Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

pzm_profile_pic.jpg
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
zf_pharyngula.jpg …and this is a pharyngula stage embryo.
a longer profile of yours truly
my calendar
Nature Network
RichardDawkins Network
facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Atheist Nexus
the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)



I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.

scarlet_A.png
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Random Quote

Every religion in the world that has destroyed people is based on love.

[Anton LaVey]

Recent Posts


A Taste of Pharyngula

Recent Comments

Archives


Blogroll

Other Information

« Autism-vaccination poll needs to be obliterated, please | Main | That'll teach us! »

More articles by PZ Myers can be found on Freethoughtblogs at the new Pharyngula!

I'd watch it

Category: Humor
Posted on: May 24, 2010 8:07 PM, by PZ Myers

It's how I've always imagined Darwin's life, anyway.

Heh. "My name is DarWIN, not DarLOSE."

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Jump to end

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/140317

Comments

#1

Posted by: johnlil#0a224 Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 8:14 PM

I wanted to see him throw Fitzroy overboard.

#2

Posted by: Ben Goren Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 8:18 PM

Well, it’s…um…er…that is to say…ah…I mean…well, I suppose it’s in the English language…?

Cheers,

b&

#3

Posted by: Zeno Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 8:25 PM

"Behold the rise of man!"

Tee hee.

#4

Posted by: Dianne Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 8:26 PM

I think they're confusing Darwin with Huxley.

#5

Posted by: Ichthyic Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 8:26 PM

I think they're confusing Darwin with Huxley.

yes, other than that it was dead on accurate...

:P

#6

Posted by: Peter H Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 8:27 PM

What a load of dingos' kidneys!

#7

Posted by: chaseacross Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 8:29 PM

Being English, I doubt Darwin would have to deal with Catholic bishops. It's probably an Anglican bishop that he punches in the "origin of species."

#8

Posted by: Brownian, Most Vicious & Petty of Pharyngulites Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 8:33 PM

Based on this new textbook I got from Texas, that's pretty much how Darwin lived.

Sez right here that after he strangled the last dodo (and wrote The Origin by reading its entrails), he invented communism solely for the purpose of creating bread lines to harvest souls on behalf of Satan and invented anti-Semitism so he'd have someone to blame his numerous crimes on—[skips ahead a few paragraphs]—before he was killed by Saints Heston and Reagan.

Man, everything I learned in school was wrong, apparently.

#9

Posted by: Ichthyic Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 8:36 PM

before he was killed by Saints Heston and Reagan.

damn, you're good.

you should have written that sketch!

:)

#10

Posted by: humanizzm Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 8:57 PM

I especially liked the huge "SPOOF" lettering in the end, just to make sure any creationists watching this don't think it's a documentary.

#11

Posted by: Mattir-ritated Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 8:58 PM

Does Patricia now own Darwin's spanking couch?

#12

Posted by: deriamis Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 9:01 PM

"Behold the rise of Man!"

I lol'd. But, yeah, good on the script writer for putting in an example of the drive to perpetuate the species. It wouldn't have been the same without it.

#13

Posted by: RamblinDude Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 9:05 PM

Looks good, but who's going to watch it? It's not even in 3D!

#14

Posted by: Kirk Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 9:06 PM

Many things that start with Dar ...

This is not necessarily seasonal, but it is Darsonal.

Dar Williams

#15

Posted by: Thickroyd Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 9:12 PM

Hmm... had the potential to be funny, but seriously, Dana Carvey is about as funny as a positive AIDS test.
He embodies the frustrated egos of the massively untalented.

#16

Posted by: Notorious P.A.T. Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 9:18 PM

That is funny )

#17

Posted by: Audley Z. Darkheart OM, purveyor of candy and lies Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 9:34 PM

I would pay $10 to see that.

And I'd giggle the entire time.

#18

Posted by: monado Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 9:49 PM

Of course, it's historically inaccurate: no proper young lady in those days would wear rouge.

#19

Posted by: 'Tis Himself, Quel Dommage Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 9:58 PM

That bishop won't be diddling kiddies for a while.

#20

Posted by: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnb-E55g7vrnvH-3L1M6d7QuDYWoM_IDEM Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 10:00 PM

Was that supposed to be funny?
If so, what was the target mental age?

#21

Posted by: Brownian, Most Vicious & Petty of Pharyngulites Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 10:19 PM

Was that supposed to be funny?

No. It was clearly a melodrama.


#22

Posted by: mike.r.bermudez Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 10:33 PM

Oblig.:

THIS. IS. EVOLUTION!

#23

Posted by: SkepgineerChick Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 10:43 PM

Knee him in his Origin of Species!!!! ROFL!!

#24

Posted by: ahtripp Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 10:52 PM

This might be the best thing I've ever seen.

