Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)



I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

Every argument for God and every attribute ascribed to Him rests on a false metaphysical premise. None can survive for amoment on a correct metaphysics…. Existence exists, and only existence exists. Existence is a primary; it is uncreated, indestructible, eternal. So if you are to postulate something beyond existence—some supernatural realm—you must do it openly denying reason, dispensing with definitions, proofs, arguments, and saying flatly, "To Hell with argument, I have faith." That, of course, is a willful rejection of reason. Objectivism advocates reason as man's sole means of knowledge, and therefore, for the reasons I have already given, is atheist. It denies any supernatural dimension presented as a contradiction of nature, of existence. This applies not only to God, but also to every variant of the supernatural ever advocated or to be advocated. In other words, we accept reality, and thats all.

[Leonard Peikoff, "The Philosophy of Objectivism", lecture series (1976), Lecture 2]

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« An amusing back-and-forth | Main | “Hey, PZ, how's the book coming along?” »

More articles by PZ Myers can be found on Freethoughtblogs at the new Pharyngula!

Retractable Forehead Genitalia

Category: Organisms
Posted on: September 27, 2009 10:17 PM, by PZ Myers

How can you resist a post about chimaeras and their amazing forehead specializations?

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Life Science

Jump to end

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/120928

Comments

#1

Posted by: subbie Author Profile Page | September 27, 2009 10:34 PM

Trying to decide whether a dickhead joke would be too coarse for this crowd.

#2

Posted by: leepicton Author Profile Page | September 27, 2009 10:41 PM

Coarse? For this crowd? Are you new here?

#3

Posted by: EricB Author Profile Page | September 27, 2009 10:43 PM

This is some cool information, learned something new tonight. I could go many ways with this kind of information, but I will remain CIVIL tonight.

#4

Posted by: subbie Author Profile Page | September 27, 2009 10:49 PM

Yeah, I kinda am. And I'm a bit worried about my early postings giving folks the wrong impression about me. So I decided to put in something tawdry with a cheap pun and clear up any misconceptions early.

#5

Posted by: mythusmage Author Profile Page | September 27, 2009 11:09 PM

One correction, the Sea of Cortez is located near the upper end of the Gulf of California, and properly speaking lies east of Baja California.

That said, I wonder if chimeras could be said to have a brow dong?

#6

Posted by: Patricia, OM Author Profile Page | September 27, 2009 11:13 PM

This IS the place for slutty and coarse remarks. Fire when ready.

#7

Posted by: hje Author Profile Page | September 27, 2009 11:17 PM

Similar weird appendages are seen in fossil sharks and chimeras too, e.g., see Benton's Vertebrate Palaeontology, or other similar sources:

http://tiny.cc/tTOyY

#8

Posted by: gyeong-hwa Author Profile Page | September 27, 2009 11:20 PM

Retractable Forehead Genitalia

This sounds strikingly similar to an activity referred to as a [starts with an F and rhymes with cheerio] also known as [rhymes with glow] job.

You know I wonder how life would be if we humans had the Baculum like some animals do?

#9

Posted by: Cycle Ninja Author Profile Page | September 27, 2009 11:21 PM

Subbie, coarse is welcome, relevance is mandatory. Enjoy yourself.

For instance, anyone else feel like naming this forehead phallus after someone like Ken Ham? Maybe call it a "luskin..."

#10

Posted by: Cuttlefish, OM, CR Author Profile Page | September 27, 2009 11:25 PM

Oh, great. Another sorehead
With his dick upon his forehead
Where the lady sharks can size him up before he buys them drinks.
See, these jerks will never fail ya--
With their forehead genitalia
All the blood runs from his frontal lobes before he even thinks!
All too often, he's a show-off;
If he's not, he gets the blow-off
From the superficial ladies who are judging him by size.
To ensure that he's selected
Keeps his forehead half erected--
Hoping vainly to get lucky with his phallocentric lies.
Such a silly, hopeless creature
With so prominent a feature
Still, I'd like to get together, maybe have a little chat;
If the women criticize him
For his forehead, I'd advise him,
On the first or second date, perhaps, he ought to wear a hat.

#11

Posted by: Smoggy Batzrubble OM4Jesus Author Profile Page | September 27, 2009 11:32 PM

When in spring, off the French Riviera,
The young mermaids fellate the chimaera,
Those erotic clitellum,
Fused to their cerebellum,
Erupt like high-pressured caldera.

#12

Posted by: Doogan Author Profile Page | September 27, 2009 11:36 PM

That Hydrolagus malanophasma is more of a dickhead than ray comfort and kirk cameron combined.

