A Florida teacher was assaulted by two fellow teachers…who splashed her with holy water because she is an atheist. This is a serious concern — they're on to us. What am I going to do if someone flings holy water onto me? I might start smoking and my flesh will melt and then I'll disintegrate with an unholy wail as Satan drags me down.
Or I might start giggling. One or the other.
Gotta make sure the Christians don't find out about this. Stakes through the heart and silver bullets…completely harmless to atheists. Holy water, though, and garlic terrify us. Especially if it's a garlic with butter and lemon on calamari, I'm just paralyzed with fear when I see that. Shhhh, don't tell anyone.









Comments
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp
|
May 25, 2010 3:07 PM
Isn't that technically assault?
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
May 25, 2010 3:07 PM
Let's get the Comfy Chair reference out of the way right off the bat.
Posted by: Zeno
|
May 25, 2010 3:08 PM
I don't get it. What is a Baptist minister's wife doing with holy water? That's a Roman Catholic sacramental that is normally disdained by Protestants, but I guess they think it works anyway. I mean, we've all seen Buffy, right?
Sheesh.
Posted by: https://me.yahoo.com/a/S1.gFXY.qdwzatYQJ0I2ItibRo1v#544d8
|
May 25, 2010 3:08 PM
A six-pack of stout beer on my doorstep would totally drive the evils out of me. Come on Christians, don't let me down!
Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage
|
May 25, 2010 3:09 PM
If someone purposely splashed water, holy or secular, on me because of a stupid cultural reason, I'd make a complaint to the cops and present the splasher with a dry-cleaning bill.
Posted by: vanharris
|
May 25, 2010 3:09 PM
Watch out, PZ, that holy water might turn into wine, that then, (with a priest's magic incantation), turns into the feckin' bible bogey.
Posted by: Randomfactor
|
May 25, 2010 3:10 PM
*NOW* you see the importance of Towel Day!
Posted by: curious tentacle
|
May 25, 2010 3:10 PM
I find the idea of tentacle assault... arousing.
Posted by: Louis
|
May 25, 2010 3:14 PM
I'm particularly terrified of large donations of cash and beautiful women performing oral sex upon my person.
Just FYI. You know, if there's any christians out there who want to really scare the crap out of me.
Oh yeah, and the group sex with dozens of really really hot women, that's the worst one. I really hate that*.
Louis
*Well, to be honest, I'd really love the opportunity to hate it.
Posted by: Gregory Greenwood
|
May 25, 2010 3:15 PM
All joking aside, it might be 'holy' water today, but battery acid tommorrow.
Never underestimate the raw, unmitigated crazy of the fundies...
Posted by: alysonmiers
|
May 25, 2010 3:16 PM
If I were to find a bottle of hard liquor on my doorstep, I would totally believe in God. Especially if a new one appeared once a week for several months at a time.
Posted by: Callinectes
|
May 25, 2010 3:18 PM
Apparently it was perfume that they joked was holy water.
Posted by: "Roger"
|
May 25, 2010 3:19 PM
This is the part that I don't like: For Rodriguez, the question is whether she was advocating atheism to her students. In a public school setting, that would seem to be improper.
Was that done during or outside of school hours? If it was during, then yes, it would be improper.
I think the "holy water" was just their way of showing that they were pissed off. Strange, but I just can't see them actually believing that it would have an effect.
Posted by: Louis
|
May 25, 2010 3:20 PM
I have just been informed by my lovely wife that I am in fact genuinely terrified of beautiful women performing oral sex upon my person, and the group sex with dozens of really, really hot women is so terrifying as to be completely out of the question.
Any confusion caused is entirely my fault. Any large cash donations should be given directly to her. Something I really do find very terrifying.
;-)
Louis
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
May 25, 2010 3:21 PM
Yahoomess:
Regular appearances of hard cider and Djarum clove cigars would have me contemplating the wonders of god...yeah, that's the ticket!
Posted by: Sven DiMilo
|
May 25, 2010 3:27 PM
Briar Patch, please.
I'll have the calamari and the stout.
Posted by: tsg
|
May 25, 2010 3:28 PM
From here:
I have a hunch, unsupported of course, that she wasn't "refuting Christianity" but refuting Pat Robertson. Which is the same thing, after all....
Posted by: Zeno
|
May 25, 2010 3:31 PM
Yes! Yay!
Posted by: qetzal
|
May 25, 2010 3:31 PM
If that happened to me, I think I'd come back the next day with my own vial of water. I'd tell them it was Official Atheist Unholy Water (TM), and fling it on them.
I'm pretty sure that will bother the theists a lot more than their holy water would bother me!
Now the only question is, who would I get to "unbless" the unholy water? Hmmm....
Posted by: Peter H
|
May 25, 2010 3:32 PM
"Apparently it was perfume that they joked was holy water."
Alog with probable assault we can add hypocrisy.
Posted by: brian.deegan2
|
May 25, 2010 3:35 PM
Would take alot more than cans stout and few cigars for me to believe.
I'd go with daily bottles of top quality scotch, box of cigars, a million euro (or dollars or pounds) oh and some of that calamari sounds good, but every second day I want the calamari to be replaced with good steak instead. Suppose the occaisional keg Guinness would be too much to ask for.
I think that lot would be a good start to helpin me believe in the flying spaghetti monster or god or any other imaginary figure to keep the good stuff coming.
Posted by: Shplane, some shit in french
|
May 25, 2010 3:36 PM
...
DOT DOT DOT
Ellipse.
(I am expressing STUNNED SILENCE)
Posted by: Westcoaster
|
May 25, 2010 3:37 PM
That sounds funny, but I can only imagine the kind of crap this teacher must put up with. Sounds like a pretty toxic work environment to me.
Posted by: threeholerhauler
|
May 25, 2010 3:40 PM
Well at least they are not burning us at the stake anymore. If they start again, the holy water may come in handy.
Posted by: truthspeaker
|
May 25, 2010 3:41 PM
I think you'll find that many American Protestants get most of their knowledge of theology from horror movies.
Posted by: IslandBrewer
|
May 25, 2010 3:42 PM
I'm vacillating between "Oh teh noes! Magic potions!" and "WTF? Are these grown ups we're talking about?"
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
May 25, 2010 3:42 PM
My oh my, the comments:
Posted by: woozy
|
May 25, 2010 3:47 PM
Ick. Now I can't get the image of fundies throwing holy water on my fried calamari out of my mind. Yuck, nothing worse then soggy calamari...
Posted by: bart.mitchell
|
May 25, 2010 3:47 PM
How to make Holy water:
Take one bottle water.
Place in pan.
Turn on high heat and boil the hell out of it.
An old classic, but always worth repeating. At our last atheist meeting, someone cracked this classic off leaving a young girl in near hysterics.
Posted by: raven
|
May 25, 2010 3:48 PM
Technically this could be construed as attempted assault with a deadly weapon. If the xian creeps thought the holy water would cause the atheist to melt into a puddle like the witch in the Wizard of Oz.
But it also could be construed as "breathing while stupid" or similar.
Probably on the surface they were trying to exorcize demons from the teacher or forcibly convert them againt their will by the power of magic holy water. Underneath, they were probably tossing the holy water as a substitute aggressive displacement activity because they couldnt burn them at the stake.
It is undeniably, certainly harassment though. The wackos have no right to attempt to exorcize or force convert someone against their will. I would file a complaint. Might not do any good but this sort of bullying and harassment won't stop at one incident. Next step. Burn a cross on someone's lawn.
Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage
|
May 25, 2010 3:49 PM
Could you please do it a bit more quietly.
Posted by: Frankencone
|
May 25, 2010 3:49 PM
*chuckles* These people seem to confuse Helsing with hellsign.
I guess it makes sense if you are a 3 year old though. Or religious.
Posted by: donbutton
|
May 25, 2010 3:49 PM
There's a poll on this here:
http://www.sfltimes.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4489&Itemid=1
The question is "Should teachers debate the existence of god in the classroom?"
It's a ridiculous question without more context, but the NO vote is winning right now 62/48, so I think the right answer in this case must be YES.
Shall we?
Posted by: Bob Kowalski
|
May 25, 2010 3:54 PM
I tease my wife that she'd burst into flame if she touches the Holy Bible. Or that if anyone were to say "Bless you!" or worse "God Bless you!" that she would start screaming, "It burns! It burns!"
