…and this is a 
Wack-a-mole opportunity in Madison
Category: Creationism
Posted on: December 2, 2008 12:58 PM, by PZ Myers
I know there are a lot of smart people at UW Madison who will be a bit dismayed to hear this: an IDEA chapter is forming in Madison. The IDEA clubs are the sad little organizations that the Intelligent Design wackaloons form on college campuses to spread their nonsense. They don't seem very effective — they produce people like Casey Luskin and Sal Cordova, so one might argue that they actually help us by dumbing down the opposition — but they are kind of embarrassing to have around.
Anyway, this group is going to show some silly ID movies, "Where the evidence leads" (irreducible complexity proves evolution is wrong!) and "The Privileged Planet" (god is real because we don't fall up!) on December 4, 10, 18 and in January at the Madison Public Library. They will have discussions afterwards in which they try to defend bogosity.
This could be great fun for the rational folk in Wisconsin. Get a group together, show up for the movie, and tear it down afterwards. Make 'em struggle, then go out for a celebratory beer afterwards. Report back if you do it!
MAJOR CORRECTION: this isn't in Madison, Wisconsin. It's Madison, South Dakota. They are easily confused, one is to the west of me, the other to the east.
This Madison contains Dakota State University — I'm sure there are avid science students there ready to play wack-a-mole, too.
Comments
Posted by: Nemo | December 2, 2008 1:03 PM
And of course he (seems to be only one guy so far) plans to show Expelled later...
How many ID films are there, anyway?
Posted by: Katharine | December 2, 2008 1:05 PM
Time to rally the troops.
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp, KoT, OM | December 2, 2008 1:05 PM
None. Only anti-evolution ones.
Posted by: TomS | December 2, 2008 1:07 PM
Is that Madison, Wisconsin? There are other Madisons in the USA.
Posted by: Chris Davis | December 2, 2008 1:10 PM
For one terrifying moment there, I thought you were talking about IKEA.
Me blood fair ran cold, it did...
Posted by: Geral | December 2, 2008 1:10 PM
"At some point, he said, he hopes to set up a debate with a college professor."
Go PZ go!
Posted by: Nyxator | December 2, 2008 1:11 PM
@4
Are there multiple UW Madisons out there?
Posted by: Katharine | December 2, 2008 1:13 PM
Indeedy, PZ is referring to Madison, Wisconsin.
Do remember that we are the home of FFRF. We rational people of UW-Madison are well-equipped against these retards.
Posted by: Glen Davidson | December 2, 2008 1:13 PM
Science proving god.Uh, well, let's make that propaganda films proving god. Just what UW needs.
Still, it can't hurt to have Luskinses and Cordovas around for the "committed materialists" (read, those who demand observable evidence) in a place where a sizable fraction of the population can and will tear their nonsense all apart while barely trying.
Glen D
http://tinyurl.com/2kxyc7
Posted by: Patricia | December 2, 2008 1:15 PM
Nothing would tickle me more than to find one of these groups starting up within 50 miles of my home town. All I can say is, gawd help them. *grin*
Posted by: Techskeptic | December 2, 2008 1:16 PM
PLAY BINGO!
Posted by: mumfie | December 2, 2008 1:17 PM
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Darwins-day/
"We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to create a Bank Holiday on Charles Darwin's Birthday (12th February). "
Please sign the UK only petition for a Darwin celebration!
Posted by: Bill Anderson | December 2, 2008 1:23 PM
I followed the link to the newspaper home page, and it is a Madison, South Dakota paper. So Madison, WI, you have still more time to prepare...
Posted by: Katharine | December 2, 2008 1:23 PM
Geral, we have someone almost as good: Sean B. Carroll, developmental biologist.
Posted by: Evan | December 2, 2008 1:29 PM
Well, folks from Madison, WI will have to drive a mighty long way to get to Madison, SD (population 6500) for the event.
Posted by: KH | December 2, 2008 1:30 PM
Regardless of which Madison it is, it's still notable that the events are at a public library! You South Dakota rational people should insist to the library that they must also screen the PBS NOVA show on the Dover trial as well as science shows explaining evolution.
