Whirled Nut Daily has announced that the Ark of the Covenant has been discovered and is going to be unveiled in Rome! I urge any of my Italian readers to close your eyes and don't look, because we all know what will happen when the Ark is opened.
You know this is serious—WND even illustrates their very scholarly article with a photo taken from the Indiana Jones movie.










Comments
Posted by: sailor1031 | June 26, 2009 9:58 AM
one word (or two?) about this - bullshit (or bull shit)
Posted by: Ted Dahlberg
|
June 26, 2009 10:00 AM
Do you remember when we were chasing the Nazis, they'd stolen the Ark of the Covenant?
Posted by: Pat | June 26, 2009 10:00 AM
The estimable Weekly World News also covers this story. And they have a poll too:
http://weeklyworldnews.com/headlines/9322/ark-of-the-covenant-revealed/
Posted by: Sili
|
June 26, 2009 10:01 AM
Ooooooh - the Kopts are gonna be soooooo pissed.
Posted by: Sili
|
June 26, 2009 10:03 AM
Oh ...
It is the Ethiopian Ark.
Slightly surprised to hear the Patriarc claims to have seen it. I thought it was only for the guardian to do.
Posted by: Eamon Knight | June 26, 2009 10:04 AM
They even have a picture based on Ron Wyatt's work. Of the two, I'd rate Raiders of the Lost Ark as the more credible source.
Posted by: Melody | June 26, 2009 10:05 AM
WTF?!! Wait, no that can't be...
Posted by: WTFWJD | June 26, 2009 10:07 AM
The Ark of the Covenant was simply a story device, like Alfred Hitchcock's 'McGuffin'.
If the thing had ever existed, how could the Jews have misplaced it?
Posted by: Richard Eis | June 26, 2009 10:08 AM
I have a magic box...but no-one is allowed to see it.
Now worship me.
If it's real, it's interesting, but it's still based on a bloody stupid religion.
Posted by: Bostonian | June 26, 2009 10:08 AM
Thanks for the WND visit, PZ. The page had an ad for conservative T-shirts with a photo of a woman in an "I'd rather be waterboarding" shirt. Oh, those witty conservatards! I need to go wash my hands. And my eyes. And my monitor.
BTW, the "real life Indiana Jones" who went to look for this Ark said in the article that he met the guardian who watches over it, and he has this to say about the old man:
That's some pretty hard worshiping. Even funnier, a Tennessee historian doubts the story because it would have involved fooling God.
The old switcharoo would never work on God.
Posted by: Olowkow | June 26, 2009 10:10 AM
All I can say is, better not touch it, or god will smite you on the spot. He smote...smatted...smitted, oh well.
Posted by: Ron | June 26, 2009 10:10 AM
According to Peter Griffin, you'll look like James Carville if you look at the ark when it is opened.
Posted by: mocular
|
June 26, 2009 10:10 AM
Here's some pictures of, "The Real Noah's Ark!"
http://www.worldviewtimes.com/article.php/articleid-813
Actually, just some pictures of shale/pelitic rocks having nothing to do with a boat.
Believers do behave in an idiotic manner.
Posted by: tsg | June 26, 2009 10:11 AM
Apparently, they've seen two Indiana Jones movies.
Posted by: Deacon Barry | June 26, 2009 10:14 AM
Great! We can get a graphologist to ascertain God's personality from his handwriting.
Posted by: MadScientist
|
June 26, 2009 10:15 AM
I was wondering what the hell 'WND' was (wingnut daily?)
The article has all sorts of (boring) stories in it but is remarkably devoid of *any* information about the claimed 'ark'. I guess all will be *revealed* (in the biblical sense) at the unveiling (ooh - kinky - if you're muslim). However, having learned from Indiana Jones that the ark is a type of Pandora's Box, I will avoid looking at it. Unless of course it comes with the pillars of lightning (or was it fire) described in the bible - then I'd stare and go "oooh!"
Incidentally, if anyone is interested I have the Holy Grail in my kitchen and am willing to part for it for a few million dollars (US, not Zimbabwean dollars). It's a family heirloom, but I'm really desperate for the cash.
Posted by: Phodopus
|
June 26, 2009 10:15 AM
"We know for a fact that there have been 30 guardians in history who have never left that enclosure"
Holy shit! I hope they have decent sanitary facilities in there.