#25

Posted by: Jadehawk, cascadeuse féministe Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 10:57 PM

ok, that was campy funny

#26

Posted by: Shplane, some shit in french Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 11:00 PM

Meh, would be better if he was a Space Marine and there were robot pirates. And if he caught animals in balls and had them fight each other until they gained enough experience to evolve (That's how it works irl rite?)

And then he would play a children's card game with the Pope to decide the fate of the world.

#27

Posted by: Scott Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 11:26 PM

Okay that was actually good for some genuine laughs. I wasn't expecting that from Funny or Die.

#28

Posted by: Andyo Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 11:29 PM

You really should have watched Sherlock Holmes to get it. It was funny.

#15: that's curious. In my case, I always thought of Dana Carvey as the funny Martin Short.

#29

Posted by: MrFire Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 11:31 PM

Parody trailers are fun.

Here is Mary Poppins, re-cut as a horror movie.

#30

Posted by: DLC Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 11:52 PM

I guess I better shut up about my thing for Julie Andrews.

#31

Posted by: Rutee, Shrieking Harpy of Dooooom Author Profile Page | May 24, 2010 11:57 PM

And then he would play a children's card game with the Pope to decide the fate of the world.

What about Mahjongg?

#32

Posted by: sam.sparx Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 12:05 AM

My pitch for Young Darwin In Love

Embarassed publically by an uptight Clergyman with better prospects than Darwin's broke-arse science career (which is why he hates God), in front of his best girl, Darwin heads off to sea in search of redemption. There's a beautiful native girl on the Galapogos who teaches him to believe in himself and though they get intimate it can never really work because she doesn't speak british. There's the hilarious odd couple of a turtle and a finch who are best friends and cause comic havoc on the ship for some reason, and finally Darwin has to race back to Blighty in time for the big lecture for the Royal Society of Sciencey Stuff, and the object of his desire and clergy guy and her dad are all in the front row because her rich dad is a patron and Darwin turns up at the last minute, when everyone is looking at their pocket watches and murmuring, and he's all rakishly dishevelled and maybe he has a fish in his pocket and he starts speaking but he's nervous, but he makes a charming joke and the audience starts to warm to him and then he's off - showing how evolution is really like love, how you have to come through the fires of natural selection to be the best you can be in wheverer you are and how the single most important act you can perform is to help your species refine itself with the person you consider most perfect and she's almost convinced by his newfound fire and passion, but the Clergyman/fiance stands up and accuses him of killing God - but Darwin's best mate (the first mate from the ship, who I forgot to mention earlier), shows up in the lecture hall and it's revealed that he and the Clergyman were lovers, so her dad punches gay clergy guy on the nose and makes him speak with a funny nasal whine, and everyone is in an uproar and Darwin leaps off the stage amidst all the tumultuousness and gets on one knee and proposes. She accepts and they kiss and then God smites them all with bears.

#33

Posted by: Rutee, Shrieking Harpy of Dooooom Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 12:11 AM

Darn, the link should be outside the blockquote.

#34

Posted by: Tabby Lavalamp Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 12:13 AM

It's still better than the Lost finale...

#35

Posted by: Shplane, some shit in french Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 12:53 AM

#31

What... what the fuck am I watching?

#36

Posted by: Usagichan Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 1:17 AM

Shplane

If you were watching the video linked by Rutee, you were watching some (outdated) satire? on Japanese politics (Koizumi was Prime Minister, Taro Aso was a hard line member of his party who would later become Prime Minister (and an Anime fan), both of fairly right wing leanings (but that's true of almost all Japanese politicians)).

The bad guys (in case you missed it) were Kim Jong-il and Kim Jong-eun.

#37

Posted by: Shplane, some shit in french Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 1:36 AM

Usagichan

Yes, I got that. It was more of a "Stunned silence" what the fuck than a "I don't actually understand this" what the fuck.

Best part is when he fights Mecha-Mao in episode three. :D

#38

Posted by: jennyxyzzy Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 2:06 AM

OK, Brownian has already won this thread, but I'm distressed to note that after 30-odd comments, no-one has noted the lack of bacon AND cephalopods in this film. I won't be going to see it :-(

#39

Posted by: Usagichan Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 2:12 AM

Shplane

I sometimes find the Japanese sense of humour difficult to follow, although these made me think of the 'Team America - World Police' puppet movie a few years back. I'm fairly sure (not 100% certain) that they are intended to be satire. They made me smile in any case.

I understand the 'stunned silence' reaction though - I still find moments like that just walking round here (my absolute favourite ATM is seeing the slimming aid called "Jesus Body" in drug stores here - can't quite tell whether it is intended to convey a 'Jesus, what a body' vibe or if it is going for the 'just crucified' slimness popularised by RC crucifixes).

