Now on ScienceBlogs: Let the War on Christmas being. Atheist style.

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Pharyngula

Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)

• Quick link to the latest endless thread




I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

tbbadge.gif
scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

Those who fight so intensely against Affirmative Action belittle the slavery and apartheid of the past while ignoring the racism of the present.

Rack Jite

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« Martin Chalfie: GFP and After | Main | Richard Royce Schrock: Recent Advances in Olefin Metathesis Catalyzed by Molybdenum and Tungsten Alkylidene Complexes »

Roger Y. Tsien: Building and Breeding Molecules to Spy on Cells, Tumors, and Organisms

Category: LindauMolecular BiologyScience
Posted on: July 2, 2009 4:52 AM, by PZ Myers

The difference between biology and chemistry: biologists ask how natural systems and molecules work, while chemistry wants to know how to artificially re-synthesize natural biomolecules. Tsien favors a synthetic approach, asking hwo to build new molecules that will perform amusing and useful functions in biology. He compares it to architecture on a molecular scale that is also a rigorous test of one's understanding of molecular function.

He thinks biology has the most interesting grand questions in all of science (hooray!). He also likes pretty colors. However, he thinks that interdisciplinary barriers prevent most biologists from knowing how to manipulate molecules other than nucleotides and proteins. Anyone who knows how to make non-linear molecules has an advantage.

His first target was intracellular Ca++, which we all know is central to cellular signaling. He gave a quick overview of Ca++ properties and functions, as a rationale for why he began looking at Ca++ indicators like aequorin. He started looking for something new, started with something selective for calcium, the calcium chelator EGTA, which lacks any chromophore. One way would be to add benzene rings (chromophores) to EGTA, which led to BAPTA, basically EGTA with two benzene rings. It has high calcium sensitivity and did exhibit a color shift, but a poor one. This work led to Fura-2 synthesis, in which you can still see the EGTA ancestor, but has a much more complex set of rings attached to it. Fura-2 requires microinjection, which Tsien wasn't good at, so he synthesized a protected form of the molecule with a methyl ester protecting group that would be stripped by enzymes in the cell.

He showed a gorgeous image of the Ca++ wave in sea urchin fertilization, visualized with pseudo-colored images of calcium concentration visualized with Fura-2.

Next step: Tsien wanted to visualize cAMP, an important second messenger in cell processes. They needed a non-destructive way to assay the dynamics of cAMP, which is present at very low concentration in the presence of many other nucleotides. The idea again was to find a specific binding agent and coupling it to a chromophore. He chose to use a specific PKA subunit that binds to cAMP, and use fluorescence resonance with a pair of adjacent chromophores. It worked, and they built proteins with rhodamine and fluorescein that did the job.

They wanted a general means to fluorescently label designated proteins. This led to the discovery of Douglas Prasher's work on cloning GFP.

What was wrong with wild-type GFP? It's main excitation was at 395nm (UV), and only minor excitation peak at 475 (blue). We don't like to zap cells with UV. He puzzled out which components of the molecule were responsible for particular peaks in the spectrum (which he got wrong), but by empirically juggling in different amino acids, he came up with a variant that emphasized suitable peaks in the spectrum. This work was done without the aid of knowing the 3D structure.

They worked out the crystal structure, and then with rational design, made more variants with different colors. The work was rejected by Science for amusing reasons: reviewers didn't understand the significance. They got it published by sending a brief note to Science that announced the imminent publication of the crystal structure of wild-type GFP in Nature.

Tsien wanted to make a red version. A Russion group found a red GFP variant in a coral, which they then analyzed and found the structure. This work has led to lots of fluroescent proteins with colors from blue to red.

Problems: Sometimes FPs are too big, the excitation wavelengths are hard to get through mammalian tissues, and a few others I was too slow to get down. Darn.

They are now developing an infrared fluorescent protein based on biliverdin, and are also studying the role of proteases in cancer. They are using polycationic proteins sequences as tools to transport payload proteins into cells, with some clever tricks to regulate accessibility and make it chemically triggerable by enzymes present in tumors. They have a probe that selectively labels tumor cells, which can be a very useful guide for surgical removal of tumors. He also combines it with in vivo labeling of nerves, which surgeons don't want to cut, making it a way to color-code living tissue for tumor resection, a technique called molecular fluorescence imaging guidance, MFIG.