#13

Posted by: Smoggy Batzrubble OM4Jesus Author Profile Page | September 27, 2009 11:39 PM

Oops, sorry Cuttlefish, I didn't mean to tread on the heels of real poetry.

Just one point, for all you biological purists--my limerick uses 'clitellum' to suggest the binding point of the oral/genital contact. It's not intended to refer to the Chimaera's genitalia. Best to think of the erupting clitellum as a messy blow-job.

There now... hasn't that raised the tone of things?

#14

Posted by: Smoggy Batzrubble OM4Jesus Author Profile Page | September 27, 2009 11:45 PM

Cuttlefish,

That's brilliant!

I think you've got the start of a major sea-themed Broadway musical number there.

#15

Posted by: Cuttlefish, OM, CR Author Profile Page | September 27, 2009 11:46 PM

Real poetry? Here?
I assure you, dear Smoggy,
Mine is doggerel.

#16

Posted by: Smoggy Batzrubble OM4Jesus Author Profile Page | September 27, 2009 11:51 PM

Well Cuttlefishom ..there's doggerel and there's doggerel...and I still think a sex-themed musical sea-romp would be a ratings winner.

Anyway as Sven pointed out, there's an even lower class of doggerel called Smoggerel.

I guess we'd better stop talking ... Dingo will tell us to get a room again

#17

Posted by: MikeS29 Author Profile Page | September 27, 2009 11:58 PM

Well, you can't say he does all his thinking with his little head...

#18

Posted by: Marcus J. Ranum Author Profile Page | September 28, 2009 12:06 AM

Great band name.

#19

Posted by: hje Author Profile Page | September 28, 2009 12:13 AM

Equally bizarre are genital photoreceptors in invertebrates:

http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.2108/zsj.18.175

#20

Posted by: DLC Author Profile Page | September 28, 2009 12:22 AM

Cuttlefish & Smoggy: I once typed a haiku about an erection, but for some reason it flew out of my mind.
Try to keep an open mind about things, people.
Oh, and -- subbie -- Coarse, Pharyngula ? you're kidding!
(see the previous "I get email" topic )

#21

Posted by: Pryopizm Author Profile Page | September 28, 2009 12:30 AM

Wow, what a mindfuck.

#22

Posted by: Crewvy Author Profile Page | September 28, 2009 2:59 AM

It was a pleasure bumping into you.

#23

Posted by: romyboo Author Profile Page | September 28, 2009 3:28 AM

What do Western chimaeras do with their genes?

They pass 'em off at the heads.

#24

Posted by: Greg Laden Author Profile Page | September 28, 2009 8:37 AM

As you will see in my Monday (I think evening) post at the Smithsonian (where I'll be guest blogging for a week) calling this feature a sex organ is a little like calling a well chosen wine and just the right music a sex organ. This is really just a basic standard fish appendage adapted to grab onto the female so she can't get away during the act.

But that does not make any of the jokes less funny.

#25

Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp Author Profile Page | September 28, 2009 8:39 AM

I think we have Mr. Laden's next born's name.

#26

Posted by: DingoJack Author Profile Page | September 28, 2009 9:27 AM

Smoggy & Cuttlefish - get a room. :)
[Happy to oblige, if only to keep the creative *erm* juices flowing] - Dingo.

#27

Posted by: davej Author Profile Page | September 28, 2009 9:50 AM

Ok, but just how would this organ have migrated to this forehead location in the intermediates?

#28

Posted by: chuckgoecke Author Profile Page | September 28, 2009 11:01 AM

Maybe this kind of critter is what Dian Bachar(also played Squeak in Baseketball) on Trey Parker and Matt Stones movie Orgazmo(about the Mormon porn stars) was trying to emulate. http://www.ladylitz555.com/images/1241639904175856343644.jpeg

#29

Posted by: Kraid Author Profile Page | September 28, 2009 2:12 PM

Jerry Coyne has pointed out that the thing on the Chimera's forehead isn't technically its genitals.

I'm still a fan of the leopard slug.

#30

Posted by: Silič O'Nopolitanopoulos, Färschdbischuf Beesknees aus Ulm und Klein Elguth, Elector Pharynguline. Author Profile Page | September 28, 2009 4:58 PM

No, Jerry hasn't chimed in. Greg Mayer is holding the fort once again.

Whattaya mean doggerel? It's obviously mackerel!

*badum tish*

Leave a comment

HTML commands: <i>italic</i>, <b>bold</b>, <a href="url">link</a>, <blockquote>quote</blockquote>

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.