Posted by: Chris P | December 2, 2008 1:31 PM
Madison - SOUTH DAKOTA
It's in the wilderness.
Chris P
Posted by: Dirty Hairy | December 2, 2008 1:31 PM
Dor sho gha! Maybe my cousin in Milwaukee will take me for my birthday!
Posted by: Saddlebred | December 2, 2008 1:34 PM
I was actually gonna go to them too...SD is a bit further from Milwaukee though.
Starting an IDEA chapter in Madison, WI would quite possibly be the most masochistic thing any IDer could do.
Posted by: KH | December 2, 2008 1:35 PM
PZ, it's less than 200 miles from Morris, Minnesota, to Madison, South Dakota!
Posted by: IST | December 2, 2008 1:41 PM
Reading the original article, the reporting is of more concern than the formation of the chapter; The article is written in such a way as to lend legitimacy to the idea in the first place.
Posted by: Sven DIMilo | December 2, 2008 1:59 PM
I'm willing to bet there's no IKEA in Madison, SD, though.
Posted by: NewEnglandBob | December 2, 2008 2:04 PM
You can email that reporter's newspaper to complain about her article at news@madisondailyleader.com
It seems they do not have email addresses for their reporters.
Posted by: Chard | December 2, 2008 2:09 PM
Duly forwarded to my brother-in-law, who is both a faculty member at Dakota State and a former debater....
Posted by: ScottKnick | December 2, 2008 2:16 PM
I was astonished to read that any ID group would be stupid enough to try to stage a public appearance in Madison, WI, where great masses of the righteous would just love to descend on them. Now, it just might fly in South Dakota.
ScottKnick
Madison, WI
Posted by: Inoculated Mind | December 2, 2008 2:20 PM
DAMN! If only t'were Madison, WI, I could do some 'field research.'
Except wear that sweater.
Posted by: JStein | December 2, 2008 2:32 PM
I'm sure we have one on campus here at Fresno, and that depresses me.
Posted by: Ken | December 2, 2008 2:33 PM
As an escapee from South Dakota I am not surprised at having one of these groups surface there. I am a little surprised it took this long and that there aren't more of these groups there.
Someone should look at the other schools there and see if they aren't infected too.
Posted by: Al | December 2, 2008 2:34 PM
I am going to have to make a note on my calendar to go and see this. This makes me more sad to be a resident of Madison, SD.
To SVEN, no we do not have an IKEA or a Walmart or even Burger King.
Posted by: BobC | December 2, 2008 2:34 PM
Yes, for sure. I've been to South Dakota many times to visit my farmer relatives. I think the state has more cows than people. Everyone is a Christian, and I bet virtually everyone believes in magical creation.
I just checked what grade the Fordham Institute gave South Dakota's public school science standards. South Dakota's grade was a D. They scored 1 point out of 3 possible points for evolution.
The earth and space sciences get much better, and on some topics good, treatment. Reviewers complain, however, of repetition of the same content in grade after grade, with insufficient modification or enhancement. The same may be said of life science. There is, for example, an adequate but fragmented sequencing of content essential to evolutionary biology. This is done while use of the word itself, "evolution," is absurdly sparing as though the writers hoped it wouldn't be noticed. Other life science content is scanty. The prose is more careful than for physical science, but here too it is not easy to guess what will actually happen in class. Grade:"D."
South Dakota avoids using the word "evolution" in their public school science standards. I wouldn't be surprised if many of their biology teachers never teach evolution.
Posted by: Olorin | December 2, 2008 2:37 PM
IDEA clubs "produce people like Casey Luskin and Sal Cordova..."
Hey, Casey Luskin was a founder of the first IDEA club.
Posted by: Ken | December 2, 2008 2:47 PM
I grew up in SD in the 60's and 70's. We learned about evolution and science back then. A number of friends went on to become scientists in a wide variety of fields. But my nieces and nephew are growing up there now and I can't see the difference between what they are learning and what a private christian school would teach.
