Now on ScienceBlogs: Charles Darwin February 12, 1809 - April 19, 1882

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)



I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

They [the Creationists] have been getting away with this nonsense [Creation Science] for some time now, even to the extent of getting legislation passed to allow them to teach "creationism" side by side with evolution. The true scientific community has largely remained within its hallowed halls rather than storming out into the quadrangle to do battle with what it knows to be pure nonsense. Scientists, unlike religionists, are political neophytes and generally remain oblivious to the issue of religion. Average Americans are not willing, nor intellectually mature enough, to handle such heady stuff as questioning any religion except upon tweedle-dum and tweedle-dee issues. Undoubtedly, this results from living under a Constitution which, in its consummate fairness in not favoring one religion above another, has made attacks on religion nearly needless and obsolete. But in the First Amendment's success lies a great danger to our liberties. If we never question our religions or their motives, they will ultimately destroy our freedom to do so.

[William H. Reynolds, Creationism: The Fossil Record and the Flood]

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« Auf wiedersehen, Lindau! | Main | My inner German awakens! »

More articles by PZ Myers can be found on Freethoughtblogs at the new Pharyngula!

Charles Darwin vs. a giant squid

Category: CephalopodsWeirdness
Posted on: July 4, 2009 11:02 AM, by PZ Myers

Awesome.

darwin_squid.jpeg

Note, however, that it reiterates that odd theme of one-eyed squid that we see all over the place.

(via Michael Barton)

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Jump to end

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/114128

Comments

#1

Posted by: Kobra | July 4, 2009 11:07 AM

I'll show you my one-eyed squid. (Alriiiiiight!)

#2

Posted by: Benjamin Geiger | July 4, 2009 11:10 AM

Completely OT, but possibly of interest:

http://www1.wsvn.com/news/articles/local/MI124870

#3

Posted by: recovering catholic | July 4, 2009 11:11 AM

But...but why would Darwin be fighting the giant squid in the first place???

#4

Posted by: Kobra | July 4, 2009 11:11 AM

@1:

I apologize if anyone was offended by this, but insomnia makes me more inclined to recognize potential innuendo and several times louder. (It's 11:11 AM and I haven't been to bed yet since last night.)

#5

Posted by: Kobra | July 4, 2009 11:13 AM

@1:

I apologize if anyone was offended by this, but insomnia makes me more inclined to recognize potential innuendo and several times louder. (It's 11:11 AM and I haven't been to bed yet since last night.)

@3:
Maybe he was attempting dissection but the squid was still alive?

#6

Posted by: Angel Kaida | July 4, 2009 11:14 AM

Benjamin Geiger,
Continuing the OT,
That made me sick to my stomach. Theists want the sign saying "you're not alone" to be taken down because "this is a spiritual based community"? I feel terrible for anyone who lives there, although I can see it happening here just as easily.

#7

Posted by: Naked Bunny with a Whip Author Profile Page | July 4, 2009 11:19 AM

Fights like this often lead to angry make-up sex.

#8

Posted by: OurDeadSelves | July 4, 2009 11:22 AM

This needs to be put on a tee shirt (or possibly a thing) STAT!

#9

Posted by: OurDeadSelves | July 4, 2009 11:24 AM

* "Thong", not "thing"!

#10

Posted by: Naked Bunny with a Whip Author Profile Page | July 4, 2009 11:24 AM

@Kobra #4: I was totally offended! I couldn't find any pics of your squid at your link.

#11

Posted by: Wowbagger, OM | July 4, 2009 11:25 AM

Slogan spotted on a t-shirt (for a band called Lazy Susan): 'The squids are alright'

#12

Posted by: Somnolent Aphid | July 4, 2009 11:42 AM

now THAT would make a great tattoo.

@3 - obviously the squid represents the biblical fundamentalist thought in that it can be blinded by reason, is a tangle of multiple myths, and appears to prefer the missionary position.

#13

Posted by: Steve_C | July 4, 2009 11:49 AM

It's hard to show both eyes of a squid at once... they're on opposites sides of the head.

#14

Posted by: Naked Bunny with a Whip Author Profile Page | July 4, 2009 12:19 PM

Maybe it's Popeye the Sailor Squid.

#15

Posted by: skeptyk | July 4, 2009 12:25 PM

Ooh, glam boots, Charles!

#16

Posted by: Alex | July 4, 2009 12:29 PM

"Charles Darwin in glam boots" is not a phrase I ever expected to THINK, let alone TYPE.

You have revolutionized my brain, skeptyk.

#17

Posted by: Romeo Vitelli | July 4, 2009 12:49 PM

So not only was Darwin a kick-ass scientist, he was also a bad-ass monster hunter? I'm not surprised.

#18

Posted by: Physicalist | July 4, 2009 12:52 PM

Whom to root for. . . . whom to root for . . .

#19

Posted by: Physicalist | July 4, 2009 12:59 PM

Also OT: god pissed at church.

#20

Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage Author Profile Page | July 4, 2009 1:20 PM

So, what did Darwin and the squid disagree about that caused the fight?

#21

Posted by: Stu | July 4, 2009 2:39 PM

He found an irreducibly complex eye and is destroying the evidence.