Posted by: Pat | June 26, 2009 10:17 AM
BTW, the WWN poll mentioned above is currently at
Yes 50%
No 45%
I don't care 5%.
Posted by: BFire | June 26, 2009 10:18 AM
If you touch it you will get smatted just like Uzza(1 Chronicles 13:10).
Posted by: Deacon Barry | June 26, 2009 10:19 AM
Great! We can get a graphologist to ascertain God's personality from his handwriting.
Posted by: Bostonian | June 26, 2009 10:19 AM
@tsg #14:
We'd know for sure if the article said something about the guardian requiring visitors to choose their ark. "He chose ... poorly." :)
Posted by: Deacon Barry | June 26, 2009 10:21 AM
Great! We can get a graphologist to ascertain God's personality from his handwriting.
Posted by: Matt Heath | June 26, 2009 10:21 AM
A lie for a lie and truth for a truth, and anyway there was no proof.Posted by: Deacon Barry | June 26, 2009 10:25 AM
Aaargh! Double post! Sorry!
Posted by: Piltdown Man | June 26, 2009 10:32 AM
Those conservative T-shirts are great, lol!
Posted by: AAB | June 26, 2009 10:43 AM
whatever they have I say give it to science and let it go through testing..
Posted by: blueelm | June 26, 2009 10:46 AM
I don't see any reason not to believe they have a 2,000 year old artifiact, or even a 2,000 year old Jewish artifact. I also have no trouble believing that they worship this artifact. What I don't understand is why they would go public. It hasn't been a good thing for the other holy relics and whatnot.
Posted by: Marco Ferrari | June 26, 2009 10:49 AM
Nobody gave a damn about the ark. The news was in on the 19th of june. This is the real McCoy:
Non sono qui per dare delle prove che l'Arca sia in Etiopia, ma sono qui per dire quello che ho visto, quello che so e che posso testimoniare. Non ho detto che l'Arca sarà mostrata al mondo. E' un mistero, un oggetto di culto".
I'm not here to give proofs that the ark is in Ethiopia, but just to refer what I've seen, I know and I can testify. I didn't say the ark will be shown. It is a mystery, an object of worship.
Wanna see it? Go to Ethiopia and, if you survive, you'll tell the world.
Marco
Posted by: daveau
|
June 26, 2009 10:50 AM
Let's see, the story was posted on WND at 9:20 EDT, and states that the ark is to be revealed at 8:00 EDT. Maybe there's some holdup with Dog's lawyers.
Hey, wait a minute! These aren't the same guys who found bigfoot recently, are they?
Posted by: James F | June 26, 2009 10:51 AM
How'd they fit all the animals into that thing? Oh wait, never mind....
Posted by: daveau
|
June 26, 2009 10:54 AM
Let's see, the story was posted on WND at 9:20 EDT, and states that the ark is to be revealed at 8:00 EDT. Maybe there's some holdup with Dog's lawyers.
Hey, wait a minute! These aren't the same guys who found bigfoot recently, are they?
Posted by: MadScientist
|
June 26, 2009 10:54 AM
@mocular: Aaaaugh! Why did I look! Now I feel like tearing out my hair in frustration. The "wood" isn't even "petrified wood" - it was never ever wood, it's simply rock. I'm sure a geologist can even put us to sleep with the details of what type of rock, how it formed, how we get the banding, etc. It's amazing what ill-educated people claim when they claim to know everything.
Posted by: Trapalon | June 26, 2009 10:58 AM
If it's the one I'm thinking of, it should be interesting. It's a wooden box, the gold is long gone. There is a hole in the bottom with a lot of charred marks. The theory is they had some early type of gun powder or other flamable that they would light off before they carried the ark into battle. So the enemy would see the smoking, flaming relic and figure they were screwed.
Odds are they went throguh a few arks over time.
Posted by: Marco Ferrari | June 26, 2009 10:58 AM
Nobody gave a damn about the ark. The news was in on the 19th of june. This is the real McCoy:
Non sono qui per dare delle prove che l'Arca sia in Etiopia, ma sono qui per dire quello che ho visto, quello che so e che posso testimoniare. Non ho detto che l'Arca sarà mostrata al mondo. E' un mistero, un oggetto di culto".
I'm not here to give proofs that the ark is in Ethiopia, but just to refer what I've seen, I know and I can testify. I didn't say the ark will be shown. It is a mystery, an object of worship.
Wanna see it? Go to Ethiopia and, if you survive, you'll tell the world.
