You can play the “Where’s Waldo” game and browse an interactive album of animal mimics, too.
Too easy! I used to specialize in spotting tree frogs at 200 paces in the Brazilian rain forest.
Didn’t even have to try in this case.
Woo-hoo! I aced the quiz. (although it really wasn’t that hard)
You know who has really good camouflage? God. Did you see him in any of those pictures? I rest my case.
I just woke up, looked at this and it went something like that:
“Hmmm something’s hidden! I see it! It’s a frog! …wait a minute…there’s another one I think. And another one. Damn! They’re good. They could be hiding in my closet.”
They could be hiding in my closet.
Take a very close look before you use your toothbrush again. I’m just sayin’.
Clever leaves! So hard to find among the frogs.
I actually only saw one frog at very first glance, but I spotted ’em when I clicked through. The katydid took me a minute too.
Of course, the pest I worry most about out here is jet black with a red hourglass, so spotting camouflage isn’t always my first concern.
Ooh! I found Waldo. He was buried in a shallow grave and covered with leaf litter. Millions of children will be relieved.
I went to the Smithsonian in ’92 and saw an insect exhibit. I walked up to a glass case to look for a South American walking stick. I searched intently for about a minute and finally spotted one, and than shortly found another, then another, then another. I almost fell backwards, the case was full of them. Practice and experience are handy in spotting these things.
Camouflage and object-mimicry are among the best and most intuitively straightforward examples of adaptation-via-natural-slxn there are. Excellent intr-bio teaching material for that reason.
Why is it we see frogs that look like leaves, but not leaves that look like frogs?
Mobius, it’s because there’s more cost/benefit advantage to frogs that mimic leaves than to plants with leaves that mimic frogs.
Know any trees that need to blend in with a field of frogs?
Mobius, okay, that wasn’t what you meant, eh.
Sadly, those froggies are now dead. And if they had been consipicuous, I wouldn’t have stepped on them.
Natural selection also has a sense of irony, y’know.
Hate to threadjack, but I’ve waited long enough for Peez to notice…
Deepak Chopsticks is up to his traditional crap on HuffPo again.
You can read his craptastic septic spew here:
My vicious and unhinged response to Deepak’s vacuous WOO is here:
Full of coolness! I’ve never seen frogs look so much like origami. Thanks, PZ!
A few years back i was in Malaysia and wound up in a store that sold all kinds of amphibians, reptiles and arthropods (completely illegal of course). I looked into a glass tank and saw a couple of these tree frogs resting on a bed of leaves. I was amazed at their camouflage. Then, after I had been staring at them for a couple of minutes, I realized that there weren’t actually any leaves at all in there – they were ALL tree frogs, probably around fifty of them. Amazing and sad.
From the mouth of an evilutionist! The leafy frog = the atheists worst nightmare. Call Ray and Kirk!
Duh. I meant the froggy leaf. I’m such an imbecile. Still, you ahev to admit as far as atheist’s worst nightmares go…
I also meant “have”. The imbecile remark stands.
Thanks for posting this! My seven year old loved these pictures and is now clamoring for more. I already have him interested in spiders, so getting him interested in other “bugs” is a great thing, too. I’d be happy if he just saw bugs as “cool,” like most boys with slimy and gross things, but he actually sees them as fascinating worthy studying.
New comments have been temporarily disabled. Please check back soon.
It will be a fine day to be glued to the computer, because TONMOCON VI is…
Pacific striped octopuses like to get up close and personal when intimate. Can you blame them?
Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: yet another creationist has disproved evolution. This one…
Bill Nye talks about the realities of reproduction, and the right wing completely loses its shit.