#22

Posted by: Teh Merkin | July 4, 2009 2:47 PM

Can't we all just get along?

#23

Posted by: Kausik Datta | July 4, 2009 2:48 PM

Awwwwwwww! But the squid has such a puppy doggish eye!
You Evil Darwinists, you!!!

#24

Posted by: Skemono | July 4, 2009 4:19 PM

So not only was Darwin a kick-ass scientist, he was also a bad-ass monster hunter? I'm not surprised.

Why do you think we don't find any evidence of fairies, goblins, trolls, ogres, phoenixes, dragons, unicorns, etc., that might be troublesome for the theory of evolution? Because Darwin wiped them all out.

...dammit, now I want someone to actually make that into a comic.

#25

Posted by: JohnnieCanuck Author Profile Page | July 4, 2009 4:43 PM

My vote is for Thor, Physicalist.

Rationally, (!) Yahweh wouldn't set fire to His own Church, even if he were pissed at the occupants.

Thor, though, could easily have done it and has motive. I say bring him in for questioning. You go first.

#26

Posted by: Angel Kaida | July 4, 2009 5:13 PM

15 skeptyk and
16 Alex,
Giant Darwin in Glam Boots is now my expletive of choice. Thank you for enhancing my life.

#27

Posted by: efrique | July 4, 2009 6:56 PM

It's one-eyed, with tentacles that reach everywhere?

It must be the squid of creationism!

No wonder Darwin looks determined to turn it into calamari.

#28

Posted by: MadScientist | July 4, 2009 7:56 PM

That looks like The Amazing Randi vs. Super Cyclops Squid to me.

#29

Posted by: X. Wolp | July 4, 2009 8:30 PM

@24: somebody should pitch that idea to the makers of "Sanctuary"... It would fit right in!

#30

Posted by: Physicalist | July 4, 2009 10:09 PM

My vote is for Thor
Maybe. I was thinking Zeus.

I think I'll sacrifice a hecatomb, just in case.

#31

Posted by: Samantha Vimes | July 4, 2009 10:52 PM

Why do you think we don't find any evidence of fairies, goblins, trolls, ogres, phoenixes, dragons, unicorns, etc., that might be troublesome for the theory of evolution?

I'm trying to think why these are troublesome. The dragons, possibly, because it's a vertebrate but has 6 limbs; same problem with fairies. The phoenix, troubling because it clones itself and can survive fire, a trick better found in the plant kingdom. Trolls, ogres, and goblins, however, could easily be evolved from primates; indeed, there was a period when several hominids overlapped in Africa and were varied in species to fit different ecological niches, an analogous situation.

#32

Posted by: Skemono | July 5, 2009 1:55 AM

somebody should pitch that idea to the makers of "Sanctuary"... It would fit right in!

I... huh? You mean Sanctuary by Sho Fumimura and Ryoichi Ikegami? I'm not sure how Charles Darwin: Monster Hunter would fit in a manga about Japanese politics.

I'm trying to think why these are troublesome.

Enh. I didn't put too much thought into it either I just threw out the names of whatever fictional creatures came to mind.

#33

Posted by: eddie | July 5, 2009 2:48 AM

Re: Physicalist @19

Awesome. I like to think out campaign of "why do churches have lightning conductors, eh?" contributed to that ;¬)

And Darwin and the squid: They're not fighting, they're *uc*ing. (IKTINACBH)

#34

Posted by: bastion of sass | July 5, 2009 3:52 AM

Physicalist @19 wrote:

Also OT: god pissed at church.

Wow! That's (at least) two churches in two days!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31706629/

Wonder what god's trying to say. These messages via lightning bolts are so hard to decipher.

#35

Posted by: katie | July 5, 2009 6:03 AM

Yo! Anyone notice the fancy new ads on the site? "Is evolution just a theory? You can prove creation. Order free booklet." etc.

I almost prefer the Russian mail-order brides.

#36

Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage Author Profile Page | July 5, 2009 6:24 AM

Yo! Anyone notice the fancy new ads on the site?

Adblock is my friend.

#37

Posted by: SteveM | July 5, 2009 11:10 AM

There is also this at the artist's site

#38

Posted by: Mena | July 5, 2009 12:46 PM

Some of these comments are making me wonder who would win in a fight, Charles Darwin or Chuck Norris. I'd bet on Darwin, Chuck Norris' arrogance and stupidity would hinder him too much.

#39

Posted by: the pro from dover | July 5, 2009 7:04 PM

The one eyed squid thing actually originated with the major blockbuster 50's monster flic "monster from the ocean floor" which actually was supposed to be an overgrown amoeba. In this disturbing image Darwin looks a lot like God, at least if God had forgotten his propecia.

#40

Posted by: Rorschach | July 6, 2009 2:11 AM

Gee PZ,

you're going to love this Squid movie !!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fa7ck5mcd1o

#41

Posted by: SEF | July 6, 2009 4:57 AM

If people keep knifing cephalopods in the eye* like that, it's hardly surprising that the next person along thinks such critters only have one eye!


* NB The wrong kind of eye at that.

Leave a comment

HTML commands: <i>italic</i>, <b>bold</b>, <a href="url">link</a>, <blockquote>quote</blockquote>

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.