How about, hamming it up a bit? Fall to the ground frothing and screaming as loudly as possible, "What did you do? What was that? It burns! It burns!" and the like for a few seconds or so and then suddenly stop & look at them, and ask, "Really had you going there, didn't I? Do you have a spray bottle?"
Posted by: JackC
|
May 25, 2010 3:55 PM
I would suggest a one-word, off-school-premises response to this situation.
SuperSoaker.
Or is that two words? I never can tell.
JC
Posted by: tsg
|
May 25, 2010 3:55 PM
I would need a "YES if we could count on it being an honest discussion, but NO if some twit is going to use it as an excuse to preach" option.
Posted by: mikerattlesnake
|
May 25, 2010 3:58 PM
when I was a teacher for two years I was talking to another teacher about how it was too bad that so many of our students' parents allowed them to play any video games and see any movies without regard to what material was age-appropriate (I was referring to things like Saw and GTA for pre-high school kids). She immediately agreed and said it was horrible that kids played world of warcraft and learned witchcraft.
I remember staring at her for about three seconds and then saying "yeah, but those things aren't real. Gang violence, prostitution, and torture are real things. Kids can't actually learn spells because witches aren't real." I couldn't figure out how to say it without sounding terribly condescending.
Public school sucks and seems to attract mostly morons. Morons with good intentions, sure, but morons nonetheless. I encountered very few people who I would call rational, critical thinkers.
Posted by: James F
|
May 25, 2010 4:01 PM
What a world! What a world!
Posted by: donbutton
|
May 25, 2010 4:01 PM
TSG said "I would need a "YES if we could count on it being an honest discussion, but NO if some twit is going to use it as an excuse to preach" option."
I think the key word here is DEBATE. Apparently, in this school district, Christianity is assumed and pushed, so debate is probably very unwelcome. It implies that there is in fact more than one opinion.
Posted by: "Roger"
|
May 25, 2010 4:04 PM
Debating god IN a classroom? No.
If on the other hand, that article was right with that one kid going all "Pat Robertson" on the people of Haiti and the teacher shot her down for that, I believe that if the student says something that stupid in class, then the student gets shot down in class.
Outside of class though; let her rip.
Posted by: tsg
|
May 25, 2010 4:08 PM
The second key word, though, is "teachers": a position of authority that can too easily be abused. Yes, I would prefer an honest discussion, however I don't think that is what we'll get.
Hence my reservations.
Posted by: lakabux
|
May 25, 2010 4:11 PM
As it happens; I am an unordained minister!
As such, for a trivial honorarium, preferably in large, unmarked bills or cases of 10 year old, single barrel bourbon, I would be delighted to perform the unblessing.
Posted by: Rey Fox, Bird Caller Guy
|
May 25, 2010 4:14 PM
From the South Florida Times article:
"Local clergy have called an emergency meeting"
Can't help but laugh at the notion of a "clerical emergency". Naturally in this case, and probably every other case, it's just a signal that it's time to flog the persecution complex again.
"an avowed atheist who was expressing her lack of belief in God with students."
Gasp! An avowed atheist! Talking out loud about it! Sound the clergy alarm! Call the church police!
"Leslie Rainer and Robinson were escorted out of the classroom on April 22 in front of students, and were ordered not to return to school grounds until further notice."
Of course, we can always count on school administrators to handle things with the appropriate ham-fistedness. *eyeroll*
Comment at the SF Times:
"I think the real issue here, that everyone else seems to be avoiding, is that God is not following through on His promises. Now, it seems to me that two good-natured, God-fearing women blasted some heathen Atheist harlot with Holy Water, and she doesn't seem to be physically hurt at all! What is going on here!? Had the blessing gone stale, or did God drop the ball on this one? "
Yes! And this comment was downrated by one, can you believe it?
Of course, this is all a big she said/she said at the moment. Still, I'd love to ask the accused teachers just what it was they were trying to accomplish.
Posted by: raven
|
May 25, 2010 4:15 PM
Being an atheist teacher in a public school can get you fired.
This teacher was fired for "suspected atheism". In the sick world of xian fundies, you don't have to do or be something. Being suspected is enough. In fact, to this day, there is no proof that he was an atheist.
It could happen that as US xianity sinks into the swamp of toxic religion and fades, that they will get more vicious in the next few decades. Witch hunts are a long, cherished, and valuable xian tradition, part of their team building.
Posted by: donbutton
|
May 25, 2010 4:16 PM
As I said, the question lacks context. If the teachers are pushing the fundy evangelism where it does not belong, then I would certainly encourage my sons to speak up and debate said teachers.
If a church-going student challenges a non-believing teacher atheism (assuming it's in the context of a related topic—philosophy, biology, cultural anthropology, etc), then yes, debate could in fact be a healthy learning experience.
Posted by: jcmartz.myopenid.com
|
May 25, 2010 4:17 PM
Last Saturday (May 22, I it was my sister's confirmation into the RCC) I got sprinked with holy water but I'm still here.
Posted by: Mattir-ritated
|
May 25, 2010 4:19 PM
When SonSpawn was eight or nine, he ran into some loons who told him that his Yu-Gi-Oh cards were demonic, that they'd burned all of theirs in a special family ceremony, and that he needed to burn his to destroy the evil spirits in them (this after I'd wasted two weeks over the summer learning to play the damn game so I could teach him to play in a local tournament). He came home from that 4-H meeting in tears at the idea that someone wanted to burn his toys, at which point his father knelt down and said "Son, you've just learned something really important. A lot of people are really really stupid." I'd been thinking along the lines of how some people get confused when they have unpleasant emotions (kids getting jealous and arguing over highly valued cards) and figure that they're being influenced by some outside force, but I decided that "really really stupid" was a fine description. Then he asked, still sniffling, if we could play several hands of poker as a family to calm him down.
Good to know that such idiots grow up to be teachers and assault their colleagues with magic cootie-banishing liquids.
Posted by: Rey Fox, Bird Caller Guy
|
May 25, 2010 4:21 PM
"I couldn't figure out how to say it without sounding terribly condescending. "
It's pretty much condescending by default. Doesn't mean you shouldn't say it, of course.
Posted by: grudgedk
|
May 25, 2010 4:24 PM
Stupidity is no defense in the eyes of the law. If you can demonstrate malicious intent, there you go.I mean if it had been the other way around, 2 Satanic teachers branding a devout Christian teacher on the forehead with an upside-down pentagram, people would be screaming bloody murder!
But grudgedk I hear you say "That's not at all the same thing! Your version is painful and sick!", and you'd be right of course, but it's not my fault your god is a wuss... :)
Posted by: monado
|
May 25, 2010 4:27 PM
Actually, holy water is noxious. A friend visited a Catholic Church, dipped a finger and touched it to her lips because that's what she thought the people ahead of her were doing on their way out. She came down with the World's Worst Cold from the combined germs of the entire congregation.
As I think Ol' Greg said the other day, religion is a public health issue.
Posted by: Silič O'Nopolitanopoulos, Färschdbischuf Beesknees aus Ulm und Klein Elguth, Elector Pharynguline.
|
May 25, 2010 4:32 PM
See?! This is why Christianity is a religion of peace! Muslims woulda thrown acid at her!
Oh ... don't give them ideas, you said.
Posted by: the.annabelle.morris.effect
|
May 25, 2010 4:33 PM
Call, me a prude, but I think it's highly inappropriate to make ANY kind of prank on ANYONE's beliefs. People would be having screaming fits if you ran into a Christian teacher's room wearing a devil mask and waving upside down crosses and you'd probably get lynched if you jumped out on a Jew dressed as a Nazi. Why is pestering Atheists somehow okay?
But then, I'm also a person who thinks playing any kind of prank makes you an asshole in the first place, so....
Posted by: Walton, Marquis of Carabas
|
May 25, 2010 4:37 PM
:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
Most awesome response ever. Mattir's husband wins the thread.
Posted by: Galahad Threepwood
|
May 25, 2010 4:42 PM
Well, I wouldn't want to be shot with silver bullets (or any kind of bullet, for that matter)--but the holy water thing is laughable. Do they think all atheists are vampires? Talk about being confused...
Posted by: Shadow
|
May 25, 2010 4:44 PM
I alway thought that Assault was the perceived threat and battery was the action.
In this case the assault would be seeing a bottle of unknown liquid (claimed to be holy water, then perfume called holy water) and the battery would be the liquid hitting her. IANAL, but I would certainly look at charges. You know they would if you threw a cracker at them.