Marco
Posted by: Sean | June 26, 2009 10:59 AM
WHERE IS THE ARK? It's past time! C'mon!!!
Posted by: Trapalon | June 26, 2009 11:02 AM
If it's the one I'm thinking of, it should be interesting. It's a wooden box, the gold is long gone. There is a hole in the bottom with a lot of charred marks. The theory is they had some early type of gun powder or other flamable that they would light off before they carried the ark into battle. So the enemy would see the smoking, flaming relic and figure they were screwed.
Odds are they went throguh a few arks over time.
Posted by: Trapalon | June 26, 2009 11:05 AM
If it's the one I'm thinking of, it should be interesting. It's a wooden box, the gold is long gone. There is a hole in the bottom with a lot of charred marks. The theory is they had some early type of gun powder or other flamable that they would light off before they carried the ark into battle. So the enemy would see the smoking, flaming relic and figure they were screwed.
Odds are they went throguh a few arks over time.
Posted by: Trapalon | June 26, 2009 11:07 AM
If it's the one I'm thinking of, it should be interesting. It's a wooden box, the gold is long gone. There is a hole in the bottom with a lot of charred marks. The theory is they had some early type of gun powder or other flamable that they would light off before they carried the ark into battle. So the enemy would see the smoking, flaming relic and figure they were screwed.
Odds are they went throguh a few arks over time.
Posted by: BeamStalk | June 26, 2009 11:10 AM
When Ron Wyatt is your source and leads for archeology, what can go wrong?
Posted by: sailor1031 | June 26, 2009 11:12 AM
Sorry Sean: no ark! just bullshit or bull shit. However thanks to this thread I DID learn that the ark of noah (different ark) has been discovered. Ain't science great?
Posted by: Randomfactor | June 26, 2009 11:14 AM
The TV special I saw argued persuasively that it's a wooden war drum. And it exists in the same sense that the hatchet that George Washington used to chop down the cherry tree exists--although it's had three new handles and a new head since then.
Posted by: daveau
|
June 26, 2009 11:14 AM
I swear I waited 5 minutes before reposting. Getting a totally new "server not found" error.
Posted by: Strangel | June 26, 2009 11:25 AM
"The Ark has access to the imagination of archaeologists, writers, religious groups, seven of every kind." - http://nazret.com/blog/index.php?title=ethiopia_ark_of_the_covenant_about_to_be_1&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
LOL Wut?
I thought the tribe of Levi came to South America after the Tower of Babel incident. Hey... wait a minute! I think somebody's lying here! Ooooh! My Mormon parents are gonna be PISSED! Or maybe not... They'll prolly just pretend it didn't happen - put this incident right up there on the shelf next to 'Evolution.' Sad.
Speaking of evolution - Lucy was in Ethiopia for 3.2 million years. I'm sure she could speak bundles about the AotC if only 'they' would ask her...
Posted by: eddie | June 26, 2009 11:32 AM
This ''you're not supposed to look'' meme gets tired. It's the same old ''don't eat the fruit of the pig'' that means don't question dogma.
PS I volunteer to have pilty waterboarded. Maybe he'll learn something.
Posted by: XD | June 26, 2009 11:53 AM
#42
Yeah, I've got that before. As always, click back and refresh.
When is this site going to be fixed? The commenting problem has been going on for months. The other blogs here don't experience it (indeed, I've never come across any other blog that has such a basic, persistent fault). It's almost like Pharyngula is being sabotaged.
Are your Seed overlords unhappy with you, PZ?
Posted by: Cowcakes | June 26, 2009 11:53 AM
@Pat #3 Such areliable source cannot be ignored
Bloody hell now I'm distraught
http://weeklyworldnews.com/celebs/4783/megan-fox-is-a-man/
Posted by: Indigo | June 26, 2009 12:02 PM
"The Ark. If it is there, at Tanis, then it is something that man was not meant to disturb. Death has always surrounded it. It is not of this earth. " - Sallah
Posted by: Randomfactor | June 26, 2009 12:08 PM
We've been over this. The ark is somewhere very safe. We have Top Men working on it.
Posted by: Roland Branconnier | June 26, 2009 12:17 PM
Friday is a good day for Woo-Woo. Not long ago France and the UFOs and now the Ark of the Covenant from Italy. Italy was part of the Axis Powers in World War II and they invaded Ethopia. This can't be a coincidence. By the way, the Ark of the Covenant without a provenance, is just another chimera!
