Brace yourselves: Glenn Moon is plainly mentally ill, but what are we to make of Pastor Steve Anderson? He has a job, he has a congregation, people actually respect him…but if you go to that link, you will hear the most astonishingly deranged, hateful, creepy nonsense in his sermons.
It's all bible-based, too. You can use that vile old book to support any evil you can imagine, I think.










Comments
Posted by: spinetingler | August 23, 2009 8:58 PM
"They recruit through rape."
Yeah, rape is traditionally the perfect tool to recruit some willing volunteers to your cause.
or not.
Posted by: Ben Mueller-Heaslip | August 23, 2009 9:02 PM
...I'm not gonna pray for his good. I'm going to pray that he dies and goes to hell. When I go to bed tonight, that's what I'm going to pray. And you say, 'Are you just saying that?' No. When I go to bed tonight, Steven L. Anderson is going to pray for Barack Obama to die and go to hell.
That's the Spirit of Christ talking. Actually, that's the Spirit of Christ attempting to incite violence, a la George Tiller.
Posted by: shane | August 23, 2009 9:03 PM
Interesting that in some countries he has crossed that fine free speech line over into the vilification and incitement to violence speech which may get him arrested. Pity he doesn't sermonize in one of those jurisdictions.
Posted by: Fil | August 23, 2009 9:04 PM
What's the bet that Pastor Steve is a closet gay who's "confused" (he's certainly dumb).
Fucking Baptists; it's always the Baptists that come out with the really crazy shit.
Gay zombie hordes recruiting your kids and running your countries. Woooo! Booga booga!
Posted by: Walton | August 23, 2009 9:05 PM
Just more evidence that the world is fundamentally a shit place. I sometimes wonder why any of us even bother trying to make it better.
Posted by: Yoritomo | August 23, 2009 9:09 PM
Ouch. I liked the hypocrisy when he managed to sneak "I love all of God's creation" into this hate-filled rant. Apparently Barack Obama is not part of God's creation...
Posted by: Rob | August 23, 2009 9:10 PM
Praise the sweet baby Jesus, I want him to die.
That, folks, is the basis of fundamentalist Christianity.
"God told me to kill you.™"
Posted by: Rtp10 | August 23, 2009 9:10 PM
It is such bullshit. I can't stand the fact that people buy into this crock.
Posted by: Uncle Glenny
|
August 23, 2009 9:11 PM
I'd caught an early video of this guy describing his experience of getting bashed up and arrested but had lost track of him.
I betcha he was all for the border protections that made it possible at the time.
Posted by: Smoggy Batzrubble OM4Jesus | August 23, 2009 9:12 PM
Dear Pastor Steve Anderson,
Praise the Lord, you are my sort of Christian! All that rage and repression must have your pulse pumping like the buns of a squad of cheerleaders mainlining caffeine. I'll bet you had a massive fat-one while you were giving that sermon. Your envy towards outed homosexuals is so palpable I don't doubt you stained your boxers thinking about all that old-man-young-boy bonking.
Don't worry Pastor Steve! I'm here to tell you that you can be a ManofGod(tm) and still meet your carnal needs and desires. My good friend and fellow Christian, Brother Floyd Rubber, runs a confidential service catering to the needs of repressed gay pastors like yourself. For $3000 he'll meet you for a week of intense cbt, flogging, and un-outed gay humiliation. I promise as a Christian that Floyd's massive pierced meatstick will really give you something to holler to the heavens about, and with the Demon of Bi-Curiousness exorcised you'll be able to go back to your pulpit ready to preach against the real evil in this world--women who refuse their Christian husbands desire that they have godly breast implants!
Email Floyd now on evangeliqueers@assgapingpastors.com.
Yours with a solution to your repressions,
Smoggy Batzrubble
Posted by: 'Tis Himself
|
August 23, 2009 9:13 PM
You'll know they are Christians by their love.
Posted by: Michael Dickens | August 23, 2009 9:13 PM
I am not surprised. There are all kinds of people like this. It's a psychological thing: some people just want a crazy leader. I mean, look at us. We smash polls repeatedly for fun.
Posted by: tsg | August 23, 2009 9:18 PM
No, we smash polls for rationality and it just happens to be fun.
Posted by: Wowbagger, OM | August 23, 2009 9:20 PM
It's clear that Christians like this one quietly resent all of the anti-war and pro-equality aspects of Jesus' teachings, preferring all of the slaughter and conquest and genocide and vengeance of the OT.
But that's the joy of a revelatory religion - you can 'interpret' it to make it mean whatever you want it to mean.
Posted by: ArthurOne
|
August 23, 2009 9:20 PM
Apparently this is his Church:
Faithful Word Baptist Church
Pastor Steven L. Anderson
2707 W Southern Ave, Suite #105
Tempe, AZ 85282
Phone: (480) 248-4082
E-mail: Info@faithfulwordbaptist.org
Posted by: Fil | August 23, 2009 9:22 PM
@ Smoggy
LOL
"The screams could be heard for miles and miles,
Brother Floyd forgot Pastor Steve had piles."
Posted by: kamaka | August 23, 2009 9:22 PM
At this, I am left to wonder: Why would any homosexual person care to be a part of a monotheistic hate-cult? Even a "moderate" ELCU sect that finally, begrudgingly says "OK, we'd rather you didn't commit this sin, but if you have to have to have sex, I guess we'll put up with you as a minister if the congregation is alright with it"?
Posted by: Cheesis K | August 23, 2009 9:24 PM
It's worth remembering here that the Bible and other similar religious texts are not being misued when used for hateful purposes. Rather, that is only their intended and rightful purpose. We should only be surprised when they are used for good purposes.
Posted by: tacitus | August 23, 2009 9:30 PM
Here's the details about his arrest. Seems he got pulled over at a checkpoint and then refused to comply with police orders to pull over and allow his car to be searched.
http://sanderson1611.blogspot.com/2009/08/court-documents-in-pdf-format.html
Posted by: Mylegacy | August 23, 2009 9:31 PM
I'm a Canadian. Over a year ago I got involved in following the US election - OK - I got obsessed. I started going to websites and agruing for Obama. It was clear he was - is - a game changer, or so I thought.
I was wrong. BOY - was I wrong - not about Obama - he is a polition who would be a welcome addition to the political discourse of ANY nation in the Western World. However, he is wasted in America.
America is mentally ill - seriously deluded - from American Christianity (an appalling abomination), to the Death penalty, to Health Care, to the lesson to be learned by your Revolution... The rest of the world THINKS - America fought TYRANNY to WIN Democracy. Americans seem to think they fought TYRANNY to win the RIGHT to bear arms and if they think their "Democracy" doesn't represent them - ie has become a TYRANNY - then they can - and SHOULD - take up arms against their own DEMOCRACY.
On SO many levels America suffers from INSANITY. Your country is seriously deluded. At first I got FURIOUS and fought harder thinking it can't be so. I am now resigned to the truth - you are past saving - and in my case you are past me caring about.
As long as you have your 11 Nuclear Carrier Battle Groups your bevy of illegal, immoral and TOTALLY unnecessary wars, your Industrial Military Complex and your Hateful, Vengeful, Disgusting god you are happy. So be it.
Posted by: tacitus | August 23, 2009 9:33 PM
Ugh -- looking at the rest of his blog, he's also a New World Order, Alex Jones-type freak too. He has a dangerous mix of irrational beliefs, it seems.
Posted by: kamaka | August 23, 2009 9:34 PM
Had a muslim fellow just today telling me the qu'ran is not against women, if people followed the qu'ran, women would be treated like QUEENS.
Posted by: Coleslaw | August 23, 2009 9:40 PM
I'd rather be treated like the Hamptons.
Posted by: Fred | August 23, 2009 9:45 PM
Had a muslim fellow just today telling me the qu'ran is not against women, if people followed the qu'ran, women would be treated like QUEENS.
Perhaps he was thinking of Anne Boleyn and Catherine Howard.
Posted by: Mr, Man | August 23, 2009 9:47 PM
@Coleslaw #23: You WIN
Posted by: Fil | August 23, 2009 9:48 PM
Remind me that poor model in Malaysia is to be caned today for just having a beer. Islam is definitely treating her like a queen....not.
I'll have a beer for her tonight and maybe even offer to kiss her bottom better.
What?
Posted by: Hank Fox | August 23, 2009 9:50 PM
The phrase "black hole Christianity" springs to mind, and I imagine this guy well inside the event horizon.
The most disgusting aspect of this dark little clown's existence is that no prominent religious leader will call him out. For whatever reason, none of them dare criticize each other.
So he can be as hatefully crazy as he wants, potentially inciting his followers to murder and assassination, and he'll continue to get away with it.
And damn, when I think of Obama's little girls, cruising the web and discovering that a PROMINENT CHRISTIAN LEADER is saying this about their dad ... shee-it, Anderson is an obscene little freak.
I know there are at least a few ardent Christians who regularly scan PZ's site. Will any of them speak up? I won't hold my breath.
........
On a side note, I have a problem believing it's entirely legal to pray for the death of the president. I mean, in the real world, that's pretty much the same as saying you want him dead, right? If ANYONE else went out in public and started ranting "I want the president dead!" what would happen?
On another side note, is it okay if one or more of US prays that God gives Pastor Steve Anderson THIS?
Posted by: Lynna | August 23, 2009 9:55 PM
How can a guy like Pastor Steve Anderson possibly have a congregation? I could sort of understand if he had an extended family or a group people held in isolation, and brainwashed in isolation. But it's hard to believe that he can spout that kind of sick-making rant in Tempe, Arizona and get away with it.
Bleh. Couldn't even listen to it all. He's thriving on hate.
Posted by: Hank Fox | August 23, 2009 9:55 PM
Pooh. That was supposed to be the "Scanners head explosion."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HY-03vYYAjA
Posted by: JD | August 23, 2009 9:57 PM
This guy is swimming in an open ocean of stupid and just hit the triple tard current. What a hateful and loud fucktard. Teh, teh, teh.
Posted by: Smoggy Batzrubble OM4Jesus | August 23, 2009 9:57 PM
Dear Fil,
Floyd Rubber gets a severe caning tonight as well. He wants to know if you are busy this evening?
Smoggy
Posted by: Hank Fox | August 23, 2009 9:58 PM
Oh, hey, it didn't occur to me at first, but this guy is in McCain's home state. I wonder if HE will say anything against this guy?
Posted by: royaldark | August 23, 2009 10:02 PM
While one part of me wishes vile, despicable speeches like that were illegal, the other, freedom-loving, censorship-hating part of me recognizes that in very few countries can one say something so radical about that country's leader and walk the streets freely. It's his right to say what he wants as long as he doesn't actually tell people to murder abortionists or homosexuals.
Posted by: David Smart | August 23, 2009 10:02 PM
I think Anderson is gay and hates himself for it - I've never seen a more apt situation for the phrase "Methinks he doth protest too much."
If the level of one's outspoken tenor against gays is proportional to how gay one is, Anderson is deeply, profoundly, gloryhole BJ Gay.
Posted by: amphiox | August 23, 2009 10:03 PM
#20 Mylegacy:
Whoa. Not all Americans are like that. In fact, it's still only a minority - a loud, scary, disturbingly influential minority, but a minority nevertheless. A minority which the centrist majority generally still hammers down when they get too loud and scary (which I think was a major contributor to Obama's victory).