Posted by: Silič O'Nopolitanopoulos, Färschdbischuf Beesknees aus Ulm und Klein Elguth, Elector Pharynguline.
|
May 25, 2010 4:45 PM
You're the awesomest mum ever. And my mum read Mortadelo y Filemón to me, so I should know.(Yes, I'm only now reading the manga, and I. can. not. stop. despite it being so utterly ridiculous.)
Posted by: Acronym Jim
|
May 25, 2010 4:49 PM
While smoking is bad for you, I hardly think it qualifies as damnable offense. I suppose though, it depends on what you're smoking.
Posted by: MrFire
|
May 25, 2010 4:51 PM
Stephen Colbert ran a skit involving something like this a while ago:
Baptiz'd
Posted by: AustinAcid
|
May 25, 2010 4:54 PM
haha, about these teachers maturity levels, there has been an on going joke at the grade school i work at, that the teachers tend to act like the children they are around so much. and from what i seen of other schools it seems to be a common trend. =)
weird that pz posted this right as the joke became common... im on to you pz... *shifty eyes*
Posted by: Fortknox
|
May 25, 2010 4:59 PM
Holy shit!
I was expecting this kind of thing in India, not US!
USA is truly becoming a first world third world country.
Posted by: lenoxuss
|
May 25, 2010 5:13 PM
Holy water is one of those things at the delicious boundary where religions embarrass themselves for us. Whereas stuff like prayer somehow remains "common sense" in the current zeitgeist (despite being a magic ritual), notions like holy water, demons, exorcism, and witchcraft have come to have, in the popular culture, the Hold-on-you-can't-really-believe-that quality, like leprechauns do. But it hasn't just disappeared like other facets of Christian theology. Why?
Because Jesus, in addition to being super-powered in various ways, was an exorcist! Not only that, but a very "human" one — driving demons into pigs, which is not the sort of thing I imagine an omnipotent being doing (why sacrifice some animals instead of just zapping away the demons?).
I'm not sure I've ever heard a good theological answer to the question of why we don't have witchcraft statutes anymore. Surely it's still physically possible to consort with Satan, acquiring demonic powers to inflict disease on one's neighbors? This stuff isn't just medieval thinking — it was mainstream theology less than 300 years ago! Did all the witches and demons disappear into the time of legend? Where does the Bible say they would?
And judging by, say, Harry Potter/Magic TCG/etc hysteria, demonological thinking still exists today. (Again, since it's in the NT, no surprise.) How do people reconcile that thinking with modern sanity? If popular culture can drive kids to become actual Satanic spell-casting warlocks, why don't the concerned parents do more to address this root problem, not just express worry about individual books/films? There should be calls for the establishment of something like the Comics Code Authority, an entity which would determine which roleplaying games, etc, are most likely to transform children into accursed Lovecraftian three-headed beasts.
Of course, the simpler route is just to stock up on holy water, but as pointed out earlier, it only works for Catholics. Oh well.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
May 25, 2010 5:17 PM
But it also could be construed as "breathing while stupid" or similar.
yes, this whole affair, that school, the "emergency fundie meeting", and the comments on the original article pretty much all strike me that way.
that's the scary part.
Florida is just filled with stupid any more.
*sigh*
phht.. emergency fundie meeting...
no doubt it looked something like this...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LI_Oe-jtgdI
Posted by: Fortknox
|
May 25, 2010 5:18 PM
Also, why am I not surprised that these "teachers" are black...they always were much more literal, ignorant and hyper superstitious...
So much for the blatant disproportionate lack of black atheists...
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
May 25, 2010 5:23 PM
How do people reconcile that thinking with modern sanity?
I think I see the flaw in your logic...
Frankly, you're talking about people who don't even bother to look.
compartmentalization is quite a powerful tool.
Posted by: Walton, Marquis of Carabas
|
May 25, 2010 5:27 PM
Oh great. Another racist idiot.
Posted by: SaraJ
|
May 25, 2010 5:28 PM
Fortknox: Racist much?
Posted by: Carlie of the lacy, gently wafting adjectives
|
May 25, 2010 5:28 PM
Cleanup in aisle #63. Pieces of crap everywhere.
Posted by: First Approximation, L'esprit de l'escalier
|
May 25, 2010 5:29 PM
Fortknox,
Fuck off.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
May 25, 2010 5:32 PM
Fortknox:
Ugh. Take your idiot rhetoric somewhere else.
Seconding Cleanup in aisle #63.
Posted by: Gregory Greenwood
|
May 25, 2010 5:34 PM
Fortknox @ 63;
Whereas reactionary, racist stereotyping is, of course, the very height of rational thought...
Posted by: Mattir-ritated
|
May 25, 2010 5:35 PM
I don't like the tone of #63 (IPU forbid - I'm being a tone troll!), but having worked in largely African American areas for years, I agree that atheism is wildly underrepresented in the African American community. This is probably because religious institutions have been the central organizers of community life for a long time (far more so than in the majority community, as far as I can tell), and atheism is seen as something that's alien or even harmful to the community. American Humanist Association had a conference on atheism in the African American community last week.
Posted by: Walton, Marquis of Carabas
|
May 25, 2010 5:36 PM
What is it with the recent influx of commenters who use atheism as a pretext for bigotry? People like Fortknox, a.human.ape, Anti_Theist317, the whole crowd of paranoid Islamophobes, and the like...
This is what worries me about the whole idea of an "atheist movement". The last thing I want is to be perceived as being on the same "side" as loons like Fortknox or Anti_Theist. And I think all of us who are liberal atheists have a responsibility to dissociate ourselves as loudly as possible from that kind of nuttery.
Posted by: raven
|
May 25, 2010 5:37 PM
??? What planet are you commenting from?
It is true that demons, witches, and witchcraft disappeared from serious thought centuries ago as primitive superstition.
However, a whole lot of people never got that memo. In fundieland, these are still major preoccupations. Spiritual warfare, the War against Halloween, hordes of demons roaming the earth stealing your parking spot, xian children kidnapped and found dead and completely drained of all their blood and on and on and on.
Exorcisms are still common in some sects, not just RCC. The fundies do a lot of them too. Carl Sagan's demon haunted darkness is a reality to tens of millions of Americans.
Posted by: Fortknox
|
May 25, 2010 5:45 PM
Oh, for fuck sake, go peddle your nonsensical PC crap somewhere else...we should just pretend that the fact that they are black and such enthusiastic superstitious nuts is just a coincidence...
Posted by: raven
|
May 25, 2010 5:45 PM
Read it and hold your head in your hands. Or order a few gallons of holy water.
Can't say anything about the accuracy of the statistic that 2/3's of all Americans believe in angels and demons. That seems high but who knows, wouldn't surprise me too much if it was so.
Posted by: danielm
|
May 25, 2010 5:45 PM
actually it's worrying, NOT because it's water - at which point I'd probably screech "I'm melting! MEEELLLTTIINNGGGGGGG (what a world, what a worlllldddd)" - but that tomorrow it might not be. It might be somebody decides they have to beat the devil out of you...
Posted by: stevieinthecity#9dac9
|
May 25, 2010 5:48 PM
fortknox. you're an idiot. it has nothing to do with race and everything to do with culture and education.
Posted by: Mattir-ritated
|
May 25, 2010 5:49 PM
Go screw yourself, Fortknox.
*Clutches pearls in horror at having broken the tone code...
Posted by: Gregory Greenwood
|
May 25, 2010 5:52 PM
raven @ 73;
Oh teh noes! Xians say vampires are real?
But, but, it is dark here, and I do not have any holy water, a handy crucifix or a sharpened piece of wood to hand!
Where is Sarah Michelle Geller when you need her?
It is hard to believe that anyone with access to the educational facilities of a First World country sees vampirism as anything other than a (hackneyed) metaphor for teen angst.
Posted by: Fortknox
|
May 25, 2010 5:53 PM
Btw, didn't that black fat cunt that is responsible for torturing and murdering children in Africa come to US recently to preach?
And what about that Uganda "kill the gays bill", it's still on the table..
Blacks were always the most enthusiastic superstitious nuts.
Even other black people who are not like that confirm this fact, you just need to get informed, without the PC nonsense....
Posted by: Fortknox
|
May 25, 2010 5:56 PM
Oh, I forgot!
That gay exorcism video that got viral, guess what?
Black! Black! Black!
