Search
Profile

PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
…and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• facebook
• MySpace
• Twitter
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
Random Quote
Hubble's observations suggested that there was a time, called the big bang, when the universe was infinitesimally small and infinitely dense. Under such conditions all the laws of science, and therefore all ability to predict the future, would break down. If there were events earlier than this time, then they could not affect what happens at the present time. Their existence can be ignored because it would have no onservational consequences. One may say that time had a beginning at the big bang, in the sense that earlier times simply would not be defined. It should be emphasized that this beginning in time is very different from those that had been considered previously. In an unchanging universe a beginning in time is something that has to be imposed by some being outside the universe; there is no physical necessity for a beginning. One can imagine that God created the universe at literally any time in the past. On the other hand, if the universe is expanding, there may be physical reasons why there had to be a beginning. One could imagine that God created the universe at the instant of the big bang, or even afterwards in just such a way as to make it look as though there had been a big bang, but it would be meaningless to suppose that it was created before the big bang. An expanding universe does not preclude a creator, but it does place limits on when he might have carried out his job!
Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time (New York: Bantam, 1988), pp. 8-9.
Recent Posts
- The Midwest Science of Origins Conference!
- Biology teaches that sexual deviancy is normal
- Mary's Monday Metazoan: Ambition!
- Our illness is their profit
- Friday Cephalopod: NUMBERLESS HOSTS!
- Dear Jezebel
- There Will Be Blood?
- Zooming in on the Origin of Life Science Foundation
- Friday Cephalopod: Feasibility trial successful
- Making excuses
A Taste of Pharyngula
Recent Comments
- Stanton on More bad science in the literature
- Stanton on Biology teaches that sexual deviancy is normal
- 'Tis Himself, OM on The Midwest Science of Origins Conference!
- Billy on Biology teaches that sexual deviancy is normal
- EntropicForces on Botanical Wednesday: Walking? No way
- kamizushi on Biology teaches that sexual deviancy is normal
- peter.waine on Biology teaches that sexual deviancy is normal
- mariadogwood on Biology teaches that sexual deviancy is normal
- Bill Dauphin, avec fromage on An open letter to the Indiana legislature
- Day2u on American political conservatism impedes the understanding of science
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
Blogroll
Other Information
« Dismal news from Ireland | Main | Now that's what atheists look like »
More articles by PZ Myers can be found on Freethoughtblogs at the new Pharyngula!
Mary's Monday Metazoan: I told her there's no way anyone will see anything sexual in this photo
Category: Organisms
Posted on: March 15, 2010 7:19 AM, by PZ Myers
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/133731
Leave a comment
HTML commands: <i>italic</i>, <b>bold</b>, <a href="url">link</a>, <blockquote>quote</blockquote>









Comments
Posted by: robhoofd
|
March 15, 2010 7:40 AM
Such a big clam you have!
Posted by: Eileen
|
March 15, 2010 8:00 AM
Gorgeous. Would be cool (and freaky) if these things were fast enough to eat scuba divers.
Posted by: scooterKPFT
|
March 15, 2010 8:05 AM
I use hydrogen peroxide to get rid of that green fur infection.
Posted by: Macallan
|
March 15, 2010 8:13 AM
It's a hairy clam!
Posted by: Rorschach
|
March 15, 2010 8:19 AM
Ahem.
I didn't adopt this nick for nothing.
I can see the remnants of the swallowed diver clearly.
Posted by: Zeno
|
March 15, 2010 8:47 AM
Why is its pubic hair green?
Posted by: nick.winnick
|
March 15, 2010 8:57 AM
The caption for this photo at the National Geographic page calls it "the largest of all mollusks."
Are they using some strange definition of mollusk that doesn't include cephalopoda? By size and weight, the colossal squid has the giant clam beat, tentacles down.
Posted by: JackC
|
March 15, 2010 9:03 AM
Clams got legs?
JC
Posted by: Thebear, just an agent of peas
|
March 15, 2010 9:24 AM
This reminds me of Do you feel like swimming
I can't see how anybody could see anything in that song either...
Posted by: https://login.launchpad.net/+id/bkPsMFK
|
March 15, 2010 9:27 AM
That sounds like a challenge.
Posted by: toth
|
March 15, 2010 9:29 AM
In what crazy, topsy-turvy world could the word "clam" ever be considered sexual!!?!!
Posted by: jacksonskepticalsociety.com
|
March 15, 2010 9:57 AM
...surely you mean "other than the fact that I'd slip that oyster a bit of the old mother of pearl." Because I don't see any other possible explanation.
Oh I'd totally do that hot, algae encrusted, thick lipped....
Man I gotta go.
Posted by: ppb
|
March 15, 2010 10:21 AM
Sometimes a clam is just a clam.
Posted by: Quidam
|
March 15, 2010 10:26 AM
I told her there's no way anyone will see anything sexual in this photo
Depends on whether or not you are a Na'vi
Posted by: ckoral
|
March 15, 2010 10:38 AM
I have a tridacna maxima in my reef. If you read up on them, wow, they are very neat creatures. Just the way they grind the food particles up that they eat is amazing alone. The symbiosis tridacna's have with zooxanthellae they have just like coral.
I have a reef and every time I look at it, I think about how this must have played a role in the leap from plant to animal. Not sure if that is true, but it seems to be.
Google tridacna for some really nice looking clam pictures.
Posted by: Rachel Bronwyn
|
March 15, 2010 10:44 AM
These things eat me up every time I play New Super Mario Bros.
Posted by: Glen Davidson
|
March 15, 2010 11:17 AM
Think pure thoughts, think pure thoughts...
