
(via TONMO)
Now on ScienceBlogs: The Chicago Tribune: Telling it like it is about the antivaccine autism "biomed" movement
Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal

PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
…and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• facebook
• MySpace
• Twitter
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
• Quick link to the latest endless thread
The major religions on the Earth contradict each other left and right. You can't all be correct. And what if all of you are wrong? It's a possibility, you know. You must care about the truth, right? Well, the way to winnow through all the differing contentions is to be skeptical. I'm not any more skeptical about your religious beliefs than I am about every new scientific idea I hear about. But in my line of work, they're called hypotheses, not inspiration and not revelation.
— Dr. Arroway Dr. Arroway in Carl Sagan's Contact (New York: Pocket Books, 1985), p. 162.
« Good news for Neoceratodus | Main | But now how will we spot the dangerous South Carolina drivers? »
Category: Cephalopods • Organisms
Posted on: November 13, 2009 7:32 AM, by PZ Myers

(via TONMO)
Find more posts in:
Life Science
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/124648
Sign in or register with TypePad. Sign up with Movable Type.
Tim Lambert 11.22.2009
PZ Myers 11.22.2009
PZ Myers 11.19.2009
Ed Brayton 11.22.2009
Ed Brayton 11.19.2009
Comments
Posted by: Nebula99 | November 13, 2009 7:41 AM
Wow, am I seriously first? Also, what species is that?
Posted by: Daniel de Rauglaudre
|
November 13, 2009 7:44 AM
Who is eating whom?
Posted by: Rixaeton | November 13, 2009 7:50 AM
*phew* Such raw savagery that you can only find in aquaria. It is a good thing we don't need to engage in such barbarism to survive.
Posted by: MadScientist | November 13, 2009 7:53 AM
Hey, who doesn't love crab? How big is that beast? I've seen crabs which only get to be about the size of a bottle cap, but the structure of that crab suggests to me that it is probably a good size for human consumption, in which case that's one huge cephalopod.
Posted by: Notagod | November 13, 2009 8:02 AM
Ah, how sweet. Virgin Mary being impregnated by one of the christian god ideas. I can image that is the case, therefore it is a christian-fact.
Posted by: Brian
|
November 13, 2009 8:25 AM
Man, what a way to go.
Posted by: Nephi
|
November 13, 2009 8:42 AM
The kiss of death
Posted by: Flea | November 13, 2009 8:51 AM
Is this sex, meal or what?
Posted by: MrFire
|
November 13, 2009 8:55 AM
I will set down money that Cuttlefish is already thinking of coupling 'crustacean' with 'degustation'...
Posted by: Canadian Curmudgeon
|
November 13, 2009 9:02 AM
Another cephalopod for this special Friday the thirteenth.
http://www.cakecentral.com/modules.php?name=gallery&file=displayimage&pid=1438565&sub=1438572
Posted by: Tim H | November 13, 2009 9:08 AM
Every time I see a picture of a cephalopod attacking a crab I have to stop and wonder how the crab fails to defend itself. Are those claws really that useless?
Posted by: abys | November 13, 2009 10:04 AM
@ #8: It's all of the above.
Posted by: Davianed
|
November 13, 2009 10:14 AM
Ia! Ia! Cthulhu fhtagn!
This crab is only the beginning, as the Old Ones shall devour all in the end days!
Posted by: Tiranna | November 13, 2009 10:51 AM
Hungry now!
Posted by: Nick | November 13, 2009 11:17 AM
CARCINUS, NOOOOOOOOOOO!
Ahem, sorry. Crabs are to me what cephalopods are to PZ.
@MadScientist: That looks like Carcinus maenas. The largest ones have a carapace about the width of your palm, or a little less. They're really common, but their size makes them finicky to shell, and there isn't usually enough meat to bother with in the legs.
Posted by: Happy Tentacles | November 13, 2009 11:46 AM
Now now, darling, please don't play with your food.
Posted by: sasqwatch | November 13, 2009 12:05 PM
Here we go again... a bunch of scientists jumping to conclusions again.
I bet the nautilus is merely giving the crab a nice backrub.
Posted by: Jamie | November 13, 2009 12:12 PM
@Tim H #11: It is pretty dangerous trying to score a crab for a meal if you're a cephalopod (yes, cephalopods can be injured by their claws); the key is to inject the crab with a paralyzing toxin (into one of their less protected joints), and then slowly digest the meal. I remember seeing an octopus with a crab in its mouth for (what I was told) a few days.
Posted by: daveau
|
November 13, 2009 1:30 PM
Tentacles vs claws. And the winner is...
Yay, Friday.
Posted by: MadScientist | November 13, 2009 3:39 PM
@Nick: Thanks. So the crab is a little bigger than the small varieties I had in mind but smaller than I'd bother to cook (unless I was as desperate as Wile E. Coyote), but at least I have some idea of the size of that cephalopod.
Posted by: Joffan | November 13, 2009 4:51 PM
I neeeeed a hat like that. Hobbitesque with a dash of pimp.
Posted by: Arsen | November 13, 2009 8:24 PM
Wow! Cephalopods like their shelled critters, don't they? Just saw a National Geographic thing on Youtube of a cuttlefish eating a crab... after hypnotizing it with flashing patterns on its skin! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zC0zOLqYnRg&NR=1&feature=fvwp 3:00-3:45
Note how the cuttlefish curl up their tentacles while eating crabs, to keep them out of the reach of pincers and legs.
Cuttlefish are scary.
Posted by: 'Tis Himself, OM
|
November 14, 2009 8:39 AM
I can has crab?
Posted by: Don Teuton | November 14, 2009 7:08 PM
PZ, here's a tattoo you'll like...
http://ny-image3.etsy.com/il_fullxfull.102096727.jpg
Posted by: Copernicus | November 20, 2009 10:59 PM
Nebula99 at #1
this looks like a Chambered Nautilus, Nautilus pompilius, having a go at a European Green Crab, Carcinus maenas...
and here again having lunch in this video:
feeding time at the National Aquarium
Posted by: NSCanadaFlux | November 22, 2009 2:33 PM
FYI, that's a nautilus, not a cuttlefish to the majority of the above posters. Cuttlefish have cuttlebones, but no shell. Basically serves a homologous function though in buoyancy.