Now on ScienceBlogs: Rhodes Secretary: Wall Street Megabonuses Draining Our Young Talent

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Pharyngula

Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)

• Quick link to the latest endless thread




I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

tbbadge.gif
scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

One good schoolmaster is worth a thousand priests.

[Robert G. Ingersoll, Speech, New York City, 1 May 1881]

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« Michael Ruse—Is Darwinism past its ‘sell by’ date? The challenge of evo-devo | Main | William Wimsatt—Why Development is Crucial to Cultural Evolution »

Hopi Hoekstra—The Causes of Evolutionary Change: What Darwin Did and Didn't Know

Category: ChicagoDarwin2009EvolutionScience
Posted on: October 31, 2009 4:14 PM, by PZ Myers

Darwin didn't know the basic mechanisms of evolutionary change. Mechanism of inheritance was a black box. Darwin's last publication before his death was "on the dispersal of bivalves". Why are freshwater bivalves so homogeneous in morphology? Describes a beetle with a conch attached to its leg, which provided a mechanism of dispersal. Turns out the specimen was sent to Darwin by Crick's grandfather.

How is variation generated and maintained in natural populations? What genes matter? What will finding the genes tell us?

We find genes underlying phenotypic diversity by comparison of highly divergent taxa (flies vs. mice, for instance), or the study of variation within species. Latter gives us the opportunity to use genetics, also allows us to know something about the environmental context that drives the differences.

Looks for phenotypic differences in the wild that contribute to fitness, then works out the genetics and development to see how it works. Hoekstra looks at color, the genetics of mammalian pigmentation in Peromyscus. These mice show lots of variation in color. The oldfield mouse of the American south lives in abandoned fields and on beaches. Beach sand is white, with low levels of vegetation, which means they are subject to high levels of predation. They wanted to document the selective advantage of light pigmentation on the beach environment, so made model mice out of clay with different colors,. and measured predation on the models. Color matters, and dark models were attacked preferentially on light sand, light models attacked in dark environments. 50% more likely to survive if your color matches your background.

Made crosses of dark and light genes and used QTL analysis to search for candidate genes. Found 3 genes correlated with the color patterns seen in Peromyscus, Mc1r, Agouti, and Corin. Mc1r is a g-coupled receptor with many mutations scattered throughout the gene. One difference is found between light and dark mice: changing one amino acid reduces the activity of the gene product.

Mc1r is the receptor; agouti is a repressor of mc1r; and Corin is an upstream regulator of agouti.

Looked at populations in the wild. Do populations on the gulf coast have the same mutation as atlantic coast mice? No — atlantic mice do not have the same mutation im mc1r, and no significant mutations were found in the atlantic mc1r.

Going even further afield, mc1r was sequenced in mammoths, and the same mutation found in light mice was found in mammoths; were mammoths polymorphic in coat color?

What do these genes tell us? 1) how many and and what are the effect sizes of genes that contribute to adaptive phenotypes? A few genes can have a large affect. 2) Do adaptive alleles tend to be dominant or recessive? Adaptive alleles are rarely completely recessive. 3) What is the relative role of epistasis versus additivity? Epistasis is very important. 4) Are the same genes responsible for convergent phenotypes? sometimes, but not the case within beach mice. 5)Are adaptive mutations in protein-coding or cis-regulatory regions? Both.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/123714

Comments

#1

Posted by: Bacopa | November 1, 2009 1:31 AM

I have a saltwater tank with a few critters I caught at End of the Island in Galveston the winter before Ike. My comb blenny and bristleworms rock. Tried to get some copopods two months ago down on the beaches up the road from Clute. I think I saw those mice there. The Gulf Coast environment varies wildly. The local beaches are brown with feldspar, but there are a few white patches of quartz and carbonate sand. Springtime brings tons of sargassum to the beaches. Bright gold mice might do well in that case. I can see how mice that produce a wide variety of color coats would do well on the coast.

Major predators of mice would mostly be herons and laughing gulls. Ocelots too, but perhaps in the less urbanized areas further south. And I pity the mouse runs afoul of an army of ghost crabs.

#2

Posted by: Bob O'H | November 1, 2009 2:55 AM

3) What is the relative role of epistasis versus additivity? Epistasis is very important.
Can you unwrap this? A lot of epistasis ends up as additive genetic variance. So whilst epistasis is important for an individual, the overall effect at the population level can be minor.

Hmm, I wonder if anyone has seriously looked at epistatic variance in the wild. It's a bugger getting good data, though.

#3

Posted by: Sven DiMilo | November 1, 2009 6:27 PM

The freshwater bivalves with which I am familiar disperse via larvae that are parasitic on fish gills...fish that are strong enough to swim upstream. The cool thing is the diversity of tricks that freshwater mussels have evolved for fooling fish into receiving a blast of larvae. See here.

Leave a comment

           Sign in or register with TypePad.            Sign up with Movable Type.

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM