Now on ScienceBlogs: Technology Review Magazine Poised to Return as Festival Sponsor!

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)



I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

History includes too much chaos, or extremely sensitive dependence on minute and unmeasurable differences in initial conditions, leading to massively divergent outcomes based on tiny and unknowable disparities in starting points. And history includes too much contingency, or shaping of present results by long chains of unpredictable antecedent states, rather than immediate determination by timeless laws of nature.

Stephen Jay Gould

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« Mmmm…lunchtime! | Main | Watson vs. Morano »

More articles by PZ Myers can be found on Freethoughtblogs at the new Pharyngula!

The War on Christmas continues apace

Category: ArtHumor
Posted on: December 6, 2009 1:38 PM, by PZ Myers

Those evilutionists! Do they have to taint everything?

darwinchristmassmall.jpeg

You can get that on a evolutionmas card, too. Perfect for giving Aunt Petunia conniptions.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Jump to end

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/126518

Comments

#1

Posted by: CalGeorge Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 1:48 PM

Darwin's reindeers! Woohoo!

#2

Posted by: vanharris Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 1:50 PM

I think that's just great! The only trouble is, the idiot Creationists will think that the precursor species are all contemporaneous.

And where are Santa's gifts? Does this mean that evolutionist Santa is a Scrooge? But i still think it's just great.

#3

Posted by: Ivy Freeborn | December 6, 2009 1:53 PM

I don't see a red nose on the lizard in front...

#4

Posted by: vanharris Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 1:54 PM

...Darwin's slay...

Epic fail!

#5

Posted by: Brian | December 6, 2009 1:58 PM

The lizard doesn't need a red nose because it can see in the infrared.

#6

Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 1:59 PM

...Darwin's slay...

I noticed that as well.

#7

Posted by: Andreas Johansson | December 6, 2009 1:59 PM

It looks suspicioustly like a reindeer "devolving" into an ichthyostegid.

(Insert stuff about culturally determined conflation of temporal and spatial axes.)

#8

Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 2:00 PM

I know a few people I would like to send it too. But the Redhead won't let me. Is the first one Shubin's Tiktaalik?

#9

Posted by: Nomen Publicus | December 6, 2009 2:00 PM

You can't fool me, there ain't no
Sanity Clause!

#10

Posted by: SEF | December 6, 2009 2:01 PM

The evolutionmas card ought to include (eg on the back) the general species names of the (extinct) critters depicted pulling the sleigh (and perhaps a bit of the ancestral tree* diagram).


* Which then makes me wonder how well one of those tree diagrams might be made to fit a stylised xmas tree outline.

#11

Posted by: Lilith | December 6, 2009 2:02 PM

I don't see a red nose on the lizard in front...

That's because it's not foggy, silly.

OT:
I don't know if anyone else has posted this, as I haven't had the chance to read all the threads for the last week, but some wonderful tentacle-filled artwork can be seen on the Tor.com site (check for more art in the comments section of the relevant post):

http://www.tor.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=blog&id=58269#more

#12

Posted by: raven | December 6, 2009 2:02 PM

We are winning the War on Xmas anyway. The Xians stole it from the pagans. The pagans are stealing it back.

I wonder how many areligious Xmas displays there will be this year? A great idea but the best ones are seasonal and humorous. A Tree of Knowledge works better than the usual pictures of jet planes crashing into skyscrapers in NYC or "Science flies people to the moon, religion flies planes into skyscrapers".

The only trouble is, the idiot Creationists will think that the precursor species are all contemporaneous.

Naw. They all died in the Flood, despite heavy supernatural support.

#13

Posted by: Mobius | December 6, 2009 2:05 PM

SQUIDMAS!!!

We want Squidmas.

#14

Posted by: Jennifurret | December 6, 2009 2:08 PM

Ahahaha, I can't believe I typed "slay" instead of "sleigh." Fail. Fixed, though I guess that Freudian slip shows I really am an evilutionist.

#15

Posted by: gg | December 6, 2009 2:14 PM

I don't see a red nose on the lizard in front...

They really should have ended the procession with an anglerfish.