Unless you're Poeing me. Man, I hope you're Poeing me.
Posted by: Camels With Hammers | August 23, 2009 10:04 PM
Well, I would distinguish between their "literal and original purposes" and their "rightful purposes." They have no inherent "rightful purposes" outside of whatever purposes their religious devotees want to give to them.And from an ethics perspective, the only rightful purposes we can put any of our activities and traditions to ones that are ethically defensible. So, I think ethically participating in these traditions at all means foreswearing all literal interpretations of fact and moral imperative from those texts. And, in fact, some of the metaphorically conveyed ideas about ethics and fact themselves should be ethically reassessed or jettisoned.
Posted by: Cuttlefish, OM | August 23, 2009 10:10 PM
The Word Of God, conveniently for those of us who hate,
Will always back our hatred with religion's holy weight.
The good may credit God, of course; sing praises to his name--
The bad, as well, cite scripture, which they loudly will proclaim!
The Word Of God is leather-bound, and sits upon your shelf,
And lets you blame a deity for things you do yourself.
You're good, or bad, or neither; you are moral or you're not;
You think that God contributed? He did precisely squat.
It's you who takes the credit, and it's you who takes the blame;
No God controlled your hatred, so don't try to spread the blame.
So go ahead; pretend that you are acting on God's word;
Both you and we know better; you're a coward and a turd.
http://digitalcuttlefish.blogspot.com/
Posted by: ArthurOne
|
August 23, 2009 10:10 PM
Same guy here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=at9MZ54Hst4&NR=1
Posted by: Hank Fox | August 23, 2009 10:11 PM
Faithful Word Baptist Church, Our Pastor:
"Pastor Anderson holds no college degree but has well over 100 chapters of the Bible committed to memory ..."
Gah.
Posted by: Helen | August 23, 2009 10:12 PM
I tried really hard to hear the footsteps of the congregation thumping their way out of the place..... I didn't hear those footsteps...no slamming door behind them either....
Mockery will not fix this. Just like it won't heal a broken leg.
You guys aren't scary - you are worse than scary.
MyLegacy has a real point.
Posted by: Fil | August 23, 2009 10:12 PM
@ Smoggy
Tempting.
I'm sure it would be much more homo-erotic than being thrashed stupid by manic unChristian Brothers with semi erections and red faces (er, they thrashed me with specially made straps that were ordered from the local boot-maker btw, not with their erections, unlike for some other kids). I will never forget the day I ran into one of those "men" later as an adult (at the Pope Show at the MCG. Some old school friends were there to give his oiliness the finger and basically tell the Micks where to shove their religion). Anyway, Brother R looked so much better after I flattened his nose for him. Funny, he didn't turn the other cheek, he just burst into tears and ran.
I'm all better now and just use words, but it was fun landing just that one punch.
Posted by: Crudely Wrott | August 23, 2009 10:19 PM
When his hapless followers meet a cruel fate by simply applying the deep spiritual messages this man o' god speaks under the influence of an uber daddy-0, we can expect a rehash of the Jim Jones experience and all of the favorite talking heads and news readers will be asking, "How could such a thing happen?"
Wrong question. How it happens is obvious. When a message of hate is preached, congregations will soon begin to hate. The congregation is not overly concerned with who they hate in service of the lord. They are deeply concerned, though, with how their service is perceived by other true believers. They do not shudder at the notion of hating in the name of Jesus but they are scared shitless of appearing to be not hateful enough or of mistakenly hating the wrong people.
This is one of the reasons that the legion of Christian religions tolerate each other. While each sect has its own sacred hatreds that at least partially define their existence as a "church", none are quite sure that they are hating with proper aim as well as intensity. At bottom, they all realize, is that between them all they have enough hatred for all of civilization and if they can just keep praying hard enough and hating hard enough and keeping the kids in the true way . . .
You take it from there. I'm out of incredulity this weekend having witnessed three paradoxes, two unusual accidents and one self contradiction already since Friday.
*damn, I'm glad there is a place like this where I can feel at home being contrary*
Posted by: Jadehawk, OM | August 23, 2009 10:20 PM
"God hates Barack Obama, I hate Barack Obama..."
what a coincidence! God hates all the same people you do!
Posted by: Brent Rasmussen | August 23, 2009 10:20 PM
Holy carp! That lunatic is in my hometown!
I am depressed.
Posted by: Uncle Glenny
|
August 23, 2009 10:20 PM
Mylegacy@20
As long as you have your 11 Nuclear Carrier Battle Groups your bevy of illegal, immoral and TOTALLY unnecessary wars, your Industrial Military Complex and your Hateful, Vengeful, Disgusting god you are happy. So be it.
Oh, don't worry. China bought the only producer of the fuel they use, IIRC. (It was in Panama for tax reasons.)
Posted by: Sastra | August 23, 2009 10:24 PM
Matthew 10:34 -- "Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." -- Jesus
I have heard even mainstream Christians agree with this verse and interpret it to mean that God knew that the Gospel would be divisive. It is deliberately written -- or was allowed to be written -- in such a way that many interpretations would be possible. That way, those who turn out to have distorted and misinterpreted the Bible would be clearly revealed to have done so.
Huh?
It doesn't seem to occur to them that this "give them the rope to hang themselves" view of Biblical exegesis says more negative things about God, than it does about Man. If God made the text ambiguous on purpose when it might have been clearer -- and thus terrible things were done by people who could make what seemed like a legitimate case for their doing so as God's will -- then this isn't a problem with human beings being flawed. God is flawed.
It's really not that hard to read homophobia into the Bible. It's harder to make the case that no, God condemns such hate. But just because it's harder, doesn't mean that the task must have been given for that purpose.
Posted by: Smoggy Batzrubble OM4Jesus | August 23, 2009 10:24 PM
Plaudits Fil,
I'll bet there were plenty who would wish they'd done the same. Reminds me of David Niven's autobiography 'The Moon's a Balloon' and his wish he'd gone and thumped the sadist who brutalized him at school. Of course I'm a Christian and hence non-violent and loving etc. etc., but even I know that turning the other cheek to a Catholic priest is risky, especially if your back is turned.
The evil part of me is perpetually sorry that Dr Melfi didn't sic Tony Soprano onto her rapist. But there y' go.
Smoggy
Posted by: R. Schauer | August 23, 2009 10:27 PM
Smoggy, huge applause...thank you.
Cuttlefish, huge applause...more thanks.
Paster Steve, please visit the Tenderloin District of San Francisco immediately...I know a few gay bikers who wish to speak to you.
Posted by: Danno Davis
|
August 23, 2009 10:29 PM
amphiox:
i'm not at all convinced that they are a minority. but i think some people have lost sight of the fact that something like 46 or 47% of voters voted for mccain and his trophy lunatic. it's reassuring to think that they're fringe--during his campaign barack himself kept harping on about the overall "decency of the american people"--but i just see that shit everywhere.
Posted by: Janine, OMnivore | August 23, 2009 10:31 PM
First, Lynna, I want you to know that this is not meant to be personal and an attack. But I feel the need to appologize, I am sorry.
But this line is typical of well meaning liberal types. Please stop assuming that all people have similar lines of thought as you. Everyday, all of us see examples of people who cross over the line of humane behavior. Remember the recent case of the homeschooling mother who ran a blog about her examples of teaching. (I cannot recall her blog name but in real life, she shared my name.) In one post, she advocated the bombing of a NYC high school for LGBT students. It turned out that her brother was a preacher who called for the extermination of LGBT people. While they are a minority, they are vocal. Some are also unhinged enough to acted on these ideas. They create enough real dangers for people like me to never allow ourselves to wonder why they have a following. They do and some are dangerous.
Once again, Lynna, I am sorry. But I had to point that out.
Posted by: Cheesis K | August 23, 2009 10:31 PM
Camels With Hammers, you are right. I should have left it at intended purposes.
Posted by: Crudely Wrott | August 23, 2009 10:32 PM
@ Cuttlefish, #37:
Mega-Wow.
/begin Mr. Magoo imitation
"Oh, Cuttle, you've done it again. Heh heh."
/end Mr. Magoo imitation.
Thanks again for your lyrical insight. You are a treasure.
Posted by: salon_1928 | August 23, 2009 10:32 PM
It's so bizarre - I have a hard time wrapping my head around the idea that people like this exist.
Posted by: peter | August 23, 2009 10:33 PM
I think he is rather MOR for an american evangelical christian.
He says what he thinks, and it seems like GWB he is consistent - apparently a benchmark for republicans.
I just wonder - couldn't he have used stronger words to more clearly profile himself?
Posted by: Tressa | August 23, 2009 10:34 PM
I always thought that "We've come to wreck everything and ruin your life; god sent us" was just the credo from "Romper Stomper."
Posted by: Darren Garrison | August 23, 2009 10:38 PM
It was a big deal in some circles when he was tased a few months back (especially amongst the anti-government rightwing nuts and the anti-police leftwing nuts). Here are a couple of links I saved.
His original "I got tased" video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUzd7G875Hc
Some of his writing:
http://www.faithfulwordbaptist.org/page9.html
And, as a bonus, his nutbag anti-vax wife:
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2009/04/if_you_think_anti-vaccine_loons_are_just.php
Posted by: merkin j pus-tart | August 23, 2009 10:38 PM
If you think he is nuts, you ought to read his wife's blog:
http://www.stevenandersonfamily.blogspot.com/
I remember some time ago she had a rant about some other church member stealing one of her recipes. There are some very odd people out there.
Posted by: Travis | August 23, 2009 10:40 PM
I am loving the "They recruit through rape. They recruit through molestation. They recruit through violation." line. I thought that was how the religious did it as well. They are also recruiters.
I also wonder how many of the people he was addressing actually notice that there are more "homosexuals, sodomites and queers" every year. To do that you would probably have to actually go see them, maybe even meet some of them and I really doubt many of his flock do that...unless he is really just acknowledging many of them are similar to Ted Haggard and know first hand.
Anyway, frightening man. But nothing new sadly.
Posted by: Lynna | August 23, 2009 10:42 PM
Great lines, Cuttlefish. Now there's something worth committing to memory.
Posted by: Charlie N. | August 23, 2009 10:44 PM
This man represents everything vile, repulsive, and horrifying about religion. He- nay-It scares me.
Posted by: Fil | August 23, 2009 10:46 PM
@ Smoggy.
Well I understand the desire for revenge. But it's so much better to let it go and move on. Violence is for TV really and best left there (in fiction though, not the news).
Fun read, that was from Niven. I especially liked his stories of my fellow Tasmanian, Errol Flynn. :-)
Ah yes, the good unChristian Brothers. I well remember getting six of the best on each hand in first form....for having the gall to stay in class during recess so that I could read a book. Can you believe my evil ways? I was not out there being manly and playing handball (true, their favourite game...in lots of ways) I was reading a BOOK! I was about the smallest kid in the class and bullied mercilessly for years in that shit-hole of a "school". I thought, if a religious school was this bad, imagine what a state school must be like? (heaven, as it turned out when I myself started teaching).