Posted by: Justin | June 26, 2009 12:18 PM
What a stupid thing to say. I expect more intelligence from a College professor. To use your blog to launch an infantile and meaningless verbal attack on a website you dislike is immature and idiotic. Get a life professor, the Ark is an artifact that people have been searching for for thousands of years. The scientific and archeological significance of this is astounding, if it is the real thing, this would be the greatest discovery in history. How foolish you would look. . .
Posted by: XD | June 26, 2009 12:20 PM
@#50
Errr.... Poe?
Posted by: Phodopus
|
June 26, 2009 12:22 PM
@50: The greatest discovery in Hist.... oh wait, you must mean for people who care
Posted by: Ralph Dosser | June 26, 2009 12:28 PM
@48 "We have Top Men working on it."
Who?
Posted by: Angel Kaida | June 26, 2009 12:28 PM
#23 Matt Heath,
Thank you for doing that, because otherwise I would have had to, and I probably would have posted the whole damn song. Nick Cave FTW, seriously.
Posted by: Justin | June 26, 2009 12:29 PM
@52, so you obviously do not value 2000 + year old artifacts. Do you have no respect for the dead sea scrolls, or the Pyramids of Giza, or the Temple Mount in Jerusalem? What a shame to be void of any concern for cultures and great archeological discoveries. You are either very immature, or have no intellectual values.
Posted by: Ralph Dosser | June 26, 2009 12:30 PM
@48 "We have Top Men working on it."
Who?
Posted by: uriel1972 | June 26, 2009 12:31 PM
It would be the proof that denies faith and God would disappear in a puff of logic... hopefully
Posted by: Tony P | June 26, 2009 12:32 PM
I want to walk up to it, flip the lid and pronounce "So much for your God."
Posted by: Nija | June 26, 2009 12:37 PM
"I am the president, and I know. It's not a copy. It's the real thing."
Take that skeptics!
Posted by: Angel Kaida | June 26, 2009 12:37 PM
Justin,
Your concern is noted. :)
Posted by: uriel1972 | June 26, 2009 12:37 PM
which ark the one with the gold cherubs or the one made out of plain wood. From memory there were two conflicting descriptions of the ark, the one with the gold and whatnot being the raiders ark.
Posted by: Phodopus
|
June 26, 2009 12:40 PM
@55:
"You are either very immature, or have no intellectual values."
I am hard pressed to choose there. However, I merely wanted to emphasize that such an ark being the "greatest discovery in history" is a stretch, and such a strong statement is imho motivated by some kind of religious feeling. I suppose this prompted my immature comment. I have great respect for cultural artifacts, and when not long ago I had the opportunity to see a collection of 6000 year old statues, I literally felt shivers go down my spine.
Posted by: Peter | June 26, 2009 12:41 PM
It would be hilarious if they opened it and it was chock full of jazz mags.
Posted by: Holbach
|
June 26, 2009 12:56 PM
And wouldn't you know, they'll probably pry back a loose board and find the shroud of Turin! "You see, there is the proof; what more do you atheists expect to erase your doubt? A shit load of crackers?"
Posted by: Hank | June 26, 2009 12:58 PM
Don't forget it is going to be unveiled before the Nazi Pope!
Posted by: Falyne, FCD | June 26, 2009 12:59 PM
Dunno if 50's a Poe, but I'm hoping the comments (as well as the article) from Weekly World News are...
Also, I'd be curious as to whether WND or WWN "reported" this first. About the same quality of "journalism", but WWN is at least meant as satire... and it wouldn't be the first time their articles were taken as fact.
Posted by: Acronym Jim | June 26, 2009 1:02 PM
Peter@63:
The issue 1, volume 1 main story covered Thelonious Monk. The ark was clearly a tool to predict the future in a very limited field.
Posted by: Falyne, FCD | June 26, 2009 1:03 PM
From the WWN comments:
Comedy gold! The blogspot link is largely in Italian, but the english bits expand on the "Ark = computer" theme. And a bit on planet Eris causing global warming.
Posted by: CCW | June 26, 2009 1:04 PM
@55:
"so you obviously do not value 2000 + year old artifacts."
"You are either very immature, or have no intellectual values."
"..this would be the greatest discovery in history."
Again Justin, only if the christian myth has any meaning to the person observing. Otherwise it is just as significant as a host of other 2000 + year artifacts.
