…and this is a 
Argonauts are odd animals. They rather resemble a nautilus, but they aren't particularly closely related to them; their closest cephalopod relatives are the octopuses. Females have a thin shell and scoot about in the water column, but the poor males are all dwarfs, rarely seen, with no shell.
What is the shell for? It seems to be a chamber for holding a bubble of air that the animals use to maintain neutral buoyancy. I'm a little surprised that this was a surprise, though — the analogy to the chambered nautilus is obvious, and all the photos and videos I've seen of them suspended in midwater suggested that they were maintaining neutral buoyancy somehow.
Life Science
Comments
Posted by: Moggie
|
May 19, 2010 7:12 AM
That's an Argonaut? Ray Harryhausen lied to me!
Posted by: puseaus
|
May 19, 2010 7:14 AM
Males are obviously less inclined to stuff themselves up with balloons.
Posted by: godlesswoman
|
May 19, 2010 7:24 AM
Here is another video http://tinyurl.com/3ae957o that explains the new discovery and shows their shell even clearer. These are really amazing animals. I have actually spent the last several hours finding out everything that I could about them.
One funny fact I learned was that researchers originally thought that the male hectocotylus (the arm of the male argonaut that includes his penis) was a parasitic worm when they found it inside the females.
Posted by: Nebula99
|
May 19, 2010 7:30 AM
That is incredibly cute.
Posted by: gre
|
May 19, 2010 8:31 AM
Does anyone know what the "black dot" between the eyes (where the two "crests" meet) is? Interesting creature.
Posted by: Anri
|
May 19, 2010 8:32 AM
Maybe it was just the general look of the beastie (and I know it's a depressing level of personification), but I could almost hear a little voice saying "Let go of me!" during the first segment of the film.
Super cute.
Posted by: nigelTheBold, Minister of Spankings
|
May 19, 2010 10:12 AM
Wow. They are beautiful.
Posted by: Katherine Lorraine, Chaton de la Mort
|
May 19, 2010 10:44 AM
Nature is so weird, but so beautiful.
Posted by: hznfrst
|
May 19, 2010 10:51 AM
What a cool little creature! Truth remains stranger than fiction - unless the ficion is religion, of course.
Posted by: Katharine
|
May 19, 2010 11:06 AM
The argonaut is, in fact, a species of octopus, and that shell is partially an egg case (it is only found in a female argonaut)!
http://www.int-res.com/articles/meps/88/m088p293.pdf
Posted by: Acronym Jim
|
May 19, 2010 11:51 AM
We all float down here.
Posted by: Acronym Jim
|
May 19, 2010 12:05 PM
[/Pennywise]
Darned fake tag fail.
Posted by: dashukta
|
May 19, 2010 12:11 PM
The first I ever heard of these critters was from Jules Vern's 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea,, where they float on the surface and use their paddle-like arms as sails...
Yeah, Vern didn't get much of his biology right.
Posted by: davegodfrey
|
May 19, 2010 3:04 PM
Does anyone know what the "black dot" between the eyes (where the two "crests" meet) is?
Its the argonaut's mouth. You can see the siphon just below it. The "crests" are the two modified arms that secrete the shell.
Posted by: Matthew Gill
|
May 19, 2010 3:06 PM
@ #5 gre
It appears the be the mouth. I could be wrong, but if it's an octopus then that black spot is right where the mouth would go.
Posted by: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawmVMlfoLldv_Cb58HMbXh9mP6j4tE8eEtY
|
May 19, 2010 4:11 PM
Does this really prove that the *primary* role of the shell is holding air? It still might be mainly an eggcase, and the animal just collects air to balance the additional weight of the shell itself, i.e. something which she neither needed nor could do without a shell.
Ralf Muschall
Posted by: David Marjanović
|
May 20, 2010 9:51 AM
This is one reason why the shell was thought not to be for buoyancy.
The other is that they hadn't been observed alive till recently.
Verne.