this post. We can't be having this sort of smut polluting the interwebs and destroying the minds of America's impressionable youths. Why do you hate America, PZ? Hater.

#40

Posted by: Jeremy | December 23, 2008 3:01 PM

Reminds me of traumatic insemination in some insects, mites, and onychophorans. I'm not sure which is more fascinating.

#41

Posted by: eric | December 23, 2008 3:49 PM

Adzak (#32) - no, strangely it reminded me of Wrath of Kahn...the part where they stick a "juvenile Ceti eel" in Chekov's ear. Do the squid's digestive enzymes work on humans? Yikes!!!

#42

Posted by: Blake Stacey | December 23, 2008 3:57 PM

Do the squid's digestive enzymes work on humans?

Only in Japan.

(Come on, you were all thinking it!)

#43

Posted by: Rebecca C. | December 23, 2008 4:38 PM

God, isn't getting it in our hair enough? Remind me never to date a squid.

#44

Posted by: Sven DiMilo | December 23, 2008 4:40 PM

Another interesting observation is the function of the squid penis.
Quoted purely for quotability.
#45

Posted by: Robert Estrada | December 23, 2008 5:50 PM

I am really! REALLY!!grateful that you chose science as a career. My imagination staggers at what might have happened if you had become a priest or cinematographer
Merry squidmas and a happy monkey!.
(does that have anything to do with spanking the monkey?)
Robert

#46

Posted by: Cannabinaceae | December 23, 2008 6:35 PM

Azdak,

Darn it, you thought along similar lines as did I. Now I'm going to have to think of some other cultural reference. Hmm...

Cephalopods are growing like yellow sea-anemones on the current
And we ejaculate aggressively in the medieval gardens of their burrowing spermatophores
Oh I want to inseminate
Oh I am inseminating
Oh I have inseminated
Thank you

To the obvious question at this point: no, the last time I indulged in LSD was when comet Hyakutake was nearby.

#47

Posted by: JM Inc. | December 23, 2008 7:00 PM

Now I'm not a biologist (though I have studied a bit of biology so I probably should know this), but I thought penises evolved to prevent the drying out of sperm after ejaculation in land animals? Is this not so?

Is it simply that this squid penis shares a different history than our own, or do they share the same history, and that history just happens to start earlier and for a different reason than I was given to think it had?

‐‐‐
PZ said: "Squid sperm show an aggressive persistence and vigorously active assault on the female body that our own pathetic human emissions lack...I feel a little inadequate".

And PZ, what a throwback you are! How typically masculine to always worry about the efficacy of your capacity for genetic proliferation. Besides, I'm sure plenty of people out there wish their male partners would squirt them with digestive enzymes, considering the human alternative when it comes to aggressive, involuntary sexual penetration. Digestive enzymes do wash off, you know; can you imagine if the primary form of birth control was to check yourself for spermatophores? Christ, I'd go for that!

#48

Posted by: g | December 23, 2008 7:03 PM

Is the gender of the human important?

#49

Posted by: Epacris | December 23, 2008 8:31 PM

Brad D @38, some movie horror monsters are based on 'real' creatures. Filmmakers will combine a few different physical &/or behavioural characteristics. Alien used the wasp implanting into paralysed live victims bit. I think the bursting out is like some worms (tho' not usually lethal). I'm not sure if there were other bits based on actual examples.

#50

Posted by: Paper Hand | December 23, 2008 9:15 PM

Does that cause injury to the female? It seems like it would from the description, but I suppose it couldn't be too serious, or the squids would never successfully reproduce!

Is this normal among all squids?

#51

Posted by: marella splendens | December 23, 2008 9:40 PM

Did anyone else think of squid bukkake when reading this?

#52

Posted by: Tulse | December 23, 2008 9:51 PM

So, PZ, is the post title a reference to the Richard Brautigan poem? If so, massive kudos!

#53

Posted by: Crudely Wrott | December 23, 2008 10:04 PM

Squid sperm show an aggressive persistence and vigorously active assault on the female body that our own pathetic human emissions lack...I feel a little inadequate, but I'm sure women are a bit relieved.

That happens to me a lot, too. Got the scars to prove it.

EOPOA (Early Onset Primary Old Age) is so comforting, eh?

#54

Posted by: PZ Myers | December 23, 2008 10:25 PM

Of course it's a Brautigan reference! What else could it be?

#55

Posted by: Owlmirror | December 23, 2008 10:33 PM

Did anyone else think of squid bukkake when reading this?

As best I could understand it, squid reproduction is, in fact, bukkake.

#56

Posted by: donna | December 23, 2008 11:16 PM

"Does that cause injury to the female? It seems like it would from the description, but I suppose it couldn't be too serious, or the squids would never successfully reproduce!"

Actually most squid tend to die after they reproduce. So yeah, it's kind of fatal.

#57

Posted by: Tulse | December 24, 2008 12:40 AM

Of course it's a Brautigan reference! What else could it be?

Well, there's a band whose name refers to the same poem. But I figured you to be both cool enough and old enough to be name-checking the original. What else would a godless liberal do but sit around and read '60s poets and novelists?

I am now expecting an appropriate "Trout Fishing in America" reference in a future post!

#58

Posted by: dwhatley | December 24, 2008 1:53 AM

Have you tried the spermatophores on other tissue to see if they would imbed?

#59

Posted by: mayhempix | December 24, 2008 5:50 AM

Great idea for a science fiction plot. The alien cephs fire their sperm at humans where it inbeds in their flesh. They can only be removed by tearing them out but their are so many it is virtually impossible without dying. When the youing cephs mature they eat away at the host.

All the Christians will believe they are being personally persecuted and blame it on gay marriage. The Muslims will blame it on western science and the infidel Christians. The new agers will blame it on bad Feng Shui. And the Libertarians will blame it on market regulation.

The hero is an atheist biologist who loves calamari.

#60

Posted by: J. Grant | December 24, 2008 9:53 AM

Just in time for Xmas!

#61

Posted by: AdamK | December 24, 2008 9:58 AM

Okay, this post and the angler fish post below?

Eeew!

Biology is soooo gross.

#62

Posted by: Jadehawk | December 24, 2008 11:16 AM

I can never unread this post... biology is traumatizing.

#63

Posted by: Skelli | December 24, 2008 12:40 PM

Gay necrophiliac bestiality FOR SCIENCE!

#64

Posted by: Inquisitor Numad | December 24, 2008 4:11 PM

And I, for one, no longer welcome our new cephalopod overlords.

#65

Posted by: Susannah | December 25, 2008 3:44 AM

JM Inc, # 47:
"Digestive enzymes do wash off, you know;... "

Dream on. The squid is underwater and they don't wash off.

Maybe they're more like ticks; you need to hold a hot match to their rear ends.

One more to add to the list of proofs of God's great love!

#66

Posted by: hip hip array | December 25, 2008 6:08 PM

Another interesting observation is the function of the squid penis. It seems to be less an intromittent organ than a kind of hose to direct the ejaculations onto the female.

They all grew up in the San Fernando Valley.

#67

Posted by: JM Inc. | December 26, 2008 2:20 AM

#65, Susannah: "Dream on. The squid is underwater and they don't wash off."

Hey, anybody who's ever had five or six too many knows that soap washes out a lot of things.

#68

Posted by: Sondra | December 27, 2008 10:50 AM

Wow. Will the baby squid get born from the dead body? That would be the ultimate alien invasion.

#69

Posted by: Sili | December 31, 2008 12:16 PM

(Read the caption carefully. That's a human triggering sperm to ejaculate into a dead male squid. It's gay necrophiliac bestiality! You don't see that in the papers every day.)
So in fact it's more specifically interspecies felching?
#70

Posted by: hery Author Profile Page | January 25, 2010 11:38 AM

Parasitic sperm will haunt my nightmares for quite some time now.

Leave a comment

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.