#16

Posted by: shonny Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 2:17 PM

Not to mention the way they are concerned about animals: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2009/12/joanna-krupa-naked-for-peta-jesus/

Oops, that Joanna is a good catlick girl!
Doesn't stop her being (fill in as necessary here) though.

#17

Posted by: Souljacker | December 6, 2009 2:18 PM

Well, what is Rudolf the red nosed reindeer if not a loving ode to natural selection ??

#18

Posted by: Zeno | December 6, 2009 2:23 PM

All of the transitional forms look reasonable except for the one on the far left. I just can't see how the antlered quadruped gave rise to the red-hatted biped. Someone really punked the equilibrium there and I'm confused!

#19

Posted by: wiley | December 6, 2009 2:28 PM

Makes about as much sense as the original.

#20

Posted by: Cuttlefish, OM | December 6, 2009 2:30 PM

Up on the rooftop, dare I think?
Must be the sound of a missing link!
Leading a team with some other chaps--
Reins between them fill the gaps

Ho! Ho! Ho! Look at 'em go!
Ho! Ho! Ho! Look at 'em go!
Up on the rooftop slick slick slick--
The fun, finny feet of the Tiktaalik!

#21

Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 2:31 PM

Makes about as much sense as the original.
Another boulder splats the attempt at feeble and inane humor by Wiley.

Wiley, you have presented no physical evidence for your imaginary deity, ergo, he doesn't exist. So evolution is a fact. You only change those facts with hard evidence, not attitude.

#22

Posted by: James T | December 6, 2009 2:33 PM

Bah, this is just an example of DE-evolution, not *real evolution*!

#23

Posted by: Abdul Alhazred Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 2:38 PM

Aren't those reindeer evolving in the wrong direction?

More war on Christmas news:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/12/05/politics/main5901552.shtml

(CBS/AP) A small town mayor is under fire for what he wrote about the President online.


Mayor Russell Wiseman of Arlington (Tennessee) called President Obama a Muslim on his Facebook page, attacked Obama's supporters, and said the president's primetime address on Tuesday about the U.S. military's strategy in Afghanistan was a deliberate effort to block the airing of the cartoon "A Charlie Brown Christmas."

...

#24

Posted by: Thomas | December 6, 2009 2:40 PM

Personally I would prefer if the war on Xmas was fought with flame throwers. That would be a hell of a lot more interesting than the Charlie Brown Holiday Special.

#25

Posted by: Alyson Miers | December 6, 2009 2:44 PM

I think Aunt Petunia would chuckle politely at that, just as long as it doesn't show any people wearing cloaks and pointy hats.

#26

Posted by: MadScientist | December 6, 2009 2:44 PM

There ought to be one with PZ on a sleigh shaped like a triceratops and drawn by team of Dawkins' Octopards.

#27

Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 2:46 PM

You only change those facts with hard evidence, not attitude.

Bah humbug.

#28

Posted by: Knockgoats | December 6, 2009 2:57 PM

Makes about as much sense as the original. - wiley the lying cowardly little shit

Oh, you mean that ludicrous bilge about the Romans telling everyone to go back to their ancestral village for a census, invented by the early liars-for-Jesus so he would seem to fulfil the prophecy that the Messiah would be born in Bethlehem. Only they really cocked it up, because Herod the Great was dead by the time Quirinius was governor of Syria, and there's no record of Herod massacring young boys in and around Bethlehem, although his life and actions are well-documented.

#29

Posted by: Gyeong Hwa Pak | December 6, 2009 2:59 PM

And where are Santa's gifts? Does this mean that evolutionist Santa is a Scrooge?

[cheezy]He brings the gift of the foundation for modern biological science![/cheezy]

I'm sending out penguin cards this year. Penguins have nothing to do with Christmas either lol.

#30

Posted by: Aaron | December 6, 2009 3:01 PM

My mother-in-law(shudder)informed me last week that "love dosent come from atheism, It comes from Jesus". she will be receiving one

#31

Posted by: brenth | December 6, 2009 3:21 PM

I want a Xmas card with the Darwin Claus and his evolutionary progression of reindeer in a race with Raytard Comfort Claus in a sled pulled by a crocoduck and a fronkey.