Just that there is a ark, if it is indeed 'the one', doesn't make it more significant, or the christian myth more true than any of the ancient Egyptian myhts although there are many 2000 + year old Egyptian artifacts that are religious in nature.
I'd call the revealing of a 'true ark' just as significant an event as the opening of Tutankhamon's burial room or discovery of any other Mayan, Sumerian, etc, religious artifact.
Historically interesting, for sure, immensly, but hardly worldshocking.
Posted by: Phodopus
|
June 26, 2009 1:04 PM
@67 ...ahm I hate to break it to you, but monks 'got nothing to do with it...
Posted by: Acronym Jim | June 26, 2009 1:09 PM
@70. I suppose that depends on how much of a fan one is.
Posted by: CCW | June 26, 2009 1:10 PM
As proven by Justin.
Posted by: Phodopus
|
June 26, 2009 1:12 PM
Well yes, everyone's entitled to do what they want 'Round midnight, but Id rather not go there :)
Posted by: CCW | June 26, 2009 1:15 PM
More of a Eric Dolphy fan myself though.
Let the stoning begin.
Posted by: CCW | June 26, 2009 1:17 PM
I'm out for Lunch anyway.
Posted by: Acronym Jim | June 26, 2009 1:19 PM
Let he who can't feel the beat cast the first stone!
Posted by: mk | June 26, 2009 1:27 PM
Mercy Seat? So that's where God poops?
Posted by: Art | June 26, 2009 1:29 PM
This is a clear sign of how all things have turned to crap under Obama. The stalwart Republicans, and one or two mediocre Democrats who blundered into doing the right thing, kept the Arc safe in a secret high-security government warehouse. The fact that it has recently been stolen, and this crime will come to light in the MSM, shows how much the security of this once great nation has deteriorated under this pretender to the throne.
The naysayers will claim it was never in US custody and that it was in Ethiopia all this time but all well informed Americans know that this is a lie. We saw the crate holding the arc being wheeled into the vast warehouse with our own eyes. And everyone knows that Ethiopians are black and not real Christians. The arc would cause them to melt so it is clear they are lying. It is only the God sanctioned hands of righteous Americans who can possess the arc for long without harm.
When the thieves attempt to show off their booty the Arc will destroy them and send their souls sent to hell. The righteous and noble American Special Forces, lead by Chuck Norris, will then recover the Arc. This will be a profound embarrassment to the crypto-islamo/fascist and, God willing, he will be removed and Ron Paul, the last righteous American politician, will be swept into office and ...
---- I woke up screaming ---
No more tongue, horseradish and sauerkraut sandwiches before going to bed.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo | June 26, 2009 1:40 PM
DownBeat?
CCW: It's Out to Lunch, one of the greatest records of all time. Back in the late 70s/early 80s when it was OOP I led a quest-like search of used record stores for a copy, and finally scored at a little place in East Lansing MI when the clerk actually put it on the turntable while i was browsing. he didn;t want to sell it, either, it took some convincing.
Posted by: Krystalline Apostate | June 26, 2009 1:46 PM
♫♪ It's the end of the world as we know it...♫♪
Seriously though, it seems like Ethiopia had all their own versions of everything - gospels, arks, etc.
Posted by: CCW | June 26, 2009 1:47 PM
Yeah, I know, It's one of my favourite albums, I played with the words a bit, won't do it again, promise.
Posted by: RyogaM | June 26, 2009 1:49 PM
So, if this Ark is reveled, and it shows absolutely no signs of supernatural activity as described in the bible (as shown in Raiders of the Lost Ark!), will Jews, Christians and Muslims admit they were wrong in giving credulity to the thrice-told tales of long ago desert dwellers? Will they admit that the very foundation of their religious beliefs is...wrong?
Because, I'll admit, if Pope reveals an old wooden crate with the power to melt my face, or, hell, just speak in god's voice, it would cause me to doubt my (lack of) faith.
Anyone Christians want to lay a wager on which way the ball will bounce?
Posted by: Watchman | June 26, 2009 1:54 PM
WND = Weapons of Neural Destruction
Posted by: blueelm | June 26, 2009 2:02 PM
@ #55
I don't think anyone here is undervaluing the fact that it would be interesting and useful to study such a relic. Assuming, for the sake of argument, that it is the ark then it would be a great object of study provided it was ever made availabe to researchers in any real capacity. However, it is the spiritual significance to contemporary people that I believe PZ is mocking.
