Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)



I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

Hubble's observations suggested that there was a time, called the big bang, when the universe was infinitesimally small and infinitely dense. Under such conditions all the laws of science, and therefore all ability to predict the future, would break down. If there were events earlier than this time, then they could not affect what happens at the present time. Their existence can be ignored because it would have no onservational consequences. One may say that time had a beginning at the big bang, in the sense that earlier times simply would not be defined. It should be emphasized that this beginning in time is very different from those that had been considered previously. In an unchanging universe a beginning in time is something that has to be imposed by some being outside the universe; there is no physical necessity for a beginning. One can imagine that God created the universe at literally any time in the past. On the other hand, if the universe is expanding, there may be physical reasons why there had to be a beginning. One could imagine that God created the universe at the instant of the big bang, or even afterwards in just such a way as to make it look as though there had been a big bang, but it would be meaningless to suppose that it was created before the big bang. An expanding universe does not preclude a creator, but it does place limits on when he might have carried out his job!

Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time (New York: Bantam, 1988), pp. 8-9.

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« Dismal news from Ireland | Main | Now that's what atheists look like »

More articles by PZ Myers can be found on Freethoughtblogs at the new Pharyngula!

Mary's Monday Metazoan: I told her there's no way anyone will see anything sexual in this photo

Category: Organisms
Posted on: March 15, 2010 7:19 AM, by PZ Myers

giant_clam.jpeg

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Life Science

Jump to end

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/133731

Comments

#1

Posted by: robhoofd Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 7:40 AM

Such a big clam you have!

#2

Posted by: Eileen Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 8:00 AM

Gorgeous. Would be cool (and freaky) if these things were fast enough to eat scuba divers.

#3

Posted by: scooterKPFT Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 8:05 AM

I use hydrogen peroxide to get rid of that green fur infection.

#4

Posted by: Macallan Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 8:13 AM

It's a hairy clam!

#5

Posted by: Rorschach Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 8:19 AM

I told her there's no way anyone will see anything sexual in this photo

Ahem.
I didn't adopt this nick for nothing.

I can see the remnants of the swallowed diver clearly.


#6

Posted by: Zeno Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 8:47 AM

Why is its pubic hair green?

#7

Posted by: nick.winnick Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 8:57 AM

The caption for this photo at the National Geographic page calls it "the largest of all mollusks."

Are they using some strange definition of mollusk that doesn't include cephalopoda? By size and weight, the colossal squid has the giant clam beat, tentacles down.

#8

Posted by: JackC Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 9:03 AM

Clams got legs?

JC

#9

Posted by: Thebear, just an agent of peas Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 9:24 AM

This reminds me of Do you feel like swimming

I can't see how anybody could see anything in that song either...

#10

Posted by: https://login.launchpad.net/+id/bkPsMFK Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 9:27 AM

That sounds like a challenge.

#11

Posted by: toth Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 9:29 AM

In what crazy, topsy-turvy world could the word "clam" ever be considered sexual!!?!!

#12

Posted by: jacksonskepticalsociety.com Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 9:57 AM

...surely you mean "other than the fact that I'd slip that oyster a bit of the old mother of pearl." Because I don't see any other possible explanation.

Oh I'd totally do that hot, algae encrusted, thick lipped....

Man I gotta go.

#13

Posted by: ppb Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 10:21 AM

Sometimes a clam is just a clam.

#14

Posted by: Quidam Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 10:26 AM

I told her there's no way anyone will see anything sexual in this photo

Depends on whether or not you are a Na'vi

#15

Posted by: ckoral Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 10:38 AM

I have a tridacna maxima in my reef. If you read up on them, wow, they are very neat creatures. Just the way they grind the food particles up that they eat is amazing alone. The symbiosis tridacna's have with zooxanthellae they have just like coral.
I have a reef and every time I look at it, I think about how this must have played a role in the leap from plant to animal. Not sure if that is true, but it seems to be.
Google tridacna for some really nice looking clam pictures.

#16

Posted by: Rachel Bronwyn Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 10:44 AM

These things eat me up every time I play New Super Mario Bros.

#17

Posted by: Glen Davidson Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 11:17 AM

Think pure thoughts, think pure thoughts...

Ha, makes thinking of doing it all the better once the puritanism wears off.

Glen D
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p

#18

Posted by: nlorenzo93 Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 11:21 AM

I think it's the largest bivalve mollusk (or mollusc).

#19

Posted by: llewelly Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 11:41 AM

JackC Author | March 15, 2010 9:03 AM:


Clams got legs?

Of course.

#20

Posted by: Aratina Cage Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 12:01 PM

Eww. That comes way too close to accurately depicting an assclam.

#21

Posted by: Brownian, Most Vicious & Petty of Pharyngulites Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 12:14 PM

Google tridacna for some really nice looking clam pictures.

Uh, that's not one of my usual search terms, but I'm game.

From the article:

Giant clams achieve their enormous proportions by consuming the sugars and proteins produced by the billions of algae that live in their tissues.

See, now why can't humans do this? Imagine: a quick inoculation of algae at birth and you'd reduce your need to eat, help sequester atmospheric carbon, and take on a healthy green sheen*.