#32

Posted by: Dust | December 6, 2009 3:52 PM

Yay! The War on Xmas!

I was so worried I was gonna miss it this year. /snark

#33

Posted by: Stardrake | December 6, 2009 4:05 PM

"Bah, this is just an example of DE-evolution, not *real evolution*!"

Are we not reindeer?

#34

Posted by: Moggie Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 4:19 PM

This might be a good time to mention the Isaac Newton Christmas card which some Pharyngulites may remember from last year. If you want to order some, you'll need to be quick, because he isn't taking orders after 7 December. No, I have no connection with the guy, I just think the card is amusing.

#35

Posted by: Teh Merkin | December 6, 2009 4:22 PM

Are we not reindeer?

No... we are DEVO.

#36

Posted by: Glen Davidson Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 4:23 PM

Next postcard will have all of that, and baby Jesus run over by the sleigh.

Cause evilutionists have no morals at all.

Glen D
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p

#37

Posted by: Wowbagger, Man-Hating Man of Pharyngula Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 4:28 PM

If reindeer evolved from lizards, why are there still lizards?

#38

Posted by: Levi in NY | December 6, 2009 4:31 PM

People keep joking about this War on Christmas thing, but I'd like to see us get serious about it, and really eradicate this stupid holiday once and for all.

No, I'm not just saying that because I work in retail, but that's part of it.

#39

Posted by: Romeo Vitelli | December 6, 2009 4:41 PM

However did you know that my Aunt Petunia wanted conniptions for Xmas?

#40

Posted by: T | December 6, 2009 4:58 PM

I'd love to see the new information the reindeer acquired in its ability to change species....

#41

Posted by: Randomfactor | December 6, 2009 5:11 PM

I'd love to see the new information the reindeer acquired in its ability to change species....

Check inside his stocking.

#42

Posted by: ursulamajor | December 6, 2009 5:22 PM

Here's a gift for, um, can't think of anyone (even PZ) that would want this:

http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/03/24/currently-for-sale

#43

Posted by: raven | December 6, 2009 5:28 PM

I'd love to see the new information the reindeer acquired in its ability to change species....

No problem. Just compare whole genomic sequences between reindeer and other species, including lobe finned fish.

#44

Posted by: Randomfactor | December 6, 2009 5:29 PM

Y'all know there's a poll at the Krupa website you could be squidding, right?

The problem is that to vote against the Eeevil Catholic Church you must vote for the Eeevil PETAns.

http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/poll-vote.php

Oh, the sacrifices I make for godless hedonism...

#45

Posted by: Joven | December 6, 2009 6:04 PM

I wish we were doing better in the war on christmas, it wasnt even past Halloween when all the christmas crap started showing up around here.

oh well, Happy Monkey.

#46

Posted by: littlejohn | December 6, 2009 7:48 PM

Great. Now we have to design a Lizadeer necktie.

#47

Posted by: DominEditrix | December 6, 2009 8:02 PM

OT, why haven't we heard anything about Tiger Woods' squidstress? Is there some sort of speciesism going on here? Why shouldn't a cephalopod be given equal time by the tabloids? Where's the justice???

#48

Posted by: Zarquon | December 6, 2009 8:04 PM

Great. Now we have to design a Lizadeer necktie.

I think you'll find that it's a buckskink.

#49

Posted by: llewelly | December 6, 2009 8:31 PM

Aren't those reindeer evolving in the wrong direction?
Direction? Evolution has no direction. I guess you must be new to this blog. It just happens that over time the climate shifted, eliminating those reindeer less adapted to the new climate. And gradually the climate shifted into one that favored more and more lizard-like reindeer. The less lizard-like reindeer were selected against - they didn't survive to breed.
#50

Posted by: Aratina Cage Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 8:35 PM

What a great idea for this jolly holiday. I'd like to see one where Santa and his reindeer devolve simultaneously until they are all the same organism.

#51

Posted by: bcoppola | December 6, 2009 8:37 PM

OT: Nifty article over at Not Exactly Rocket Science about how a common European songbird might be splitting into two species practically in front of our eyes:

http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2009/12/british_birdfeeders_split_blackcaps_into_two_genetically_dis.php

Part of the reason: Brits and their bird feeders changing the migration pattern of a sub-population.