Posted by: First Approximation, L'esprit de l'escalier
|
May 25, 2010 5:56 PM
It's possible one or more are just people trying to make atheists look bad. It has happened before. I haven't been following closely enough to comment whether that is the case for the examples you mentioned.
In any case, being an atheist doesn't guarantee a person will be rational or even a decent human being. Given any large enough group there's bound to be a few morons and bigots.
Indeed.
Posted by: dutchdoc
|
May 25, 2010 5:58 PM
... and yet another story that bears all the marks of there being WAY more to it than meets the eye!
(Some of it already beginning to surface)
Maybe most people here get a vision of two religious nut jobs attacking this poor atheist teacher and, with foam on their mouths, yelling exorcist gibberish while dousing the poor lady with holy water ...
while in reality there could have been those two teachers in the doorway of the class, holding up a perfume bottle, and jokingly flicking some drops in the general direction of the atheist teacher, giggling and saying, "hey.. it's holy water" ... hee hee hee...
Which was it? Are both scenarios equally plausible? Were you there?
(I personally find the second scenario more plausible, and it also happens to be the story that's now surfacing as to what the entire class room appears to have reported).
Just saying...
Posted by: First Approximation, L'esprit de l'escalier
|
May 25, 2010 5:58 PM
Fortknox: impenetrable (to reason).
Seriously, fuck off.
Posted by: Fortknox
|
May 25, 2010 6:03 PM
Two black bozos claiming they can raise dead and heal sick
What did I say about blacks always being the most enthusiastic superstitious nuts?
Posted by: Walton, Marquis of Carabas
|
May 25, 2010 6:07 PM
Exactly! And that's why I don't believe in the idea of an "atheist movement".
Atheism is an absence of belief in deities; nothing more, nothing less. An atheist can be a good, bad or indifferent person; more rational or less rational; more intelligent or less intelligent; and can hold a whole range of political, social and religious views. Atheism isn't a philosophy of life, any more than non-stamp-collecting is a hobby.
The philosophy shared (to varying degrees) by the majority of the regulars on Pharyngula is not atheism alone, but liberal secular humanism. (I'm using "liberal" not in a narrow political sense here - and I certainly don't mean "centre-left" or "progressive" - but rather in a broader sense, to mean "attached to the general values of individual freedom and rational thought". So it can include both left-wingers and libertarians.) Liberal secular humanism, unlike atheism, is a positive philosophy that upholds certain moral values: the dignity of all human beings, individual freedom, constitutionalism and the rule of law, rational scientific thought, and the importance of education. And this is why I think all the "atheist conferences" and so on should be renamed.
Posted by: raven
|
May 25, 2010 6:07 PM
LOL. As another commenter noted above, a lot of xians get most of their information about their religion from movies.
But the dead, bloodless xian kids aren't being attacked by vampires in their mythology.
They blame it on satanists who kidnap children and bleed them out for their rituals. All those missing kids on milk cartons? Satanists.
FWIW, they really, truly believe that. Various fundie xian groups spent decades pressuring the FBI into investigating missing children. The FBI spent a huge amount of time doing so. They never found a single case of a missing kid abducted by satanists for their rituals. In fact, there is no evidence that real satanists even exist.
There are for real missing children. They go missing for many reasons, some horrible. The most common is being abducted by one parent involved in a custody dispute.
Posted by: Mattir-ritated
|
May 25, 2010 6:07 PM
Quoted for stupidity
Fortknox, you are a bigoted, ill-informed, sexist idiot, filled with your own special mix of enthusiastic superstitious nuttery. Have you failed to notice the enthusiastic superstition of the TeaBaggers, who are as melanin-impaired a group as you could wish to find? Have you further failed to notice that the teacher who was splashed with the water was herself a person of color (Latina, based on her name)?
Good job dragging in a totally irrelevant but highly charged distractor, as if the causes of reason and skepticism really needed more opposition based knee-jerk emotions...
Obviously you forgot your towel today.
Posted by: Caine, ghetto féministe
|
May 25, 2010 6:09 PM
Fortknox, fuck off. Your racism is not welcome here, full stop. You can't justify it, nor can you expect to be considered rational.
Posted by: Walton, Marquis of Carabas
|
May 25, 2010 6:10 PM
QFT.
Ugh. Fortknox is one of the most repulsive racist morons I've ever seen around these parts. (And his last post threw in a bit of gratuitous misogyny and some added bigotry against overweight people, too.)
Posted by: raven
|
May 25, 2010 6:13 PM
The ones who came up with that idea and are pushing it are white US xian fundies based in Washington DC.
2/3's of all Americans believe in demons. 12% of the US population is black. Do the math, the vast majority of demon haunted Americans are white.
Oh, I forgot, Trollknox doesn't do math or reality.
Posted by: Paul
|
May 25, 2010 6:15 PM
That's not true!
...it's also been a metaphor for sex in more prudish times, and a metaphor for dysfunctional family...before Twilight came along...
Posted by: PZ Myers
|
May 25, 2010 6:17 PM
Fortknox, you're going to get banned real soon now.
Posted by: Gregory Greenwood
|
May 25, 2010 6:18 PM
raven @ 87;
My bad. Satanists instead of vampires. I suppose believing in human cultists is marginally more rational than belief in the undead, but the total lack of evidence for satanism definitely places this obsession in the usual range of fundie fantasy.
Posted by: gr8hands
|
May 25, 2010 6:22 PM
Forknox, you're presenting anecdotes (which I presume you know is not evidence) about your point.
I agree that merely calling you a racist is not refuting you.
As you have made the outrageous claim, it is up to you to provide evidence of it. Can you cite any studies that reach the same conclusion?
You do realize that the quickest way to get white people to cancel their subscription is to write something negative about their religion, or mess with the horoscope, don't you? Very enthusiastic.
Check out the public demonstrations and marches for religious things like abortion, prayer, etc. Mostly white people.
Check out the demographics for the megachurches. Mostly white people.
Check out the partipants in the aggressive religious-based killings for centuries in Ireland. Entirely white people.
Check out the people who started all the Crusades and Inquisitions. Entirely white people.
Check out the demographics for private religious schools. Mostly white people.
I could go on and on, and that wouldn't necessarily be anything more than anecdotal commentary, but it does appear to involve millions of white people.
But, I would still appreciate getting the citation for the scientific research supporting your claim.
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp
|
May 25, 2010 6:26 PM
Wow, and here I was thinking that the dumbest commenter of the day was Hyperon.
Posted by: raven
|
May 25, 2010 6:27 PM
There is a large lunatic fringe of the fundie xian-satanist-child abduction meme complex who are questionably sane. Google has lots of links. These people are far more frightening than satanists or vampires. Those are just mythology, while the kooks are real.
Posted by: Christie Wilcox
|
May 25, 2010 6:29 PM
As far as I see it, two teachers harassed another teacher based on that teacher's religious views. The school did the right thing in disciplining them - it's not about who was/wasn't teaching about God, it's about bullying. The fact that the actual vehicle of their harassment was harmless doesn't matter.
If the situation were the other way around, I hope the school would do the same thing to two athiest teachers. Or if it were two teachers harassing another about his/her weight, ethnicity, etc... Persecution in the workplace isn't acceptable, period.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
May 25, 2010 6:29 PM
while in reality there could have been those two teachers in the doorway of the class, holding up a perfume bottle, and jokingly flicking some drops in the general direction of the atheist teacher, giggling and saying, "hey.. it's holy water" ... hee hee hee...
somehow, I don't find that comforting.
you do?
Posted by: Gregory Greenwood
|
May 25, 2010 6:31 PM
raven @ 97;
Undeniably true. Few things are scarier than the fringe of the fringe. They are the 100% proof kind of crazy that is capable of anything.
Posted by: Michelle R
|
May 25, 2010 6:31 PM
People, if this happens to you, reach for the nearest firehose/garden hose. :D
Posted by: https://me.yahoo.com/a/okJN9ABk1eh1hpOE.HCbIYsToV4Owg--#f7d03
|
May 25, 2010 6:44 PM
I've been reading about this case all day. There's a real question here as to what, exactly, happened. From what I can detect, some people say X, others say Y. I'd like to know more about exactly went down.
