(via io9)
Pharyngula
Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal
Search
Profile

PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
…and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• facebook
• MySpace
• Twitter
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
• Quick link to the latest endless thread
Random Quote
It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.
[Albert Einstein, 1954, from "Albert Einstein: The Human Side", edited by Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffman, Princeton University Press]
Recent Posts
- Another of those polls that should be 100%:0%
- Apostasy is a crime punishable by death in Islamic countries
- Mr Deity brings me solace and hope
- The Deep Rifts simply call us unto the breach once more
- Correcting Ken Ham's standard omission
- Evolution in two minutes
- The cameraman speaks
- Mary's Monday Metazoan: What's pink and tubular?
- We're doomed. It's another sign of the apocalypse.
- A wonderful debate
A Taste of Pharyngula
Recent Comments
- Demonhype on Another of those polls that should be 100%:0%
- Phil Ferguson on Another of those polls that should be 100%:0%
- B.T. Murtagh on Another of those polls that should be 100%:0%
- Stardrake on Another of those polls that should be 100%:0%
- Blair on Mary's Monday Metazoan: What's pink and tubular?
- Biology Blogger on Another of those polls that should be 100%:0%
- fr33think3r.myopenid.com on I get email
- Patricia, OM on The Deep Rifts simply call us unto the breach once more
- Owlmirror on Another of those polls that should be 100%:0%
- Peter G on The cameraman speaks
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
Blogroll
Other Information
« The Disco Institute has a new hack | Main | Open thread for general revilement »
I am happy to see the classics updated
Category: Cephalopods • Weirdness
Posted on: July 15, 2009 2:11 PM, by PZ Myers
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/114932
Sign in or register with TypePad. Sign up with Movable Type.









Comments
Posted by: Felix | July 15, 2009 2:24 PM
Ah, so they've finally recognized that these so-called 'classics' were in severe need of some deeper meaning.
deeper meaning, get it? I crack myself up. *splorsh*
Posted by: DLC | July 15, 2009 2:24 PM
Hahaha! that's a good one.
Tentacles from the pond. what next, squid washing up on the beach ?
Posted by: Hypatia's Daughter | July 15, 2009 2:44 PM
Oh,Yeah!! I hope they have done/will do Dickens. I have never been able to get past Chapter 1 of David Copperfeld. THIS I could swallow (with OO & garlic, of course.)
Posted by: MartinDH | July 15, 2009 2:46 PM
Reminds me of the scene from "Ed Wood" when Bela Lugosi battles the rubber octupus.
Posted by: Bjørn Østman | July 15, 2009 2:51 PM
Why was her dress wet up to the waist before she went into the water?
Posted by: TuxedoCartman
|
July 15, 2009 3:09 PM
Finest film since Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus. It should be a tight race at the Academy Awards this year.
Posted by: LawnBoy | July 15, 2009 3:12 PM
The author of the rewrite is a college friend of mine - a very funny guy. This should be good.
Posted by: AlanWCan | July 15, 2009 3:19 PM
Wouldn't yours be?Posted by: Sili
|
July 15, 2009 3:26 PM
Bah. As David repeatedly tells us, there's no such thing as freshwater cephalopods.
Or so they would have us believe ...
Posted by: Smidgy | July 15, 2009 3:32 PM
I especially like the other one, 'Pride and Prejudice and Zombies', with the first line, 'It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains.'
Posted by: SciencePundit
|
July 15, 2009 3:36 PM
CTHULHU FHTAGN!!!
Posted by: toth | July 15, 2009 4:03 PM
Cthulhu Fhtagn
What a wonderful phrase
Cthulhu Fhtagn
Ain't no passing craze
It means Cthulhu dreams beneath the waves
He's our undersea
Monstrosity
Cthulhu Fhtagn
Posted by: daveau
|
July 15, 2009 4:27 PM
Smidgy@10
Yes, apparently Mr. Darcy greatly admires the Bennet girls' zombie slaying abilities. The spousal unit (Master's in English Lit) has read it, but I haven't gotten around to it, yet.
Posted by: mattincinci | July 15, 2009 4:39 PM
LMFAO
Posted by: phantomreader42 | July 15, 2009 4:51 PM
toth:
I'm going to have that running through my head for a while. There's probably a better word than "running", but it's not coming to mind.
Posted by: Keith | July 15, 2009 5:13 PM
Just finished P&P&Z and it was great. Looking forward to this one as well.
Posted by: phantomreader42 | July 15, 2009 5:17 PM
toth:
I'm going to have that running through my head for a while. There's probably a better word than "running", but it's not coming to mind.
Posted by: Tim Danaher | July 15, 2009 5:21 PM
All together now...
#'No, it never rains in southern California...#
(you'd probably have to be from the place where those accents are from to get the overarching incongruity in that clippette...funny, though).
Posted by: Beast | July 15, 2009 5:26 PM
Willoughby *so* deserved that!
Posted by: OurDeadSelves | July 15, 2009 5:48 PM
I just got my copy of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies in the mail today! How timely!