What is amazing though, is that once you ditch the religion (which I did at 14 or so) although the Catholic guilt complex may linger, you can end up being so much more tolerant of other cultures and lifestyles (maybe not religion itself though....but it's the ideas I despise, not those suckered into it, unless they are stupidly evil themselves).
Gay men a problem for me, despite my school experiences? Not at all, bring 'em on and lets party. Hell, same for anyone's sexual preferences. My niece (who is a stunner) is a lesbian and is just over from Melbourne with her (equally stunning) lesbian lover. We have a great time and her haircuts are a scream (as is all the metal ware).
What was it Walter Matthou said in Grumpy Old Men? "Mmmm, lesbians, yummy." lol ;-)
Posted by: Jadehawk, OM | August 23, 2009 10:48 PM
Janine, this brother is the self-same Pastor Anderson we just got to listen to. That homeschooling blog was by his sister (I only remembered because I know the crazy blogger's sister-in-law had an oddly spelled name, and now I notice that the wife of this pastor IS that sister-in-law with the oddly spelled name).
Posted by: Valdyr | August 23, 2009 10:49 PM
You know, all this stuff about homosexual recruitment makes me wonder... how did that (untrue) slogan never get turned around on the religious right? After all, no one is born Christian; they must recruit.
Posted by: Jadehawk, OM | August 23, 2009 10:50 PM
also this is the same guy who threw a hissy-fit over a German sign forbidding pissing while standing :-p
Posted by: Crudely Wrott | August 23, 2009 10:51 PM
Trying to "accommodate" or to simply coexist with the likes of the most revered and reverend Anderson is one of the hardest tests of tolerance. I'll wager five quatloos that godless heathens can tolerate him to a larger degree than he and his followers can tolerate us.
Let us watch and find out.
Posted by: merkin j pustart | August 23, 2009 10:52 PM
#63 "I know the crazy blogger's sister-in-law had an oddly spelled name" . . . Her name was something like Raani Starns?
Posted by: Patricia, OM | August 23, 2009 10:52 PM
Can't wait for the flood of fools to show up spouting Anderson is no true christian. They have no such sermons preached in their churchs.
Anderson is a true christian, he's preaching straight out of the holy bable. He stopped one verse short of sending his congregation out on a godly mission to bash the teeth out of gay people and send Obama on the short train to hell. -
Anyone arrogant enough to reject the verdict of the judge or of the priest who represents the Lord your God must be put to death. Deut. 17:12 NLT
This guy needs to be arrested.Posted by: Darren Garrison | August 23, 2009 10:52 PM
On a similar note, in T.estes land, a sickening, sad post about a 17-year-old girl struggling with whether or not god requires that she cover her head while in church, and who proudly speaks of how she is submissive to her god, her father, and will be submissive to her future husband.
Posted by: Jadehawk, OM | August 23, 2009 10:55 PM
I think that's the blogging name of the homeschooling mom who hated the LGBT school, and the sister of pastor Anderson. his wife's name is Zsuzsanna; i've never seen that spelling before, so that's why I remembered from that last incident.
Posted by: merkin j pustart | August 23, 2009 10:57 PM
I messed up in entry #57 . . . it was Raani Starnes who stated "I feel like I've been a victim of recipe rape" and not Pastor Anderson's wife. Still, the wife's blog is bat-shit crazy.
Posted by: Janine, OMnivore | August 23, 2009 11:03 PM
Thank you, Jadehawk! It was Raani Starnes.
Posted by: UncleAl | August 23, 2009 11:03 PM
Oh, this guy is a REAL piece of work. Jadehawk, you're right...This is the same guy who was severely agitated because he got the idea that Germans pee sitting down. According to him, real Christians piss standing up. Next time he goes to Germany, he's by God going to piss standing up and no godless heathen was going to rob him of eternal life.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qo3o4nfiG7A
Here's a pic of his crappy strip mall church
http://www.faithfulwordbaptist.org/page3.html
On top of his lunacy, he's a lousy preacher and public speaker.
Posted by: Lynna | August 23, 2009 11:03 PM
Janine @50:
No need to apologize. My fault really for not posting what I was actually thinking. I know all too well how dangerous people like Anderson can be. I live in one of the states where shelves of ammunition in the local gun shops and Wal-Marts were stripped bare as soon as it became apparent that Obama was going to win the election.
What I meant to say was that I see it, I hear it, and I don't want to believe it is possible -- but I know it is not only possible, but living and breathing among us. I've been doing quite a bit of reading on the neurological aspects of belief -- trying to understand, and hoping to see a way out for these people trapped in their hate loops.
Once in awhile a particular flavor of rat-brained insane triggers my "holy fuck, what the hell?" reaction, a reaction that you would think would be worn out by now.
No, they don't think like I do, and that's the point.
Posted by: raven | August 23, 2009 11:04 PM
I keep saying fundie xianity looks a lot like satanism.
1. Worship an inept but sadistic, monster of a god. check
2. Practice human child sacrifice (faith healing). check
3. Practice witchcraft- praying that a supernatural being kills Obama, check
4. Continuous lies and hate. Check although maybe this is just a fundie xian thing.
Think about it. If one can't tell the difference, is there really a difference?
Posted by: Janine, OMnivore | August 23, 2009 11:08 PM
Thank you, Lynna.
Posted by: Jadehawk, OM | August 23, 2009 11:09 PM
holy fuck. read this and weep. what a fucking creep and tyrant.
Posted by: Jadehawk, OM | August 23, 2009 11:11 PM
nevermind, I fail at reading and I accidentally made crazy-lady's point for her :-p
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp | August 23, 2009 11:11 PM
What does this guy have against bundles of sticks, brittish cigarettes and meatballs?
Posted by: MadScientist | August 23, 2009 11:11 PM
"Deranged ignorant lying asshole" comes to mind. I don't remember nuts like him when I lived in Phoenix.
Posted by: Jim Flannery | August 23, 2009 11:14 PM
Y'all have short memories. I knew the guy looked and sounded familar ... PZ featured his wife's blog about Sodomites in Schools OH NOES! back in October, and Orac was bangin on her antivax whutfukry in April.
Posted by: raven | August 23, 2009 11:14 PM
This minister could be a schizophrenic. They often gravitate to extreme reliions, sometimes fundie xianity, sometimes New Age, or Eastern.
One of my quite distant relations (thank Cthulhu) is SZ and very smart. He made it half way through med school before dropping out to become the guru of a vaguely Eastern cult. The cult gained quite a following without much effort.
Recently he chucked it all. Because, "I realized my devotees were crazier than I was." Which is saying a lot since he is severely afflicted.
SZ's run around 1% of the population, 3 million in the USA. It is not rare.
Posted by: MadScientist | August 23, 2009 11:15 PM
@Yoritomo #6: No, Obama is not one of god's creations. These idiots believe that folks with dark colored skin are failed attempts by satan to create humans - the monkeys and other apes were even earlier attempts by the devil. That's the bullshit they'll be brainwashing kids with.
Posted by: Mixter | August 23, 2009 11:16 PM
What a pathetic individual.
Mixter
Posted by: RobertDW | August 23, 2009 11:19 PM
PZ - you've got a spammer @ post 60
Posted by: Patricia, OM | August 23, 2009 11:19 PM
Now Chimpy, you know those Ramen heathens come with meatballs, strippers and beer volcanos.
Posted by: Krystalline Apostate | August 23, 2009 11:20 PM
Huh:
Why hasn't the FBI gone after this guy for threatening the president?
Oh right...prayer doesn't work.
Posted by: souper genyus | August 23, 2009 11:20 PM
Barney Frank put it best:
Posted by: Margaret | August 23, 2009 11:21 PM
MadScientist,
So on what day was god supposed have had his pilot experiments? A Week before he got down to some real work maybe?
The real problem with Germany, for this guy at least, is the hate crime laws just might be applied...
Santayana: Those who can not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
Posted by: Fil | August 23, 2009 11:30 PM
"...and our modern medical establishment that knows next to nothing about health with my child's lifelong wellbeing."
Said Mrs crazy-ass preacher's wife.
As opposed to biblical health care that knows all about medicine I suppose.
As in, "Lets all pray her better now...oh, she's done stopped breathing".
I mean, wtf? "knows next to nothing about health"???? What planet are these people on? She obviously has not a single clue as to the incredible progress made in medicine since the the medical profession ditched the bible for the scientific method. What an insult to western medicine.
The rest of the paranoid drivel she writes makes less sense than the Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers after a night sucking on bongs full of righteous weed.
Posted by: Janine, OMnivore | August 23, 2009 11:30 PM
This is not the first time that a video by Steve Anderson has been linked to on Pharyngula. Yes, he is Raani Starnes' brother.
Posted by: Janine, OMnivore | August 23, 2009 11:37 PM
And I was correct about Raani changing her name to Janine.
Posted by: Fil | August 23, 2009 11:45 PM
OT, but...
Well, some good news for a change. Maybe international outrage over Islamic treatment of women can occasionally stop the madness.
_________________________________________________
Model mum spared cane for beer drinking
Reuters
August 24, 2009 1:14pm
RELIGIOUS authorities in Malaysia today freed a woman who was on her way to a jail in the capital, Kuala Lumpur, to be caned for drinking beer.
"The warrant cannot be executed," Sharafuddin Zainal Ariffin, head of enforcement for the state of Pahang's Islamic Affairs Department, said after Kartika Sari Dewi Shukarno, 32, was returned to her house.
She would have been the first woman to be caned in this Southeast Asian country.
Posted by: Crudely Wrott | August 23, 2009 11:47 PM
You paint a vivid scene, Lynna.
Sometimes I get the sensation that the whole planet has moved sideways underneath me. Usually that's when I hear such as Anderson or, say, a close family member put forth a statement that runs counter to all of my experience and insight. Always an unaccountable source is invoked despite lack of any evidence. In such small moments I die just a little bit.
Then I try to remember how the basic nature of the world hasn't changed that much since people first started looking for meaning and substance. No matter how wrongly people have interpreted (and then cleverly marketed) some world view incorporating "outside assistance", a base population of people who are not so easily impressed remains and perpetuates. PZ's blog, and many others, are evidence of the claim that all is not lost.
In spite of such optimism, we are still left with the problem of how to get along with people who are prone to accepting myth over reality. I am lately taken up with how to go about this with some family members. So far the best I can do is to love them. That and doing my best to describe what science is and what it has given us.
But mostly I just love them. Sometimes that's all I've got.
Posted by: Withheld | August 23, 2009 11:47 PM
Jst fr fn frd p Skyp nd lft mssg tht 'd tkn t ht rdr n th Rvrnd. N ntntn f dlvrng n t bt wnt t s hm mk vd bt t.
[Great, asshole. Just what we need. You do know that if I'm contacted by the police I will be cheerfully handing over all the information about your identity that I have, right? --pzm]
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp | August 23, 2009 11:50 PM
Yeah that's great.
sigh
For your next trick call up the some catholic pretending to be a jew saying you want their children's blood.
Posted by: AlanWCan | August 23, 2009 11:51 PM
Waitaminute. He's also clearly preaching politics from the pulpit? Out with the tax free status -- tax this idiot back into the bronze age (where he'd clearly be happy)
Posted by: Jadehawk, OM | August 23, 2009 11:54 PM
because the alternative would make things even worse?
Posted by: Patricia, OM | August 23, 2009 11:58 PM
Withheld, Just which group did you request to hit the pastor? Feces throwers, teh gay teletubbies or female wearers of bifurcated garments?
Posted by: ausador | August 24, 2009 12:01 AM
I've decided that I am moving to China, perhaps they need another english language teacher. If not perhaps I can eek out a living with my skills as a licensed electrician. Maybe I will just starve amongst the peasents, I really don't care anymore. To be anywhere other than this God besotted land would be a relief.
Posted by: Inteligent Designer, OP | August 24, 2009 12:09 AM
PZ, do you like me?
Posted by: Crudely Wrott | August 24, 2009 12:15 AM
Withheld, you make my ass tired.
Your simple shit has been run into the ground time after time. While such has made for some great theater it is less than helpful in the real world. The one in which we really live, that is.
You might want to take a bearing on a known landmark and verify your position.
Posted by: GAZZA | August 24, 2009 12:16 AM
100 chapters committed to memory? What's that, maybe a couple of pages?
Hell, I can match that several times over - I can quote virtually the entire script of Monty Python and the Holy Grail or Life of Brian. And I'm not special - I'm just a typical geek.
Posted by: Janine, OMnivore | August 24, 2009 12:17 AM
Withheld, one does not deal with a whacked out asshole by stirring up other whacked out asshole.
Posted by: Patricia, OM | August 24, 2009 12:18 AM
ausador - Fear not. We are with you. And take heart brother, Pastor Anderson, Ted Haggard, and Smoggy are all headed down the highway to hell (smirk) Titus 1:15,16 .
Posted by: ironflange | August 24, 2009 12:21 AM
We all know damn well that one day, hopefully really soon, this guy is going to be caught with his hands in somebody else's pants.
Posted by: Steve | August 24, 2009 12:24 AM
My suggestion, don't feed the trolls. The more we take notice the more they become acceptable to the wingnuts.
Posted by: Anti.Theist317 | August 24, 2009 12:25 AM
He is obviously passionate, committed & very serious. I think the modern day cherry picker still irks me more.
Isn't it illegal for preachers to take a political stance? Or am I mistaken? If it is I am receptive to chipping in $100 to following through have something done.
It just seems to deal with 'endorsement'.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/28/AR2008092802365.html
He does not love he hates Obama, he does not want to obey him, he does not respect him and wants him to melt like a snail - is that just first amendment speech? Then he quotes bible verses about killing people. Seems a little questionable?
I am anti-theist and dislike a lot the government does. I am passionate, sometimes I get angry. But to wish sulfuric acid boil away the flesh of a political official or those whose opinions differ(salt on a snail). Well, god damn he accepted the position of an authority, announced with unwavering veracity a truth he believed as an absolute in public to multiple people on more than one occasion. This is a smidgen different - no?
AT
Posted by: Intelligent Designer, OP | August 24, 2009 12:31 AM
Hi Patricia,
I think it might be more instructive to consider the entire paragraph of the scripture you referenced. It appears that Titus is complaining about people just like Steve Anderson.
Posted by: Joel Jacobson | August 24, 2009 12:33 AM
"Pastor Anderson holds no college degree but has well over 100 chapters of the Bible committed to memory ..."
Big fuckin' deal. I've committed to memory the lyrics of most of the Andrews Sisters songs in spite of my college degree.
Posted by: rob | August 24, 2009 12:34 AM
W.T.F.?
Posted by: Alan Kellogg | August 24, 2009 12:35 AM
#56
I watched the first video you linked to and two things hit me;
1. He was within his rights to act as he did. The Border Patrol was wrong in how they handled the situation, and the state police did wrong in backing them up. I suspect someone with the Border Patrol jumped to a conclusion based on the man's appearance (profiling, it's not just a black thing) and got his buddies to back him up. When challenged regarding their motivation, they lied. The state police got involved on the wrong side because cops are supposed to support cops against civilians.
2. All that aside, his position was untenable. Far better to let the Border Patrol search the car and learn that they were wrong. Accept the insincere apology, drive away, and contact a lawyer regarding the rights violations. Better an eventual cash settlement than getting tased in addition.
What this incident shows us is that Anderson is an obstinate man who knows nothing of the value of compromise. Getting the story from the police and the Border Patrol may show us something very different, but going by his version I have to say nobody comported themselves well in this.
My point in all this? Even the worst people in the world can be right about some things. It does not mean they are right in all things, just in a few. Remember that and your opposition to such liars and frauds will be so much more effective.
Posted by: Crudely Wrott | August 24, 2009 12:35 AM
106 wins the thread.
And now to food and sleep. Perversely, morning comes quickly but it'll be a long time till breakfast.
May we all wake refreshed. G'night.
Posted by: Helix Rugens | August 24, 2009 12:37 AM
inb4 he gets outed for homosexuality
Posted by: Patricia, OM | August 24, 2009 12:37 AM
Crudely Wrott - best have a care with that ass. If it runs wild your countenance will be changed, the joints of your loins will be be loosed, and your knees will smote one against another.
If you are lax with your ass the only remedy is to call upon the astrologers, the Chaldeans and the soothsayers. Daniel, Chapt. 5
Posted by: Janine, OMnivore | August 24, 2009 12:44 AM
I would seem that Withheld's action is a meme. Here is a similar statement from Pam's House Blend.
Posted by: Patricia, OM | August 24, 2009 12:48 AM
Intelligent Designer - Yes, that is so. There are many other verses denouncing false pastors, which I, as a many decades long True Christian know well. Unfortunately, in Pastor Andersons case the faithful are not heeding the word of god and doing their christian duty.
Posted by: Crudely Wrott | August 24, 2009 12:55 AM
But wait! Even at this late hour hope is a constant companion:
Thar be the makins of sweet dreams! Aaaarrrrr, matey.
/end pirate speak, resume going to bed.
Posted by: Patricia, OM | August 24, 2009 12:59 AM
@117 - Bed down that ass first!
Posted by: Pareidolius | August 24, 2009 1:08 AM
Not sure who's worse, the batshit crazy Andersons or the self-righteous, stereotyping Mylegacy. Dude, your rant was almost as long and incoherent as Pastor Steve's insufferable Hell Sermon.
Posted by: amk | August 24, 2009 1:11 AM
Time for the obligatory link to Bob Altemeyer's book The Authoritarians. It will help answer that question. Everyone who hasn't already should read it. It's free!
Posted by: Crudely Wrott | August 24, 2009 1:13 AM
Patricia at 113 warns that:
I appreciate the warning, dear lady. Too late, alas. I called 'em all with no result. Yet damage has been minimal and my own confidence level has been enhanced to the point that I rather like verses 22 and 23:
We do find ways to survive, don't we?
*I'll try sleep again but something says it won't be easy*
Posted by: Daniel | August 24, 2009 1:23 AM
Anderson's brainwashing must be entering its adult phases. Notice how closely his rhetoric for gays and Obama resembles speeches about South Korea by Kim Jong Il! He even devises an absurd shadow-group conspiracy just like Himmler! I bet that not only do the church goers listen to him, but they listen only to him; anybody 'unsaved' could be a godless queer and a tool of the devil. A few waning dictators could definitely use the fine example that organized religion has left us!
All praise God and our Dear Leader, Steve Anderson!
Posted by: Ben Terry | August 24, 2009 1:33 AM
Ugh, as much as listening to this is awful, its about 7 minutes in when you hear the baby coo and yelp that really brings it home and makes you want to throw up...
Posted by: Patricia, OM | August 24, 2009 1:34 AM
Ah, now we see, all good things come to him that treats his ass well.
Enjoy thy lords, thy wives, thy concubines, silver, gold, brass and wine...
Damn it, I keep chickens.
Posted by: K.R. | August 24, 2009 1:38 AM
The horrid Raani Starnes isn't his sister in law - she's his honest to god biological sister.
I guess crazy runs in the family.
His wife is just as bad as he is: stevenandersonfamily@blogspot.com
Additionally he's been in the news quite a bit recently. You can find out more by googling "Steven Anderson" and "border patrol." Here's his blog... http://sanderson1611.blogspot.com/
Sorry if I'm repeating anything already posted by the way, I haven't read all the comments yet.
Posted by: Fil | August 24, 2009 1:51 AM
Wow, I didn't pick up on what that idiot Withheld was on about...the Skype thing didn't ring any bells.../irony.
Must be a pain for PZ running a site like this at times.
Oh well. Here's something a a bit nicer he may like.
I'm not sure if people outside OZ can watch this stuff, but the ABC in Australia has a good internet TV site. On the doco page there is a very nice program on cuttlefish, complete with their amazing Alien hypno displays and brainy behaviour. Nine days left to watch this one. PZ may get a kick out of the accents. :-)
Cuttlefish:The Brainy Bunch.
http://www.abc.net.au/iview/test/#/docs
Posted by: strange gods before me | August 24, 2009 1:51 AM
http://sanderson1611.blogspot.com/
That bit about 1611 refers to the publication of King James' Authorized Version of the Bible. Of course. Of course he has to be a King-James-Only nut.
Posted by: Teliria | August 24, 2009 1:59 AM
Allen (#111)
Agree with the Supreme Court in 1976(?) or not, in actuality, he was not within his rights to refuse the search. Within a certain distance from the border (I THINK it is ~100 miles), the BP does not require probable cause to search. They were completely within the law to search his vehicle and the local law enforcement was within their right to arrest him for refusing to obey law enforcement.
As I said, whether one feels that is 'right' or not, it is within the law.
Based on the facts on hand, I do not agree with tazing him when he was only being obstructionist and not violent. They would have to make a really strong case that the tazing was necessary for safty before I would agree with that being ok.
Posted by: K.R. | August 24, 2009 2:03 AM
Must be past my bedtime.
That should be: http://www.stevenandersonfamily.blogspot.com
Yow.
Posted by: Citizen of the Cosmos | August 24, 2009 2:04 AM
Does religion make people crazy, or do people pick a religion as an excuse for them being crazy? suddenly they can say whatever they want, and if someone calls them on it, they can just brush it off by saying it's their religion.
Posted by: Citizen of the Cosmos | August 24, 2009 2:12 AM
Walton @5
It is frustrating that so many are trying so hard to make it worse, and I sometimes wonder if there is anything we can do about that, or if we should just give up. Sometimes I wonder if we should just hurry up and rush into another dark age just so people can see that it's not that good. Maybe then they would appreciate a better society. But I doubt it.
Posted by: Fil | August 24, 2009 2:22 AM
The psychologist in me says that one's view of our world can depend very largely on how much information one subscribes to on the internet and other media.
If, instead of reading threads like this everyday, I instead ignored the various media and just went for walks on the beach, or played with the dog, then to me at least, the world would seem a very pleasant place indeed.
Curiosity and a sense of community however drive me, even in retirement, to see wtf's going on.
Then one gets depressed by stupid wars and aggression, overpopulation, environmental degradation, together with religion's place in making this happen.
Basically, we are screwed folks. A hard rain's gunna fall. :-(
Sod it, maybe I'll go for a walk on the beach, "Here Fido! Walkies!!"