Posted by: Skyler | December 2, 2008 2:48 PM
As the president of Dakota State University's Secular Student Organization, I will definitely be at their presentations to help promote reason. Atheists are few and far between here, but we have two things the creationists don't have: facts and reason.
Posted by: SC | December 2, 2008 2:48 PM
If only there were more IFIGUDFLI - Intelligent Falling Intersecting Gravity Under Deism For Lasting Improvement - groups.
Posted by: Quiet_Desperation | December 2, 2008 2:54 PM
I think they should be IDEAL
Intelligent Design Evolution Awareness Losers
South Dakota? People live there? I thought it was just pheasants and deactivated nuclear missile silos.
Posted by: Jello | December 2, 2008 2:58 PM
Remember taht old Jeff Foxworthy bit, "here's your sign". Turns out we don't need to hand out signs now the morons are forming clubs.
Posted by: Brownian, OM | December 2, 2008 3:03 PM
Whoever is going to shred the IDEA people, go armed with some theology as well as science.
Remember, the people IDers are trying to reach already hate scientists as a bunch of atheist eggheads who hate Christianity and common sense. All they hear when a biologist talks is the sound of dollars being spent on fruit flies in France.
Instead, remind them that ID 'proves' Brahma just as much as it does Jehovah/Yahweh/Elohim.
"That's right folks, the lack of transitional fossils means the brown people were right all along. Line up to get your forehead Bindis right here!"
That'll send 'em into the cool secular embrace of science faster than you can say "Happy Diwali!"
Posted by: Patricia | December 2, 2008 3:12 PM
Let em' have it Skyler!
Posted by: ez | December 2, 2008 3:19 PM
Can someone get through to PZ? Ask him if he is man enough to debate a real creation scientist. Tell him not to be afraid of the bible even though it is sharper than an two edged sword.
If he believes his own non evidential rhetoric let him stand up call ICR's event dept and set up a debate.
Dr. Gish is still around and would love to show the audience the LACK of evidence supporting the so called SMART religion of PZ Meyer.
The "evidence" for evolution made PZ leave the God of the bible and gravitate to the god of humanism. The debate will not only show that particles to people can't be true but that it has NEVER taken place.
Lets see if PZ if man enough or evolved ape enough . . . .
Posted by: HumanisticJones | December 2, 2008 3:23 PM
I love the his attempt and fail at fear mongering.
You aren't loosing any freedom to discuss your unsubstantiated non-theory, you just can't hijack valuable class time to peddle it. I also note that the article claims that Parker wrote seven books, but fails to cite where I can find any of them.
Posted by: John Phillips, FCD | December 2, 2008 3:34 PM
ez, good Poe. It was a Poe, wasn't it? After all, it is so hard to say nowadays with all the seagulls we have visiting recently.
Though if I waere you, next time, I would mess up the spelling a bit more as it was a bit too neat to be taken for real. And there definitely wasn't enough capitals or exclamations. Though a good first attempt.
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead | December 2, 2008 3:34 PM
What an oxymoron. Creationism isn't scientific. Never has been, never will be. There is no mention of creationism in the scientific literature, which is where science is found, so there can be no scientific discussion of the issue. What an idiot. The bible does not refute science. Only more science can refute science. That requires evidence and the publishing of the evidence in the scientific literature. The bible can refute another holy book, but gosh, science does not have a holy book. The knowledge of science is constantly changing as new facts are found. A debate should be amongst equals. Something with no evidence to back it up (creationism) versus the theory of evolution with millions of papers is not a match. There cannot be an even debate.Posted by: manigen | December 2, 2008 3:36 PM
Off topic, but I figured everyone here would be interested in:
http://www.spookysquid.com/notc/
Posted by: gypsytag | December 2, 2008 3:37 PM
I call POE on ez!!!!
Posted by: bfish | December 2, 2008 3:46 PM
These IDEA clubs can definitely peter out, so take heart Madisons, in whatever state you reside.
They tried one at Berkeley three years ago. Back in those halcyon days of yore they even scored mention on Uncommon Descent out of nothing but the goodness of Bill Dembski's heart - well, that and the fact that he was going to speak there.