*Added bonus: you'd be irresistible to girdle-wearing starship captains, should you be into a tumble in the back seat of a Constitution-class Chevy.

#22

Posted by: Margaret Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 1:17 PM

Why is its pubic hair green?

For St. Paddy's Day.

#23

Posted by: and7barton Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 1:30 PM

A clam is just a clam, but a cigar is a SMOKE.

#24

Posted by: daveau Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 2:05 PM

...there's no way anyone will see anything sexual in this photo

Oh, I get it now. It's we who have the dirty minds, not you. See you Wednesday.

#25

Posted by: recovering catholic Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 2:21 PM

"I have a reef and every time I look at it, I think about how this must have played a role in the leap from plant to animal. Not sure if that is true, but it seems to be."

Not sure what you mean by this, but plants and animals diverged from each other WAY before animals and zooxanthellae evolved symbiotic relationships. It is cool, though!

#26

Posted by: Patricia, OM Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 2:53 PM

That's one slutty clam, I know a wanton expression when I see one.

#27

Posted by: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawk6EuJ25qQXXX6AA1qI20x3qF-U7gYF3Dw Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 3:05 PM

It's spawning.
Regards,
Katkinkate

#28

Posted by: Kraid Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 3:09 PM

PZ and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamvulva.

...or something like that.

#29

Posted by: Son of Murph Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 3:41 PM

If anyone sees anything sexual in this green tinged object they should get help, and probably mongo antibiotics.

#30

Posted by: Sven DiMilo Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 3:45 PM

"I have a reef and every time I look at it, I think about how this must have played a role in the leap from plant to animal. Not sure if that is true, but it seems to be." Not sure what you mean by this, but plants and animals diverged from each other WAY before animals and zooxanthellae evolved symbiotic relationships. It is cool, though!

Better: plants and animals diverged from each other WAY before there were plants and animals. That is, both plants and animals are derived--eventually, and among lots of other branchings--from some single-celled eukaryotic ancestor that lived maybe a billion years ago. They are entirely separate developments, and there was never any leap from one to the other.

Although recently there has been dome crosstalk:
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/53496/title/Sea_slug_steals_genes_for_greens,_makes_chlorophyll_like_a_plant

#31

Posted by: jari.pennanen Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 4:02 PM

Interesting Poll results graphic of "Has Pope Benedict done enough to crack down on Catholic priests' sex abuse"

The number of people voted seems rather significant and what do we get? The Iowa has 62% "Yes", and 38% "No". Rest of the world, including other states of US, seems to be on definite "No" side.

#32

Posted by: BlueEyedVideot Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 4:03 PM

I had a bite of that once...I'm still chewing.

#33

Posted by: JackC Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 4:07 PM

Llewelly, I was going more for this but I liked yours a lot too.

Apropos of that. Nevermind the commentary - just read the cartoon.

JC

#34

Posted by: DLC Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 4:22 PM

I am tempted to write more allusions to the words on the Euphemisms list.

#35

Posted by: cousinavi Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 4:50 PM

Chet Pussy: All right, pussy, pussy, pussy! Come on in pussy lovers! Here at the Titty Twister we're slashing pussy in half! Give us an offer on our vast selection of pussy. This is a pussy blow out! All right, we got white pussy, black pussy, Spanish pussy, yellow pussy, we got hot pussy, cold pussy, we got wet pussy, we got...
[sniffs]
...smelly pussy, we got hairy pussy, bloody pussy, we got snappin' pussy, we got silk pussy, velvet pussy, Naugahyde pussy, we even got horse pussy, dog pussy, chicken pussy! Come on, you want pussy, come on in, pussy lovers! If we don't got it, you don't want it! Come on in, pussy lovers!

And now, blue underwater pussy.

#36

Posted by: Charlie Foxtrot Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 7:26 PM

Is that clam bearded?

#37

Posted by: shegeek1000101 Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 7:53 PM

I'm almost afraid to speculate about whether or not those are edible...
(almost)

#38

Posted by: 'Tis Himself, OM Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 8:21 PM

Is that clam bearded?

There's nothing sexual about that clam so obviously not.

#39

Posted by: Evil Merodach Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 8:51 PM

Two words: vagina dentata

#40

Posted by: barcsb Author Profile Page | March 15, 2010 10:46 PM

I want your plankton inside me

#41

Posted by: drewy813 Author Profile Page | March 16, 2010 3:12 AM

Blue Waffle??

Google it. Actually don't. But you should. Just to satisfy your own curiosity.

#42

Posted by: Ichthyic Author Profile Page | March 16, 2010 3:25 AM

Chet Pussy:

Isn't that Cheech Marin from one of Tarantino's vamp movies?

#43

Posted by: Sven DiMilo Author Profile Page | March 16, 2010 12:32 PM

Two words: vagina dentata radula

(yeah, I know tha bivalves have no radula. But they sure as hell have no dentata, either. It's at least phylum-appropriate)

#44

Posted by: Ichthyic Author Profile Page | March 16, 2010 7:42 PM

But they sure as hell have no dentata,

if one wanted to be creative, one could say they DO have teeth...

in the hinge.

:P

Leave a comment

HTML commands: <i>italic</i>, <b>bold</b>, <a href="url">link</a>, <blockquote>quote</blockquote>

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.