Posted by: XD | August 24, 2009 2:22 AM
Walton #5
We try and make it better for the many people who aren't shit. And we also do it because we can, and because it's better than making the world worse.
After saying that, Pastor Steve Anderson is doing the same thing. It's just that we have different opinions of what constitutes 'better', and who is and isn't 'shit'. That's why it's important to have well developed ethics, and it's also the reason why strict, dogmatic morality is bad; it stops one from really thinking about what is right and what is wrong.
Posted by: Tabby Lavalamp | August 24, 2009 2:26 AM
Mylegacy #20 wrote:
I was wrong. BOY - was I wrong - not about Obama - he is a polition who would be a welcome addition to the political discourse of ANY nation in the Western World. However, he is wasted in America.
I'm Canadian too and, while I disagree with much of what else you wrote, I'm going to ignore it.
I just wanted to point out how wrong you are about Obama. The guy went from elected office to elected office leaving behind little in the way of legislative legacy, and is now working overtime to appease the right wing of the US (which those of us who saw his commitment to bipartisanship leading to). He's done nothing to change any game, and has folded on many important promises (and is doing so again on healthcare reform).
Posted by: Tabby Lavalamp | August 24, 2009 2:31 AM
Damn, that's what I get for flipping between tabs. Put the close tag in the middle of the quote.
Posted by: strange gods before me | August 24, 2009 2:40 AM
I'm not sure I'd call that a "mix."
The whole New World Order craze is just Anti-Communism for Kids. For a while it was a Bircher thing, and it survives now as a way to obsess about the Soviets even in their apparent absence.
This was always huge with the right-wing Christians in America, because of communism's associations with atheism. Before the Birchers, it's trivial to trace it back to Father Coughlin in the 1930s. I imagine it surely predates him; maybe someone else here can help me out.
The narrative is always the same, and it's simple. International socialists and communists are trying to destroy whichever predominantly white Western Christian nation you live in. They will use subtle tactics to undermine your nation's sovereignty. Labor unions threaten you from the inside, and international associations of governments threaten from the outside. They have already infiltrated your government at the highest levels.
Stripped of the usual NWO alphabet soup and name-dropping, you'll recognize this narrative. It's the basic belief system of right-wing libertarians, including those right here on Pharyngula. (They've already infiltrated this thread! ;)
Anthropogenic global warming is the newest form of the constant communist threat. A conspiracy of foreign scientists have falsified data to persuade world leaders that there is an international problem that will require an international response. Their real goal is to weaken your nation's economy and destroy your sovereignty with treaties.
Oh, and of course these scientists are, not coincidentally, predominantly atheists.
Posted by: scooter
|
August 24, 2009 3:05 AM
This guy has some serious closet issues. Why does he hate American Ladybugs?
He's right about those homo seckshuls, though. I've gotten several recruiting pitches from them usually after many beers and some of their oral arguments can be very convincing.
This preacher is waaaaay too fixated on salty saline solutions and precious bodily fluids to be totally straight, and what is up with the Jeffrey Dommer crush?
-----------------------------------------
If you think he hates obama, you haven't heard THIS GUY
Posted by: Drosera
|
August 24, 2009 3:47 AM
Intelligent Designer @100,
Why would he? I see from your blog that you are just the 999,999th moron who is too fucking stupid to understand that evolution is not a purely random process.
As for Pastor Anderson, people like him are more evidence that the Bible is an evil book that can inspire evil people to become even more evil. Don't expect true Christians TM to protest him; they understand all too well that, if anything, Pastor Anderson is an even truer Christian than they are.
Posted by: Mrs Tilton
|
August 24, 2009 3:48 AM
Uncle Al @72,
he got the idea that Germans pee sitting down. According to him, real Christians piss standing up
For starters, roughly half the German population pisses sitting down and has always done so. But then I'd not be surprised to learn that Anderson doesn't think women can be real Christians.
That said, Anderson is not pulling this out of his arse altogether. There are Germans who encourage men to piss sitting down as well. Some people even mount a small sticker or card on the wall next to the toilet showing a red circle-&-slash round a stick-figure pissing while standing. The men-should-piss-sitting meme as well as the reaction against it are sufficiently widespread in Germany that Sitzpinkler has become a recognised slang term for "wimp".
Posted by: Harry | August 24, 2009 3:54 AM
Put him on trial for attempted murder - or will he admit that prayer doesn't work.
Posted by: Monado | August 24, 2009 3:55 AM
Speaking of deranged politics, someone on BookCrossing posted a link to their blog describing their experience with Canadian healthcare: Healthcare Canadian style.
The original discussion has some more experience notes and links:
Bookcrossing: healthcare thread.
Posted by: Fil | August 24, 2009 4:23 AM
From Mr Do You love Me PZ...
"A thoughtful person once asked the question: “Does entropy apply to information?” The answer is obviously “yes”, but why? The short answer is that it’s because the probability of information is extremely low."
Fuck. Off.
Intelligence is improbable on Earth is all I can say, most especially amongst dogmatists (and no, I don't mean dog lovers)...
Can't you dicks work out that universes are two a penny? There's fuck all there, substance wise (sub atomic particles are not tiny dots of "stuff") and universes must be infinite in number and repetition? If it can happen once dickwead it must happen an infinite number of times.
Does entropy apply to info? FFS, give us a break.
Posted by: XD | August 24, 2009 4:29 AM
Well, in his own mind, he did just commission a hit on the President. And in court, you are expected to take an oath on the bible. So, we have the strange situation of courts assuming god is real, and presumably that prayers have some validity, but that a prayer to the same god to kill the President is completely harmless.Talk about double standards!
Posted by: moonkitty | August 24, 2009 4:39 AM
@Anti.Theist317:
"He is obviously passionate, committed & very serious. I think the modern day cherry picker still irks me more."
The notion of the "modern day cherry picker" is ahistorical. Fundamentalism and the doctrine of biblical inerrancy are modern phenomena.
The Bible is not a book; it is a whole bunch of books. It is full of contradictions, in part because those books were written by different people with different theologies, myths, and oral histories, at different times. People may've been more gullible about some Scriptural claims back in times and cultures where scientific rationalism was rare or nonexistant, but that doesn't mean that they thought that stuff was "inerrant." Heck, had Matthew and Luke taken Mark for the literal truth, they wouldn't have bothered to write their gospels (and "correct" him.)
Even Augustine understood that the Bible could not be taken literally.
IMO it is the modern-day literalist/fundamentalist who deserves a heaping helping of smack-down. Passion and committment are not admirable traits in themselves; devoted to hateful and irrational idea, they just help turn idiocy into deadly idiocy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_inerrancy
Posted by: strangebrew | August 24, 2009 4:45 AM
It is not really the batshit stirrers that are a strain on the patience,it is the thought,that in many ways,is even more depressining and actually very much more terrifying,that he,and his rancid spouse/sister/sister in law...as appropriate... are actually quite obviously insane....full pedal to the metal stark staring raving paranoid schizophrenics to the nth degree.
But what is disturbing is the fact they have supporters and congregations that lap up and approve every little drop of oozing poisonous stench that issues from their very sick and warped view of reality.
These folk espousing such thoughts and promoting such rants are not eccentric nutty harmless soothsayers/woo spouters clinging to shirt tails of society,where they are politely ignored and quietly laughed at for their quaint little perverse ways,they are becoming a significant minority.
That is the very real reality,and they are crawling out into the daylight like myopic cockroaches through desparation and fear.
It seems strange to a foreigner that although the American 1st Amendment is supposed to garantee free speech etc etc...
Which beggers the question...'Where is the free speech for Atheist inspired bus signs'? for example...because is is seemingly only true free speech if you tag a imagined uberpappy and state terrorist brat as a prime mover to whatever vileness you intend.
And although it is a tennant of government that the American folk should feel justly proud of... it is seemingly rapidly becomingh a format to broadcast and spread the word of hatred as wide as possible...these folk are not deluded enough to fail to realise what the power of a computer and the internet can provide...so hatred...intolerance...predudice...all manner of personal likes and dislikes can be freely desseminated with no comeback...because the bible says so!
As for the Kook in chief being discussed and his related and sycophantic kooks in tow...
Christians should be...but of course never will be...fully and comprehensibly ashamed of themselves for not exercising a little more backbone and a modicum of taste and fully condemning this outright abomination of their delusion...but I expect no better from them...being brain dead sycophantic jeebus lusters...they have little morality...so it is really a 'right thing to do' to far!
I guess the only reaction is laugh at the crap vomitors openly and constantly...but do not let a media or law enforcement officer hear you laugh at these scum because that is a violation of the the first amendment...apparently!
Posted by: Intelligent Desighner, OP | August 24, 2009 4:45 AM
Hi Drosera @ 138,
I understand that you think natural selection is sufficient to overcome entropy. And to a limited extent it is. Stay tuned for a followup blog entry that illustrates via simulation the limitations of natural selection.
But let's suppose for a moment that I am stupid -- or that you disagree with my way of thinking. Does that mean its ok for you to hate me?
Posted by: Ichthyic | August 24, 2009 4:59 AM
And to a limited extent it is.
I see after a year of flailing, you've finally at least started to come around.
someday, you'll see that entropy has fuck all to do with why selection works, and maybe, just maybe, you'll then start to explore *gasp* the other mechanisms involved in evolution.
But let's suppose for a moment that I am stupid
For what it's worth, I don't think you're stupid, Stimpy, just deluded and maybe a little nuts.
Posted by: tohellwithyourturtle | August 24, 2009 5:13 AM
What are the parameters of the sim.? Are they based on real life or are they designed to show what you want (a.k.a. the sims)? Considering the endless bullshit that I seem to come across lately criticizing Dawkins' program, tell me how yours is to be different. What is going to be added (yes, it was primitive), what is going to be removed?
Posted by: scooter
|
August 24, 2009 5:16 AM
Absolutely not fair to hate you, however this thread is about killing homos, and you sir are a proven homosexual, I know where you live, and I've spoken with your wife.
According to Anderson you must DIE!!!
The fact that you are up at this late hour fwapping to 4chan and Pharyngula is evidence enough that you must be exterminated.
Your irrelevant opinions on scincey stuff does not interest me, it's the boy fucking faggotry that people like you practice that disturbs America
Thank you for Posting here.
I hacked this site and I will be informing your neighbors that you are a dangerous pedophlie
Posted by: Drosera
|
August 24, 2009 5:17 AM
ID-er,
I don't hate you, and it would not be okay if I did. Where did you get that idea? Why should I? Guys like you just irritate me, because it annoys me when science is attacked with false arguments to promote religion.
For your next blog entry, may I suggest that you first give a mathematically sound definition of information? And then demonstrate that the evolutionary process can not create information? I bet you can't.
Posted by: scooter
|
August 24, 2009 5:21 AM
Dosera, ease up, get a hold of yourself.
This guy is one of 'them'.
He's not like us
Posted by: Drosera
|
August 24, 2009 5:26 AM
scooter,
ID-er may be a deluded moron, but so far I don't think he deserves the same treatment as that piece of shit Pastor Anderson.
Posted by: Ray Moscow | August 24, 2009 5:28 AM
These "kill the queers" Christians are being entirely biblical. They are not misintepreting anything.
This is one of many reasons why the Bible is an evil book, or rather the cause of much harm and evil, especially if taken literally.
