Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)



I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

Christian Liberalism: The doctrine that there may be an absolutely powerful, infinitely knowledgeable, universe spanning entity that is deeply and personally concerned about baby seals but doesn't give a damn about my sex life.

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« Peter & Rosemary Grant—Natural Selection, Speciation, and Darwin's Finches | Main | Paul Sereno— Dinosaurs: Phylogenetic reconstruction from Darwin to the present »

More articles by PZ Myers can be found on Freethoughtblogs at the new Pharyngula!

Douglas Schemske—Ecological Factors in the Origin of Species

Category: ChicagoDarwin2009Evolution
Posted on: October 30, 2009 12:19 PM, by PZ Myers

How do different varieties become species? Darwin credited selection. What are the details of this process? Speciation is a booming topic in the science literature, with 25,000 titles last year. Need to define a species to begin. Uses Mayr's biological species concept, which focuses on the importance of reproductive isolating factors.

Darwin on speciation: recommends Stauffer's compilation of Darwin's notes as much more thorough and specific than the Origin. Darwin explained speciation as a consequence of selection, divergence, and extinction. Mayr thought Darwin considered geographic isolation to be unimportant; the big book does infer that "some degree of geographical isolation would be indispensible". Darwin had much more sophisticated views of speciation than Mayr ascribed to him.

What are reproductive barriers in nature? Case study of monkeyflowers (Mimulus) that show very different morphologies and different pollinators (bees vs. hummingbirds). Ecogeographic barriers, premating isolation, postmating prefertilization barriers, hybrid unfitness. In Mimulus, species separated by elevation with a very narrow band of sympatry. Reciprocal translocation showed that the two species are highly adapted to their native ranges.

Premating isolation imposed by bees/hummingbirds that very rarely feed on different flowers.

Postmating isolation: artificially pollinated with cross-species gametes. One species can produce hybrids, but the other does so only at low frequency.

Hybrid fitness: F1 hybrids are not as viable.

Cited Coyne's work on how these factors work sequentially. Each step in isolation has different degree of contribution, but ecogeographic isolation is the most important component.

What traits contribute to reproductive isolation? They made hybrid F1s, crossed them to produce F2 hybrids that vary widely in morphology. Transplanted them to Yosemite, where they kept records of what pollinators visited which hybrids. Key factors were nectar production (hummingbirds favor lots of nectar); bees shunned hybrids rich in carotenoids — reds were invisible to bees.

Now looking at QTLs (quantitative trait loci) that affect reproductive isolation, and those genes that affect carotenoid production seem to be important. Isolated strains that only carried trans-specific carotenoid genes. This single gene has dramatic differences in visitations by bees vs. hummingbirds.

A single gene substitution seems to be responsible for the reproductive isolation. It takes a long period of time for post-zygotic barriers to evolve, and the most important barriers are in the habitat. Comparative studies of other species were cited to show that ecogeo barriers are the main agents of speciation.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Life Science

Jump to end

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/123639

Comments

#1

Posted by: Glen Davidson Author Profile Page | October 30, 2009 1:18 PM

It's ironic that Darwin wrote of the "Origin of Species" in terms of natural selection, when it seems unlikely that NS itself actually drives much speciation. True, it plays roles in reproductive isolation, but this is usually secondary to the existence of a trait or traits which themselves don't exist in response to NS.

Well, anyway, there's a lot to be learned about speciation, while adaptation via NS is rather more solidly understood.

Glen D
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p

#2

Posted by: mythusmage Author Profile Page | October 30, 2009 1:58 PM

Sorry Glenn, but I have to disagree. So long as the trait exists in some form, it can be selected for. Selected because it provides a survival advantage.

So no, natural selection doesn't lead to the existence of a trait, but a trait can give an organism an advantage in terms of natural selection, and that is how traits influence natural selection.

#3

Posted by: Von Krieger | October 30, 2009 2:08 PM

Rorschach, what have you done with PZ?

#4

Posted by: Shaggy Maniac Author Profile Page | October 30, 2009 4:41 PM

@#4

See:
Rapid Evolution of Reproductive Isolation in the Wild: Evidence from Introduced Salmon

Andrew P. Hendry,1* John K. Wenburg,2 Paul Bentzen,2, 3 Eric C. Volk,4 Thomas P. Quinn3
Science 20 October 2000: Vol. 290. no. 5491, pp. 516 - 518
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/290/5491/516

#5

Posted by: Shaggy Maniac Author Profile Page | October 30, 2009 4:43 PM

Sorry, I meant @#2

#6

Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM Author Profile Page | October 30, 2009 5:08 PM

I would be mortified as a scientist invoking this drivel.
We scientists would be mortified of your bad behavior if you were one of us. Science requires its practicioners to be honest, at least in their professional activities. You are morphing and avoiding your ban, both dishonest acts. And you expect us to listen to you? You show great stupidity if you do. Mensa would be mortified.
#7

Posted by: Luke | November 2, 2009 2:12 PM

I enjoyed this talk. I'm not a biologist by training, so it was interesting to have all the factors that can contribute to speciation laid out and analyzed. I hadn't before thought of it as a sequential process. It was also fun to hear Schemske poke fun at Coyne.

Leave a comment

HTML commands: <i>italic</i>, <b>bold</b>, <a href="url">link</a>, <blockquote>quote</blockquote>

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.