This was another excellent talk — Tsien has an entertaining sense of humor.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/113985

Comments

#1

Posted by: RobertDW | July 2, 2009 5:06 AM

Ca++? Wow! Object Oriented Calcium...

(Sorry, bad programmer joke; Ca++ would be a Calcium ion; it's down two electrons so it's got two positive charges. I think, anyway - my chem classes are nearly 20 years ago now)

#2

Posted by: Rorschach | July 2, 2009 5:07 AM

Ca++, cAMP....I recognize the terms,but I still have no idea what you're even talking about !

Anyway,to liveblog those talks the way you're doing it must be quite exhausting I imagine !

Make sure there's some decent sustenance for lunch !!

#3

Posted by: DuckPhup | July 2, 2009 5:16 AM

The difference between biology and chemistry: biologists ask how natural systems and molecules work, while chemistry wants to know how to artificially re-synthesize natural biomolecules.


Quick guide to the sciences...

- If it's green and icky... it's biology

- If it stinks... it's chemistry

- If it doesn't work... it's physics

#4

Posted by: Lissa | July 2, 2009 5:17 AM

Ooh, I can make a small claim to fame here: I gave a talk at a conference in the same symposium session as Roger Tsien a few years ago, and sat across the table from him at the symposium dinner!

#5

Posted by: antistokes | July 2, 2009 7:57 AM

Ca++, cAMP....I recognize the terms,but I still have no idea what you're even talking about !

Ca2+ (or Ca++) is the doubly charged calcium ion and is a common second messenger in cells, like the programmer says (baaaaad pun there, heh).

cAMP = cyclic AMP. AMP is adenosine monophosphate (you may have heard of ATP, the "energy currency" for all biological sytems, this guy is the same as AMP, only it has two more phosphates (the T stands for "tri-"). cAMP is another common molecule used in signal transduction.

#6

Posted by: Bernard Bumner Author Profile Page | July 2, 2009 8:16 AM

Roger Tsien has pretty complicated procedures if you want his lab to give you a plasmid, that's all I'm saying...

#7

Posted by: Ian Harvey | July 2, 2009 11:07 AM

One of my favourite stories.
Back when I worked with FURA-2 and INDO-1 (early 90s) one of our idiot medics had a poster accepted for a US conference. We checked it for her before she went and pointed out the most obvious errors. The most in your face was the Ca axes labelled as µM instead of nM (what's 3 orders of magnitude?) She refused to admit any error and disappeared across the water.
When she came back and we all asked how it went she said it was fine except for this one guy who kept making the same mistake we had. He kept telling her that the axis should be nM and she kept correcting him and apparently gave him an impromptu lecture on the use of Calcium sensitive fluorophores. She said he had a strange name, he introduced himself as Chen but his namebadge said Tsein.
She couldn't understand why we were all rolling on the ground laughing.
Scarily bright guy.

#8

Posted by: Owlmirror | July 2, 2009 4:05 PM

When she came back and we all asked how it went she said it was fine except for this one guy who kept making the same mistake we had. He kept telling her that the axis should be nM and she kept correcting him and apparently gave him an impromptu lecture on the use of Calcium sensitive fluorophores. She said he had a strange name, he introduced himself as Chen but his namebadge said Tsein.
She couldn't understand why we were all rolling on the ground laughing.

I'm going to kinda guess that her giving him "an impromptu lecture on the use of Calcium sensitive fluorophores" was essentially the equivalent of giving her grandmother an impromptu lecture on the use of those white ovoids called "eggs", in terms of sucking the contents from them.

#9

Posted by: Ian Harvey | July 3, 2009 10:05 AM

Owlmirror

Only if you began said lecture with "Well gran the first thing you do is wait till the egg hatches"

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





           Sign in or register with TypePad.            Sign up with Movable Type.

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM