Bioluminescence is common, especially in marine organisms. Shimomura classified thes into a couple of types: luciferain, photoprotein, and an undefined "other". Luciferin requires an enzymatic (luciferase) reaction, and luminescence is proportional to the concentration of the substrate. The photoprotein type requires a single molecule — aequorin, symplectin, pholasin, etc.
He summarized how D-Luciferin is converted to Oxyluciferin in the presence of O2 and ATP, catalyzed by luciferase, to produce light, either red light in acidic media or yellow green in alkaline media. There is also a variant of this reaction called coelenterazine-luciferase luminaescence, found in many marine organisms, like Periphylla, a ellyfish, and Chiroteuthis, a squid. Coelenterazine is converted to coelenteramide in the presence of O2 to produce light and CO2.
Another organism is Cyprodana, a crustacean that uses a luciferin variant — produces a very pretty blue glow.
Luminiscent bacteria convert luciferin into a fattye acid, FMN, to produce light, which is also luciferase-catalyzed. Luciferase seems to be popping up all over the place — unfortunately, Shimomura doesn't talk much at all about variations in the enzyme, but is more focused on giving us the chemical intermediates produced in the reaction. Typical chemist!
This is especially unfortunate since the luciferase reaction in different organisms seems to produce very different reaction products…it's getting me very curious about how these different forms of the protein must differ to be yielding such different outcomes, all only similar in that they also produce light as a byproduct. And then we see that some very different phyla, such as krill and dinoflagellates, use nearly identical reactions.
Photoproteins: he talks about Aequorea aequorea, which produces green light with a protein called aequorin that binds a complex molecule that resembles coelenterazine, that undergoes a conformational change in the presence of calcium ions to produce green light. If GFP is used, it produces green light.
A squid, Symplectoteuthis, converts dehydrocoelenterazine to symplectin which then produces light.
Then he switches to talking about fungal biolominescence in Mycena and Panellus, mushrooms that glow green. The precursor is decanoylpanal is conferted to luciferin, which produces light in the presence of superoxides, O2, and tetradecanoylcholine. The reaction can take place in the absence of any enzyme.
Shimomura is not exactly a dynamic speaker — he basically just read off his list of reactions — but at least he had lots of pretty pictures of glowing organisms. If only he'd said something about the relationships and evolutionary differences between them all!









Comments
Posted by: Tim | July 2, 2009 3:53 AM
As sad as this might seem, I love that stuff. Even without the evolution material, I miss these lectures. Well, ok, I don't miss the droning of the lecturers, but the material and the teaching-aids...
Posted by: baryogenesis | July 2, 2009 4:55 AM
Seems as if you're more rested. I'm imagining a scenario where chemists and biologists are sharing bier and info and then I gobble up your reporting. Glowing green shrooms? Hmmm. My son and his friends probably can add to the research.
Posted by: glowworm | July 2, 2009 5:19 AM
Using GFP to illuminate (sorry, can't resist!) gene expression sounds like a hacker's dream. When you're faced with a binary program that doesn't do quite what you want it to, out come the dissasembler and hex editor to tinker with the instructions. I think these biochemists are doing the same with living thing - the code consists of genes and the whole program is the organism's DNA. Yet I think we're still a long way from cutting and pasting genes to create an entirely new organism.
Really cool stuff :)
Posted by: BaldySlaphead | July 2, 2009 8:57 AM
"Luciferain"? No wonder fundies think biologists are evil.
Couldn't they have just use some term meaning 'light bringer'..?
Posted by: Brock | July 2, 2009 10:02 AM
Yay for luciferase! It taught me that catalysts can change shape in order to bind with reactants, whereas in my previous naivety I had assumed them to be rigid bodies that only performed a simple "lock & key" sort of behavior. Luckily one of my chem profs had us write short papers on enzymes, and I happened to pick this one due to the lovely glow of firefly butts ;)
Here's a paper on the conformational dynamics of luciferase:
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1959537
Posted by: Rob Coover | July 2, 2009 1:03 PM
I just thought I'd note that this is sort-of-quasi-tangentially related to the coming anniversary of the Revolution, because inventor David Bushnell's submarine, the Turtle, got its lighting from bioluminescent fungus known as foxfire while its crew of 1 was using it in a vain attempt to sink a British ship in New York Harbor.
Posted by: Steve H | July 2, 2009 8:21 PM
There are a lot of errors in this post. I would recommend appreciating it for its account of the lecture, but go elsewhere for scientific facts. Sorry I'm
not being more specific, but I'm writing this from my iPhone.
Posted by: DLC | July 3, 2009 12:47 AM
Interesting and enlightening to see that research is still being done in this field.