Personally I have my doubts that the object will be made available in any real way. The religious have a history of unsubstantiated claims when it comes to artifacts. There's a lot of motivation for forgery and there has been for over a thousand years. They also tend to deeply resent the research of art historians, archaeologists, and scientists on those objects. Remember, there are still people who are afraid to look at the object because the superstition surrounding it is still so viable. This is not particularly new information to historians either. People know about this thing.
Posted by: Gruesome Rob | June 26, 2009 2:24 PM
Don't Look Ethel!!!
Posted by: Brownian, OM
|
June 26, 2009 2:58 PM
Bostonian wrote, "The old switcharoo would never work on God."
I dunno. He's pretty thick. After all, if he can't tell a Jew from an Egyptian without a smear of lamb's blood, how's he supposed to tell a real ark from a fake one?
Further, what would be the point of following the ten commandments anyway? For crying out loud, if the dude can't even figure out which ethno-religious group you belong to without the aid of an erythrocyte-smattered lintel then what's the likelihood he's going to have any clue as to whether or not you lit a fire on Saturday?
Posted by: Brownian, OM
|
June 26, 2009 3:01 PM
"Don't Look Ethel!!!"
But it was too late.
Heh, I saw what you did there, Gruesome Rob.
Posted by: Dude | June 26, 2009 3:36 PM
I feel the need to quote avp now.
"Well, you are experts, aren't you?"
"Yes, but this is like opening the Ark and finding Moses' DVD collection!"
Which ones?
Passion of the Christ
Star Wars Episode 1
Pokemon.
Posted by: TheLoneIguana
|
June 26, 2009 4:53 PM
Isn't Addis Ababa where Lex Luthor got Kryptonite as well? Popular place for fiction.
Probably 'cause it's just fun to say "Addis Ababa."
Posted by: tsg | June 26, 2009 4:56 PM
That's one of the classic funny place names, like Cucamonga, Walla Walla, Timbuktu and Seattle.
Posted by: 'Tis Himself
|
June 26, 2009 5:04 PM
Top men!
Posted by: Ed Darrell | June 26, 2009 5:04 PM
But not nearly as much fun as saying "Timbuktu," or "Ougadougu," or "Walla Walla, Washington."
Posted by: Sven DiMilo | June 26, 2009 5:07 PM
Kalamazoo
Tucumcari
Tehachapi
Tonopah
Seattle?
Posted by: Peter | June 26, 2009 5:37 PM
jazz mags = porn
Posted by: Phodopus
|
June 26, 2009 5:40 PM
aaaah you had to spoil the joke
Posted by: Peter | June 26, 2009 6:29 PM
Nope, just setting up for the 'well, there was a blue note' gag....
Posted by: Rolan le Gargéac | June 26, 2009 6:31 PM
MadScientist #32
Why you have go at geologist ?
What geologist done you ?
Geologist save you graboids !
You leave geologist be !
Geologist GOOD !
Grrrr.
Posted by: Fred the Hun
|
June 26, 2009 8:29 PM
Rolan le Gargéac @ 97
Don't worry It's not your fault.
Posted by: Acronym Jim | June 26, 2009 8:30 PM
DJIBOUTI!
Posted by: Flounder99 | June 26, 2009 8:51 PM
Hey! isn't that a picture of the peanut butter guy about half way down? Yep, I googled Chuck Missler and he is the peanut butter guy.
Posted by: J.C. Samuelson | June 26, 2009 9:26 PM
Just to add to #28:
"There are many writings and evidences of the presence of the Ark in Ethiopia. There is no reason why someone [would] dare to affirm to have something that he doesn't have," explained the Patriarch.
Non c'è ragione perché qualcuno pretenda di affermare di avere qualcosa che non ha -ha precisato il Patriarca-.
Riiiight. He wouldn't dare.
Would he? ;)
Posted by: KZT | June 26, 2009 10:23 PM
Read as far as the blonde chick in the stupid t-shirt and thought the whole thing sounded like a 419 scam.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo | June 26, 2009 10:31 PM
Posted by: 'Tis Himself
|
June 26, 2009 10:44 PM
Popocatépetl and Iztaccíhuatl (pronounced pop-o-cat-a-petal and icks-ta-see-wattle). They're two Mexican volcanoes.
Posted by: SEF
|
June 27, 2009 8:32 AM
Better (ie more annoying to Christofascists) contents for the (not-)ark might include:
• Sleeping Beauty in suspended animation in a glass/crystal casket, awaiting supplications from 7 pygmies and dwarfs and 1 true prince ...
• Yoda, in force-induced suspension - ie the "ark" is actually his personal mini-spaceship.
• an infinite improbability drive (as per the Heart Of Gold spaceship in Hitch-Hikers Guide To The Galaxy)
• a selection of gold rings and a list saying to whom they are to be distributed and/or the One Ring ...
Posted by: Patricia Burns | June 27, 2009 8:37 PM
I believe that the “ark of the covenant” (Heb.9:4) and “the ark of his (God’s) testament” (Re.11:9) are one in the same, and contain the “tables of the covenant” (Heb.9:4), the Ten Commandments.
I believe that the ark of the covenant/the ark of his testament is now in the temple of God in heaven (Re.11:19).
At the Seventh TRUMPET (1 Thess.4:16-17), the temple of God is opened in heaven to reveal the ark of His testament (Re.11:19).
And, again, at the GIVING of the Seven Last PLAGUES (Re.15:1-8), “the temple of the tabernacle of the testimony in heaven was opened” (Re.15:5), wherein is contained “the ark of his testament” (Re.11:19), “the ark of the covenant” (Heb.9:4).
Patricia (© 2002) Bible Prophecy on the Web
Posted by: arachnophilia
|
June 27, 2009 10:34 PM
so, uh, any word on this? other than that it didn't happen?
i've always been immensely curious about what it is the ethiopians actually have, if anything at all. oh, and i love this line at the end of that article:
because, you see, they could have a 3400 year old box made of acacia wood, covered in gold, with sculptures of cherubim on the top, with a couple of stones inside inscribed with protosemitic characters... but if it doesn't match their modern bible, it clearly must be a fake.riiight. talk about cart before the horse. guess what, in ancient literature, the older copy generally gets the priority unless there's a really good reason to think otherwise. so how about we establish just what this is, how old it is, and whether or not it's a box that used to live in the first temple in jerusalem based on some other factors. like, you know, archaeology. carbon dating. stuff like that.
but i guess we'd have to even see some proof that the ethiopians have anything at all. like the mormons and their plates, i'm not convinced that there's even a physical object being hidden here.
Posted by: John Morales | June 27, 2009 10:45 PM
SEF @105, I reckon it might be a Thrint in a statis field, as per World of Ptavvs by Niven.
</SF geek>
Posted by: Martin Fassbinder | June 29, 2009 12:19 AM
Praise the lord. His Glory no longer dwells in the holiest of hollies. His spirit was pored out on the day of Pentecost. The same power that rested upon the arch now inhabits the souls of those who have received the infilling of the Holy Ghost. Millions around the world have experienced God in the way that only the Jewish high priest could have. By one man Christ Jesus our high priest, the veil of the temple was torn, and access to God's spirit was given to all men. Repent Be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins and you shall receive the gift of the holy ghost. Jesus Christ is the manifest image of the invisible God. Here O Israel the Lord or God is one Lord.
Posted by: Martin Fassbinder | June 29, 2009 12:23 AM
Praise the lord. His Glory no longer dwells in the holiest of hollies. His spirit was pored out on the day of Pentecost. The same power that rested upon the arch now inhabits the souls of those who have received the infilling of the Holy Ghost. Millions around the world have experienced God in the way that only the Jewish high priest could have. By one man Christ Jesus our high priest, the veil of the temple was torn, and access to God's spirit was given to all men. Repent Be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins and you shall receive the gift of the holy ghost. Jesus Christ is the manifest image of the invisible God. Here O Israel the Lord or God is one Lord.
Posted by: Janine, OMnivore | June 29, 2009 12:38 AM
Martin Fassbinder, twice was two times too many. You convinced no one that does not already share your delusion. But I do want to find the holiest of hollies. Do you mean the plant or the band?
Posted by: God | June 29, 2009 12:40 AM
Thanks.
You misspelled "Holies". And I never did dwell in the Holiest of Holies.
What am I, a book? The word is spelled "poured". And no, it wasn't "poured out".
You misspelled "ark". And no power "rested upon the ark", and no power inhabits any souls, since believe Me, I would know if they had received an infilling of Me.
Hardly "millions". I'm not that promiscuous. I prefer minimal manipulation for maximum hilarity.
Nah. It was a scam.