Posted by: Happy Tentacles
|
July 15, 2009 6:03 PM
Oh bliss! I have long thought that almost all TV adaptations of nineteenth century classic novels would have been improved by the presence of a few Cephalopods. I'd now like to see 'The Pickwick Papers' performed entirely by cuttlefish, or the octopus version of 'Mill on the Floss'. Or even 'The Barchester Chronicles' re-interpreted by a theatre-group of progressive-thinking atheist giant squid.
Posted by: @BangClangCrash | July 15, 2009 7:37 PM
toth@12:
You win. Forever. Nothing else will ever be funny again.
Posted by: wrpd | July 15, 2009 8:31 PM
I liked the South Park version of Great Expectations.
Posted by: dbtad | July 15, 2009 9:07 PM
@tosh:
That made my week. Thank you!
Posted by: toth | July 15, 2009 10:01 PM
Much as I love praise, I must come clean and reveal that the above is not my own concoction. It's a common song circulating among a certain circle of my friends who are rather Cthulhu obsessed ("Cthulhu kisses", which involve waggling fingers in front of one's mouth like tentacles and touching other waggling tentacle-fingers, are common). I'm afraid I don't know the origin. I thought it might be from A Shoggoth On the Roof, but apparently not (I am not nearly as well versed in Cthulhu details as said friends, I just absorb their obsession happily).
Posted by: Cowcakes | July 15, 2009 10:18 PM
I used to dread the mention of Jane Austen ever since being forcibly subjected to her tediously tortuous prose in high school. I may have to reassess my opinion with these revised works
Posted by: Brandon P. | July 15, 2009 11:10 PM
What we need now is Shakespeare with non-avian dinosaurs.
Posted by: Autumn
|
July 16, 2009 2:33 AM
A while ago, my wife went on a Jane Austen kick; she read all the novels and bought most of the BBC adaptations. I got her Pride and Prejudice and Zombies as a lark, and her main complaint is that it is, except for a few inclusions, simply the same book that Austen wrote.
She admits that the original novel is not something that she would read again.
I, however, am actually reading it, so I may be able to intelligently discuss Pride and Prejudice, as long as I remember to forget the "unmentionables".
Posted by: Rich | July 16, 2009 4:28 AM
Having just finished Pride and Prejudice and Zombies I can honestly say that I found it a very enjoyable read. It's rare that I pick up any non-fiction, but I'm glad that I made an exception in this case. Highly recommended.
Posted by: Orange | July 16, 2009 8:30 AM
Waaaaah. Thank goodness Jane Austen isn't alive to see this. She would positively faint! :)
Posted by: Sleeper | July 16, 2009 8:41 AM
@Bjørn Østman (#5)
Take two, with no duplicate costume and no time to wait for it to dry. At a guess.
Posted by: SeanJJordan | July 16, 2009 9:26 AM
@29, Rich
Um, you do realize that even without the zombies, Pride and Prejudice is fiction, right?
Posted by: Gregory | July 16, 2009 10:05 AM
With the success of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, the author has been contracted to write two other similar books. This is one of them; the other has the working title of Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, which will be based on Lincoln's autobiography.
Posted by: Ian | July 16, 2009 10:06 AM
toth,
It's a song by filker Tom Smith. I think it's even available for download somewhere on his website at www.tomsmithonline.com
Posted by: Gregory | July 16, 2009 10:07 AM
Err... Lincoln's biography. Sorry.
Posted by: Don | July 16, 2009 1:35 PM
#26
Austen's prose tortuous? Man, you must have had lousy teachers.
I hear one of the series is to be 'Queen Victoria - Demon Slayer' Tag line 'She loved her country, she hated demons.'
Posted by: Don | July 16, 2009 1:50 PM
Oh, and a zombified Christmas Carol which begins 'Marley was dead. Again.'
Posted by: HombreMoleculos | July 16, 2009 5:10 PM
#5
She probably did what I would have done. Pissed my pants.
Posted by: Cate B | July 16, 2009 6:57 PM
I dig the irony of turning Sense and Sensibility into a dark gothic tale with monsters! I'm sure Marianne would appreciate it. Can't say the same for Elinor, though ...
Posted by: IO | July 17, 2009 2:43 AM
#39
Elinor would just deal with it like she deals with everything. Plus, if the monsters got Lucy Steele and/or Fanny, she might get to appreciate them, too ;-)
Posted by: runescape money | July 17, 2009 4:28 AM
I've been desperately searching for an answer to the problems I've had trying to implement this,
runescape goldand I've posted bugs up to the Drupal website, but without response. Somewhere between mailhandler and notifications, the wrong info is making it into the db when a reply email is sent by a mail recipient.
Posted by: estraven | July 17, 2009 9:38 AM
Anyone may read what Austen thought of her contemporaries' fascination with horror novels in Northanger Abbeys.
And compulsory reading has to be removed from all kinds of schools, if it ends up preventing people from appreciating Austen's prose.