#52

Posted by: Bill | December 6, 2009 8:42 PM

Joven #46 - at least you have Thanksgiving to get in the way of Christmas. Here in Australia we start getting the Christmas crap up as early as late September!

I would like to see an 'Evolution of' Christmas card, something that encompassed the development of Mid-winter's celebrations (which are of course, mid-summer here in the Southern Hemisphere), from pagan festival to retail paganism with everything in between.

Happy Festivus (for the Rest of Us). Good luck in the Feats of Strength this year.

#53

Posted by: AVSN | December 6, 2009 8:44 PM

I'm guessing the FFRF bus sign weren't enuf nonesense for one season.

#54

Posted by: SEF | December 6, 2009 8:46 PM

Proto-Santa may have ridden the lizardeer directly (as per creationist dinos).

With the ridiculously fast rate at which creationists require evolution to have occurred (ie post-ark), there should be some instances around the globe where Santa and his lizardeer divide and diverge around roof-top ridges only to emerge on the other side as a ring species (where the ends are no longer compatible).

#55

Posted by: SEF | December 6, 2009 8:50 PM

And, freakily, when I started my post #54, there was only aratina cage's post #50 and not bcoppola's #51! (It took a while to find any of the sort of "lizard"-y link I wanted; and I still didn't get as good a one as I'd previously seen somewhere.)

#56

Posted by: OurDeadSelves | December 6, 2009 8:51 PM

at least you have Thanksgiving to get in the way of Christmas. Here in Australia we start getting the Christmas crap up as early as late September!

Oh, how nice it would be if the Xmas season started after Thanxgiving!

We started seeing Xmas decorations and seasonal crap pop up in stores around mid-September. I just wanted one (one!) holiday not tainted by the Xmas stench, but no, Halloween got ruined this year, too.

#57

Posted by: gucci shop | December 6, 2009 8:53 PM

There are several Gucci shoes that are considered to be elegant and classic designs.When it comes to footwear for wearingout on the town they have a great collection of suede sandals,satin mules,Gucci pumps and more.

#58

Posted by: Aratina Cage Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 9:02 PM

I'm guessing the FFRF bus sign weren't enuf nonesense for one season.
Sorry to ruin your Christmas, AVSN, but top hats do not bring snow people to life.

---

SEF, "Proto-Santa" made me chuckle, and then this:

there should be some instances around the globe where Santa and his lizardeer divide and diverge around roof-top ridges only to emerge on the other side as a ring species (where the ends are no longer compatible)
would make an excellent animation.

#59

Posted by: AVSN | December 6, 2009 9:07 PM

OMG LOL you really think you can ruin my Christmas. Sorry economy already did that.

#60

Posted by: nuada-oz Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 9:11 PM

Bethlehem news, 25/12/2009:

It's a Girl!!!

#61

Posted by: Wowbagger, Man-Hating Man of Pharyngula Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 9:15 PM

OMG LOL you really think you can ruin my Christmas.

Why would we want you not to enjoy a pagan celebration? Or the honouring of Mithras?

Sorry economy already did that.

Why don't you pray to your god to help you? Oh, that's right - deep down you know that he doesn't exist so there's no point.

#62

Posted by: AVSN | December 6, 2009 9:20 PM

Moron Wowbagger, even tho i know you won't ever understand it, you are wrong. Deep down I do know God exists. Don't bother arguing. You can't ever be right. "Ignorance" is bliss they say, I ignore your stupidity, I'll be happy.

#63

Posted by: Aratina Cage Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 9:25 PM

OMG LOL you really think you can ruin my Christmas -AVSN
After taking out Santa (and his reindeer) and Frosty (the reasons for the season — besides presents) what other ludicrous nonsense is left for us atheists to ridicule and destroy in the War on Christmas? I must be forgetting something...


Sorry economy already did that. -AVSN
Agreed. :\

#64

Posted by: Gyeong Hwa Pak | December 6, 2009 9:26 PM

Shorter AVSN: I'm right +infinity. *sticks tongue out.