#40

Posted by: Rutee, Shrieking Harpy of Dooooom Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 2:14 AM

Actually, my favorite part was in the manga, when it became clear that Yulia Tymoshenko is actually bedding her assistant, rather than Koizumi.

Either that or Space Hitler kidnapping The Pope.

I don't think it's Satire. It's sort of like Metal Wolf Chaos, but for Japan. It's just plain old hot blooded awesome!politics that runs on cool and nonsensoleum. There is awesome and win and not a god damn bit of it is recognizable in the real world.

Personally after the last presidential campaign I think I'd prefer it if the presidential candidates fight in giant robots then do what they do. It'd certainly destroy less of the country.

#41

Posted by: Rutee, Shrieking Harpy of Dooooom Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 2:18 AM

Er, come to think of it, it's important to say that I don't think they're intended to be accurate depictions of reality either. Satire would be trying to say... something. This seems to just be "LOOK AT HOW BADASS THAT IS", knowing full well it isn't real. It's too OTT to be taken seriously, but it doesn't seem to have enough of a message to seem to be satire of something else.

But that's just me. I don't think it's funny so much as awesome.

#42

Posted by: Moggie Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 2:20 AM

#7:

Being English, I doubt Darwin would have to deal with Catholic bishops.

Why on Earth would you think that? England has more than enough Catholic bishops.

#43

Posted by: Shplane, some shit in french Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 2:29 AM

#39

Well it was pretty funny once I figured out what was going on. Funny in a "hahawut" kind of way, but still.

#41

It did seem to try to convey a few smaller messages. I'm not sure if it was seriously doing so, or just pretending to the lulz.

I mean, there was the part in Ep. 3 about Global Warming and whatnot.

#44

Posted by: RobertL Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 2:30 AM

One - that would be more than enough Catholic bishops!

#45

Posted by: jcmartz.myopenid.com Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 2:38 AM

Frakkin' funny!

#46

Posted by: SaintStephen Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 4:54 AM

Dana Carvey just slays me. His comedic genius is quite literally on a par with Darwin's scientific genius. I cannot even look at him without smiling. Carvey is just unequivocally, unabashedly brilliant. Definitely in my Top Three Comic talents, right up there with (the young) Bill Cosby and (the young) Woody Allen.

Regarding this movie, I am SO there, that when I get there, there will be no more there, there.

#47

Posted by: catsmate Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 5:52 AM

Hmmm. Perhaps someone read "The Amazing Doctor Darwin" a few too many times? And mixed up his Darwins....

#49

Posted by: edmundog Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 7:29 AM

Dana Carvey is a decently talented guy who seems to have gone after Dick van Dyke's career, without realizing that it happened to Dick van Dyke because he was a drunk. Early success, a string of crappy family movies, and in 15 years or so, a show old people watch.

#50

Posted by: Ray Moscow Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 8:15 AM

I loved him thrashing the bishop and kicking him in his "origin of species", but that poor dodo.

"What have I done?!!!"

#52

Posted by: alex.asolis.net Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 12:57 PM

Pure awesome. :D

#53

Posted by: Silič O'Nopolitanopoulos, Färschdbischuf Beesknees aus Ulm und Klein Elguth, Elector Pharynguline. Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 5:04 PM

Why on Earth would you think that? England has more than enough Catholic bishops.
Yeah. But imagine how many they'd be if Darwin hadn't kicked them in the origins?

Did Darlose invent the Darlex?

#54

Posted by: Notkieran Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 8:11 PM

To expand Catsmate's comment at #47:

There actually is a book called "The Amazing Doctor Darwin" by Charles Sheffield, which is a collection of Victorian-era mysteries involving what would, at the time, have been cutting-edge science.

As Catsmate pointed out, that was Erasmus Darwin.

I would be shocked that Dana Carvey never realised this, except that I am resigned to an entire world of people who live up the trope of "DID NOT DO THE RESEARCH" since it's all entertainment anyway.

#55

Posted by: Notkieran Author Profile Page | May 25, 2010 8:59 PM

Edit: To expand ON.

Sorry, my work computer eats keystrokes like Cookie Monster gone to town.

#56

Posted by: melior Author Profile Page | May 26, 2010 1:02 AM

I always get a chuckle watching the "Ancestry.com" TV ad where the guy says, "I found other people on ancestry.com who created [lineage] trees, and was able to trace my ancestry back to the Civil War!"

Makes me want to produce a parody ad where the guy says, "I found other people on evolutionarybiology.org who created trees, and was able to trace my ancestry back 2.5 million years!"

Leave a comment

HTML commands: <i>italic</i>, <b>bold</b>, <a href="url">link</a>, <blockquote>quote</blockquote>

Site Meter

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.