Posted by: tohellwithyourturtle | August 24, 2009 5:30 AM
The requested blog post from ID would be pointless. One can I know that that was an elementary response, but this is clearly out of mine, as well as ID guy's, range of expertise, but this is an honest question. Does it fit? I think it does. Does it mean that magical intervention is necessary? No, it rules it out.
Posted by: tohellwithyourturtle | August 24, 2009 5:32 AM
Sorry for the open italics. Fuckin' typos.
Posted by: tohellwithyourturtle | August 24, 2009 5:36 AM
Hmm, entire sections were missing there due to my screw up. One can define information as adaptation to ones' environment. If said individual's survival traits are passed on to their offspring, doesn't this count as added information?
To paraphrase the lost sections.
Posted by: scooter
|
August 24, 2009 5:51 AM
If you were a fly on the wall when I spoke to his wife, you might think differently.
I'm not saying all fags must die like IDer closet case but if the kneepads fit choke on it
Posted by: Drosera
|
August 24, 2009 5:56 AM
tohellwithyourturtle,
That isn't a mathematical definition of information that would enable you to measure the information content of a given string of DNA. And that's what I want ID-er to provide.
Posted by: DingoJack | August 24, 2009 6:01 AM
Intelligent Desighner -
Hating, ridiculing and taunting someone like you is both impolite and cruel.
One should never make fun of those who are worse off than yourself. Those afflicted by mental illness, feeble mindedness or brain injuries.
Or that's what my dear old mother said.
But did she know? [nelson]HA HA![/nelson] :) - DJ
Posted by: AJS | August 24, 2009 6:16 AM
I'm sorry, but how in the name of all that's sane and wholesome is it even halfway legal for someone to spout that kind of shit in public and get away with it?
Calling for gay people to be killed is soliciting a crime, and praying for the death of the President is treason.
Posted by: tohellwithyourturtle | August 24, 2009 6:25 AM
My bad, Drosera, but can't what I mentioned be stated mathematically? I'm sorry, I'm only mediocre at maths, excepting those that apply to my livelihood.
Posted by: scooter
|
August 24, 2009 6:26 AM
You're not from around here are you?
Posted by: tohellwithyourturtle | August 24, 2009 6:39 AM
BTW, Drosera, I love the botanical name. Nice.
Posted by: John Scanlon | August 24, 2009 7:00 AM
#99,
Like this? -"EEK!!! - yup, that circuit's live..."
Posted by: Matt Heath | August 24, 2009 7:03 AM
For all I know this might be a valid reading of the qu'ran and it's surely preferable to out and out misogyny BUT it's still totally sexist. Nobody who says "women should be treated like queens" is thinking of Elizabeth I, they mean a queen perch meekly on the kings arm. It's the same bullshit as the "ladies against feminism" crowd. Women should have doors opened for them, they should be given gifts, but their real purpose is to churn out heirs, and when it comes to making decisions affected their lives they should STFU.Posted by: Rorschach | August 24, 2009 7:07 AM
hey scooter,what have u been up to mate?
I'm not sure,but I would have thought calling for the culling of your president or the "sodomites" and "fags", or calling Barney Frank a homosexual pedophile, would be enough to constitute hate speech and have him arrested.
He would be, in a first world country.
Religion should not be an excuse for hate speech and murder fantasies,anywhere.
Im not sure this guy is insane, he might just be serious.And a potential killer.
Posted by: Ray Moscow | August 24, 2009 7:20 AM
In the US, you can say just about anything and get away with it, as long as you cloak it in religion.
Posted by: Annie Moris | August 24, 2009 7:28 AM
My husband wrote a 'nice' short story.
It's very versatile, as you only have to change the name from Fred Phelps to Steve Anderson and it still makes sense.
http://petros-speaks.blogspot.com/
Oh, HOW I wish it was true!
Posted by: strangebrew | August 24, 2009 7:42 AM
"Brace yourselves: Glenn Moon is plainly mentally ill, but what are we to make of Pastor Steve Anderson?"
I think it goes a lot deeper then just judging this one lunatic...
What about the congregation he supposedly leads...where are their morality buttons?
Kooks and trash like this do not operate in a vacuum...but rely on a support network and the fall back claim of representing their flock!
His flock obviously support this maniac...maybe approve..maybe even suggest the issues and their take on those issues...
Is he representing his flocks attitude?...or promoting his own attitude?...or a combination of both...?
If the first choice then that is a whole community there guilty as sin of hate crime...presumably because it is a majority view!
If the second point is the way it boogies then what on earth is the community doing to repress his more sadistic side...they are responsible ...no one else...no one else gives him the green light and he cannot spout hatred without their tacit approval...so if it is his own little droppings of pastorial wisdom...are his congregation afraid of him then?
Of course the third choice of insanity seems to be more likely...in which case there is something incredibly evil twisted and rotten at the heart of contempory religion in the US...and the educational failure is more then apparent.
The media and political muscle that support and encourage these paragons of demented thinking is out of all proportion to the christian ethic...what there is of it!
It adds nothing to humanity...in fact it removes more then augments...cannot understand why this behaviour should be suffered in the 21st century.. let alone allowed!
But then again maybe we are aware of that glitch in western society to start with...and choose to ignore it...thus the toxicity is given full range and scope.
It will end in tears...crazy batshit religions always ends in tears...tis a given.
And the tears will be shed by the innocent and never by the perpetrators...that is also a given.
Posted by: SimonC | August 24, 2009 7:43 AM
Walton said: “Just more evidence that the world is fundamentally a shit place. I sometimes wonder why any of us even bother trying to make it better.”
You puzzle the hell out of me, Walton. You seem like a bright lad. I’ve seen you change your opinion once the evidence was presented clearly to you – the sign of a decent intellect… And then you post the above statement – let me re-state what you wrote so that it is, hopefully, clearer.
1. The evidence shows that the world can be a shitty place.
2. Some people spend their time trying to fix this.
3. The evidence shows that they haven’t fixed everything in my short life.
4. Ergo: what they are doing seems pointless to ME.
Do you see where you’re going wrong? Points 3 and 4 show a definite slant to WALTON’S way of thinking. Reality, however, isn’t constrained to the rules of ‘Walton’s Magical Libertari-Land’. Things do not need to be ‘fixed’ now to be improved, they merely need to be improved. A quick look around tells me that infant mortality worldwide is reducing, well-being of citizens is on the up, more young people like you have the opportunity to educate themselves – you get the point?
One last question, and I don’t know if you’ve already answered this, have you been tested or diagnosed for clinical depression? It’s a well-meant question. It’s just that your leap to worst-possible-outcome results reminds me of a few friends that I’ve lost to depression. And they were also impossible idealists like yourself, always comparing the world to a glowing wish for it that they all held inside themselves. I hope you aren’t a depressive, but if you are then I also hope you seek help.
Posted by: strange gods before me | August 24, 2009 8:00 AM
Well said, moonkitty.
Posted by: Jeff Eyges
|
August 24, 2009 8:01 AM
@#merkin #57:
If you think he is nuts, you ought to read his wife's blog
I remember PZ calling our attention to her some months ago. I'm not surprised this is her husband. Well, I suppose I'm a little surprised he allows her to speak in public.
The most depressing aspect is the number of positive comments she receives.
@Fil #92:
Model mum spared cane for beer drinking
Well, some good news for a change. Maybe international outrage over Islamic treatment of women can occasionally stop the madness.
Fil, it isn't such good news. She believed she deserved it, that she had sinned against Allah, her husband and her parents, and wanted it carried out in public to serve as a deterrent to other women.
http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/world-news/former-malaysian-model-wants-to-be-whipped-in-public_100235658.html
http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/south-asia/malaysian-model-mum-spared-cane-for-beer-drinking_100236988.html
Posted by: Jeff Eyges
|
August 24, 2009 8:04 AM
@amphiox #35:
Whoa. Not all Americans are like that. In fact, it's still only a minority - a loud, scary, disturbingly influential minority, but a minority nevertheless. A minority which the centrist majority generally still hammers down when they get too loud and scary (which I think was a major contributor to Obama's victory).
I agree with mylegacy. Steve Anderson is merely an extreme example of the sickness that's plagued America since its inception, and it's finally caught up with us. This country is finished. It's too badly broken, and cannot be repaired. The economic quagmire in which we find ourselves is only one aspect, a surface manifestation. We aren't coming back from this - and, due to the interconnected nature of the global economy, as we go down, we'll be taking everyone else with us.
Although, as with everything else, it's a complex phenomenon, the most direct cause has been the behavior of the criminals, lunatics and imbeciles the fundies have spent the past thirty years voting into office. Even now, as we continue to sink, they don't recognize their culpability; they continue to shriek, like parrots, "The liberals! The gaaayyys!"
There might be a chance if we initiated a policy of mandatory testing for intelligence and sanity as a prerequisite for voting - but, of course, it'll never happen. We can't be saved - nor do we deserve to be.
This may be the end of our species. It is certainly the end of our global civilization - and it's the Christians who've caused it. They ended up being far more dangerous than the Islamic fundies have ever been.
Posted by: Drosera
|
August 24, 2009 8:07 AM
tohellwithyourturtle,
Mathematically speaking, information is a rather tricky concept. In the sense of 'meaningful content' it appears to be (almost) impossible to quantify precisely, because it depends on a context (the 'environment' in your example). Out of context, a meaningful string of characters may be complete nonsense (a perfectly adapted deep-sea fish will not survive for long in a desert). For that reason information is usually equated in mathematical models with complexity, which does not require a context. Even complexity is very hard to quantify, but at least in theory it can be done (google 'Kolmogorov Chaitin complexity' for more info).
But maybe ID-er has some better ideas?
Thanks. I like carnivorous plants. The Revenge of the Vegetable Kingdom. :)
Posted by: strange gods before me | August 24, 2009 8:09 AM
It can be, depending on how specific the requests and their likelihood of leading to imminent violence.
It certainly is not.
Posted by: MikeTheInfidel | August 24, 2009 8:09 AM
Praying for illegal things isn't illegal; I think this is an admission by our government that God can't be trusted for *anything*. Also, in America, the far-right churches fight too hard to protect their free speech to let something so silly as hate speech to be punished.Posted by: Jessie Colt | August 24, 2009 8:13 AM
"On November 12, 2005, Brother Anderson sought counsel from his pastor, Stephen Nichols, about starting a church in Phoenix, AZ. They discussed and prayed about it and decided that Brother Anderson would move to Phoenix immediately to start the church. The next day, on November 13, 2005, Pastor Nichols called him up on the platform of Regency Baptist Church in the Sunday morning service and had the church pray for Brother Anderson as he would be going out to start this new church."
In other words, the guy has been a flake since day one and the church in California couldn't wait to get rid of him and sending him into the desert was the best they could think of.
Posted by: Heya | August 24, 2009 8:14 AM
Hey there Jeffy? Number one-seven-three? Could we have a wee bit less pessimism with the morning coffee?
Thanks.
Smile, friend. No one's pissed in your Cheerios yet.
Posted by: Thorne | August 24, 2009 8:20 AM
@ #166 Rorschach: "Im not sure this guy is insane, he might just be serious.And a potential killer."