Here is the announcement on UD:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/education/idea-club-comes-to-uc-berkeley/
I saw both his talks, but for some reason his ideas didn't catch fire amongst the student population. The website has not been updated since about two weeks after he spoke.
http://idea.berkeley.edu/
Posted by: Chris P | December 2, 2008 3:48 PM
Nobody else going to join his chapter and throw rocks?
http://ideachaptermadisonsd.ning.com/
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp, KoT, OM | December 2, 2008 3:56 PM
BBBBWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA
HAHA
AHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
No thanks. The Gish Gallop is nothing but an exercise in eating shit as fast as you can and trying to say it is Foie Gras.
Hilarious.
Posted by: raven | December 2, 2008 3:58 PM
I know a few people from SD. They left because the town they lived in was becoming a ghost town, boarded up buildings and the average age of the people left was 60 or so.
They didn't dislike it but unless you are obsessed with corn, wheat, and shooting birds and quadrupeds it didn't seem to have much else going on. The winters weren't fun either.
Posted by: SASnSA | December 2, 2008 3:59 PM
They act as if they don't have the opportunity to brainwash their kids' minds with this hogwash. What, every night at home and Sunday and Wednesday at church isn't enough time to corrupt little minds? They need to have this shit taught like science in school too?
If you want your kids to go to schools that "teach the controversy", send them to private religious schools! Not everybody is foolish enough to believe that garbage, even among Christians! (believe it or not)
Posted by: Naked Bunny with a Whip | December 2, 2008 4:00 PM
Remember taht old Jeff Foxworthy bit, "here's your sign".
That's Bill Engvall's schtick, I believe. Foxworthy's is "you might be a redneck if...".
Posted by: Evan B | December 2, 2008 4:02 PM
I recently escaped South Dakota to go to school in NYC, but I should be back to attend at least one of these events in January...
I don't know---considering what I know about the Madison area and SD in general, this doesn't look good at all...I hope a few college professors (cough cough PZ cough) show up...
Posted by: Brownian, OM | December 2, 2008 4:06 PM
Forget Dr. Gish and PZ. I'll debate you right here and right now, dipshit.
And BTW, Happy Diwali, Fuckface.
Posted by: mothra | December 2, 2008 4:10 PM
If ez is not a Poe, WHAT A MAROON! Don't feed the Troll.
I immigrated to that other Dakota (aka Baja Manitoba) two decades ago. I can faithfully report that there are enclaves of godless atheists in SD, at least in East River country. Madison? probably not.
South Dakota is often the political target range for many nut groups and their ideas. Witness the recent no exceptions abortion law (failed), the politicization of state judges (failed), suing of Judges by convicts (failed). But some of these votes have been close and there are new and nuttier ballot measures all the time...
Posted by: Naked Bunny with a Whip | December 2, 2008 4:14 PM
unless you are obsessed with corn, wheat, and shooting birds and quadrupeds it didn't seem to have much else going on.
If you're too damned lazy to read a book or pick up some sort of hobby, I suppose that might be true, outside the cities. Not everyone needs to be jammed into the middle of a crowd to find a little enjoyment in life, though. Some of us find the idea horrifying, in fact.
Posted by: Mikko | December 2, 2008 4:27 PM
play some bullshit bingo
Posted by: NewEnglandBob | December 2, 2008 4:47 PM
A terrific book:
God: The Failed Hypothesis.
How Science Shows That God Does Not Exist
By Victor J. Stenger
From Amazon:
Physicist Victor J. Stenger contends that, if God exists, some evidence for this existence should be detectable by scientific means, especially considering the central role that God is alleged to play in the operation of the universe and the lives of humans. Treating the traditional God concept, as conventionally presented in the Judeo-Christian and Islamic traditions, like any other scientific hypothesis, Stenger examines all of the claims made for God's existence.
He considers the latest Intelligent Design arguments as evidence of God's influence in biology. He looks at human behavior for evidence of immaterial souls and the possible effects of prayer. He discusses the findings of physics and astronomy in weighing the suggestions that the universe is the work of a creator and that humans are God's special creation.
