Now on ScienceBlogs: A study that oversells massage therapy

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)



I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

In an early class, one of the students asked me if I believed in God. I replied, 'I don't think so.' And then proceeded to wail on the theme, using material from this column of some weeks ago, in which I observed the perpetuation of insanity on this planet through the mediums of Arabs-vs-Jews, Catholics-vs-Protestants, Southern Baptists-vs-Everyone. I said I felt if 'God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he them,' (Genesis 2:27, King James's italics, not mine) then we were God. And when Man (my cap, not King James's) in his most creative, his most loving, his most gentle and most human, then he is most God-like. The student said he would pray for my immortal soul. He also asked for my address, so he could send me some literature on the subject of God. I thanked him politely and told him I'd gotten all the literature I could handle on the subject from a certain Thomas Aquinas.

[Harlan Ellison, from "The Glass Teat", Article #29]

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« An entirely appropriate summary of Stephen Meyer's talk in Oklahoma | Main | I didn't even know there was a reporter there! »

More articles by PZ Myers can be found on Freethoughtblogs at the new Pharyngula!

That Dawkins guy gets all the cool gigs

Category: Entertainment
Posted on: September 30, 2009 10:32 AM, by PZ Myers

Richard Dawkins is appearing on Colbert tonight, it should be good. In a near miss, Francis Collins is appearing tomorrow; too bad we couldn't get a collision.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Jump to end

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/121118

Comments

#1

Posted by: Kobra Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 10:40 AM

Damn. I might have to watch that despite not usually watching TV.

#2

Posted by: Rorschach Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 10:40 AM

Well, he is going to be on Maher on Friday too, that should be interesting...:-)

Taping the Colbert appearance since I'm taking my kid to the zoo at the time !

#3

Posted by: Dr Benway Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 10:46 AM

Yeah, Collins' belief in Jesus is crazy! However, Maher's believe in ill-defined "toxins" and the Western medicine conspiracy is perfectly sensible.

#4

Posted by: daveau Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 10:47 AM

Colbert should be good, although I'd rather see him on Stewart where he can get a word in edgewise. I always DVR both, but might stay up to watch, since I know it will be discussed tomorrow.

#5

Posted by: https://certifi.ca/eean Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 10:50 AM

Would be better if it was the other way around (Collins one night, Dawkins the next), since Colbert often poses comments from recent guests.

Should be good though. Colbert the character is of course rabidly Catholic, but Colbert the real person is likely vaguely religious as well.

#6

Posted by: fishyfred Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 10:52 AM

Yeah, Collins' belief in Jesus is crazy! However, Maher's believe in ill-defined "toxins" and the Western medicine conspiracy is perfectly sensible.

Have you not read the blog for the past couple of days?

#7

Posted by: Mike Wagner Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 11:04 AM

Dawkin's appearances on CBC (The Hour on TV, and The Current on Radio) were both great.
It's nice to see him interviewed by intelligent people who actually understand what he's written. :)

#8

Posted by: Matt "Nora" Penfold Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 11:07 AM

Have you not read the blog for the past couple of days?

You mean you think Benway should actually go looking for evidence ? How very uncivil of you. Expect a stern rebuke from Mooney, Kirshembaum and Rosenau anytime now.

#9

Posted by: Andyo Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 11:26 AM

#5 eean:

Should be good though. Colbert the character is of course rabidly Catholic, but Colbert the real person is likely vaguely religious as well.

Colbert for real is actually pretty catholic too, only not crazy. He has said he teaches Sunday school, even. I think it was on Charlie Rose, but somebody also asked him if he taught his children of hell, and IIRC he said no.

#10

Posted by: consciousness razor Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 11:37 AM

Colbert and Dawkins ... that's some guaranteed entertainment right there.

Andyo, perhaps this is just a nitpick, but what if any is the difference between a crazy Catholic and an irrational Catholic? Colbert actually teaches Sunday school? That would lower my opinion of him considerably.

#11

Posted by: AZ Writer (Kim Hosey) Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 11:41 AM

I canceled my TV a while ago (starving artist and all), and have said a few times I totally don't miss it. I take it back for the first time.

I grew up with a father who embraced what seems to be Colbert's style of Catholicism -- he was reasonably devout and deeply stubborn about certain beliefs, but also pretty extreme in both his intelligence and irreverence. I don't know, I guess that kind of belief facilitates the bad kind too, but it was enlightening to me, at any rate.

#12

Posted by: falterer Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 11:44 AM

Excited about this, though I think Dawkins will be more interested in talking about evolution than atheism. Both he and Collins are wearing slightly different hats from when they were interviewed by NPR a couple of years ago.

My guess: Colbert will play the young earth creationist, allowing Dawkins to give the rationalist perspective. Maybe tomorrow, he'll try to confide in Collins as a fellow man of faith, only to find that Collins sees no conflict between evolution and god--in fact, understanding evolution helps scientists make flu vaccines...

Right or wrong, this'll be fun to watch!

#13

Posted by: Matt "Nora" Penfold Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 11:45 AM

Hang on a minute.

If Colbert is really a devout Catholic how come he wants Dawkins on his show ?


Don't M&K tell us that Dawkins' rhetoric will mean moderate religious people will not listen to him ? Do you think they have bothered to let Colbert know he is not playing the game by their rules ?