Nah, nuts like this aren't killers. They incite others to kill, then denounce them as "not TRUE Christians!"
Some comments made above got me to wondering. This guy obviously believes that prayer works, and that God will answer his prayers. Indeed, since he claims that God speaks to him, it would be reasonable to assume that he believes God will grant his prayers eventually. So, could this be construed as a conspiracy to commit murder? Any lawyers out there who could comment on this?
Posted by: Taylor | August 24, 2009 8:21 AM
We should all start making decisions about what parts of the "good" book we take literally. I know this might not be the most enlightened mentality, but its certainly one that this asshole would understand. If anyone ever sees Pastor Steve Anderson at a Red Lobster, maybe we should pull him into the street and hit him with rocks until he dies. After all, the same god that detested homosexuality so much is the same god that detested shellfish.
Posted by: strange gods before me | August 24, 2009 8:24 AM
Also, in America, the ACLU fights hard to protect everyone's free speech, and "hate speech" is a foreign concept to our Constitution.
I'd like to keep it that way.
The same First Amendment that lets them say I'm subhuman is what lets me say that they're evil fucks who hate America, and should be publicly shamed and shunned, and that their existence is the fault of the Christian faith.
Posted by: Drosera
|
August 24, 2009 8:28 AM
Taylor @180,
Don't you know that Jesus died for us so that we can eat shellfish after all?
Posted by: Taylor | August 24, 2009 9:16 AM
Drosera, that is true, how could I have forgotten? I guess I'll put down this rock...until I can find another scripture verse that will allow me to pick it up again and then I'll decide that that verse cancels out the other ones.
Posted by: MAJeff, OM | August 24, 2009 9:20 AM
Don't you know that Jesus died for us so that we can eat shellfish after all?
Nail him up again, and pass the paella.
Posted by: XD | August 24, 2009 9:36 AM
SimonC
And it's a very good question. My spiral into the depths of depression coincided with the development of serious misanthropy. The internet makes it very easy to wallow in all that is bad in the world, and there is a lot that is bad! A few months of that and I was suicidal.
However, the more one focuses on the bad, the less one sees the good, which is also plentiful (more plentiful than one might expect). Walton, it's very important that you make time to enjoy activities with friends. If you don't feel you have friends to do things with, join groups where you can meet like minded people. If you find that too difficult, go see a counsellor. You're at Uni, right? All UK Universities have counsellors. Book an appointment and have a chat with him/her (it's free). There is nothing to lose, and if you are developing a depressive illness, it's much better to tackle it sooner rather than later (like any illness, really).
Posted by: Sam C | August 24, 2009 9:51 AM
Jeff Eyges #173:
So those who showed signs of intelligence or sanity would be disenfranchised? Yes, the Christian Right would go along with that, coz intelijunz iz just anutha lib'rul nazi commie plot agin the Bibble's teechings of hate and destructions and those sane bastards are just crazy and trying to destroy our b'loved Amuricky.
Armageddonoutofhere...
Posted by: astrosmash | August 24, 2009 9:51 AM
UNBE "FUCKIN'" lEIVABLE
Posted by: Gregory Greenwood | August 24, 2009 10:12 AM
Ok, it official. Steve Anderson is the most vile, hate filled bigoted godbot abomination I have ever had the misfortune of realising pollutes the world with his repugnant presence. He actually wants to reintroduce the unconscionable barbarity of murdering people because of their sexuality? While attempting to back up his tirade with the old calumny that homosexuals somehow 'recruit' 'normal' people? Of course he riffs on the idea of 'recruiting' children. He equates homosexuality to pedophilia. He hysterically blathers about rape as a recruitment tool. This reminds of a law (I think it was called Section 28) that was almost passed in the UK a few years ago that actually tried to establish that comprehensive sex education 'promoted' homosexuality in schools and so tried to interfere with the teaching of sex ed to 'protect' children from recruitment by closet homosexual teachers. The law ultimately fell, but it is still a stain on British Jurisprudence.
Steve then gets started on claiming that Barak Obama is a nazi and elucidating his fantasies of murdering the President and condeming his soul to eternal hell fire. Either death by salt or by employing Steve's personal hitman, the sky fairy himself!
After being exposed to this cretin's bile I feel physically dirty. Anderson and his ilk make me sick. They are the Tao of all that is wrong with religion. And there is a lot wrong with religion.
Posted by: raven | August 24, 2009 10:25 AM
Anderson is just practicing witchcraft. This is begging or soliciting a supernatural entity to do your bidding.
Fundie xians do this a lot. They even have a name for it, Imprecatory Prayer.
Acording to his magic book, witches are to be killed. Dumb Anderson just condemmed his hateful ass to death. The legality is questionable. As long as he is asking an invisible spook to do it, it seems no one gets arrested. The invisible spook never actually seems to do anything except send tornados and hurricanes to fundieland. God hates fundie xians.
Posted by: Jeff Eyges
|
August 24, 2009 11:08 AM
Hey there Jeffy? Number one-seven-three? Could we have a wee bit less pessimism with the morning coffee?
Hey, you only had to read about it at 8:14. I've been up thinking about this stuff for hours.
Smile, friend. No one's pissed in your Cheerios yet.
Unsubstantiated assertion!
Posted by: Jeff Eyges
|
August 24, 2009 11:16 AM
@raven:
Anderson is just practicing witchcraft. This is begging or soliciting a supernatural entity to do your bidding.
This always gets me. Why does God need them to tell him what to do? You never get a straight answer out of them about this.
Years ago, on the 700 club, there was a missionary couple on (typical day). The husband was talking about his conversion experience, and the wife chimed in with how they'd researched his family history, and had discovered Baptist missionaries out on the Plains, annoying the poor Native Americans, who didn't already have enough problems. They figured these early godbotherers must have "prayed for their future generations"? So - God just granted their request? Like Santa Claus? What if your Christian antecedents didn't think to do the same? You're just shit out of luck, and you go to hell? "Sorry, your great grandfather filed form 5595A, instead of 5595B..."
And, he contradicts himself. Earlier on, he said that God appointed Obama to destroy this nation as punishment for its sins - but he's going to pray for Obama's death? So, he's rebelling against God? Don't you, like, I don't know - go to hell for that?
Posted by: Widgetas | August 24, 2009 11:27 AM
Oddly enough, I have more respect for him than for Christians who gloss over the unsavoury bits of the bible.
Having said that, I think he's an arse.
Btw - I'm an atheist... and I've never salted a snail or a slug. Hmm...
Posted by: Dahan | August 24, 2009 12:42 PM
What a fucking loon.
It's hard to put into words how proud I am to be an atheist after listening to the hate-filled bilious spittle issuing from that man's mouth.
Posted by: BlueIndependent | August 24, 2009 1:11 PM
Sigh. These people have a mental condition. Something is very wrong in the minds of people who claim to be peaceful but wish nothing but the harshest judgements and violence on others from places it takes nobody with any courage to utter such things from.
These people need to be confronted on what they say, because much more of this is certain to cause violence, and to create some really deep divisions in this country. After listening to a series of lectures last week on how this country became so divided prior to the Civil War, so much of the politics back then seems to be coming to the forefront now. Back then half the country saw reality one way, and the other half another way. And some small events that took place that, outside of that sort of political environment would have meant very little, meant a lot to either side and pushed both over the edge to initiate this country's first major internal conflict.
It feels as if we're approaching a similar place now, though things are less clear because the political center, which is poorly represented, creates a much different dynamic. But there are a lot of Americans that accept reality, and a minority of others that care more about perceptions than truths. It's not so much that perceptions have been allowed to run unabated as it is about those believing the perceptions, cast as those perceptions have been before truth has tied its shoes, have a stated lack of and vehement reticence to showing any interest in correcting their views to the facts. In short, a political minority of people who don't care and refuse to participate while actively tainting the waters are causing divisions that shouldn't exist over an issue that affects everybody.
It's something to witness, because you can see peoples' minds just breaking down under the stress of all the lies, beliefs, mischaracterizations, and obfuscations they've been fed and told to believe. And because the lies have become so heavy and false, the starkness that reality presents when it comes to these peoples' doors is so unfathomably massive and different that they then further misperceive the truth as a colossal fantasy being perpetrated by ne'er-do-wells they don't know, can't see, and cannot define.
Last August I couldn't tell what was going to happen to this country once the election happened. It's morbidly amazing that 12 months later, after the correct candidate won, I feel as if absolutely everything is on the line yet again, and for only one of that candidate's stated policy goals, and even more ironically, one that would eventually improve the lives of many of the millions who think he's a Muslim Manchurian candidate from another country working for international terrorists funded by the Illuminati.
Posted by: Taylor | August 24, 2009 1:35 PM
I'm inclined to wonder if it would do any good (or at least make us all feel better) if we repeated this thread on Steve Anderson's blog.
http://sanderson1611.blogspot.com/
I'm sure there are plenty of us chomping at the bit to articulate to this monster why we don't much care for him.
Posted by: raven | August 24, 2009 1:46 PM
It might not be that bad. Xianity is losing 1-2 million adherents per year. 7 out of 10 kids stop going to church at age 18.
30% of all evangelicals voted for Obama. Only about 25% of the population thought Bush was greater than a moron or identify with the Theothuglican party.
What you might be seeing is the last gasp of the christofascists.
Posted by: Gav | August 24, 2009 2:00 PM
Rev BDC @78 ... and bassoons.
Mrs Tilton @139 ... not just Germans. You often see this little sign in the UK, in the loos of long distance coaches. It's there for obvious reasons - as you can imagine (but might prefer not to) it's difficult to maintain a steady aim when the bus is lurching about.
Posted by: Jim Flannery | August 24, 2009 2:23 PM
Well, if you look at his website, one of them was the guy with the AR-15 outside Obama's Phoenix appearance the next day.
Posted by: RamblinDude
|
August 24, 2009 2:32 PM
A lot of Christians have this weird schizo thing with the bible. They can’t really make their minds up as if they’re Old-Testament Christians or New. It all depends on what mood they’re in and who delivered the last sermon they heard. That’s why, for all their talk about peace and love of Jesus, their eyes tend to get hard and merciless when there’s talk about an old-testament stoning. It’s one of the lessons you learn early on as a Christian. You don’t feel sorry for the people who drowned in Noah’s flood; you don’t cry for the entire cities full of people who were slaughtered to the last woman and child at the hands of Joshua and the other biblical murderers; you don’t waste your time worrying about the sinners who have died and will spend eternity suffering in hell. It’s not really callousness; it’s just being saved.
Posted by: Jeff Eyges
|
August 24, 2009 2:43 PM
It might not be that bad. Xianity is losing 1-2 million adherents per year. 7 out of 10 kids stop going to church at age 18.
Yes, but that's only in the US. In less developed countries, it's growing by leaps and bounds, and they're now sending missionaries back here, because we're no longer "Christian" enough.
Posted by: Timothy (TRiG) | August 24, 2009 3:10 PM
I met this lunatic on Good as You a few days ago. I'm highly amused to learn he's the same guy who did the pissing Germans rant. Complete fruitcake.
But a fruitcake with an audience. That's scary.
I'd like to see him selling pencils from a cup.
TRiG.
Posted by: Intelligent Designer, OP | August 24, 2009 3:34 PM
Drosera,
I can't provide you with a mathematical definition of information. What I can do is examine some forms of information and talk about its mathematical probability.
Generally speaking you can say that information is a pattern that has meaning. A pattern can take a variety of forms such as spoken or written words, blue prints, computer instructions, financial data or a mathematical formula.
Information theory deals with information as a message that gets transmitted from a sender to a receiver. It is generally during the storage and transmission of information that entropy applies. As entropy increases, the information becomes distorted and looses meaning. Eventually entropy increases to the point where there is no meaning, just nonsense.
As applied to DNA, the message contains instructions for constructing a living organism. An example of transmission is cell division, with the parent cell being the sender and the child cells being the receivers.
Posted by: Priya Lynn | August 24, 2009 3:47 PM
"Intelligent" Designer, in DNA transmission those messages that are degraded are weeded out by natural selection, therefore the information continues to be solid.
Posted by: Emily | August 24, 2009 3:47 PM
The upside of our slightly-less-free speech, here in the UK, is that bastard could be arrested for hate speech.
And given an ASBO ;-)
(Although, if he actually came over here, we'd probably just post him back to you).
Posted by: raven | August 24, 2009 3:51 PM
Yo Intelligent Designer #202. For someone interested in evolution simulations, Tom Schneider has a popular one, open source with a tutorial. He quantitates Shannon information. It increases during evolution. Duh.
Entropy isn't too relevant to heredity. We decrease local entropy by increasing entropy somewhere else in an open system. Human development, human existence, and evolution are decreases in entropy driven by the same source. The sun. Don't fall for the second law of thermodynamics fallacy.
There are any number of computer evolution simulation programs around.
One such is called EV. Using RM + NS, it shows that Shannon information can increase quite rapidly. Anyone can download it from the net.
Posted by: Intelligent Designer, OP | August 24, 2009 4:21 PM
Generally speaking you can say that information is a pattern that has meaning. A pattern can take a variety of forms such as spoken or written words, blue prints, computer instructions, financial data or a mathematical formula.
Information theory deals with information as a message that gets transmitted from a sender to a receiver. It is generally during the storage and transmission of information that entropy applies. As entropy increases, the information becomes distorted and looses meaning. Eventually entropy increases to the point where there is no meaning, just nonsense.
As applied to DNA, the message contains instructions for constructing a living organism. An example of transmission is cell division, with the parent cell being the sender and the child cells being the receivers.
Posted by: truthspeaker | August 24, 2009 4:50 PM
Yes, Intelligent Designer, we know. You're not telling us anything we don't know.
Posted by: Drosera | August 24, 2009 4:58 PM
Intelligent Designer @202,
I seems that you don't realize that in information theory the notion of meaning goes right out the window. Information is reduced to quantifiable things such as number of bits or complexity. As Raven @205 has pointed out, it can be proved that an evolutionary process can lead to an increase in information in this sense. So, if you think that you can prove that this is impossible, and especially if you think that you can quantify meaning, I would urge you to write an article in the peer reviewed literature. You should also contact Dr. William Dembski about it; he is more than a little interested in this line of work, and according to his admirers he is nothing less than the Newton of Information Science. I don't think it is useful to continue this discussion here; you have your own blog, after all.
Posted by: agenoria
|
August 24, 2009 5:54 PM
@Walton #5
I sometimes wonder why we bother too. However, I've just finished reading "Does God Hate Women?" by Ophelia Benson and Jeremy Stangroom. It's far from easy reading, but reinforces Douglas Adams' view that religion must not be ring-fenced, be beyond criticism. And there has been progress over the centuries. PZ can write a blog without risking being stretched on a rack.
Posted by: Jeff Eyges
|
August 24, 2009 6:13 PM
I'd like to see him selling pencils from a cup.
Timothy, I'm not sure he should be allowed to handle sharp objects.
Posted by: Krystalline Apostate | August 24, 2009 7:32 PM
ID @ 202:
You realize this shoots down the concept of an afterlife, don't you?
Posted by: Keith Douglas | August 24, 2009 9:26 PM
Valdyr: You'll probably get them saying something like "Christ is stamped or your heart, all you gotta do is pray and all will be clear" or some other nonsense. Amazing what "sin blockage" can do, eh?
raven: The schizophrenic hypothesis has been suggested for Paul and Mohammed, too ... given that, maybe so.
Crudely Wrott: I don't know about your case, but someone I care for very much is also a bit off in some of her thinking sometimes (though nothing so nasty as any of this stuff) and I think sometimes that the affection is the *reason* I keep confronting the issue. With someone else it would be easy to walk away, but ... how do we deal here? I wish I knew.
amk: Indeed. A fascinating (and terrifying, and depressing) work.
Posted by: Cowcakes | August 25, 2009 1:05 AM
How is this bloke allowed to walk around freely, let alone spread his venomous hatred. Listening to him he certainly sounds as if he meets every criteria to be defined as a psychopath. The inmates that are in the asylum have nothing on him.
It would be bad enough with him just ranting but what's really scary is that there are people who follow him.
Posted by: K.R. | August 25, 2009 4:47 AM
Hot damn! He made it onto MSNBC. Methinks things are about to get a wee bit uncomfortable for the Anderson family.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fq9G44tomKY
Posted by: tohellwithyourturtle | August 26, 2009 1:59 AM
Thank you again to Drosera. I asked a question that may seem stupid that is in reality only naive. I appreciate the answer. You've clarified an issue that, frankly, boggled me to an extent: how can one deny evolution results in adaptations that are beneficial...at least in the short term.
The answer, of course, is that they lack anything of substance with which to rebut, but still continue to defend the group that they were indoctrinated into during a vulnerable time; be it youth, imprisonment, whatever. The evidence does not matter to them as it must be skewed in some way to fit the "belief structure" of science, regardless of the fact that that is exactly what they do (skew and distort evidence).
I know, everybody here already knows that, but I arrived at the same conclusion through different means...I didn't assume stupidity because most that believe that way aren't stupid (otherwise why is this ridiculous battle still being waged). They think, due to being memetically programmed, that you are attacking them and their friends PERSONALLY, not that you are attacking the weakness of their beliefs. The solution: I don't know. It's been us vs. them for as long as we have existed on this little insignificant rock.
Posted by: Drosera | August 26, 2009 3:46 AM
tohellwithyourturtle,
Glad to have been of some help.
You are right; most believers are not necessarily stupid. They just refuse to apply their intellect to their belief, or if they do they use it to make up excuses for their belief. As long as they don't switch that mental button we can argue forever with them.
Christians always retort that atheism is a belief too. While this is not accurate, I grant them one thing. Many of us do have the missionary zeal to convert. We want to convert the believers to reality. Don’t we?
Posted by: John Morales | August 26, 2009 3:56 AM
Drosera,
I guess so, in general, but this is not really applicable to accommodationists and apatheists — they're more into "live and let live".
Posted by: Rorschach | August 26, 2009 4:10 AM
I for one dont have any "missionary zeal to convert".
I might be interested in, and trying to help in, less children being brainwashed into religious woo in this world, and reduce the political influence of religious crackpots like our own PM here by trying to help improve education,but I dont go around arguing with braindead zombies in the hope of deconverting them.
Posted by: Feynmaniac | August 26, 2009 4:50 AM
Depends what you mean by "convert the believers to reality". I can only speak for myself, but if you mean I want to convert believers to atheism, then no. I don't suffer the urge to have everyone share my views on religion. If by "convert...to reality" you mean have them actually think about their beliefs rather than blindly accept them then yes, I have a missionary zeal. Too often I see theists who have not critically examined their arguments or the evidence that contradicts their position, be it on the existence of God or on evolution. They often just repeat the things they were taught without much thought (if I only had a nickle for every time I've heard Pascal's wager and the third-law-of-thermodynamics-contradicts-evolution argument). I'd rather have the religious think critically and actually understand what they are arguing against than to have them blindly converted to atheism.
Posted by: Jeff Eyges
|
August 26, 2009 5:51 AM
I have no interest in attempting to convince fundies of anything. I'm largely convinced that there is a neurological foundation to fundamentalism; most of them are simply incapable of maintaining an objective world view. At this point, I merely want to minimize their influence upon society as much as possible. I'd like to breed that maladaptive trait out of the genome as well, but that sure as hell isn't going to happen.
Posted by: Drosera | August 26, 2009 5:10 PM
Feynmaniac, I say amen to that.
People should learn first of all that it is okay to ask questions. Instead, believers learn, through the 'revelations' of their prophets, that it is not okay to ask for evidence. Their god will be angry if you question the words of the prophets. It’s a cheap trick, but very effective. Faith is the biggest obstacle to reason.
As missionaries, we atheists are moreover at a distinct disadvantage. We want to convert by convincing people of our views; we don’t want to use force, lies, fear, or empty promises, like religion has done throughout history. We can neither promise our converts eternal life, nor can we threaten them with punishment in hell if they don’t follow our example. We can’t instil the awe for a Big Brother in the sky who can enter their souls and who keeps account of their sins. There are neither sins nor souls in our world. All we have to offer are honesty and integrity. For many people that is not enough, evidently.
I keep hoping that the example of science will eventually cause religion to wither away, like an obnoxious weed that is cut off of it’s water supply. But we still have a long way to go.
Apologies if this sounds like a sermon. Now back to fundie bashing.
Posted by: Drosera | August 27, 2009 4:57 AM
Even Pastor Tom is now distancing himself from Steve Anderson. "Real Christians aren't like this." It's a textbook example of the No True Scotsman fallacy.
But he is not doing it right:
In other words, if the New Testament had contained the command to kill homosexuals, he would have followed it.
Savor the delicious irony in his conclusion:
'Clear headed Christians'? Yes, they exist. But Pastor Tom is not one of them.
PS: An earlier version of this post was held up for moderation; I have removed the links and reposted it. Apologies if it turns up again later.
Posted by: John Morales | August 27, 2009 5:23 AM
Drosera, PZ wrote earlier today that, due to a huge surge of spam, the moderation queue is too large for him to wade through to sort out the wheat from the chaff.
PS Great comment @221!
Posted by: Drosera | August 27, 2009 5:55 AM
Thanks, John. Both for the info and the compliment.
Posted by: aratina cage
|
August 27, 2009 11:20 AM
Yes, I agree with John Morales, those are great comments by Drosera and Feynmaniac about converting theists. I just want to reiterate based on Drosera's Hard Truth report that Tom Estes is one sick puppy, maybe one step above Fred Phelps but no higher than Jerry Falwell. And also, I really hate Christian love.
Posted by: Jeff Eyges
|
August 28, 2009 2:33 PM
We should love them, just like Jesus would have.
Yes, we should love them, until they go to hell. Then we can watch their eternal torment and just laugh and laugh...
But are there also insane atheists? Yes.
In his earlier posts, he said this constantly. Apparently, we're all insane. It's the only way he can deal with the threat we pose to his belief system.
Posted by: Drosera | August 28, 2009 4:27 PM
Preacher Tom Estes has a new rant about homosexuals on his blog.
I am not going to cite his bible-inspired madness any more; it's too depressing on every level.
Go to hardtruth_dot_squarespace_dot_com if you have a really strong stomach.
PS URL modified to avoid moderation black hole.