After evaluating all the scientific evidence, Stenger concludes that beyond a reasonable doubt the universe and life appear exactly as we might expect if there were no God.
Posted by: John Pieret | December 2, 2008 5:48 PM
Well, at least one person in that Madison is on the case:
http://www.keloland.com/custompages/kelolandblogs/madvilletimes/index.cfm?c=2502
Posted by: Emmet Caulfield | December 2, 2008 5:58 PM
Gish, whose god is, of course, the God of the Gallops.
Posted by: Derek | December 2, 2008 6:13 PM
SSO is on the case. Though PZ could make a quick jaunt and help things out.
So, they have a website:
http://ideachaptermadisonsd.ning.com/
However, Parker, the creator of the group, posted an Edward Current video:
http://ideachaptermadisonsd.ning.com/video/video/show?id=2408246%3AVideo%3A182
Reverse Poe?
Posted by: mothra | December 2, 2008 6:26 PM
Now, now Emmet (#158) we shouldn't criticize the aging (Cadriff) giants in their field. Duane Gish and his ilk have made one solid contribution (albeit worthless) to the field of rhetoric.
Posted by: mothra | December 2, 2008 6:28 PM
Ooops! #58- unless you were planning to post again when this thread reaches # 157. ::)
Posted by: Chris P | December 2, 2008 6:36 PM
Expecting somebody from the university there to defend evolution might be expecting a bit much. They don't go much beyond Biology 101. No genetics classes and no mention of evolution.
I'm surprised that nobody much wants to pharyngulate the Parker website. You just sign on and start making comments and then he sends you a nastygram back. I was hoping it would be like the homeschooler site where she got fed up and shut down public access.
Chris P
Posted by: MaryK | December 2, 2008 7:03 PM
They had one of those "body worlds" style exhibits there this summer, and I went to it (I was there for field work). Oh, dear, it was bad. The very first specimen had a tape recording going that tipped me off to how it was gonna go down: "Whether you believe in evolution or intelligent design, we can all agree that the body is a magnificent machine..."
Posted by: John C. Randolph | December 2, 2008 7:37 PM
In my social circles, "IDEA" stands for International Design Excellence Awards, and they're given for outstanding examples of industrial design work.
Someone should probably advise the committee that the IDiots are infringing on their trademark.
-jcr
Posted by: John C. Randolph | December 2, 2008 8:04 PM
Grumble.. Link didn't work:
http://www.idsa.org/IDEA2009/index.html
-jcr
Posted by: Blind Squirrel FCD | December 2, 2008 8:12 PM
It's not even wilderness. Imagine wilderness with the trees, mountains, hills and water removed. Shortgrass prairie turned to row crops.
Does make it easy to lay out the roads, though.
Posted by: Donald James Parker | December 2, 2008 8:38 PM
Gosh,
Sure am glad I provided fodder for your entertainment today since you all city folks don't have chicken to milk or hay to smoke. I have a little proposition for you. If you can show me where the scientific method has been deployed to prove Darwin's theory, I'll shut down my little dog and pony show and get a life. In which lab has life been created? In which lab has one species turned into a different one? Etc. etc. etc.
Mr. Myers - the IDEA organization is just a minor irritation. You should try out my novel All the Voices of the Wind. You and Richard Dawkins get lots of air time.
Donald James Parker
Author of the Masterson Family Series exposing Darwin's Folly via fiction.
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead | December 2, 2008 8:44 PM
DJP, Try over 100,000 scientific papers, probably over 1,000,000. Just pick up any copy of Nature or Science and you will probably find at least one. Now count the papers in the scientific literature backing creationism and ID. Very fews, if any. Now look for the publication of the seminal paper for either of those theories in the scientific literature. You won't find them.
Thats what separates science from religion.
Posted by: Brim S McCarthy | December 2, 2008 8:46 PM
Don,You crack me up. Way to go for opening the debate in your community. Thanks for the IDEA about setting up a club in Madison, WI. You may see one there soon...
Posted by: John Morales | December 2, 2008 8:49 PM
That should read: If you can show me where the scientific method has been deployed to improve Darwin's theory.
Answer is: modern biology.
Posted by: natural cynic | December 2, 2008 9:09 PM
Yikes! This brings back memories. I was a faculty member at Dakota State about 15 years ago and I can attest that "the controversy" was rumbling just under the surface at that time. There were at least three faculty members in Science & Math who were in the ID/creationist camp along with a prominent town optometrist. One of the faculty [Biology] was about to retire and he taught his courses with a more or less standard curriculum with some added remarks about his personal beliefs and another faculty [Chemistry] actually wanted to have a course on creationism. I got introduced to the subject through a few statements I made that could not be totally backed up. That got me interested in the debates on Usenet and in more independent study. I also got to then mark-up a copy of Darwin on Trial that one of them had [easy].
If you check out the books by Donald James Parker, the instigator of the IDEA club, you might be amused, or appalled, or both. He has novelized "the controversy", with his protaganist fighting the battle for ID. Reviewers mentioned that the author was really good at presenting both sides. Yeah, right.
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead | December 2, 2008 9:14 PM
DJP, big scientific theories, like General Relativity or Evolution (note, not "Dawinism"), are not proved by one experiment due to the large amount of data required. So little pieces are proved. When all the evidence and data agree with the theory, they are considered "proven", as both these theories are. Science is still searching for evidence to disprove these theories, since a Nobel prize is waiting for the scientist who accomplishes that feat. For GR, that is over 100 years, and ToE it is almost 150 years.
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead | December 2, 2008 9:17 PM
The GR years should be
overalmost 100.....Posted by: Shaden Freud | December 2, 2008 9:20 PM
#67
Crocoduck! *drinks*
Posted by: John Morales | December 2, 2008 9:24 PM
Nerd, need I remind you ToE also stands for theory of everything.
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead | December 2, 2008 9:32 PM
Sorry John, you're right, it can. From context it should mean Theory of Evolution, but I see where a casual reader could get confused even if I never mentioned string theory. It's been a long day, and there are too many acronyms.
Posted by: Kel | December 2, 2008 9:33 PM
Remember that experiment where they took DNA from thylacine and were able to grow a gene? Awesome stuff. http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2008/05/20/2249769.htmBut here in planet reality, we have seen several speciation events. Once you have speciation you have two separate species, so yes we have seen animals turn into a "different" one.
Posted by: Brownian, OM | December 2, 2008 9:36 PM
In the same lab in which mountains have been created and eroded, stars exploded and nebulae born, forests grown, and species extincted.
Or do you only allow as science that which can be reproduced in an Erlenmeyer flask?
At any rate, for a modern example of speciation, consider the London Underground Mosquito, a mosquito that is in the process of/has already become reproductively isolated from its parent population, the above-ground Culex pipiens. (Reproductive isolation can lead to speciation, since genes can no longer be exchanged between the parent and daughter populations). As it's likely you won't bother to look yourself, allow me to produce the abstract (the full paper can be found here):
Now, please spare us the objections that these are still mosquitos and not another 'kind', or that you expect some sort of transitional form to something else (mosquitoducks?) or other such nonsense. We've heard 'em all before.
The significance of this paper is that it is exactly what the theory of evolution predicts: populations that are genetically isolated from each other will, through the processes of genetic drift and natural selection, become further genetically, morphologically and behaviourally distinct from each other.
If you're still disappointed in the lack of mosquitoducks or whatever, the problem lies in your faulty understanding of the theory, not the theory itself. (Don't feel too bad; lots of high school students similarly think calculus is stupid because they don't understand it.)
If you think this example (and the hundreds of thousands of corroborating data) is somehow insufficient support for the theory because no one's yet produced a new multicellular species in the lab, consider that no such doubt exists for the growing of forests, yet a given size of forest no one's done that in a lab either.
Posted by: Wowbagger | December 2, 2008 9:45 PM
Donald James Parker,
Why do you stop at the 'theory' of evolution? Why aren't you using your
profound willful ignorancekeen analysis to attempt to overthrow those other 'theories' like the theory of gravity or the theory of flight? Surely you should be giving equal time to proving intelligent falling (for the former) and intelligent levitation and movement (for the latter).And what about the germ theory of disease? Are you intending to release your 'alternative' to that anytime soon?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Posted by: Emmet Caulfield | December 2, 2008 9:47 PM
In a bizarre coincidence, I think creationists are stupid and I don't understand them.
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp, KoT, OM | December 2, 2008 9:55 PM
In which field are you planning on setting those strawmen a fire?
Posted by: Carlie | December 2, 2008 10:05 PM
In which lab has one species turned into a different one?
Not that you'll care, but Verne Grant's. And that was in 1966, so you can't plead that it's too hard to keep up with recent literature. And if you want to cry that that one's too old, try Lorne Riesberg not just creating a species, but creating one with specific characteristics as a test of a hybridization hypothesis. Stick those flowers in your pipe and smoke them.
Posted by: Steve | December 2, 2008 10:29 PM
Wow, any wackjob that can edit and do some cgi can have a movie about their fantasy creator. Do they not teach argument and logic at UW??? Post hoc ergo propter hoc, straw man, circular reasoning....?
Posted by: Simon Scott | December 2, 2008 10:43 PM
You know, that post starts with a fundamental error, then descends into nonsense.
Posted by: Andy | December 2, 2008 10:44 PM
unless you are obsessed with corn, wheat, and shooting birds and quadrupeds it didn't seem to have much else going on.
Hey, at least it keeps the hippies away! ;-)
I grew up in SD, and it wasn't half bad. . .small place, but what the hey. . .(I'm pretty sure that I know commenter Evan B, who graduated from high school with my little sister. Small world. . .) Of course, I also swore that I would never be a New Yorker or a Californian. . .and now I've been both (but thank goodness I escaped New York!!!!).
At any rate, DSU isn't exactly the academic acme of South Dakota. I'm not too worried.
Posted by: Richard Simons | December 2, 2008 11:13 PM
Can you name a single scientific theory that has been proven? How about Gey's lab, the one that accidentally produced Helacyton gartleri?If you just want new species, don't forget grapefruit, nectarine, Spartina townsendii, Fatshedera and various other plants.
Posted by: Cowdragon | December 2, 2008 11:20 PM
Madison, SD resident as well. I plan on going and ripping it up a bit. Gonna be a fun "debate". it helps when you have facts on your side. What do they have? Lies and their mythology? BWAHAWHAWHAW!
Posted by: raven | December 2, 2008 11:56 PM
For someone in an agricultural area, you sure haven't been paying much attention. Supplementing the federal subsidies with a little hemp growing, are we? Testing the product from the local ethanol plant? All them thar 4 legged funny looking things, the 2 legged feathered funny looking things, and all that green stuff have been evolved from wild progenitors, within recent history. In many cases, the wild progenitors are still up and moving about.
Wolves to dogs.
Eurasian wild cats to kitty cats.
Aurochs and other wild bovines to domestic cattle 2 species involved.
jungle fowl to white leghorn chickens.
teosinte to corn
wheat rye hybrids to tricale
the current wheat, rye, and barley grains don't much resemble their ancestors either, some of which still exist.
As to creating synthetic life, there are numerous projects on going as we speak. The artificial cell program is within a year or two of success. They have already synthesized a complete genome and cloned it in yeast. When they are successful it wouldn't make any difference to you. Ignorant crackpots have minds set in concrete and even ANFO wouldn't dislodge them.
PS Many of us on this blog are from rural areas. Some of us live in rural areas. You don't have to be stupid and ignorant just because the nearest subway is 500 miles away.
Posted by: Ompompanoosuc | December 3, 2008 12:14 AM
@#42 Nerd of Redhead
The bible does not refute science. Only more science can refute science.
I really like that. Can I use it?
pompy
Posted by: nobody special | December 3, 2008 2:38 AM
Holy crap, there's a plethora of towns named Madison. In fact, half of the states in the U.S.A. contain a "Madison."
Crazy.