#14

Posted by: RagingBullwinkle Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 11:57 AM

Too bad it`s not the other way around. Colbert is a theist and he`ll let Collins have the last word.

#15

Posted by: consciousness razor Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 12:02 PM

Matt Penfold: Catholics believe evolution is compatible with their particular flavor of God, as incomprehensible as that sounds. The fact that Dawkins is an atheist is different story. Is it perhaps Colbert's secret way of celebrating Blasphemy Day? If he (and not his character) is religious, he certainly doesn't seem to care much about blasphemy.

#16

Posted by: Matt "Nora" Penfold Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 12:08 PM

Mr T, the argument advanced by M&K (and others) is that Dawkins' rhetoric on religion puts off moderate religious believers who would otherwise be onboard as regards the evolution/creationism debate.

Clearly Colbert never got the memo telling him that as a moderate Catholic he is supposed to have nothing to do with promoting evolution, and especially nothing to do with Dawkins. That or Colbert is an intelligent man who has worked out that you can disagree with someone of some things and agree with them on others without problem.

#17

Posted by: xinit Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 12:13 PM

I was lucky enough to get last minute tickets to see Prof. Dawkins, thanks to CFI Ontario.

I especially liked his re-enactment of the Banana Video in answer to a question about Comfort's plot to distribute "Origin" on campuses. What I thought of most when I read that Francis Collins was going to be on Colbert the night following Dawkins was a cautious answer he gave regarding Collins' appointment... He stated that he was sure that Collins was very intelligent, and (paraphrased)

"that he wasn't sure if his [Collins] religious... ... I'm trying to come up with a polite way of saying it... religious PROCLIVITIES... ever interfered with his scientific decision making"

Religious proclivities.

Makes it sound dirty, and the audience loved it.

#18

Posted by: consciousness razor Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 12:25 PM

Matt Penfold: yes, I understand where you're going there... Surely, such an uncivil attitude toward M&K's bullshittery argument is hardly appropriate.

Quoth Mooney, from Whitman without citation, "Do I contradict myself? Very well then I contradict myself." The logic is irrefutable. Irrefutable, I tell you!

#19

Posted by: Andyo Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 3:26 PM

Just in case (some don't seem to know), Dawkins has been on Colbert before, for the release of TGD. It was pretty funny.

I think Colbert, even though he's probably the most "religious" of these talk show hosts (Stewart, Maher, Conan, Letterman), is the most scientifically literate. His interviews with scientists are better than the others and he's demonstrated he knows his stuff and the questions he asks wouldn't be asked just by anyone (see Jon Stewart's interviews with scientists). If you notice, in that Dawkins interview he hits a lot of the IDers rationalizations which suggests he also knows about the "New Atheists" and has informed himself.

RE: Sunday School, see this and this. I saw that Conan interview, and I'm not sure but I think he also mentioned it on Charlie Rose.

He's also said how he views religion with a sense of humor. He has been asked this because his comedy on religion is probably the funniest of the bunch (This Week in God, anyone?).

#20

Posted by: bobxxxx Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 8:08 PM

"Richard Dawkins is appearing on Colbert tonight"

Actually, Richard Dawkins in on Colbert tomorrow night, Thursday 10/1/2009.

#21

Posted by: Sylvie Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 8:18 PM

To Xinit #17: Hee hee. "Proclivities” reminds me of this Arthur C. Clarke quote "I would defend the liberty of consenting adult creationists to practice whatever intellectual perversions they like in the privacy of their own homes; but it is also necessary to protect the young and innocent."

#22

Posted by: Sylvie Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 8:31 PM

Per Colbert's Web site, Dawkins in on today, Wednesday, 9/30. I'm in the Pacific Time Zone, which means 11:30 tonight (too late for me). Comedy Central re-runs the late night show at an earlier time (7:30 or 8:30) the next day, so, he should be on again tomorrow, 10/1, at a more reasonable hour.

#23

Posted by: JJ Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 8:42 PM

@11 AZ Writer (Kim Hosey)
You should be able to watch it o Hulu (if you are in the US)

http://www.hulu.com/the-colbert-report

#24

Posted by: bobxxxx Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 9:08 PM

Correction to #20, Dawkins is on Colbert tonight 11:30PM and tomorrow at 7:30PM Eastern time.

#25

Posted by: Rey Fox, Bird Caller Guy Author Profile Page | September 30, 2009 11:45 PM

"(Stewart, Maher, Conan, Letterman)"

Don't forget Craig Ferguson.

#26

Posted by: Boomer Author Profile Page | October 1, 2009 12:00 AM

Crocoduck tie... nice!

#27

Posted by: Josh Rosenau Author Profile Page | October 2, 2009 10:47 PM

"too bad we couldn't get a collision"

Yeah, they might have traded compliments for a while: http://www.newsweek.com/id/216206/page/1
http://biologos.org/resources/richard-dawkins/

Interesting to note, in response to Matt Penfold, et al., that Dawkins has adopted a rather more conciliatory tone about science and religion of late. Maybe he's actually willing to acknowledge that his critics have a point and to incorporate their advice.

Leave a comment

HTML commands: <i>italic</i>, <b>bold</b>, <a href="url">link</a>, <blockquote>quote</blockquote>

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.