In the end, teachers shouldn't soapbox for anyone or anything--not the GOP, not a religion, not Amway, nothing. But there's a difference between advocating/evangelizing and discussing a topic in a way that's pedagogically appropriate. Again, it's unclear what, exactly, this teacher did or said to draw the ire of her colleagues. All I've read so far is that she was "discussing" her atheism with students. This could mean anything. It depends what was said, how it was said, and in what context it was said--and none of that is clear right now.
What's not in dispute (beside the fact that flinging holy water at atheists doesn't kill our mojo) is that being an out atheist is often risky. If your a teacher, and you're out, you'll have parents talking about how they don't want you interacting with "our children," as though you were some kind of pedophile (i.e. Catholic clergy).
Posted by: pnrjulius
|
May 25, 2010 7:02 PM
Wait... PZ... you eating calamari... isn't that like cannibalism?
Posted by: Pierce R. Butler
|
May 25, 2010 7:45 PM
This is obviously an extreme case of abuse by an atheist teacher: she burned nothing on her students' arms with a Tesla coil!
Posted by: Ströh
|
May 25, 2010 7:46 PM
Holy water? Really? These people are just asking for trouble. Sure, most of us don't react very badly to Holy Water® but some of us... Well, lets just say seeing us shed our human skin and erupt into our true form in all its Eldritch glory isn't precisely nice.
Posted by: Pierce R. Butler
|
May 25, 2010 8:01 PM
Meanwhile, back at the South Florida Times>:
And according to the Broward-Palm Beach New Times "Juice" blog,
What is it with southeastern teachers' unions these days?
Posted by: Rutee, Shrieking Harpy of Dooooom
|
May 25, 2010 8:06 PM
OT: Actually, it is. If you're too stupid to have a mens rea, you can either get the charge thrown out, or have it downgraded to negligence, like the cult leader who killed someone because he actually thought he could rip out the guy's heart and fix it, then put it back.Stupidity is not a PERFECT defense, and the criminal law will only let you be so stupid, but it IS a defense.
Posted by: Ströh
|
May 25, 2010 8:34 PM
@ #107
Even so, doesn't intent trump ignorance? In other words: in a theoretical situation where a person believes an act will kill or seriously injure a person, ignorance to the fact that it can't would be a poor defence, correct?
I doubt that applies here, though. The only thing the two teachers where blatantly ignorant of was that their "prank" could have more far-reaching consequences than they thought, and ignorance of what constitutes decent behaviour really is no defence at all.
Posted by: monad
|
May 25, 2010 8:39 PM
@103: It's not like cannibalism is unheard of among cephalopods, though.
Posted by: llewelly
|
May 25, 2010 8:46 PM
pnrjulius | May 25, 2010 7:02 PM:
No. It's like communion.
Posted by: Denis Loubet
|
May 25, 2010 9:04 PM
Holy Water today, wooden stakes and silver bullets tomorrow.
Best to nip it in the bud right now.
Posted by: rn.massey
|
May 25, 2010 9:17 PM
*grumbles* It takes this for me to delurk to answer a moron on one of my favorite blogs:
@Foxtrot: this black atheist would very much like for you to shut your racist piehole while you're still behind.
Not ahead, behind. I didn't have a clue about the skin color of the water flinging twits nor of the teacher getting soaked, and now that I do...it doesn't change my opinion in the least. You can find a lot of example of religious nuts of all stripes and colors doing stupid stuff, and now that I've thought about it, I take back my first sentence.
Please continue to blather on, please give PeeZed a reason to boot your butt from the blogs.
Posted by: Notkieran
|
May 25, 2010 9:24 PM
Tangential to Michelle @ #101:
There was this one time when I was in school, in art class, one classmate decided to harass me by flicking water on me from the tap.
This was a bad idea. I was painting at the time, and I threw my brush water right into his face.
I am a fully paid up subscriber to the Untouchable Strategy of Dispropotionate Response.
Posted by: mirroreyes
|
May 25, 2010 9:36 PM
This reminds me of stories from (I think) Victorian England: wealthy Jews were in the habit of hiring Christians to work the Sabbath. A number of times the Christian servants decided to sprinkle water on their employers children to "baptize" them. When this became public, the children were taken from their parents ... the laws at the time required those of the same religion to be with their own, and since the kids were baptized they were no longer Jewish.
Crazy, this religion stuff.
Posted by: Rey Fox, Bird Caller Guy
|
May 25, 2010 9:41 PM
Would it be worth it to mention to Fortknox that the atheist teacher is also black?
Posted by: tuckerch
|
May 25, 2010 9:42 PM
"...xian children kidnapped and found dead and completely drained of all their blood and on and on and on."
Kidnapped, or...
ABDUCTED BY ALIENS???
Either are equally likely.
Oh, wait. There's no actual PROOF that xian children were killed and drained of all their blood?
Foo!
Posted by: wadvln
|
May 25, 2010 9:53 PM
PZ - I have been reading your blog for a LONG time - with pleasure. I have never felt the need to wrote a comment until now. Trust me when I tell you that for the faithful to threaten you with calamari dressed with butter should evoke no fearful response. Calamari - grilled or fried - with garlic, OLIVE OIL, and a squeeze of lemon (try lime every once in a while for a change of pace) is likely to cause you to convert!
May I also suggest a Greco di Tufo as a wine pairing?
BTW I also teach at a state school.
Posted by: WarrenS
|
May 25, 2010 9:55 PM
There is an excellent POE in the comments:
Posted by: A. Nuran
|
May 25, 2010 10:06 PM
It's funny as long as it's just holy water.
Salafist Muslims in Pakistan and Afghanistan have started throwing acid on immodest women. Charedi Jews in Israel throw rocks at anyone they don't like. Christians in this country tend towards bullets.
Posted by: monimonika
|
May 25, 2010 10:11 PM
Mattir #47:
Can you teach me how to use my Catapult Turtle to launch my Dragon Champion toward my opponent's Castle, shattering its Floatation Ring, thereby causing it to collapse on top of my opponent's monsters?
Posted by: Zoot Capri
|
May 25, 2010 10:12 PM
Today it is sprinkling "holy water" on someone, tomorrow it is bombing Planned Parenthood offices. You cannot trust these crazy nut cases. They are not rational. They are so brain washed and think that everything they do in the name of "jesus" is ok. They flat out scare me.
Posted by: woozy
|
May 25, 2010 10:14 PM
Let's see here:
May 25 2:54 P.Z. posts about two teachers flicking holy water. The teachers are black.
May 23rd P.Z. posts about a aircrash survivor attributing his survival to God. Survivor is indian.
May 23rd Man wants doctor to lay off treatment of his rapidly dying wife because doctor hasn't given prayers enough time to work. Man is white.
May 22nd: Five million schoolkids get screwed in Texas. Texas school board is mostly white.
May 21st: Cynthia Dunbar (white) leads public prayer to declair US a Christian country.
May 20th: Contraception is dishonest because sexual relationships are public property and pregnancy is proof that married couples are fulfilling their vows to God. So blogged a white woman.
May 19th: Ken Hamm whines that the Creationism museum is being unfairly picked upon. Hamm is... I do research because I just realize I don't actually know ... white (hmm, why am *I* not surprised?)
May 18th: "Atheists always use rape as an argument for justifying killing because they want to justify abortion. But is rape really that bad? " Race is ... who the fuck knows and or cares?
That's as far back as is browsable here. So to answer Fortknox's question "we should just pretend that the fact that they are black and such enthusiastic superstitious nuts is just a coincidence"? Uh, yeah, that's kind of the conclussion I reach.
So if that's just "PC nonsense" than what does non-PC common sense say about Ken Hamm and Cynthia Dunbar and Man praying for months while his wife rapidly dies and Michael Huckabee saying there's duck hunting in heaven all being white?
Posted by: chaseacross
|
May 25, 2010 10:16 PM
It's important that the people who did this are disciplined firmly. Otherwise it will escalate. I wouldn't be so quick to make light of this. Holy water one day, bullets the next.
Posted by: Woof
|
May 25, 2010 10:27 PM
Florida: Texas with alligators.
Posted by: chaseacross
|
May 25, 2010 10:28 PM
@mirroreyes
The practice of Jews hiring Christians (and Muslims, and heathens of every sort) to do work on the Sabbath goes back millenia. The practice of taking children away after forced baptism isn't specific to England, and was definitely right out in Victorian England. Jews in England had enjoyed unusual amounts of tolerance in England, going back to the 17th century when they were officially allowed to return by Oliver Cromwell (never say religious zealotry never served to promote tolerance). It was in Catholic countries where the practice of forced baptism and loss of custody lingered on past the Middle Ages. There were a few famous cases in the early 19th century, particularly in Rome, where the Pope often personally interceded in these cases in favor of removing children from Jewish parents. If you get a chance, read The Popes Against the Jews, an indictment of the Catholic Church and its strong links to anti-semitism in Europe.
Posted by: dutchdoc
|
May 25, 2010 10:40 PM
#99:
No. Nor do I find it disturbing.
You do?
Posted by: monimonika
|
May 25, 2010 10:40 PM
dutchdoc #83
I second Ichthyic @#99. Is this scenario supposed to somehow lessen the malicious intent of the two teachers?
Actually, if it was perfume that was flicked, it would seem to me to have more potential for damage than if it was just water (assuming the Holy Water is not contaminated with bacteria). Certain perfumes can stain or react badly (if the sprayed person is allergic) on skin or clothing. Plus, leaving the smell behind could be seen as a form of vandalism.
Posted by: joe_s
|
May 25, 2010 10:40 PM
how can you deny the power of holy magic. i was at the Vatican several years ago and bought a pope medallion can opener, we call it the popener. That and the holy water I filled in a plastic bottle from St Paul's guarentee I can open any suitable container. First I sprinkle the holy water, chant a few incantations and then apply the magic popener to the bottle. It has failed me nought all these many years later
Posted by: Mattir-ritated
|
May 25, 2010 10:46 PM
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!
Don't ever ask me such a question again. What a total waste of summer vacation that was. SonSpawn came back home and announced that none of his friends actually knew how to play the game. And for that matter, don't bring up the whole Warhammer phenomenon, which is currently absorbing much of our family conversation.
@Walton
Mr. M thanks you for your compliment. He is, unfortunately, not a blog kind of a guy, plus he's still waiting anxiously for the hardbodied evangelical co-eds to show up to assist him with his marital duties. (Would holy water help with that?)
Posted by: Robster
|
May 25, 2010 10:55 PM
See, they're at it again. They wouldn't expect an immediate response from the sky fairy. They will say they can wait till gawd acts 'in his own good time'. Of course, the whole episode will fade into memory and will never be mentioned again. Maybe someone could ask the 'girls' how things transppired in say 6 months and post the result here.
Posted by: Killua
|
May 25, 2010 11:02 PM
PZ, allow me to express my utter disappointment in you. Garlic, butter, and lemon on calamari? What, and do you want the calamari fried too? It's so.. ordinary. If you're going to guile them into prepping you some cephalopods, you might as well make it a more complex dish and get your money's worth on a free meal. One that'll avoid large amounts of butter and fried calamari.
... Maybe I should cook some squid tomorrow night. Hum.
Posted by: Numad
|
May 25, 2010 11:12 PM
"Wait... PZ... you eating calamari... isn't that like cannibalism?"
Cannibalism in cephalopods is just good taste.
Posted by: Fortknox
|
May 26, 2010 12:21 AM
From my extensive watching The Atheist Experience show, reading black atheist bloggers, and listening to podcasts and youtube videos there is a clear pattern which can not be denied.
Black people are far more embarrassingly literal about their superstitions than white people.
Both in deeds and in thinking.
My guess is that it has a great deal to do with ghettoization of their communities and subculture, black churches, the extra effort to enthral themselves in delusions because of greater
absurdity of them being both black and christians at the same time, given the history.
How you came to the conclusion that I'm a racist for saying that is beyond my comprehension.
You are truly lazy, sloppy bunch of people quick to label and insult anyone who goes out of the PC box.
Posted by: Jadehawk, cascadeuse féministe
|
May 26, 2010 12:24 AM
oh yeah, that explains so well why most KJV only's and YEC's are pasty white.seriously, take your racist ass somewhere else
Posted by: otrame
|
May 26, 2010 12:26 AM
@123
Hey, we have alligators in Texas... Seen 'em myself.
As for the topic, my $0.02:
If the teacher was discussing her atheism in class, she should be counseled to knock it off. So should any teacher espousing a religion in class. Not appropriate.
Even in the most "harmless" version of events, the teachers should be seriously disciplined. That sort of behavior needs to be stomped on. Otherwise it will get out of control. Besides, hostile work environment gets you sued, and it should. And then there is the whole "this is the role model we want for our kids?" issue.
The supposed teacher in the comments on the original story who talked about how the victim was a spy for the school administration and implying that she deserves anything she got needs to go back to school and learn 1) how to write the English language and 2) write "Two wrongs don't make a right" on the blackboard 100 times.
Oh, and Fortknox, please go fuck yourself. With something real sharp. Or better yet (in case you might actually enjoy that) just go away.
Posted by: woozy
|
May 26, 2010 12:32 AM
There is an excellent POE in the comments:
Clarify something for me, please. Is a POE a satire that is so dead-on that it is taken seriously, or something serious that is so extreme it is assumed that it must be a satire but in actually it really *is* that nuts?
I was under the impression a POE was that later and that was an example of the former, but I could be wrong on both accounts.
Posted by: llewelly
|
May 26, 2010 12:51 AM
Fortknox | May 26, 2010 12:21 AM:
Based on a subjective interpretation of anecdotes, you say?
A ghettoization which you encourage by making racist remarks on atheist blogs. People like you drive blacks away from atheism.
Posted by: First Approximation, L'esprit de l'escalier
|
May 26, 2010 1:05 AM
woozy,
Poe's law states that it's difficult to distinguish between satire with no blatant displays of humour and extreme fundamentalism.
A 'Poe' means a satirist parodying religion. However, due to Poe's law it is sometimes difficult to say whether someone is an actual religious fundamentalist or is merely a 'Poe'.
Posted by: Arancaytar
|
May 26, 2010 2:12 AM
Holy water does not protect from Cthulhu! :P
Posted by: Jordan
|
May 26, 2010 2:25 AM
It's starting to get pretty warm now that summer is nearing, so maybe a holy water spritz every now and then might be refreshing.
Posted by: Peter Ashby
|
May 26, 2010 4:35 AM
@Mirroreyes
For a history of the practice of forced baptism of Jewish Children read David I. Kertzer, The kidnapping of Edgardo Mortara
He got access to the Vatican archives on the subject, they are not entirely closed to scholarship.
Posted by: Balstrome
|
May 26, 2010 5:28 AM
They should have added "The atheist teacher was treated for 3rd degree burns at the local hospital. Doctors report that she walked backwards down the stairs on all fours and that her head rotated 360 degrees, but is otherwise recovering normally."
Posted by: Gregory Greenwood
|
May 26, 2010 8:53 AM
Balstrome @ 142;
And as a follow up article;
"One week after the incident, both of the Christian teachers were found in the woods, deceased from severe trauma to the neck and excessive blood loss, verging on complete exsanguination. The authorities suspect an animal attack.
Strangely, little blood was found at the scene, and despite the fact that both victims were carrying fire arms that had been fired repeatedly, there was no evidence that the animal that attacked them was harmed in any way.
The atheist teacher made no comment beyond;
The meaning of this cryptic statement remains unclear."
Posted by: iDodd
|
May 26, 2010 9:27 AM
My question is, was it "black" holy water which would destroy all the information the victim teacher had to share (leaving her students facing an Texas-type education), "white" holy water from which new information and genuine education would spew forth, or wom-holy water which would transport the victim to another parallel universe full of like-minded and rational people?
Posted by: rn.massey
|
May 26, 2010 10:02 AM
Oh gee, how on earth did we get the idea that you're a racist moron?
btw, you may want to look up the majority racial make up of backwoods snake handlers, young earth creationists, woo-woo pagans, and that old standard, the witch hunters of the past centuries that actually believed that witches suckled their familiars with third nipples.
I'll say it again; religious nutcases come in all colors, but in this particular case, the race of the teachers involved doesn't bloody matter. So stop trying to derail what is already a fucked up story with your inane and pointless assertions.
Posted by: a.human.ape
|
May 26, 2010 10:08 AM
Two teachers at Blanche Ely High School in Pompano Beach are in danger of losing their jobs after a March incident in which they allegedly doused an atheist teacher with holy water, the South Florida Times reports.
This is very interesting to me because I live in a town that is right next to Pompano Beach (Margate which is west of Pompano Beach), and I work in Pompano Beach.
I'm not too surprised. This area has as many religious extremists as Iran.
The two teachers are guilty of assault and excessive stupidity. The parents of that school's students should demand they be fired. Even Christians should be angry about this. Idiots should not be in the education business.
Posted by: Aussie Kim
|
May 26, 2010 11:14 AM
At the very least, any teachers at that school who don't support those lunatic assault-artists should bring water bottles to work labelled "HOLY WATER", or even "ZAMZAM" (Islamic Holy water) just to annoy those bastards. Perhaps the bottles should be clear and full of coke, or something else entirely unholy. Like champagne.
That way, when the Xtian teachers get sprayed with the alternative holy water, their clothes will be stained, as well as their egos and reputations...
Posted by: tutone21
|
May 26, 2010 12:15 PM
The Power of Christ Compels You!! The power of Christ Compels you!!
Posted by: https://me.yahoo.com/a/K2PNji0at.txAjzTShOlxwLuFcVVFwbnng--#bd813
|
May 26, 2010 12:33 PM
I have coffee with witches every Thursday, and I will be going to a lecture by a Satanist tomorrow. Who doesn't exist?
Yes, there are alligators in Texas, down in the SE corner, anyway.
Posted by: Gregory Greenwood
|
May 26, 2010 12:55 PM
@ 149;
He or she doubtless self-identifies as a Satanist, but I doubt that they abduct and exsanguinate Christian kids for kicks.
The Xian Satanist Myth is a paranoid conspiracy theory that states that there are literally hundreds of thousands of secret, Satanist cultists engaged in blood rites and human sacrifice in the modern USA, who are seeking to summon literal demons to destroy the faithful. They also tend to use the terms 'Satanist' and 'Atheist' interchangeably.
Among the animal mutilation obsessed brigade there are two primary flavours, those who say aliens did it, abd the others who claim it is the work of neophyte Satanists who are working up to human scarifice.
Despite a lengthy series of FBI investigations, no evidence of this type of eat-your-liver-with-some-fava-beans-and-a-nice-cianti type of Satanist was ever found. The really paranoid Xians just say that this proves how high the conspiracy actually reaches...
People who engage in funny woo rites and call themselves Satanists, sure. The fundie delusion of an massed anti-Christian conspiracy of followers of the "Prince of Lies" (hey, isn't that Donald Rumsfeld's preferred title at the weekend?), not so much.
Posted by: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkuZEdZCVnvnRTP76E825JuYjMk7D7CVPg
|
May 26, 2010 1:36 PM
This reminds me of a story in 19th Italy, where a maidservant admitted during confession that she had baptised the son of the wealthy Jewish family she worked at (the baptism took place when the kid was ill and she was afraid he might die). The boy was taken away from his parents, because a catholic child cannot be raised by heathens.
Posted by: Acronym Jim
|
May 26, 2010 2:24 PM
woozy@122:
Conclussion: Noun.
1. the stunned response a rational person exhibits upon attempting to process an astoundingly stupid conclusion.
I'm totally using this.
Posted by: JNorris
|
May 26, 2010 3:04 PM
"garlic with butter and lemon on calamari" now PZ is a purveyor of gastronomic cephalopod pornography and I love it!
Posted by: Aquaria
|
May 26, 2010 11:40 PM
Sheesh, I would go totally rapturous and go to church and flop out for jaysus fer shure if the christ-humpers would box up Matsumoto Jun, Kaneshiro Takeshi, and Hiroshi Tamaki and send them to me for my entertainment needs on my all-expenses paid trip to Paris.
Posted by: raven
|
May 27, 2010 12:02 AM
Does this satanist have supernatural powers and talk to powerful, immortal fallen angels? And you have proof?
Long ago, I knew a self proclaimed Warlock. His only obvious power was to be eratic and annoying. Last seen when diagnosed as a schizophrenic and put on heavy doses of medication.
Posted by: Hyperon
|
May 27, 2010 10:38 AM
People like Fortknox well and truly exasperate me. Not only because of the intrinsic vileness and stupidity of their racist bullshit (as considerable as that is). Also they make those of us with sensible reservations about "PC nonsense" look like bigots by association.
Posted by: woozy
|
May 27, 2010 2:03 PM
Also they make those of us with sensible reservations about "PC nonsense" look like bigots by association.
Yes, and here a Pharyngula we are so PC. I mean just look at the lengths we go to to respect and be sensitive to others' spiritial beliefs.
Hey, just because racism, intolerance, insensitivity, and genocide aren't PC doesn't that they must therefore be air-quote not PC air-quote.
KnoxFart (okay, lame insult, I know): there is a clear pattern which can not be denied: Black people are far more embarrassingly literal about their superstitions than white people.
Well, I deny it. The pre-concieved notions I have about black people that I justify with anecdotal evidence and a shrug of the shoulders and a come-on-really-between-just-you-and-me-you-think-so-too-dont-you grin seem to be different than your pre-concieved notions about black people that you justify with anecdotal evidence and a shrug of the shoulders and a come-on-really-between-just-you-and-me-you-think-so-too-dont-you grin. I have to many pre-concieved notions that I justify with anecdotal evidence and a shrug of the shoulders and a come-on-really-between-just-you-and-me-you-think-so-too-dont-you grin about creationists, young-earthers, and right wing armageddon fetishists and my pre-concieved notions that I justify with anecdotal evidence and a shrug of the shoulders and a come-on-really-between-just-you-and-me-you-think-so-too-dont-you grin about their whiteness to allow whatever pre-concieved notions that I justify with anecdotal evidence and a shrug of the shoulders and a come-on-really-between-just-you-and-me-you-think-so-too-dont-you grin I may have about black people's superstitious literalism to be greater than my pre-concieved notions that I justify with anecdotal evidence and a shrug of the shoulders and a come-on-really-between-just-you-and-me-you-think-so-too-dont-you grin of white people in general.
This leads to a dilemna: How does one reconcile the difference between two differing pre-concieved notions that are justified with anecdotal evidence and shrugs of the shoulders and a come-on-really-between-just-you-and-me-you-think-so-too-dont-you grins? What would a rationalist do?
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
May 27, 2010 2:16 PM
It depends how "sensible" is defined. Usually when somebody says that, they aren't "sensible" with their objections, but rather have underlying prejudices, such a misogyny, they want to experess, but feel restrained by "PC". For example, if you mean you can't use certain words deliberately insult women, you don't have "sensible" objections since those words do hurt, and are also found objectionable by most men. Nothing you say changes that. Both being truly sensible and having basic politeness says one doesn't use those words except in very limited circumstances. Usually in private, never in public speaking like a blog. So, I don't find your objections to PC to be "sensible".Until you quit lying to yourself, you can't quit lying to us.
Posted by: woozy
|
May 27, 2010 4:35 PM
Nerd, are you referring to Hyperon's previous objections (which I would have missed) or the any hypothetical objections.
We've all had experience with PC going overboard. (What the hell is wrong with the word "blind" and why could "visually impaired" *possibly be more supportive?) However a bunch of backlashers like to use it to dismiss any objection to their racist or fascists ideas. Appearently claiming something is "not PC" utterly withdraws any complaint and validates any statement. Thus while I might praise PZ Myers and claim that PZ is "not PC", I will *never* so praise racism. Racism might not be PC, but it is definitely not "not PC".
Let's quit this "Well, I know I might not be PC..." business. Absolutely *none* of us *are* PC. That doesn't mean fortknox isn't a racist moron.
Posted by: Hyperon
|
May 27, 2010 4:56 PM
If you weren't troubled by political correctness on Pharyngula, you would realize the obvious truth that Islam, in the modern world, is by many orders of magnitude a more violent, primitive and dangerous religion than Christianity, and is the cause of hugely greater suffering. If Islam is tiger, Christianity is a mouse. There's no justification for being even-handed -- much less singling out Christianity, which is what happens on this blog.Granted, Islam isn't (yet) as big a problem in American domestic affairs as is Christianity. In my opinion, though, we are citizens of the world first, and citizens of our countries only second.
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
May 27, 2010 5:11 PM
Here come dah Islamophobia...As if we aren't surprised, based upon your previous mewlings as a religious bigot. Why don't you just give up Hyperon? You just keep diggging yourself deeper and deeper. We aren't intersted in justifying your bigotry for you. We aren't interested in hearing your bigotry and misogyny. Just do yourself and everyone else a favor and just go and stay away.Posted by: Hyperon
|
May 27, 2010 5:15 PM
"Islamophobia", is it? Yes...guilty as charged.
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
May 27, 2010 6:20 PM
If you weren't troubled by political correctness on Pharyngula, you would realize the obvious truth that Islam, in the modern world, is by many orders of magnitude a more violent, primitive and dangerous religion than Christianity, and is the cause of hugely greater suffering.
we're mostly concerned with conceptual issues here. Islam, being a late arrival to the Abrahamic religion game, is STILL an Abrahamic religion at heart, and shares most of the same nonsense at its base.
what PEOPLE do with that nonsense will vary from place to place, and time to time, but being equal oportunity deniers of fucking nonsense, Islam is no more or less nonsensical than the other Abrahamic religions.
if you want to go take your grievances out on the PEOPLE that have decided to utilize the more violent aspects of this nonsense regularly and directly, why don't you sign up for a tour in the Middle East?
I'm sure you would be quite happy putting to practice your idea.
right?
Posted by: Ichthyic
|
May 27, 2010 6:22 PM
Also they make those of us with sensible reservations about "PC nonsense" look like bigots by association.
ROFLMAO.
wow.
just...
wow.
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
May 27, 2010 6:29 PM
Along with misogyny and general anti-social behavior like threadjacking. You have problems that need fixing. This blog is not the place to fix them. You have a health service where you can get counseling. You need help to deal with reality.As I said, we aren't interested in your phobias. That is for you, not us, to deal with. If you are so all fired ready to discuss certain sensitive issues, why not stop boring us with you inane and bigoted ideas, and start your own blog, where you can control the discussion? That would be the intelligent thing to do. And then stay away from here.
Posted by: woozy
|
May 27, 2010 6:45 PM
If you weren't troubled by political correctness on Pharyngula, you would realize the obvious truth that Islam,...
Ah, that would answer the question I asked Nerd about.
I wasn't aware that I had ever stated any opinion about Islaam. I am not PZ. Nor are all the commenters (save you) in total lock-step agreement. So please address to me what I say and don't assume I follow the Pharyngula PC party line that Islaam is the bee's knees and can do utterly no wrong and, man, PZ just looooves those fatwas and stoning rape victims to death.
... truth that Islam, in the modern world, is by many orders of magnitude a more violent, primitive and dangerous religion than Christianity
No, as a religion in the modern world I'd put it on par with Christianity. As fundimentalist nationalist radical doctrine, I'll grant that they are pretty scary. (Although I'm not about to give abortion clinic bombers and armagedon fetishists in Congress a free pass any time soon. And in the not-so modern world of 70 years ago there was another fundimentalist nationalist radical doctrine that wasn't Islaam-based that was pretty darn scary too. Just not "modern".) Lest you think I'm splitting hairs, let me stress that I sincerely *do* believe that as nationalism their hatred and danger had nothing to do with either culture or religion, and under other circumstances Christianity could be, and has been, frequently, be used to equal hatred and danger.
Posted by: Cygnus Tygger
|
May 27, 2010 7:38 PM
Okay, stepping outside of the Phayngula PC bubble and comparing Islaam to Christianity:
Well, Islaam's got all those neat sayings about knowledge and truth and equating how great Allah is with how many words there are for him. "...if all the oceans were ink and the something or other parchment then..." and all that. As a knowledge and library geek, I gotta love that.
Christianity has that forgiveness stuff and that's kind of nice, but really not that original when you get down to it. Islaam does the same and it gets kind of trippy when it talks about infinite mercy and forgiveness simply pouring down on you. It's the nerd word thing Islaam's got going for it. It's heady stuff. I guess, Christianity got its simplicity and aesthetic prettiness though when it talks about forgiveness. That's easy to take home to the parents, I guess.
'Course Christianity had that whole S & M and blood and pain worshipping thing that is so sensual. You just know that it's really a kinky sex thing. I mean sometimes you just gotta tear your fingernails into it and rip your teeth into steaming painful carnality, ya know. Islaam's got nothing on that.
Don't get the prophet thing of Islaam though. I mean, prophets are great 'cause they know things and are all smart and holy and all. But I have teachers, and heros, and mentors and all but they're just guys, ya know. At least with Christianity they claim he was god and he's got that whole sexy death hunk thing going for him. I think that's why they make crucifixes heand-held size. Islaam doesn't have any bed toys like that.
Both got that infidel and unbeliever business, though, and that's really not cool.
I dunno. In the end it might come down to images. Islaam won't let draw a picture of my nice bearded teacher. But why would I want to anyway? But that naked dead guy on the cross...! I can wear him between my boobs every day and slip him under the sheets at night.
But then Christianity is all about him and that's a pretty one-sided relationship. Yeah, Islaam's alla' Allah (hah, alla 'bout Allah! Get it?) but at least it asks what I can do to know him better, you know? All that sexy word stuff ... if his name were written in the sky it'd dwarf my life to an ant's weeny ... and if I saw his mercy I'd be crushed flat by its staggering infinitynessosity... You gotta respect someone trying so hard to impress you. With Jesus he just pouts and says "I died for your sins. Bet you're sorry now, bitch."
I dunno. I guess, it's a wash.
Posted by: Nerd of Redhead, OM
|
May 27, 2010 8:03 PM
Woozy, I meant to respond earlier. Hyperon (also known as Hypershit) has posted here on and off for over a year. He has some personal problems, is a known religious bigot and known misogynist, and also has general tendencies toward threadjacking, minimizing the trauma of rape, and just plain obnoxious behavior. He thinks he is smarter than most of the regulars here, but proves otherwise with almost every post.
I can acknowledge PC can be carried too far. But those of us here can discuss the edges some ideas close to PC without going out of our way to show bigotry. For example, I think most of us here would acknowledge there are slight differences in the way men and women think on the average. But, we would also argue that those differences are minute, and subject to greater difference within a given sex than between the two sexes. Which makes the whole argument a wash, not even worth breaking a sweat, much less a post, for. For all practical purposes there is no difference between the sexes. Hypershit is the type who tries to take a small difference, turn it into a stereotype, and that stereotype into a reason for some type of discrimination. That is his MO. Which we have seen before, and seen in society too with bigots. Which is why we don't give him any breaks. He has earned his disdain. He is now first on many lists if PZ held a Survivor Pharyngula session.
Posted by: woozy
|
May 27, 2010 9:55 PM
I can acknowledge PC can be carried too far. But those of us here can discuss the edges some ideas close to PC without going out of our way to show bigotry.
I think people like to hide behind the "I know it may not be PC ..." backlash. Such a statement makes the guy feel like a straight-shooter bravely telling it like it is while the rest of us are cowering PC toadies afraid of original thought. As well, the implication is that the cowering PC toadies *only* say what they say because it is PC and no other reason.
"I know it may not be PC but these so called 'homeless' are nothing but a bunch of lazy bums and should be run out of town." Yes, that isn't PC and yes, the speaker has a right to speak his opinion. And who knows, maybe the homeless advocates really only do it because it is PC.
But by saying "it may not be PC", the speaker isn't actually strengthening his opinion or weakening the opponent's. The homeless advocate *still* has a series of rebuttals the validity of which are irrelevent to their PC quotient.
Racists *love* to falsely validate their arguments with "I may not be PC but ..." and to up the ante "if you were willing to look past the PC mindset you'd see it's true". "It may not be PC but it's obvious blacks are more embarrassingly literal in their superstitions than whites," Fortknox says. Well, he's right in one sense; That statement *isn't* PC. But so what? "Hitler was a great man and if we ever kill off all the jews history will vindicate him," is *also* not PC. Just because something isn't PC doesn't mean ... well, it doesn't mean *anything*. You may as well say "Well, this sentence may not be written in Spanish but..."
But when Fortknox then says "if you'd only step out of the PC mindset you'd agree" he's ... well, before he's simply saying "I'm a racist". Now he's saying "The only reason anyone opposes racism is because it isn't PC". Well, ... you know what I'm getting at. Words simply fail me.
Posted by: Kerry
|
May 10, 2011 9:14 PM
God does exist, because I've seen him, and it's no fairytale. On my website you will find a true vision of Jesus Christ, the Son Of God himself.
Read my book J.U.D.A.S. "ONE" & "TWO" 700 pages.
http://www.kerryhay.spiderweb.com.au
Posted by: John Morales
|
May 10, 2011 9:22 PM
Kerry, what you imagine is a proof, isn't.
As for your website and your book, they sound utterly uninteresting to me.
Bah.