You're missing an "and" in there. "Repent and be baptized". But there's no gift afterward. Sorry.
No, he isn't. He was conned, and he conned everyone else for Me.
You misspelled "Hear" and "our", and left off a comma after "Israel". And the final "Lord" should read "God".
Why are they sending dyslexics to proselytize, anyway?
Posted by: Janine, OMnivore | June 29, 2009 12:47 AM
Why are they sending dyslexics to proselytize, anyway?
But God, I thought that you liked to use the most foolish of humans to spread your word?
Posted by: Satan | June 29, 2009 12:59 AM
Don't tell Me that it hasn't occurred to You to stuff two or three dozen angry seraphim in the ark, for all the face-melting fun when they open it up.
Eh, it could be worse. He could have written: "Here O Isreal the Lord or Dog is won Dog."
Posted by: God | June 29, 2009 1:01 AM
Maybe it has, and maybe it hasn't.
Hmmmmmmmm.... "Surprise!"
Heh.
--
There's a fine line between "foolish" and "silly.
Posted by: Janine, OMnivore | June 29, 2009 1:05 AM
I am afraid I do not understand. Do you like to use foolish or silly people as your emissary?
Posted by: God | June 29, 2009 1:38 AM
It depends on the goal, of course. Never send an idiot to do the job of a moron, and vice-versa.
And of course, having a patsy able to write well is important. Things like "Gory to Dog oh hi" are fine for low comedy, but if One is trying to prove a point about the gullibility of mortal humans and win a bet with Satan -- which I totally did, of course -- One needs someone who can, at the very least, spell words like "Corinthians" and "Galatians", so the letters go to the right people and not wind up in the Early Roman Empire equivalent of the dead letter box.
Posted by: Ryan Egesdahl
|
June 29, 2009 11:55 AM
Actually, I would not mind if an historian said the Ark of the Covenant had ever actually existed because even the Jews say that it was destroyed when Jerusalem was overrun and the temple torn down. So this one can't be real in any case.
As if we ever needed the clarification - I mean, seriously, it's WingNut Daily!
Posted by: Martin Fassbinder | June 29, 2009 11:06 PM
I apologize for my poorly written post. I am grateful for a God who looks past our handicaps. I wish I could present my case better. Janine and the other blogger; I don't know you guys, but I just want you to you know that God truly loves you. He gave you life, and gave his life for you. Please try seeking God in prayer. Just call on the name of Jesus and ask him to reveal himself to you. Your life can be changed in an instant. God Bless!
Posted by: God | June 29, 2009 11:37 PM
Don't worry about it too much. No human is perfect. But you should be warned: Around here, the humans look more at logical coherence and consistency than spelling. Is what you are writing based on evidence and logic, or on mindless dogma?
Actually, I exploit your handicaps, for My amusement. That's just the way I am. Sorry. Well, not really.
Well, what you've been writing has been more grammatical and better spelled, so that's a definite improvement.
I love humans the way that humans love ant farms, or clowns. Or an ant farm of clowns. I finds you amusing.
No, not really. As I noted above, it was all a trick; an extended joke for My own amusement.
I probably won't answer.
Sorry. You're still thinking that the trick was true.
Nah. Not unless I decide I want another patsy for My long-running joke. That's what happened to Paul of Tarsus. Boom!
Meh.
Posted by: Smoggy Batzrubble | June 30, 2009 12:04 AM
Dear Martin Assbinder
Bless you, my brother, for your witness on this evil atheist blog. As a fellow believer, I'd like to offer you a discount on a year's supply of BIBLE™. Jesus also asked me to tell you secretly that for your heroic witness He's putting your name forward for your ARMOUR OF GOD.
Quietly though, God (the REAL ONE) wants to know who the fuck you think you are telling these hell-bound atheists that "God truly loves you". For the record, He didn't give his life for atheist douchebags. In fact He's looking forward to frying them for eternity in the deepest depths of hell where Satan's nastiest demons will rape them with red hot pokers. He says DON"T YOU DARE go spouting that "gentle Jesus meek and mild crap" without permission! Don't you know the END TIMES are close at hand and God is getting ready to subject billions of unbelievers to incredible suffering? And if you go making promises on God's behalf that you can't keep, you might just find yourself in Hell along with every high class hooker that ever lived, instead of in Heaven strumming your harp for eternity alongside the lame and halt.
Your messenger from our Furious Father
Smoggy Batzrubble