Ha, makes thinking of doing it all the better once the puritanism wears off.
Glen D
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p
Posted by: nlorenzo93
|
March 15, 2010 11:21 AM
I think it's the largest bivalve mollusk (or mollusc).
Posted by: llewelly
|
March 15, 2010 11:41 AM
JackC Author | March 15, 2010 9:03 AM:
Of course.
Posted by: Aratina Cage
|
March 15, 2010 12:01 PM
Eww. That comes way too close to accurately depicting an assclam.
Posted by: Brownian, Most Vicious & Petty of Pharyngulites
|
March 15, 2010 12:14 PM
Uh, that's not one of my usual search terms, but I'm game.
From the article:
See, now why can't humans do this? Imagine: a quick inoculation of algae at birth and you'd reduce your need to eat, help sequester atmospheric carbon, and take on a healthy green sheen*.
*Added bonus: you'd be irresistible to girdle-wearing starship captains, should you be into a tumble in the back seat of a Constitution-class Chevy.
Posted by: Margaret
|
March 15, 2010 1:17 PM
For St. Paddy's Day.
Posted by: and7barton
|
March 15, 2010 1:30 PM
A clam is just a clam, but a cigar is a SMOKE.
Posted by: daveau
|
March 15, 2010 2:05 PM
Oh, I get it now. It's we who have the dirty minds, not you. See you Wednesday.
Posted by: recovering catholic
|
March 15, 2010 2:21 PM
"I have a reef and every time I look at it, I think about how this must have played a role in the leap from plant to animal. Not sure if that is true, but it seems to be."
Not sure what you mean by this, but plants and animals diverged from each other WAY before animals and zooxanthellae evolved symbiotic relationships. It is cool, though!
Posted by: Patricia, OM
|
March 15, 2010 2:53 PM
That's one slutty clam, I know a wanton expression when I see one.
Posted by: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawk6EuJ25qQXXX6AA1qI20x3qF-U7gYF3Dw
|
March 15, 2010 3:05 PM
It's spawning.
Regards,
Katkinkate
Posted by: Kraid
|
March 15, 2010 3:09 PM
PZ and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamvulva.
...or something like that.
Posted by: Son of Murph
|
March 15, 2010 3:41 PM
If anyone sees anything sexual in this green tinged object they should get help, and probably mongo antibiotics.
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
March 15, 2010 3:45 PM
Better: plants and animals diverged from each other WAY before there were plants and animals. That is, both plants and animals are derived--eventually, and among lots of other branchings--from some single-celled eukaryotic ancestor that lived maybe a billion years ago. They are entirely separate developments, and there was never any leap from one to the other.
Although recently there has been dome crosstalk:
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/53496/title/Sea_slug_steals_genes_for_greens,_makes_chlorophyll_like_a_plant
Posted by: jari.pennanen
|
March 15, 2010 4:02 PM
Interesting Poll results graphic of "Has Pope Benedict done enough to crack down on Catholic priests' sex abuse"
The number of people voted seems rather significant and what do we get? The Iowa has 62% "Yes", and 38% "No". Rest of the world, including other states of US, seems to be on definite "No" side.
Posted by: BlueEyedVideot
|
March 15, 2010 4:03 PM
I had a bite of that once...I'm still chewing.
Posted by: JackC
|
March 15, 2010 4:07 PM
Llewelly, I was going more for this but I liked yours a lot too.
Apropos of that. Nevermind the commentary - just read the cartoon.
JC
Posted by: DLC
|
March 15, 2010 4:22 PM
I am tempted to write more allusions to the words on the Euphemisms list.
Posted by: cousinavi
|
March 15, 2010 4:50 PM
Chet Pussy: All right, pussy, pussy, pussy! Come on in pussy lovers! Here at the Titty Twister we're slashing pussy in half! Give us an offer on our vast selection of pussy. This is a pussy blow out! All right, we got white pussy, black pussy, Spanish pussy, yellow pussy, we got hot pussy, cold pussy, we got wet pussy, we got...
[sniffs]
...smelly pussy, we got hairy pussy, bloody pussy, we got snappin' pussy, we got silk pussy, velvet pussy, Naugahyde pussy, we even got horse pussy, dog pussy, chicken pussy! Come on, you want pussy, come on in, pussy lovers! If we don't got it, you don't want it! Come on in, pussy lovers!
And now, blue underwater pussy.
Posted by: Charlie Foxtrot
|
March 15, 2010 7:26 PM
Is that clam bearded?
Posted by: shegeek1000101
|
March 15, 2010 7:53 PM
I'm almost afraid to speculate about whether or not those are edible...
(almost)
Posted by: 'Tis Himself, OM
|
March 15, 2010 8:21 PM
There's nothing sexual about that clam so obviously not.
Posted by: Evil Merodach
|
March 15, 2010 8:51 PM
Two words: vagina dentata
Posted by: barcsb
|
March 15, 2010 10:46 PM
I want your plankton inside me
Posted by: drewy813
|
March 16, 2010 3:12 AM
Blue Waffle??
Google it. Actually don't. But you should. Just to satisfy your own curiosity.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
March 16, 2010 3:25 AM
Chet Pussy:
Isn't that Cheech Marin from one of Tarantino's vamp movies?
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
March 16, 2010 12:32 PM
(yeah, I know tha bivalves have no radula. But they sure as hell have no dentata, either. It's at least phylum-appropriate)
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
March 16, 2010 7:42 PM
But they sure as hell have no dentata,
if one wanted to be creative, one could say they DO have teeth...
in the hinge.
:P