#65

Posted by: nejishiki | December 6, 2009 9:30 PM

You people don't know anything about Santa Claus. Here, allow me to teach you:
http://video.adultswim.com/aqua-teen-hunger-force/santa-ape.html

#66

Posted by: AVSN | December 6, 2009 9:31 PM

Pak, read again, you misinterpet.

#67

Posted by: Gyeong Hwa Pak | December 6, 2009 9:38 PM

Pak, read again, you misinterpet.

Nope. I'm right. You assume that God exists and is undeniable because of some internal feeling in you and you state that this feeling can't be refuted. You therefore assert that God exists and therefore cannot be refuted on the basis of your feeling. You proceed to call others who attempt to disagree fools and dismiss their argument. In short you're using very a childish argument of "I'm always right".

#68

Posted by: AVSN | December 6, 2009 9:43 PM

Fine whatever when you come up with a cogent argument against the truth of God's existance I welcome your return to my graces. Until than SHUVE OFF

#69

Posted by: Wowbagger, Man-Hating Man of Pharyngula Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 9:48 PM

Deep down I do know God exists. Don't bother arguing. You can't ever be right. "Ignorance" is bliss they say, I ignore your stupidity, I'll be happy.

But you just said your Christmas is already ruined by the economy; ergo you're not happy - so much for your 'logic'. Maybe you should pray to your god for a new brain. Do let us know how that goes...

And I'm no more ignorant of your god than you are; the difference is that I acknowledge that it is inevitable based on your god's nonexistence (you can't 'know' anything about something that doesn't exist) while you choose to believe that the poorly-written work of fan-fiction (i.e. the bible) is accurate without ever exercising anything resembling critical thought regarding its origins.

You could try your luck at demonstrating how you reached your conclusion regarding your god's existence. Go ahead; I could use a good laugh.

#70

Posted by: Gyeong Hwa Pak | December 6, 2009 9:52 PM

Fine whatever when you come up with a cogent argument against the truth of God's existance I welcome your return to my graces.

The argument: God/gods lack any physical evidence of their existence. Their stories are evolved and ever changing therefore leading us to conclude that they don't exist. Emotions are not physical evidence and are some lousy arguments. Until you are able to provide physical evidence for your deity (and I specify “YOUR” because folks like you tends to argue that only YOUR god exists), you are condemned to look like a delusional paranoid fool who lashes at everyone else just because your fragile emotions are exposed.

(I'm stealing NoR's line lol)

#71

Posted by: PinkySlayer Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 9:53 PM

PZ!!!!MAKE IT SO THE LINKS OPEN IN A NEW TAB GODDAMNIT!!!!

#72

Posted by: breakerslion | December 6, 2009 9:56 PM

Something is very wrong with that drawing. I don't see anything that would explain the ability of Santa's reindeer to fly. There's not a single aerodynamic aspect to any one of those alleged ancestors. That's every bit as ridiculous as a Watchmaker finding a turnip in the Garden of Eden! You should be ashamed of yourselves! Humbug, I say. Humbug!

#73

Posted by: Jadehawk, OM Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 10:04 PM

the economy ruined AVSN's Christmas?

he must celebrate Christmas in the tradition of "a Christmas story", as opposed to (for example) "it's a wonderful life"

commercialism; the true meaning of Christmas, even for supposed Christians.

#74

Posted by: breakerslion | December 6, 2009 10:05 PM

Short cogent argument against the existence of God:

"The model works without that assumption" - Pierre-Simon LaPlace

#75

Posted by: Damian | December 6, 2009 10:07 PM

when you come up with a cogent argument against the truth of God's existance {sic} I welcome your return to my graces.

That's easy. If you believe in any of the traditional conceptions of God — i.e. one that is a combination of omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, omnibenevolent, etc — then she cannot logically exist.

If you were at all interested in understanding whether what you believe is coherent and non-contradictory, you should already know this, but I will give you a clue as to why the God concept is a problem.

Can God create something that even she cannot lift?

Once you understand why that creates a logical problem, you might begin to understand why some people believe that God, as described by the majority of people that claim to believe in her, is incoherent and contradictory, and thus, does not exist.

#76

Posted by: Wowbagger, Man-Hating Man of Pharyngula Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 10:17 PM

If God exists and is omnipotent and wants me to believe in him then it would be impossible for me not to believe in him if he did exist, because my doing so would indicate that he has failed at something - and an omnipotent being cannot, by definition, fail.

But I do not believe in God; ergo, no God. Other kinds of gods? Perhaps. But not the Abrahamic one.

#77

Posted by: Gyeong Hwa Pak | December 6, 2009 10:22 PM

But I do not believe in God; ergo, no God. Other kinds of gods? Perhaps. But not the Abrahamic one.

That's a major problem from Fundies arguments about God. If there is a god, why Yahweh? Why not Inti? At least we can see Inti.

#78

Posted by: Sven DiMilo | December 6, 2009 10:23 PM

PZ!!!!MAKE IT SO THE LINKS OPEN IN A NEW TAB GODDAMNIT!!!!

Please stop shouting and get a mouse with a right button on it.

#79

Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 10:27 PM

Please stop shouting and get a mouse with a right button on it.
Or, if you have a Mac, push the command/apple button, then the mouse while the button is depressed.
#80

Posted by: Jadehawk, OM Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 10:30 PM

my mac has right click. why doesn't yours?

#81

Posted by: Gyeong Hwa Pak | December 6, 2009 10:30 PM

Or, if you have a Mac, push the command/apple button, then the mouse while the button is depressed.

Actually, I think he has a popup-blocker enabled and therefore it gets tedious to have to unblock when you want to click a link.

#82

Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 10:33 PM

my mac has right click. why doesn't yours?
That activates the dashboard.
#83

Posted by: nejishiki | December 6, 2009 10:33 PM

The 'new tab' problem is not caused by the site, but by a virus in your computer. To remove it, delete the C:\Windows\System32 folder. On a Mac, go to the terminal and type sudo rm -rf /* . When asked for your password, type it in.
Hope that helps!

#84

Posted by: gg | December 6, 2009 10:34 PM

#37 wrote: "If reindeer evolved from lizards, why are there still lizards?"

More importantly, how do we explain pygmies vs. (Santa's) elves?

#85

Posted by: Jadehawk, OM Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 10:37 PM

That activates the dashboard.
isn't that what clicking the scroll ball does?
#86

Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 10:45 PM

isn't that what clicking the scroll ball does?
It depends on how you set up your mouse via the system preferences/mouse. Your choice.
#87

Posted by: Jadehawk, OM Author Profile Page | December 6, 2009 10:57 PM

It depends on how you set up your mouse via the system preferences/mouse.
I didn't... the boyfriend did [/idiot moment]

:-p

#88

Posted by: Ewan R | December 6, 2009 11:11 PM

"Ignorance is bliss"

a little late to rehash this one, but this probably sums up why christians are such happy chappies and us atheists so miserable =(

#89

Posted by: FTFKDad | December 6, 2009 11:23 PM

Live in or near Colorado Springs? Come join a HumanLight holiday celebration on December 19th at the Gill Foundation, 315 E. Costilla, 6pm. Families welcome

No God? …. No Problem! Come Celebrate with us. Freethinkers of Colorado Springs wishes to invite all non theists, especially those with children, to join us for HumanLight. We share a pot luck meal, are entertainedby a magician, gift exchanges, games and have great secular music.
Suggested donation of $5 each or $12 per family … please don’t let that stop you if the budget can’t afford it.We’ll also be collecting food for Care and Share or an unwrapped toy.

For more on HumanLight: http://humanlight.org/wordpress/about/faq/

#90

Posted by: Nerdanel | December 7, 2009 6:53 AM

The problem I have with the picture is that the animal on the left isn't a reindeer but what appears to be a white-tailed deer, a completely different species. Real reindeer look different and drop their antlers before Christmas.

American illustrations keep copying other American illustrations...

#91

Posted by: ursulamajor | December 7, 2009 7:50 AM

"poorly-written work of fan-fiction (i.e. the bible)"

Best. Description. Ever.

#92

Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp | December 7, 2009 8:02 AM

Moron Wowbagger, even tho i know you won't ever understand it, you are wrong. Deep down I do know God exists. Don't bother arguing. You can't ever be right. "Ignorance" is bliss they say, I ignore your stupidity, I'll be happy.

Stunning argument.

#93

Posted by: Josh | December 7, 2009 8:08 AM

Deep down I do know God exists.

Deep down I know Odin exists. Can you explain why I'm wrong?

#94

Posted by: Ray Moscow | December 7, 2009 8:19 AM

I think the Squidbillies Christmas special will win you scrooges back to the reason for the season (i.e., the axial tilt of the earth):

http://video.tvguide.com/Squidbillies/Christmas+Hostage/339787?autoplay=true&partnerid=OVG

#95

Posted by: Mick | December 7, 2009 11:21 AM

I was in a store yesterday when this little girl, maybe 4 years old, approaches her mother and says, "Mom I want this for Christmas" and the mother yells, "That doesn't make Jesus happy!"

The little girl just shrank.

Oooh, that was scary. A sobering moment for me.

She should get this card someday.

Evolving Ray Comfort
http://www.dabreo.net/comfort/index.html

#96

Posted by: Andreas Johansson | December 7, 2009 11:24 AM

What was the girl wishing for?

#97

Posted by: Ray Moscow | December 7, 2009 1:12 PM

Strictly speaking, nothing makes Jesus happy, because he doesn't exist.

Still, you can't beat religious emotional abuse for manipulting vulnerable people such as children, as long as you don't give a shit about hurting them. Loser parenting win!

#98

Posted by: Mick | December 7, 2009 1:22 PM

She was asking for a $2 little purse at a thrift store. It was total manipulation, Ray. Very hard to watch. And even though we know Jesus doesn't/didn't/won't exist, the little girl won't even be allowed to explore that very thought.

Evolving Ray Comfort
http://www.dabreo.net/comfort/index.html

#99

Posted by: Woody Tanaka | December 7, 2009 2:45 PM

Happy Monkey!!

#100

Posted by: Moggie Author Profile Page | December 7, 2009 3:10 PM

#62:

"Ignorance" is bliss they say ... I'll be happy.

Blissfully happy, I expect.

#101

Posted by: Rutee | December 7, 2009 3:29 PM

Wouldn't it be a little tasteless to use these to give Aunt Marge a conniption?

Still, cute cards.

#102

Posted by: mythusmage Author Profile Page | December 7, 2009 5:49 PM

Has anybody besides me noticed that the artiodactyl evolved from a perriosidactly (or however you spell the dang words)?

#103

Posted by: Rumpleforeskin | December 8, 2009 7:36 PM

Twas the night before Jesus came, and all through the house,
Not a creature was praying, not one in the house.

Their Bibles were put on the shelf without care,
In hopes that Jesus would never come there.

The children were dressing to crawl into bed,
Without ever kneeling or bowing a head.

Mom in her rocker with Sue on her lap,
Was watching the Late Show while I took a nap.

When out of the East there rose such a clatter,
I sprang to my feet to see what was the matter.

Away to the window I flew like a flash,
Tore open the shutters and threw up the sash.

When what to my wondering eyes should appear,
But angels proclaiming that Jesus was here.

With a light like the sun sending forth a bright ray,
I knew in a moment this must be the day.

The light of His face made me cover my head,
It was Jesus, returning just like He said.

And though I possessed worldly wisdom and wealth,
I cried when I saw Him in spite of myself.

In the Book of Life which He held in His hand,
Was written the name of every saved man. [person]

He spoke not a word as He searched for my name,
When He said "It's not Here," my head hung in shame.

The people whose names had been written with love,
He gathered to take to His Father above.

With those who were ready, He rose with no sound,
While all the rest were left on the ground.

I fell to my knees but it was too late;
I'd waited too long and thus sealed my fate.

I stood and I cried as they rose out of sight;
Oh, if only we'd been ready tonight!

In the words of this poem the meaning is clear:
The coming of Jesus is drawing near.

There's only one life; when comes the last call;
We'll find that the Bible was true after all.

Leave a comment

HTML commands: <i>italic</i>, <b>bold</b>, <a href="url">link</a>, <blockquote>quote</blockquote>

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.